How can I use my own logger with custom log records in Postsharp?
In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?
Static Logger
Sample for own LogAspect
logging aop postsharp
add a comment |
In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?
Static Logger
Sample for own LogAspect
logging aop postsharp
The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support
– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14
add a comment |
In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?
Static Logger
Sample for own LogAspect
logging aop postsharp
In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?
Static Logger
Sample for own LogAspect
logging aop postsharp
logging aop postsharp
asked Nov 21 '18 at 12:26
user3572382user3572382
134
134
The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support
– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14
add a comment |
The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support
– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14
The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support
– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14
The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support
– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53412016%2fhow-can-i-use-my-own-logger-with-custom-log-records-in-postsharp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53412016%2fhow-can-i-use-my-own-logger-with-custom-log-records-in-postsharp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support
– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14