Definition of the $0$-coboundary in group cohomology












0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to learn, what is group cohomology. Since I'm not a matematician, the general definition is too abstract to me (at least for the time being), and requires too much category theory and homological algebra. First I'm trying to catch the "technical" definition presented by Wikipedia. This definition starts with the definition of the modules of cochains for $n=0,1,...$, and the coboundary maps from the $n$-th module to the $n+1$-th as follows:



"For $nge0$, let $C^n(G,M)$ be the group of all functions from $G^n$ to $M$. This is an abelian group; its elements are called the (inhomogeneous) $n$-cochains. The coboundary homomorphisms



$begin{cases} d^{n+1} : C^n (G,M) to C^{n+1}(G,M)\ left(d^{n+1}varphiright) (g_1, ldots, g_{n+1}) = g_1 varphi(g_2,dots, g_{n+1}) + sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^i varphi left (g_1,ldots, g_{i-1}, g_i g_{i+1}, ldots, g_{n+1} right ) (-1)^{n+1}varphi(g_1,ldots, g_n) end{cases}$



"



This is OK for $n>0$, but it has no sense when $n=0$. What is the definition of the $d^1$ coboundary map?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to learn, what is group cohomology. Since I'm not a matematician, the general definition is too abstract to me (at least for the time being), and requires too much category theory and homological algebra. First I'm trying to catch the "technical" definition presented by Wikipedia. This definition starts with the definition of the modules of cochains for $n=0,1,...$, and the coboundary maps from the $n$-th module to the $n+1$-th as follows:



    "For $nge0$, let $C^n(G,M)$ be the group of all functions from $G^n$ to $M$. This is an abelian group; its elements are called the (inhomogeneous) $n$-cochains. The coboundary homomorphisms



    $begin{cases} d^{n+1} : C^n (G,M) to C^{n+1}(G,M)\ left(d^{n+1}varphiright) (g_1, ldots, g_{n+1}) = g_1 varphi(g_2,dots, g_{n+1}) + sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^i varphi left (g_1,ldots, g_{i-1}, g_i g_{i+1}, ldots, g_{n+1} right ) (-1)^{n+1}varphi(g_1,ldots, g_n) end{cases}$



    "



    This is OK for $n>0$, but it has no sense when $n=0$. What is the definition of the $d^1$ coboundary map?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to learn, what is group cohomology. Since I'm not a matematician, the general definition is too abstract to me (at least for the time being), and requires too much category theory and homological algebra. First I'm trying to catch the "technical" definition presented by Wikipedia. This definition starts with the definition of the modules of cochains for $n=0,1,...$, and the coboundary maps from the $n$-th module to the $n+1$-th as follows:



      "For $nge0$, let $C^n(G,M)$ be the group of all functions from $G^n$ to $M$. This is an abelian group; its elements are called the (inhomogeneous) $n$-cochains. The coboundary homomorphisms



      $begin{cases} d^{n+1} : C^n (G,M) to C^{n+1}(G,M)\ left(d^{n+1}varphiright) (g_1, ldots, g_{n+1}) = g_1 varphi(g_2,dots, g_{n+1}) + sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^i varphi left (g_1,ldots, g_{i-1}, g_i g_{i+1}, ldots, g_{n+1} right ) (-1)^{n+1}varphi(g_1,ldots, g_n) end{cases}$



      "



      This is OK for $n>0$, but it has no sense when $n=0$. What is the definition of the $d^1$ coboundary map?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to learn, what is group cohomology. Since I'm not a matematician, the general definition is too abstract to me (at least for the time being), and requires too much category theory and homological algebra. First I'm trying to catch the "technical" definition presented by Wikipedia. This definition starts with the definition of the modules of cochains for $n=0,1,...$, and the coboundary maps from the $n$-th module to the $n+1$-th as follows:



      "For $nge0$, let $C^n(G,M)$ be the group of all functions from $G^n$ to $M$. This is an abelian group; its elements are called the (inhomogeneous) $n$-cochains. The coboundary homomorphisms



      $begin{cases} d^{n+1} : C^n (G,M) to C^{n+1}(G,M)\ left(d^{n+1}varphiright) (g_1, ldots, g_{n+1}) = g_1 varphi(g_2,dots, g_{n+1}) + sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^i varphi left (g_1,ldots, g_{i-1}, g_i g_{i+1}, ldots, g_{n+1} right ) (-1)^{n+1}varphi(g_1,ldots, g_n) end{cases}$



      "



      This is OK for $n>0$, but it has no sense when $n=0$. What is the definition of the $d^1$ coboundary map?







      group-cohomology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 28 at 7:14









      mmamma

      622413




      622413






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          For $n=0$, $G^n$ has only one element, so a function $G^nto M$ is essentially an element $min M$ (the image of the element of $G^n$).



          Now if $min M$ is such an element, or correespondingly $f: *mapsto m$ is the map $G^0to M$, you have $d^1f $ which is a map $G^1=Gto M$, and the formula gives $d^1f (g) = gcdot f() + displaystylesum_{i=1}^0$something $+ (-1)^{-1}f()= gcdot m - m$.



          Indeed a sum going from $1$ to $0$ of anything is $0$, and for the first and last terms, you remove on element of the list $(g_1,...,g_{n+1})$, which, for $n=0$, has only one element, so you get a list with $0$ elements : great : $f$ can take those as arguments; ans it returns $m$.



          Any map of the form $gmapsto gcdot m- m$ is called a principal derivation $Gto M$, and the kernel of $d^2 : C^1(G,M)to C^2(G,M)$ consists of derivations, that is, maps $d: Gto M$ such that $d(gh) = d(g) + gd(h)$. So $H^1(G,M)$ is the set of derivations modulo principal derivations.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The name principal derivation is new for me. Is it a synonym for principal crossed homomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 29 at 4:37












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, according to this : encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Crossed_homomorphism
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            Jan 29 at 8:51










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! Meanwhile I found that in Weibel's An Introduction to Homological algebra it is explicitely formulated (definition 6.4.1)
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 30 at 5:45











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090575%2fdefinition-of-the-0-coboundary-in-group-cohomology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          For $n=0$, $G^n$ has only one element, so a function $G^nto M$ is essentially an element $min M$ (the image of the element of $G^n$).



          Now if $min M$ is such an element, or correespondingly $f: *mapsto m$ is the map $G^0to M$, you have $d^1f $ which is a map $G^1=Gto M$, and the formula gives $d^1f (g) = gcdot f() + displaystylesum_{i=1}^0$something $+ (-1)^{-1}f()= gcdot m - m$.



          Indeed a sum going from $1$ to $0$ of anything is $0$, and for the first and last terms, you remove on element of the list $(g_1,...,g_{n+1})$, which, for $n=0$, has only one element, so you get a list with $0$ elements : great : $f$ can take those as arguments; ans it returns $m$.



          Any map of the form $gmapsto gcdot m- m$ is called a principal derivation $Gto M$, and the kernel of $d^2 : C^1(G,M)to C^2(G,M)$ consists of derivations, that is, maps $d: Gto M$ such that $d(gh) = d(g) + gd(h)$. So $H^1(G,M)$ is the set of derivations modulo principal derivations.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The name principal derivation is new for me. Is it a synonym for principal crossed homomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 29 at 4:37












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, according to this : encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Crossed_homomorphism
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            Jan 29 at 8:51










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! Meanwhile I found that in Weibel's An Introduction to Homological algebra it is explicitely formulated (definition 6.4.1)
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 30 at 5:45
















          1












          $begingroup$

          For $n=0$, $G^n$ has only one element, so a function $G^nto M$ is essentially an element $min M$ (the image of the element of $G^n$).



          Now if $min M$ is such an element, or correespondingly $f: *mapsto m$ is the map $G^0to M$, you have $d^1f $ which is a map $G^1=Gto M$, and the formula gives $d^1f (g) = gcdot f() + displaystylesum_{i=1}^0$something $+ (-1)^{-1}f()= gcdot m - m$.



          Indeed a sum going from $1$ to $0$ of anything is $0$, and for the first and last terms, you remove on element of the list $(g_1,...,g_{n+1})$, which, for $n=0$, has only one element, so you get a list with $0$ elements : great : $f$ can take those as arguments; ans it returns $m$.



          Any map of the form $gmapsto gcdot m- m$ is called a principal derivation $Gto M$, and the kernel of $d^2 : C^1(G,M)to C^2(G,M)$ consists of derivations, that is, maps $d: Gto M$ such that $d(gh) = d(g) + gd(h)$. So $H^1(G,M)$ is the set of derivations modulo principal derivations.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The name principal derivation is new for me. Is it a synonym for principal crossed homomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 29 at 4:37












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, according to this : encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Crossed_homomorphism
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            Jan 29 at 8:51










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! Meanwhile I found that in Weibel's An Introduction to Homological algebra it is explicitely formulated (definition 6.4.1)
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 30 at 5:45














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          For $n=0$, $G^n$ has only one element, so a function $G^nto M$ is essentially an element $min M$ (the image of the element of $G^n$).



