How to prove that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is commutative for a given elliptic curve E?
$begingroup$
Given a prime $p$ and considering the finite field $mathbb{F}_p$, I need to see that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}$(E) is commutative using orders. It is known that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p} subseteq text{End}(E)$, and I have seen how $text{End}(E)$ is one of the following:
$mathbb{Z}$
An order in an imaginary quadratic field
An order in a quaternion algebra
The key is, if I show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is exactly an imaginary quadratic order, then it would be necessarily a commutative ring, but how to show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is indeed an imaginary quadratic order? This fact should be true regardless the curve is either ordinary or supersingular, or, in other words, regardless the inclusion $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}subseteq text{End}(E)$ is strict or not.
Any help on how to approach this will be appreciated, thanks.
number-theory analytic-number-theory elliptic-curves
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a prime $p$ and considering the finite field $mathbb{F}_p$, I need to see that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}$(E) is commutative using orders. It is known that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p} subseteq text{End}(E)$, and I have seen how $text{End}(E)$ is one of the following:
$mathbb{Z}$
An order in an imaginary quadratic field
An order in a quaternion algebra
The key is, if I show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is exactly an imaginary quadratic order, then it would be necessarily a commutative ring, but how to show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is indeed an imaginary quadratic order? This fact should be true regardless the curve is either ordinary or supersingular, or, in other words, regardless the inclusion $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}subseteq text{End}(E)$ is strict or not.
Any help on how to approach this will be appreciated, thanks.
number-theory analytic-number-theory elliptic-curves
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In AEC $deg_i(phi)=p$ and $p=phi^*phi$ so $deg_s(p)$ is 1 or p. If it's p then $E[p^r]=deg_s(p^r)=p^r$, $E[p^infty]$ is infinite procyclic $cong mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]/mathbb{Z}$ and $End(E)$ injects in $End(E[p^infty])$.The harder case $E[p^infty]=O$ is obtained from considering the dual isogeny map $fto f^*$ as an anti-involution giving a norm and trace from which it is shown $End(E)$ is a subring of a quaternion algebra, then $phi^{2n}-t_nphi^n +p^n=0$ lets us conclude about the subring commuting with $phi^n$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 26 at 18:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a prime $p$ and considering the finite field $mathbb{F}_p$, I need to see that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}$(E) is commutative using orders. It is known that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p} subseteq text{End}(E)$, and I have seen how $text{End}(E)$ is one of the following:
$mathbb{Z}$
An order in an imaginary quadratic field
An order in a quaternion algebra
The key is, if I show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is exactly an imaginary quadratic order, then it would be necessarily a commutative ring, but how to show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is indeed an imaginary quadratic order? This fact should be true regardless the curve is either ordinary or supersingular, or, in other words, regardless the inclusion $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}subseteq text{End}(E)$ is strict or not.
Any help on how to approach this will be appreciated, thanks.
number-theory analytic-number-theory elliptic-curves
$endgroup$
Given a prime $p$ and considering the finite field $mathbb{F}_p$, I need to see that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}$(E) is commutative using orders. It is known that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p} subseteq text{End}(E)$, and I have seen how $text{End}(E)$ is one of the following:
$mathbb{Z}$
An order in an imaginary quadratic field
An order in a quaternion algebra
The key is, if I show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is exactly an imaginary quadratic order, then it would be necessarily a commutative ring, but how to show that $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}(E)$ is indeed an imaginary quadratic order? This fact should be true regardless the curve is either ordinary or supersingular, or, in other words, regardless the inclusion $text{End}_{mathbb{F}_p}subseteq text{End}(E)$ is strict or not.
Any help on how to approach this will be appreciated, thanks.
number-theory analytic-number-theory elliptic-curves
number-theory analytic-number-theory elliptic-curves
edited Jan 26 at 16:24
AiYagami
asked Jan 26 at 16:18
AiYagamiAiYagami
635
635
$begingroup$
In AEC $deg_i(phi)=p$ and $p=phi^*phi$ so $deg_s(p)$ is 1 or p. If it's p then $E[p^r]=deg_s(p^r)=p^r$, $E[p^infty]$ is infinite procyclic $cong mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]/mathbb{Z}$ and $End(E)$ injects in $End(E[p^infty])$.The harder case $E[p^infty]=O$ is obtained from considering the dual isogeny map $fto f^*$ as an anti-involution giving a norm and trace from which it is shown $End(E)$ is a subring of a quaternion algebra, then $phi^{2n}-t_nphi^n +p^n=0$ lets us conclude about the subring commuting with $phi^n$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 26 at 18:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In AEC $deg_i(phi)=p$ and $p=phi^*phi$ so $deg_s(p)$ is 1 or p. If it's p then $E[p^r]=deg_s(p^r)=p^r$, $E[p^infty]$ is infinite procyclic $cong mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]/mathbb{Z}$ and $End(E)$ injects in $End(E[p^infty])$.The harder case $E[p^infty]=O$ is obtained from considering the dual isogeny map $fto f^*$ as an anti-involution giving a norm and trace from which it is shown $End(E)$ is a subring of a quaternion algebra, then $phi^{2n}-t_nphi^n +p^n=0$ lets us conclude about the subring commuting with $phi^n$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 26 at 18:05
$begingroup$
In AEC $deg_i(phi)=p$ and $p=phi^*phi$ so $deg_s(p)$ is 1 or p. If it's p then $E[p^r]=deg_s(p^r)=p^r$, $E[p^infty]$ is infinite procyclic $cong mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]/mathbb{Z}$ and $End(E)$ injects in $End(E[p^infty])$.The harder case $E[p^infty]=O$ is obtained from considering the dual isogeny map $fto f^*$ as an anti-involution giving a norm and trace from which it is shown $End(E)$ is a subring of a quaternion algebra, then $phi^{2n}-t_nphi^n +p^n=0$ lets us conclude about the subring commuting with $phi^n$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 26 at 18:05
$begingroup$
In AEC $deg_i(phi)=p$ and $p=phi^*phi$ so $deg_s(p)$ is 1 or p. If it's p then $E[p^r]=deg_s(p^r)=p^r$, $E[p^infty]$ is infinite procyclic $cong mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]/mathbb{Z}$ and $End(E)$ injects in $End(E[p^infty])$.The harder case $E[p^infty]=O$ is obtained from considering the dual isogeny map $fto f^*$ as an anti-involution giving a norm and trace from which it is shown $End(E)$ is a subring of a quaternion algebra, then $phi^{2n}-t_nphi^n +p^n=0$ lets us conclude about the subring commuting with $phi^n$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 26 at 18:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ consists of the endomorphisms of $E$ that commute
with the Frobenius automorphism $F$. As $p$ is prime, $F$ has norm $p$, and
so $Bbb Z[F]$ is a quadratic imaginary order.
If $E$ is ordinary, $text{End}(E)$ is a quadratic imaginary order
and so $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)=text{End}(E)$.
If $E$ is supersingular, then $text{End}(E)$ is a non-commutative
quaternion order, and the elements that commute with $F$ are just those in
$Bbb Q(F)captext{End}(E)$, which form an order in the quadratic field
$Bbb Q(F)$.
In both cases, $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ may be an order strictly containing
$Bbb Z [F]$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088438%2fhow-to-prove-that-textend-mathbbf-pe-is-commutative-for-a-given-elli%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ consists of the endomorphisms of $E$ that commute
with the Frobenius automorphism $F$. As $p$ is prime, $F$ has norm $p$, and
so $Bbb Z[F]$ is a quadratic imaginary order.
If $E$ is ordinary, $text{End}(E)$ is a quadratic imaginary order
and so $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)=text{End}(E)$.
If $E$ is supersingular, then $text{End}(E)$ is a non-commutative
quaternion order, and the elements that commute with $F$ are just those in
$Bbb Q(F)captext{End}(E)$, which form an order in the quadratic field
$Bbb Q(F)$.
In both cases, $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ may be an order strictly containing
$Bbb Z [F]$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ consists of the endomorphisms of $E$ that commute
with the Frobenius automorphism $F$. As $p$ is prime, $F$ has norm $p$, and
so $Bbb Z[F]$ is a quadratic imaginary order.
If $E$ is ordinary, $text{End}(E)$ is a quadratic imaginary order
and so $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)=text{End}(E)$.
If $E$ is supersingular, then $text{End}(E)$ is a non-commutative
quaternion order, and the elements that commute with $F$ are just those in
$Bbb Q(F)captext{End}(E)$, which form an order in the quadratic field
$Bbb Q(F)$.
In both cases, $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ may be an order strictly containing
$Bbb Z [F]$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ consists of the endomorphisms of $E$ that commute
with the Frobenius automorphism $F$. As $p$ is prime, $F$ has norm $p$, and
so $Bbb Z[F]$ is a quadratic imaginary order.
If $E$ is ordinary, $text{End}(E)$ is a quadratic imaginary order
and so $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)=text{End}(E)$.
If $E$ is supersingular, then $text{End}(E)$ is a non-commutative
quaternion order, and the elements that commute with $F$ are just those in
$Bbb Q(F)captext{End}(E)$, which form an order in the quadratic field
$Bbb Q(F)$.
In both cases, $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ may be an order strictly containing
$Bbb Z [F]$.
$endgroup$
$text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ consists of the endomorphisms of $E$ that commute
with the Frobenius automorphism $F$. As $p$ is prime, $F$ has norm $p$, and
so $Bbb Z[F]$ is a quadratic imaginary order.
If $E$ is ordinary, $text{End}(E)$ is a quadratic imaginary order
and so $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)=text{End}(E)$.
If $E$ is supersingular, then $text{End}(E)$ is a non-commutative
quaternion order, and the elements that commute with $F$ are just those in
$Bbb Q(F)captext{End}(E)$, which form an order in the quadratic field
$Bbb Q(F)$.
In both cases, $text{End}_{Bbb F_p}(E)$ may be an order strictly containing
$Bbb Z [F]$.
answered Jan 26 at 16:35
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
106k1161133
106k1161133
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088438%2fhow-to-prove-that-textend-mathbbf-pe-is-commutative-for-a-given-elli%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
In AEC $deg_i(phi)=p$ and $p=phi^*phi$ so $deg_s(p)$ is 1 or p. If it's p then $E[p^r]=deg_s(p^r)=p^r$, $E[p^infty]$ is infinite procyclic $cong mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]/mathbb{Z}$ and $End(E)$ injects in $End(E[p^infty])$.The harder case $E[p^infty]=O$ is obtained from considering the dual isogeny map $fto f^*$ as an anti-involution giving a norm and trace from which it is shown $End(E)$ is a subring of a quaternion algebra, then $phi^{2n}-t_nphi^n +p^n=0$ lets us conclude about the subring commuting with $phi^n$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 26 at 18:05