Algebras finite-dimensional over their base field are Artinian.












3












$begingroup$


The standard proof that a $k$-algebra $A$ that is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space is Artinian goes as follows:



"Suppose we have an infinite descending chain of ideals $I_1 supseteq I_2 supseteq I_3 supseteq ...$ in $A$. Then each $I_j$ is also a finite-dimensional $k$--vector space (since $A$ is), so $dim_k I_1 ge dim_k I_2 ge dim_k I_3 ge ...$. Since we cannot have an infinite strictly descending sequence of non-negative integers, the sequence of dimensions must stabilize, so the chain of ideals must stabilize."



What I'm wondering is why it isn't possible to eventually have $I_n supseteq I_{n+1} supseteq I_{n+2} supseteq ...$ where $dim_k I_n = dim_k I_{n+1} = dim_k I_{n+2} = ...$ but $I_n$, $I_{n+1}$, $I_{n+2}$, etc. are all distinct ideals in $A$. In other words, why should the fact that the dimensions stabilize imply that the ideals also stabilize?



Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many $n$-dimensional subspaces are there of an $n$-dimensional vector space? Adapt the answer to your chain of ideals. Can the $I_{n+i}$, for non-negative integers $i,$ be distinct?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Leary
    Jan 23 at 0:25








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    note that if an algebral is unital then any ideal must be a subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – David Holden
    Jan 23 at 0:30
















3












$begingroup$


The standard proof that a $k$-algebra $A$ that is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space is Artinian goes as follows:



"Suppose we have an infinite descending chain of ideals $I_1 supseteq I_2 supseteq I_3 supseteq ...$ in $A$. Then each $I_j$ is also a finite-dimensional $k$--vector space (since $A$ is), so $dim_k I_1 ge dim_k I_2 ge dim_k I_3 ge ...$. Since we cannot have an infinite strictly descending sequence of non-negative integers, the sequence of dimensions must stabilize, so the chain of ideals must stabilize."



What I'm wondering is why it isn't possible to eventually have $I_n supseteq I_{n+1} supseteq I_{n+2} supseteq ...$ where $dim_k I_n = dim_k I_{n+1} = dim_k I_{n+2} = ...$ but $I_n$, $I_{n+1}$, $I_{n+2}$, etc. are all distinct ideals in $A$. In other words, why should the fact that the dimensions stabilize imply that the ideals also stabilize?



Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many $n$-dimensional subspaces are there of an $n$-dimensional vector space? Adapt the answer to your chain of ideals. Can the $I_{n+i}$, for non-negative integers $i,$ be distinct?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Leary
    Jan 23 at 0:25








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    note that if an algebral is unital then any ideal must be a subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – David Holden
    Jan 23 at 0:30














3












3








3





$begingroup$


The standard proof that a $k$-algebra $A$ that is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space is Artinian goes as follows:



"Suppose we have an infinite descending chain of ideals $I_1 supseteq I_2 supseteq I_3 supseteq ...$ in $A$. Then each $I_j$ is also a finite-dimensional $k$--vector space (since $A$ is), so $dim_k I_1 ge dim_k I_2 ge dim_k I_3 ge ...$. Since we cannot have an infinite strictly descending sequence of non-negative integers, the sequence of dimensions must stabilize, so the chain of ideals must stabilize."



What I'm wondering is why it isn't possible to eventually have $I_n supseteq I_{n+1} supseteq I_{n+2} supseteq ...$ where $dim_k I_n = dim_k I_{n+1} = dim_k I_{n+2} = ...$ but $I_n$, $I_{n+1}$, $I_{n+2}$, etc. are all distinct ideals in $A$. In other words, why should the fact that the dimensions stabilize imply that the ideals also stabilize?



Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The standard proof that a $k$-algebra $A$ that is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space is Artinian goes as follows:



"Suppose we have an infinite descending chain of ideals $I_1 supseteq I_2 supseteq I_3 supseteq ...$ in $A$. Then each $I_j$ is also a finite-dimensional $k$--vector space (since $A$ is), so $dim_k I_1 ge dim_k I_2 ge dim_k I_3 ge ...$. Since we cannot have an infinite strictly descending sequence of non-negative integers, the sequence of dimensions must stabilize, so the chain of ideals must stabilize."