          Now if $min M$ is such an element, or correespondingly $f: *mapsto m$ is the map $G^0to M$, you have $d^1f $ which is a map $G^1=Gto M$, and the formula gives $d^1f (g) = gcdot f() + displaystylesum_{i=1}^0$something $+ (-1)^{-1}f()= gcdot m - m$.



          Indeed a sum going from $1$ to $0$ of anything is $0$, and for the first and last terms, you remove on element of the list $(g_1,...,g_{n+1})$, which, for $n=0$, has only one element, so you get a list with $0$ elements : great : $f$ can take those as arguments; ans it returns $m$.



          Any map of the form $gmapsto gcdot m- m$ is called a principal derivation $Gto M$, and the kernel of $d^2 : C^1(G,M)to C^2(G,M)$ consists of derivations, that is, maps $d: Gto M$ such that $d(gh) = d(g) + gd(h)$. So $H^1(G,M)$ is the set of derivations modulo principal derivations.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For $n=0$, $G^n$ has only one element, so a function $G^nto M$ is essentially an element $min M$ (the image of the element of $G^n$).



          Now if $min M$ is such an element, or correespondingly $f: *mapsto m$ is the map $G^0to M$, you have $d^1f $ which is a map $G^1=Gto M$, and the formula gives $d^1f (g) = gcdot f() + displaystylesum_{i=1}^0$something $+ (-1)^{-1}f()= gcdot m - m$.



          Indeed a sum going from $1$ to $0$ of anything is $0$, and for the first and last terms, you remove on element of the list $(g_1,...,g_{n+1})$, which, for $n=0$, has only one element, so you get a list with $0$ elements : great : $f$ can take those as arguments; ans it returns $m$.



          Any map of the form $gmapsto gcdot m- m$ is called a principal derivation $Gto M$, and the kernel of $d^2 : C^1(G,M)to C^2(G,M)$ consists of derivations, that is, maps $d: Gto M$ such that $d(gh) = d(g) + gd(h)$. So $H^1(G,M)$ is the set of derivations modulo principal derivations.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 28 at 9:10









          MaxMax

          15.7k11143




          15.7k11143












          • $begingroup$
            The name principal derivation is new for me. Is it a synonym for principal crossed homomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 29 at 4:37












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, according to this : encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Crossed_homomorphism
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            Jan 29 at 8:51










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! Meanwhile I found that in Weibel's An Introduction to Homological algebra it is explicitely formulated (definition 6.4.1)
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 30 at 5:45


















          • $begingroup$
            The name principal derivation is new for me. Is it a synonym for principal crossed homomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 29 at 4:37












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, according to this : encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Crossed_homomorphism
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            Jan 29 at 8:51










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! Meanwhile I found that in Weibel's An Introduction to Homological algebra it is explicitely formulated (definition 6.4.1)
            $endgroup$
            – mma
            Jan 30 at 5:45
















          $begingroup$
          The name principal derivation is new for me. Is it a synonym for principal crossed homomorphism?
          $endgroup$
          – mma
          Jan 29 at 4:37






          $begingroup$
          The name principal derivation is new for me. Is it a synonym for principal crossed homomorphism?
          $endgroup$
          – mma
          Jan 29 at 4:37














          $begingroup$
          Yes, according to this : encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Crossed_homomorphism
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          Jan 29 at 8:51




          $begingroup$
          Yes, according to this : encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Crossed_homomorphism
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          Jan 29 at 8:51












          $begingroup$
          Thanks! Meanwhile I found that in Weibel's An Introduction to Homological algebra it is explicitely formulated (definition 6.4.1)
          $endgroup$
          – mma
          Jan 30 at 5:45




          $begingroup$
          Thanks! Meanwhile I found that in Weibel's An Introduction to Homological algebra it is explicitely formulated (definition 6.4.1)
          $endgroup$
          – mma
          Jan 30 at 5:45


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090575%2fdefinition-of-the-0-coboundary-in-group-cohomology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

          Notepad++ export/extract a list of installed plugins