Can this problem be reduced to a Sturm-Liouville form?












0












$begingroup$


From a system of three coupled PDEs



begin{eqnarray}
frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} + beta_h (theta_h - theta_w) &=& 0,\
frac{partial theta_c}{partial y} + beta_c (theta_c - theta_w) &=& 0,\
lambda_h frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} + lambda_c V frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} - Vfrac{partial theta_c}{partial y} &=& 0
end{eqnarray}



with the bc(s) as



The boundary conditions for the problem are as follows:



The PDE(s) needs to be solved on a rectangular region where $x$ varies between $0$ to $1$ and $y$ varies between $0$ to $1$.



$$frac{partial theta_w(0,y)}{partial x}=frac{partial theta_w(1,y)}{partial x}=0 $$



$$frac{partial theta_w(x,0)}{partial y}=frac{partial theta_w(x,1)}{partial y}=0 $$



$$theta_h(0,y)=1 $$$$theta_c(x,0)=0$$
The first two were solved and substituted in the following form as
begin{eqnarray}
0 &=& e^{-beta_h x} left( lambda_h e^{beta_h x} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} - beta_h e^{beta_h x} theta_w + beta_h^2 int e^{beta_h x} theta_w , mathrm{d}x right) +\
&& + V e^{-beta_c y} left( lambda_c e^{beta_c y} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - beta_c e^{beta_c y} theta_w + beta_c^2 int e^{beta_c y} theta_w , mathrm{d}y right).
end{eqnarray}



The following assumption was made then
$theta_w(x,y) = e^{-beta_h x} f(x) e^{-beta_c y} g(y)$ where $F(x) := int f(x) , mathrm{d}x$ and $G(y) := int g(y) , mathrm{d}y$ to reach the following two separated third order ODEs



begin{eqnarray}
lambda_h F''' - 2 lambda_h beta_h F'' + left( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h - mu right) F' + beta_h^2 F &=& 0,\
V lambda_c G''' - 2 V lambda_c beta_c G'' + left( (lambda_c beta_c - 1) V beta_c + mu right) G' + V beta_c^2 G &=& 0,
end{eqnarray}



Can these ODEs be expressed in Sturm-Liouville form of EigenValue problems (All texts i see show examples for second order problem ?)
My attempts at solving these two ODEs as eigen value problems were failing



1 Eigen values of a Third Order Linear Homogenous ODE
2 How to choose Eigenvaues for system extending in perpendicular direction?
3 Eigenvalues keep giving trivial solutions everytime.



I must mention here that user @Christoph ,@Cesareo and @LutzL have been extremely helpful in getting me this far.



So I have been trying other approaches and Sturm - Liouville problems was a form of problem i came across.



ATTEMPT



If i try the following form:
$$
lambda_h f'' - 2 lambda_h beta_h f' + ( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h) f' + beta_h^2 int f mathrm{d}x = mu f
$$

But this form has an integral operator on the LHS, Differentiating it w.r.t. $x$ makes it a third order problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph Any guiding direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Indrasis Mitra
    Jan 25 at 15:59
















0












$begingroup$


From a system of three coupled PDEs



begin{eqnarray}
frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} + beta_h (theta_h - theta_w) &=& 0,\
frac{partial theta_c}{partial y} + beta_c (theta_c - theta_w) &=& 0,\
lambda_h frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} + lambda_c V frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} - Vfrac{partial theta_c}{partial y} &=& 0
end{eqnarray}



with the bc(s) as



The boundary conditions for the problem are as follows:



The PDE(s) needs to be solved on a rectangular region where $x$ varies between $0$ to $1$ and $y$ varies between $0$ to $1$.



$$frac{partial theta_w(0,y)}{partial x}=frac{partial theta_w(1,y)}{partial x}=0 $$



$$frac{partial theta_w(x,0)}{partial y}=frac{partial theta_w(x,1)}{partial y}=0 $$



$$theta_h(0,y)=1 $$$$theta_c(x,0)=0$$
The first two were solved and substituted in the following form as
begin{eqnarray}
0 &=& e^{-beta_h x} left( lambda_h e^{beta_h x} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} - beta_h e^{beta_h x} theta_w + beta_h^2 int e^{beta_h x} theta_w , mathrm{d}x right) +\
&& + V e^{-beta_c y} left( lambda_c e^{beta_c y} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - beta_c e^{beta_c y} theta_w + beta_c^2 int e^{beta_c y} theta_w , mathrm{d}y right).
end{eqnarray}



The following assumption was made then
$theta_w(x,y) = e^{-beta_h x} f(x) e^{-beta_c y} g(y)$ where $F(x) := int f(x) , mathrm{d}x$ and $G(y) := int g(y) , mathrm{d}y$ to reach the following two separated third order ODEs



begin{eqnarray}
lambda_h F''' - 2 lambda_h beta_h F'' + left( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h - mu right) F' + beta_h^2 F &=& 0,\
V lambda_c G''' - 2 V lambda_c beta_c G'' + left( (lambda_c beta_c - 1) V beta_c + mu right) G' + V beta_c^2 G &=& 0,
end{eqnarray}



Can these ODEs be expressed in Sturm-Liouville form of EigenValue problems (All texts i see show examples for second order problem ?)
My attempts at solving these two ODEs as eigen value problems were failing



1 Eigen values of a Third Order Linear Homogenous ODE
2 How to choose Eigenvaues for system extending in perpendicular direction?
3 Eigenvalues keep giving trivial solutions everytime.



I must mention here that user @Christoph ,@Cesareo and @LutzL have been extremely helpful in getting me this far.



So I have been trying other approaches and Sturm - Liouville problems was a form of problem i came across.



ATTEMPT



If i try the following form:
$$
lambda_h f'' - 2 lambda_h beta_h f' + ( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h) f' + beta_h^2 int f mathrm{d}x = mu f
$$

But this form has an integral operator on the LHS, Differentiating it w.r.t. $x$ makes it a third order problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph Any guiding direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Indrasis Mitra
    Jan 25 at 15:59














0












0








0





$begingroup$


From a system of three coupled PDEs



begin{eqnarray}
frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} + beta_h (theta_h - theta_w) &=& 0,\
frac{partial theta_c}{partial y} + beta_c (theta_c - theta_w) &=& 0,\
lambda_h frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} + lambda_c V frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} - Vfrac{partial theta_c}{partial y} &=& 0
end{eqnarray}



with the bc(s) as



The boundary conditions for the problem are as follows:



The PDE(s) needs to be solved on a rectangular region where $x$ varies between $0$ to $1$ and $y$ varies between $0$ to $1$.



$$frac{partial theta_w(0,y)}{partial x}=frac{partial theta_w(1,y)}{partial x}=0 $$



$$frac{partial theta_w(x,0)}{partial y}=frac{partial theta_w(x,1)}{partial y}=0 $$



$$theta_h(0,y)=1 $$$$theta_c(x,0)=0$$
The first two were solved and substituted in the following form as
begin{eqnarray}
0 &=& e^{-beta_h x} left( lambda_h e^{beta_h x} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} - beta_h e^{beta_h x} theta_w + beta_h^2 int e^{beta_h x} theta_w , mathrm{d}x right) +\
&& + V e^{-beta_c y} left( lambda_c e^{beta_c y} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - beta_c e^{beta_c y} theta_w + beta_c^2 int e^{beta_c y} theta_w , mathrm{d}y right).
end{eqnarray}



The following assumption was made then
$theta_w(x,y) = e^{-beta_h x} f(x) e^{-beta_c y} g(y)$ where $F(x) := int f(x) , mathrm{d}x$ and $G(y) := int g(y) , mathrm{d}y$ to reach the following two separated third order ODEs



begin{eqnarray}
lambda_h F''' - 2 lambda_h beta_h F'' + left( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h - mu right) F' + beta_h^2 F &=& 0,\
V lambda_c G''' - 2 V lambda_c beta_c G'' + left( (lambda_c beta_c - 1) V beta_c + mu right) G' + V beta_c^2 G &=& 0,
end{eqnarray}



Can these ODEs be expressed in Sturm-Liouville form of EigenValue problems (All texts i see show examples for second order problem ?)
My attempts at solving these two ODEs as eigen value problems were failing



1 Eigen values of a Third Order Linear Homogenous ODE
2 How to choose Eigenvaues for system extending in perpendicular direction?
3 Eigenvalues keep giving trivial solutions everytime.



I must mention here that user @Christoph ,@Cesareo and @LutzL have been extremely helpful in getting me this far.



So I have been trying other approaches and Sturm - Liouville problems was a form of problem i came across.



ATTEMPT



If i try the following form:
$$
lambda_h f'' - 2 lambda_h beta_h f' + ( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h) f' + beta_h^2 int f mathrm{d}x = mu f
$$

But this form has an integral operator on the LHS, Differentiating it w.r.t. $x$ makes it a third order problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




From a system of three coupled PDEs



begin{eqnarray}
frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} + beta_h (theta_h - theta_w) &=& 0,\
frac{partial theta_c}{partial y} + beta_c (theta_c - theta_w) &=& 0,\
lambda_h frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} + lambda_c V frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - frac{partial theta_h}{partial x} - Vfrac{partial theta_c}{partial y} &=& 0
end{eqnarray}



with the bc(s) as



The boundary conditions for the problem are as follows:



The PDE(s) needs to be solved on a rectangular region where $x$ varies between $0$ to $1$ and $y$ varies between $0$ to $1$.



$$frac{partial theta_w(0,y)}{partial x}=frac{partial theta_w(1,y)}{partial x}=0 $$



$$frac{partial theta_w(x,0)}{partial y}=frac{partial theta_w(x,1)}{partial y}=0 $$



$$theta_h(0,y)=1 $$$$theta_c(x,0)=0$$
The first two were solved and substituted in the following form as
begin{eqnarray}
0 &=& e^{-beta_h x} left( lambda_h e^{beta_h x} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial x^2} - beta_h e^{beta_h x} theta_w + beta_h^2 int e^{beta_h x} theta_w , mathrm{d}x right) +\
&& + V e^{-beta_c y} left( lambda_c e^{beta_c y} frac{partial^2 theta_w}{partial y^2} - beta_c e^{beta_c y} theta_w + beta_c^2 int e^{beta_c y} theta_w , mathrm{d}y right).
end{eqnarray}



The following assumption was made then
$theta_w(x,y) = e^{-beta_h x} f(x) e^{-beta_c y} g(y)$ where $F(x) := int f(x) , mathrm{d}x$ and $G(y) := int g(y) , mathrm{d}y$ to reach the following two separated third order ODEs



begin{eqnarray}
lambda_h F''' - 2 lambda_h beta_h F'' + left( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h - mu right) F' + beta_h^2 F &=& 0,\
V lambda_c G''' - 2 V lambda_c beta_c G'' + left( (lambda_c beta_c - 1) V beta_c + mu right) G' + V beta_c^2 G &=& 0,
end{eqnarray}



Can these ODEs be expressed in Sturm-Liouville form of EigenValue problems (All texts i see show examples for second order problem ?)
My attempts at solving these two ODEs as eigen value problems were failing



1 Eigen values of a Third Order Linear Homogenous ODE
2 How to choose Eigenvaues for system extending in perpendicular direction?
3 Eigenvalues keep giving trivial solutions everytime.



I must mention here that user @Christoph ,@Cesareo and @LutzL have been extremely helpful in getting me this far.



So I have been trying other approaches and Sturm - Liouville problems was a form of problem i came across.



ATTEMPT



If i try the following form:
$$
lambda_h f'' - 2 lambda_h beta_h f' + ( (lambda_h beta_h - 1) beta_h) f' + beta_h^2 int f mathrm{d}x = mu f
$$

But this form has an integral operator on the LHS, Differentiating it w.r.t. $x$ makes it a third order problem.







ordinary-differential-equations multivariable-calculus pde eigenfunctions sturm-liouville






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 25 at 9:43







Indrasis Mitra

















asked Jan 25 at 9:21









Indrasis MitraIndrasis Mitra

80111




80111












  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph Any guiding direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Indrasis Mitra
    Jan 25 at 15:59


















  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph Any guiding direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Indrasis Mitra
    Jan 25 at 15:59
















$begingroup$
@Christoph Any guiding direction would be helpful.
$endgroup$
– Indrasis Mitra
Jan 25 at 15:59




$begingroup$
@Christoph Any guiding direction would be helpful.
$endgroup$
– Indrasis Mitra
Jan 25 at 15:59










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086909%2fcan-this-problem-be-reduced-to-a-sturm-liouville-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086909%2fcan-this-problem-be-reduced-to-a-sturm-liouville-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory