Existence and uniqueness of solution of $y'=(x-y)^{2/3}$ such that $y(5)=5$












0












$begingroup$


Assume the Initial Value Problem:
$$
y'(x)=[x-y(x)]^{frac23}equiv f(x,y(x)), quad y(5)=5
$$

Existence:



Since $f: mathbb{R^2} longrightarrow mathbb{R}$ and $(x_0,y_0)=(5,5) in mathbb{R^2}$, Peano's Theorem ensures that there exists a local solution $z: I longrightarrow mathbb{R}$, where $I$ is a neighborhood of $x_0=5$.



Uniqueness:



I'm not sure whether we can deduce anything about uniqueness. We could take:
$$
f_y=frac{partial}{partial y} f(x,y)=-frac{2}{3(x-y)^{frac13}}, quad forall (x,y):xneq y
$$



Here's the part which confuses me. Does the fact that $f_y$ not bounded for any neighborhood of $x_0=5$ prevents us from proving uniqueness?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Assume the Initial Value Problem:
    $$
    y'(x)=[x-y(x)]^{frac23}equiv f(x,y(x)), quad y(5)=5
    $$

    Existence:



    Since $f: mathbb{R^2} longrightarrow mathbb{R}$ and $(x_0,y_0)=(5,5) in mathbb{R^2}$, Peano's Theorem ensures that there exists a local solution $z: I longrightarrow mathbb{R}$, where $I$ is a neighborhood of $x_0=5$.



    Uniqueness:



    I'm not sure whether we can deduce anything about uniqueness. We could take:
    $$
    f_y=frac{partial}{partial y} f(x,y)=-frac{2}{3(x-y)^{frac13}}, quad forall (x,y):xneq y
    $$



    Here's the part which confuses me. Does the fact that $f_y$ not bounded for any neighborhood of $x_0=5$ prevents us from proving uniqueness?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Assume the Initial Value Problem:
      $$
      y'(x)=[x-y(x)]^{frac23}equiv f(x,y(x)), quad y(5)=5
      $$

      Existence:



      Since $f: mathbb{R^2} longrightarrow mathbb{R}$ and $(x_0,y_0)=(5,5) in mathbb{R^2}$, Peano's Theorem ensures that there exists a local solution $z: I longrightarrow mathbb{R}$, where $I$ is a neighborhood of $x_0=5$.



      Uniqueness:



      I'm not sure whether we can deduce anything about uniqueness. We could take:
      $$
      f_y=frac{partial}{partial y} f(x,y)=-frac{2}{3(x-y)^{frac13}}, quad forall (x,y):xneq y
      $$



      Here's the part which confuses me. Does the fact that $f_y$ not bounded for any neighborhood of $x_0=5$ prevents us from proving uniqueness?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Assume the Initial Value Problem:
      $$
      y'(x)=[x-y(x)]^{frac23}equiv f(x,y(x)), quad y(5)=5
      $$

      Existence:



      Since $f: mathbb{R^2} longrightarrow mathbb{R}$ and $(x_0,y_0)=(5,5) in mathbb{R^2}$, Peano's Theorem ensures that there exists a local solution $z: I longrightarrow mathbb{R}$, where $I$ is a neighborhood of $x_0=5$.



      Uniqueness:



      I'm not sure whether we can deduce anything about uniqueness. We could take:
      $$
      f_y=frac{partial}{partial y} f(x,y)=-frac{2}{3(x-y)^{frac13}}, quad forall (x,y):xneq y
      $$



      Here's the part which confuses me. Does the fact that $f_y$ not bounded for any neighborhood of $x_0=5$ prevents us from proving uniqueness?







      ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems lipschitz-functions initial-value-problems






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 26 at 16:59









      Did

      248k23226465




      248k23226465










      asked Jan 26 at 16:14









      LoneBoneLoneBone

      968




      968






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          As you have already seen, the function $f$ is not locally Lipschitz continuous around $y=x$, hence you cannot deduce uniqueness using the standard Cauchy-Lipschitz theory.



          Nevertheless, the Cauchy problem admits a unique solution.
          You can get an intuition of this fact observing that any solution hits the "bad" set ${(x,y): x=y}$ only for $x=5$, since $y'(5) = 0$.



          For a formal proof, you can observe that $y(x)$ is a solution of your Cauchy problem if and only if the function $z(x) := x - y(x)$ is a solution to
          $$
          z' = 1-z^{2/3}, quad, z(5) = 0,
          $$

          and this Cauchy problem admits unique solution.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088428%2fexistence-and-uniqueness-of-solution-of-y-x-y2-3-such-that-y5-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            As you have already seen, the function $f$ is not locally Lipschitz continuous around $y=x$, hence you cannot deduce uniqueness using the standard Cauchy-Lipschitz theory.



            Nevertheless, the Cauchy problem admits a unique solution.
            You can get an intuition of this fact observing that any solution hits the "bad" set ${(x,y): x=y}$ only for $x=5$, since $y'(5) = 0$.



            For a formal proof, you can observe that $y(x)$ is a solution of your Cauchy problem if and only if the function $z(x) := x - y(x)$ is a solution to
            $$
            z' = 1-z^{2/3}, quad, z(5) = 0,
            $$

            and this Cauchy problem admits unique solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              As you have already seen, the function $f$ is not locally Lipschitz continuous around $y=x$, hence you cannot deduce uniqueness using the standard Cauchy-Lipschitz theory.



              Nevertheless, the Cauchy problem admits a unique solution.
              You can get an intuition of this fact observing that any solution hits the "bad" set ${(x,y): x=y}$ only for $x=5$, since $y'(5) = 0$.



              For a formal proof, you can observe that $y(x)$ is a solution of your Cauchy problem if and only if the function $z(x) := x - y(x)$ is a solution to
              $$
              z' = 1-z^{2/3}, quad, z(5) = 0,
              $$

              and this Cauchy problem admits unique solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                As you have already seen, the function $f$ is not locally Lipschitz continuous around $y=x$, hence you cannot deduce uniqueness using the standard Cauchy-Lipschitz theory.



                Nevertheless, the Cauchy problem admits a unique solution.
                You can get an intuition of this fact observing that any solution hits the "bad" set ${(x,y): x=y}$ only for $x=5$, since $y'(5) = 0$.



                For a formal proof, you can observe that $y(x)$ is a solution of your Cauchy problem if and only if the function $z(x) := x - y(x)$ is a solution to
                $$
                z' = 1-z^{2/3}, quad, z(5) = 0,
                $$

                and this Cauchy problem admits unique solution.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                As you have already seen, the function $f$ is not locally Lipschitz continuous around $y=x$, hence you cannot deduce uniqueness using the standard Cauchy-Lipschitz theory.



                Nevertheless, the Cauchy problem admits a unique solution.
                You can get an intuition of this fact observing that any solution hits the "bad" set ${(x,y): x=y}$ only for $x=5$, since $y'(5) = 0$.



                For a formal proof, you can observe that $y(x)$ is a solution of your Cauchy problem if and only if the function $z(x) := x - y(x)$ is a solution to
                $$
                z' = 1-z^{2/3}, quad, z(5) = 0,
                $$

                and this Cauchy problem admits unique solution.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 26 at 16:55









                RigelRigel

                11.3k11320




                11.3k11320






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088428%2fexistence-and-uniqueness-of-solution-of-y-x-y2-3-such-that-y5-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]