How can I use my own logger with custom log records in Postsharp?












0















In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?



Static Logger



Sample for own LogAspect










share|improve this question























  • The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support

    – AlexD
    Dec 22 '18 at 16:14
















0















In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?



Static Logger



Sample for own LogAspect










share|improve this question























  • The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support

    – AlexD
    Dec 22 '18 at 16:14














0












0








0








In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?



Static Logger



Sample for own LogAspect










share|improve this question














In Postsharp I can write my own logger adapter with which I can easily integrate my own logger class. In our class we have our own logger provider classe. Different categoriers of logger can be requested by the provider not only one. In the normal implementation, a static logger instance is used. We end up with a separate logger instance for each instance. Improves the testability with Unittest and logging each instance in a separated file. How can I rebuild the LogAspect to work with my own logger provider class with a non-static instance? In the net there are different examples how I build my own LogAspect. But I do not want to make everything new. Is there a solution?



Static Logger



Sample for own LogAspect







logging aop postsharp






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 12:26









user3572382user3572382

134




134













  • The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support

    – AlexD
    Dec 22 '18 at 16:14



















  • The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support

    – AlexD
    Dec 22 '18 at 16:14

















The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support

– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14





The logging framework in the current version of PostSharp (6.0) caches the logger instances based on the namespace and type name. This behavior cannot be disabled or overridden. Please consider filing a feature request for a future version on our support page postsharp.net/support

– AlexD
Dec 22 '18 at 16:14












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53412016%2fhow-can-i-use-my-own-logger-with-custom-log-records-in-postsharp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53412016%2fhow-can-i-use-my-own-logger-with-custom-log-records-in-postsharp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

SQL update select statement

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules