Why doesn't the second method work?












0












$begingroup$


I have been trying to complete this question:



The region R, bounded by the curve with equation $y=sin(x)$, $0leqslant x leqslant pi$ and the line with equation $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



The region R is rotated through $2pi$ radians about the line $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



Show that the solid of revolution formed has area $dfrac{pi}{2}(pi-3)$



I have tried two methods, one of which has worked, and the other has not, but I don't understand why the second method didn't work



The first method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} (sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2 dx$$, which worked fine.



The second method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} sin^2x dx - piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} dfrac{1}{2} dx$$, which would find the volume from rotating $y=sin x$, and subtract the volume from rotating $y=dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, which I thought would find the correct value, but it didn't.



I can see that the integrals are different, because the expansion of $(sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2$ $ne$ $sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, but I am not getting why the second method doesn't work, as it looks like it should, graphically.



My question is why doesn't the second method work, but the first does?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Surely what you're calculating is a volume, not area.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 26 at 17:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.G. i meant volumes, sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:15
















0












$begingroup$


I have been trying to complete this question:



The region R, bounded by the curve with equation $y=sin(x)$, $0leqslant x leqslant pi$ and the line with equation $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



The region R is rotated through $2pi$ radians about the line $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



Show that the solid of revolution formed has area $dfrac{pi}{2}(pi-3)$



I have tried two methods, one of which has worked, and the other has not, but I don't understand why the second method didn't work



The first method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} (sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2 dx$$, which worked fine.



The second method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} sin^2x dx - piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} dfrac{1}{2} dx$$, which would find the volume from rotating $y=sin x$, and subtract the volume from rotating $y=dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, which I thought would find the correct value, but it didn't.



I can see that the integrals are different, because the expansion of $(sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2$ $ne$ $sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, but I am not getting why the second method doesn't work, as it looks like it should, graphically.



My question is why doesn't the second method work, but the first does?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Surely what you're calculating is a volume, not area.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 26 at 17:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.G. i meant volumes, sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:15














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have been trying to complete this question:



The region R, bounded by the curve with equation $y=sin(x)$, $0leqslant x leqslant pi$ and the line with equation $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



The region R is rotated through $2pi$ radians about the line $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



Show that the solid of revolution formed has area $dfrac{pi}{2}(pi-3)$



I have tried two methods, one of which has worked, and the other has not, but I don't understand why the second method didn't work



The first method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} (sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2 dx$$, which worked fine.



The second method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} sin^2x dx - piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} dfrac{1}{2} dx$$, which would find the volume from rotating $y=sin x$, and subtract the volume from rotating $y=dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, which I thought would find the correct value, but it didn't.



I can see that the integrals are different, because the expansion of $(sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2$ $ne$ $sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, but I am not getting why the second method doesn't work, as it looks like it should, graphically.



My question is why doesn't the second method work, but the first does?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have been trying to complete this question:



The region R, bounded by the curve with equation $y=sin(x)$, $0leqslant x leqslant pi$ and the line with equation $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



The region R is rotated through $2pi$ radians about the line $y = dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$



Show that the solid of revolution formed has area $dfrac{pi}{2}(pi-3)$



I have tried two methods, one of which has worked, and the other has not, but I don't understand why the second method didn't work



The first method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} (sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2 dx$$, which worked fine.



The second method was to do the integral $$piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} sin^2x dx - piint_{dfrac{pi}{4}}^{dfrac{3pi}{4}} dfrac{1}{2} dx$$, which would find the volume from rotating $y=sin x$, and subtract the volume from rotating $y=dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, which I thought would find the correct value, but it didn't.



I can see that the integrals are different, because the expansion of $(sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2})^2$ $ne$ $sin^2x-dfrac{1}{sqrt2}$, but I am not getting why the second method doesn't work, as it looks like it should, graphically.



My question is why doesn't the second method work, but the first does?







calculus integration solid-of-revolution






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 26 at 17:16







Joshua Peacham

















asked Jan 26 at 16:42









Joshua PeachamJoshua Peacham

162




162












  • $begingroup$
    Surely what you're calculating is a volume, not area.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 26 at 17:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.G. i meant volumes, sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:15


















  • $begingroup$
    Surely what you're calculating is a volume, not area.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 26 at 17:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.G. i meant volumes, sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:15
















$begingroup$
Surely what you're calculating is a volume, not area.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 26 at 17:09




$begingroup$
Surely what you're calculating is a volume, not area.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 26 at 17:09




1




1




$begingroup$
@J.G. i meant volumes, sorry
$endgroup$
– Joshua Peacham
Jan 26 at 17:15




$begingroup$
@J.G. i meant volumes, sorry
$endgroup$
– Joshua Peacham
Jan 26 at 17:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Where did you find this question? The second integral seems to me the correct way to evaluate the volume.
When calculating the volum of a revolution solid using this method, what are you doing in fact is "adding" the areas of infinite cilinders with very small heights, each one with radius $f(x)$ and "height" $dx$. The "volume" of each cilinder is $pi[f(x)]²dx$.



So the volume of the solid is



$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx$$.



(You can make this rigorous using Riemann sums, but I think it's unnecessary here.)



In your case, you're not adding cylinders, you are adding "cylinders" with a hole, so the "volume" of each cylinder is $[pi f(x)²-pi g(x)²]dx$. "Adding it up", it would result in
$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx-piint_a^b [g(x)]² dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It's from my school textbook, I thought the second method should work as it finds the total volume from rotating y=sinx then subtracting the cylinder that we don't want, as it is the part outside the region R
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:14











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088465%2fwhy-doesnt-the-second-method-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Where did you find this question? The second integral seems to me the correct way to evaluate the volume.
When calculating the volum of a revolution solid using this method, what are you doing in fact is "adding" the areas of infinite cilinders with very small heights, each one with radius $f(x)$ and "height" $dx$. The "volume" of each cilinder is $pi[f(x)]²dx$.



So the volume of the solid is



$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx$$.



(You can make this rigorous using Riemann sums, but I think it's unnecessary here.)



In your case, you're not adding cylinders, you are adding "cylinders" with a hole, so the "volume" of each cylinder is $[pi f(x)²-pi g(x)²]dx$. "Adding it up", it would result in
$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx-piint_a^b [g(x)]² dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It's from my school textbook, I thought the second method should work as it finds the total volume from rotating y=sinx then subtracting the cylinder that we don't want, as it is the part outside the region R
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:14
















0












$begingroup$

Where did you find this question? The second integral seems to me the correct way to evaluate the volume.
When calculating the volum of a revolution solid using this method, what are you doing in fact is "adding" the areas of infinite cilinders with very small heights, each one with radius $f(x)$ and "height" $dx$. The "volume" of each cilinder is $pi[f(x)]²dx$.



So the volume of the solid is



$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx$$.



(You can make this rigorous using Riemann sums, but I think it's unnecessary here.)



In your case, you're not adding cylinders, you are adding "cylinders" with a hole, so the "volume" of each cylinder is $[pi f(x)²-pi g(x)²]dx$. "Adding it up", it would result in
$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx-piint_a^b [g(x)]² dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It's from my school textbook, I thought the second method should work as it finds the total volume from rotating y=sinx then subtracting the cylinder that we don't want, as it is the part outside the region R
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:14














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Where did you find this question? The second integral seems to me the correct way to evaluate the volume.
When calculating the volum of a revolution solid using this method, what are you doing in fact is "adding" the areas of infinite cilinders with very small heights, each one with radius $f(x)$ and "height" $dx$. The "volume" of each cilinder is $pi[f(x)]²dx$.



So the volume of the solid is



$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx$$.



(You can make this rigorous using Riemann sums, but I think it's unnecessary here.)



In your case, you're not adding cylinders, you are adding "cylinders" with a hole, so the "volume" of each cylinder is $[pi f(x)²-pi g(x)²]dx$. "Adding it up", it would result in
$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx-piint_a^b [g(x)]² dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Where did you find this question? The second integral seems to me the correct way to evaluate the volume.
When calculating the volum of a revolution solid using this method, what are you doing in fact is "adding" the areas of infinite cilinders with very small heights, each one with radius $f(x)$ and "height" $dx$. The "volume" of each cilinder is $pi[f(x)]²dx$.



So the volume of the solid is



$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx$$.



(You can make this rigorous using Riemann sums, but I think it's unnecessary here.)



In your case, you're not adding cylinders, you are adding "cylinders" with a hole, so the "volume" of each cylinder is $[pi f(x)²-pi g(x)²]dx$. "Adding it up", it would result in
$$V=piint_a^b [f(x)]² dx-piint_a^b [g(x)]² dx$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 26 at 17:15

























answered Jan 26 at 17:08









Célio AugustoCélio Augusto

193




193












  • $begingroup$
    It's from my school textbook, I thought the second method should work as it finds the total volume from rotating y=sinx then subtracting the cylinder that we don't want, as it is the part outside the region R
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:14


















  • $begingroup$
    It's from my school textbook, I thought the second method should work as it finds the total volume from rotating y=sinx then subtracting the cylinder that we don't want, as it is the part outside the region R
    $endgroup$
    – Joshua Peacham
    Jan 26 at 17:14
















$begingroup$
It's from my school textbook, I thought the second method should work as it finds the total volume from rotating y=sinx then subtracting the cylinder that we don't want, as it is the part outside the region R
$endgroup$
– Joshua Peacham
Jan 26 at 17:14




$begingroup$
It's from my school textbook, I thought the second method should work as it finds the total volume from rotating y=sinx then subtracting the cylinder that we don't want, as it is the part outside the region R
$endgroup$
– Joshua Peacham
Jan 26 at 17:14


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088465%2fwhy-doesnt-the-second-method-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window