What I'm wondering is why it isn't possible to eventually have $I_n supseteq I_{n+1} supseteq I_{n+2} supseteq ...$ where $dim_k I_n = dim_k I_{n+1} = dim_k I_{n+2} = ...$ but $I_n$, $I_{n+1}$, $I_{n+2}$, etc. are all distinct ideals in $A$. In other words, why should the fact that the dimensions stabilize imply that the ideals also stabilize?



Thanks in advance for any help.







ring-theory ideals artinian






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 23 at 0:18









user514014user514014

1336




1336








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many $n$-dimensional subspaces are there of an $n$-dimensional vector space? Adapt the answer to your chain of ideals. Can the $I_{n+i}$, for non-negative integers $i,$ be distinct?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Leary
    Jan 23 at 0:25








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    note that if an algebral is unital then any ideal must be a subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – David Holden
    Jan 23 at 0:30














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How many $n$-dimensional subspaces are there of an $n$-dimensional vector space? Adapt the answer to your chain of ideals. Can the $I_{n+i}$, for non-negative integers $i,$ be distinct?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Leary
    Jan 23 at 0:25








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    note that if an algebral is unital then any ideal must be a subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – David Holden
    Jan 23 at 0:30








1




1




$begingroup$
How many $n$-dimensional subspaces are there of an $n$-dimensional vector space? Adapt the answer to your chain of ideals. Can the $I_{n+i}$, for non-negative integers $i,$ be distinct?
$endgroup$
– Chris Leary
Jan 23 at 0:25






$begingroup$
How many $n$-dimensional subspaces are there of an $n$-dimensional vector space? Adapt the answer to your chain of ideals. Can the $I_{n+i}$, for non-negative integers $i,$ be distinct?
$endgroup$
– Chris Leary
Jan 23 at 0:25






1




1




$begingroup$
note that if an algebral is unital then any ideal must be a subspace.
$endgroup$
– David Holden
Jan 23 at 0:30




$begingroup$
note that if an algebral is unital then any ideal must be a subspace.
$endgroup$
– David Holden
Jan 23 at 0:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

If $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $Wsubseteq V$ is a subspace with $dim W=dim V$, then $W=V$. Indeed, $dim V=dim W+dim V/W$ so $dim V/W=0$ which means $V/W$ is trivial so $W=V$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, that clears it up!
    $endgroup$
    – user514014
    Jan 23 at 1:03











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083920%2falgebras-finite-dimensional-over-their-base-field-are-artinian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

If $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $Wsubseteq V$ is a subspace with $dim W=dim V$, then $W=V$. Indeed, $dim V=dim W+dim V/W$ so $dim V/W=0$ which means $V/W$ is trivial so $W=V$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, that clears it up!
    $endgroup$
    – user514014
    Jan 23 at 1:03
















3












$begingroup$

If $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $Wsubseteq V$ is a subspace with $dim W=dim V$, then $W=V$. Indeed, $dim V=dim W+dim V/W$ so $dim V/W=0$ which means $V/W$ is trivial so $W=V$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, that clears it up!
    $endgroup$
    – user514014
    Jan 23 at 1:03














3












3








3





$begingroup$

If $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $Wsubseteq V$ is a subspace with $dim W=dim V$, then $W=V$. Indeed, $dim V=dim W+dim V/W$ so $dim V/W=0$ which means $V/W$ is trivial so $W=V$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $Wsubseteq V$ is a subspace with $dim W=dim V$, then $W=V$. Indeed, $dim V=dim W+dim V/W$ so $dim V/W=0$ which means $V/W$ is trivial so $W=V$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 23 at 0:25









Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

189k14216347




189k14216347












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, that clears it up!
    $endgroup$
    – user514014
    Jan 23 at 1:03


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, that clears it up!
    $endgroup$
    – user514014
    Jan 23 at 1:03
















$begingroup$
Thanks, that clears it up!
$endgroup$
– user514014
Jan 23 at 1:03




$begingroup$
Thanks, that clears it up!
$endgroup$
– user514014
Jan 23 at 1:03


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083920%2falgebras-finite-dimensional-over-their-base-field-are-artinian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith