Finding incomplete solutions of second order ODE system












8












$begingroup$


For a smooth, 1-periodic, positive function $c:mathbb{R}rightarrow (0,infty)$ consider the following second order ODE system for the curve $gamma(t)= (x(t),y(t),z(t)):mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ (note that I will denote the derivative of $c$ by a prime and the derivatives of the curve components $x,y,z$ by dots).



begin{align}
(i) hspace{15mm} ddot{x}(t)+ frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t))}~ dot{x}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
(ii) hspace{14mm} ddot{y}(t) +frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t)))}~dot{y}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
(iii) hspace{16mm} ddot{z}(t)-c'(z(t)) ~ dot{x}(t)dot{y}(t)=0
end{align}



My question: I'm interested in finding a function $c$ as described above such that the system has "incomplete" solutions, i.e. solutions $gamma:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ which are not defined for all times $tinmathbb{R}$. Or alternatively I want to show that for all $c$ as above there are no incomplete solutions.



Background: the background to this problem is a geometric one: I have a family of metrics ${g_c}$ given on $mathbb{R}^3$ (where $c$ is as described above) and I'm asking myself if all those metrics are geodasically complete. Solving the geodesic equation for those metrics gives the above system of ODEs.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    8












    $begingroup$


    For a smooth, 1-periodic, positive function $c:mathbb{R}rightarrow (0,infty)$ consider the following second order ODE system for the curve $gamma(t)= (x(t),y(t),z(t)):mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ (note that I will denote the derivative of $c$ by a prime and the derivatives of the curve components $x,y,z$ by dots).



    begin{align}
    (i) hspace{15mm} ddot{x}(t)+ frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t))}~ dot{x}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
    (ii) hspace{14mm} ddot{y}(t) +frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t)))}~dot{y}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
    (iii) hspace{16mm} ddot{z}(t)-c'(z(t)) ~ dot{x}(t)dot{y}(t)=0
    end{align}



    My question: I'm interested in finding a function $c$ as described above such that the system has "incomplete" solutions, i.e. solutions $gamma:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ which are not defined for all times $tinmathbb{R}$. Or alternatively I want to show that for all $c$ as above there are no incomplete solutions.



    Background: the background to this problem is a geometric one: I have a family of metrics ${g_c}$ given on $mathbb{R}^3$ (where $c$ is as described above) and I'm asking myself if all those metrics are geodasically complete. Solving the geodesic equation for those metrics gives the above system of ODEs.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      8












      8








      8


      3



      $begingroup$


      For a smooth, 1-periodic, positive function $c:mathbb{R}rightarrow (0,infty)$ consider the following second order ODE system for the curve $gamma(t)= (x(t),y(t),z(t)):mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ (note that I will denote the derivative of $c$ by a prime and the derivatives of the curve components $x,y,z$ by dots).



      begin{align}
      (i) hspace{15mm} ddot{x}(t)+ frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t))}~ dot{x}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
      (ii) hspace{14mm} ddot{y}(t) +frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t)))}~dot{y}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
      (iii) hspace{16mm} ddot{z}(t)-c'(z(t)) ~ dot{x}(t)dot{y}(t)=0
      end{align}



      My question: I'm interested in finding a function $c$ as described above such that the system has "incomplete" solutions, i.e. solutions $gamma:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ which are not defined for all times $tinmathbb{R}$. Or alternatively I want to show that for all $c$ as above there are no incomplete solutions.



      Background: the background to this problem is a geometric one: I have a family of metrics ${g_c}$ given on $mathbb{R}^3$ (where $c$ is as described above) and I'm asking myself if all those metrics are geodasically complete. Solving the geodesic equation for those metrics gives the above system of ODEs.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For a smooth, 1-periodic, positive function $c:mathbb{R}rightarrow (0,infty)$ consider the following second order ODE system for the curve $gamma(t)= (x(t),y(t),z(t)):mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ (note that I will denote the derivative of $c$ by a prime and the derivatives of the curve components $x,y,z$ by dots).



      begin{align}
      (i) hspace{15mm} ddot{x}(t)+ frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t))}~ dot{x}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
      (ii) hspace{14mm} ddot{y}(t) +frac{c'(z(t))}{c(z(t)))}~dot{y}(t)dot{z}(t)=0 \
      (iii) hspace{16mm} ddot{z}(t)-c'(z(t)) ~ dot{x}(t)dot{y}(t)=0
      end{align}



      My question: I'm interested in finding a function $c$ as described above such that the system has "incomplete" solutions, i.e. solutions $gamma:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ which are not defined for all times $tinmathbb{R}$. Or alternatively I want to show that for all $c$ as above there are no incomplete solutions.



      Background: the background to this problem is a geometric one: I have a family of metrics ${g_c}$ given on $mathbb{R}^3$ (where $c$ is as described above) and I'm asking myself if all those metrics are geodasically complete. Solving the geodesic equation for those metrics gives the above system of ODEs.







      ordinary-differential-equations riemannian-geometry nonlinear-system






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 30 at 9:51









      YuiTo Cheng

      2,0592837




      2,0592837










      asked Jan 26 at 15:45









      JS.JS.

      1709




      1709






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4





          +50







          $begingroup$

          The equation system has the following first integrals:
          $$c(z)^2left(dot x^2+dot y^2right)=I_1=const$$
          $$c(z)left(ydot x-xdot yright)=I_2=const$$
          If $c_{MIN}<c(z)<c_{MAX}$, then $dot x$ and $dot y$ are bounded:
          $$|dot x|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          $$|dot y|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          Assuming that $c'(z)$ is a bounded smooth function, $ddot z(t)$ is also bounded. This means that there are no singular solutions (such that $x$, $y$ or $z$ reach infinity for finite $t$). Also, existence theorem guarantees existence of solution to the initial value problem in the neighborhood of every $t=t_0$, so there are no incomplete solutions.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @user450093: to find $I_1$: multiply equation (i) by $dot x$, (ii) by $dot y$, and add them. To find $I_2$: multiply equation (i) by $y$, (ii) by $x$, and subtract the latter from the former. However, such procedure does not work with equation (iii).
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Jan 30 at 14:36












          • $begingroup$
            This is already really helpful! But to me it is not clear yet how you conclude that all solutions are complete from the fact that $dot{x}$,$dot{y}$ and $ddot{z}$ are bounded (especially I don't see how the boundedness of $ddot{z}$ is used).
            $endgroup$
            – JS.
            Jan 31 at 13:44










          • $begingroup$
            The idea is that if a solution cannot be extended beyond $t=t_0$, then $x(t_0)$ or $y(t_0)$ or $z(t_0)$ is infinite. This is impossible because $x(t_0)=infty$ means that $dot x(t_0) = infty$, so $|dot x|$ must be unbounded. Similarly, $z(t_0)=infty$ means that $ddot z(t_0)=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:04












          • $begingroup$
            However, I agree that my proof is not very strict, it does not rule out other types of singularities, for example $dot x(t)=sin{(1/(t-t_0))}$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:05













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088396%2ffinding-incomplete-solutions-of-second-order-ode-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4





          +50







          $begingroup$

          The equation system has the following first integrals:
          $$c(z)^2left(dot x^2+dot y^2right)=I_1=const$$
          $$c(z)left(ydot x-xdot yright)=I_2=const$$
          If $c_{MIN}<c(z)<c_{MAX}$, then $dot x$ and $dot y$ are bounded:
          $$|dot x|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          $$|dot y|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          Assuming that $c'(z)$ is a bounded smooth function, $ddot z(t)$ is also bounded. This means that there are no singular solutions (such that $x$, $y$ or $z$ reach infinity for finite $t$). Also, existence theorem guarantees existence of solution to the initial value problem in the neighborhood of every $t=t_0$, so there are no incomplete solutions.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @user450093: to find $I_1$: multiply equation (i) by $dot x$, (ii) by $dot y$, and add them. To find $I_2$: multiply equation (i) by $y$, (ii) by $x$, and subtract the latter from the former. However, such procedure does not work with equation (iii).
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Jan 30 at 14:36












          • $begingroup$
            This is already really helpful! But to me it is not clear yet how you conclude that all solutions are complete from the fact that $dot{x}$,$dot{y}$ and $ddot{z}$ are bounded (especially I don't see how the boundedness of $ddot{z}$ is used).
            $endgroup$
            – JS.
            Jan 31 at 13:44










          • $begingroup$
            The idea is that if a solution cannot be extended beyond $t=t_0$, then $x(t_0)$ or $y(t_0)$ or $z(t_0)$ is infinite. This is impossible because $x(t_0)=infty$ means that $dot x(t_0) = infty$, so $|dot x|$ must be unbounded. Similarly, $z(t_0)=infty$ means that $ddot z(t_0)=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:04












          • $begingroup$
            However, I agree that my proof is not very strict, it does not rule out other types of singularities, for example $dot x(t)=sin{(1/(t-t_0))}$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:05


















          4





          +50







          $begingroup$

          The equation system has the following first integrals:
          $$c(z)^2left(dot x^2+dot y^2right)=I_1=const$$
          $$c(z)left(ydot x-xdot yright)=I_2=const$$
          If $c_{MIN}<c(z)<c_{MAX}$, then $dot x$ and $dot y$ are bounded:
          $$|dot x|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          $$|dot y|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          Assuming that $c'(z)$ is a bounded smooth function, $ddot z(t)$ is also bounded. This means that there are no singular solutions (such that $x$, $y$ or $z$ reach infinity for finite $t$). Also, existence theorem guarantees existence of solution to the initial value problem in the neighborhood of every $t=t_0$, so there are no incomplete solutions.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @user450093: to find $I_1$: multiply equation (i) by $dot x$, (ii) by $dot y$, and add them. To find $I_2$: multiply equation (i) by $y$, (ii) by $x$, and subtract the latter from the former. However, such procedure does not work with equation (iii).
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Jan 30 at 14:36












          • $begingroup$
            This is already really helpful! But to me it is not clear yet how you conclude that all solutions are complete from the fact that $dot{x}$,$dot{y}$ and $ddot{z}$ are bounded (especially I don't see how the boundedness of $ddot{z}$ is used).
            $endgroup$
            – JS.
            Jan 31 at 13:44










          • $begingroup$
            The idea is that if a solution cannot be extended beyond $t=t_0$, then $x(t_0)$ or $y(t_0)$ or $z(t_0)$ is infinite. This is impossible because $x(t_0)=infty$ means that $dot x(t_0) = infty$, so $|dot x|$ must be unbounded. Similarly, $z(t_0)=infty$ means that $ddot z(t_0)=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:04












          • $begingroup$
            However, I agree that my proof is not very strict, it does not rule out other types of singularities, for example $dot x(t)=sin{(1/(t-t_0))}$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:05
















          4





          +50







          4





          +50



          4




          +50



          $begingroup$

          The equation system has the following first integrals:
          $$c(z)^2left(dot x^2+dot y^2right)=I_1=const$$
          $$c(z)left(ydot x-xdot yright)=I_2=const$$
          If $c_{MIN}<c(z)<c_{MAX}$, then $dot x$ and $dot y$ are bounded:
          $$|dot x|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          $$|dot y|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          Assuming that $c'(z)$ is a bounded smooth function, $ddot z(t)$ is also bounded. This means that there are no singular solutions (such that $x$, $y$ or $z$ reach infinity for finite $t$). Also, existence theorem guarantees existence of solution to the initial value problem in the neighborhood of every $t=t_0$, so there are no incomplete solutions.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The equation system has the following first integrals:
          $$c(z)^2left(dot x^2+dot y^2right)=I_1=const$$
          $$c(z)left(ydot x-xdot yright)=I_2=const$$
          If $c_{MIN}<c(z)<c_{MAX}$, then $dot x$ and $dot y$ are bounded:
          $$|dot x|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          $$|dot y|<frac{sqrt{I_1}}{c_{MIN}}$$
          Assuming that $c'(z)$ is a bounded smooth function, $ddot z(t)$ is also bounded. This means that there are no singular solutions (such that $x$, $y$ or $z$ reach infinity for finite $t$). Also, existence theorem guarantees existence of solution to the initial value problem in the neighborhood of every $t=t_0$, so there are no incomplete solutions.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 30 at 9:36









          atarasenkoatarasenko

          3565




          3565












          • $begingroup$
            @user450093: to find $I_1$: multiply equation (i) by $dot x$, (ii) by $dot y$, and add them. To find $I_2$: multiply equation (i) by $y$, (ii) by $x$, and subtract the latter from the former. However, such procedure does not work with equation (iii).
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Jan 30 at 14:36












          • $begingroup$
            This is already really helpful! But to me it is not clear yet how you conclude that all solutions are complete from the fact that $dot{x}$,$dot{y}$ and $ddot{z}$ are bounded (especially I don't see how the boundedness of $ddot{z}$ is used).
            $endgroup$
            – JS.
            Jan 31 at 13:44










          • $begingroup$
            The idea is that if a solution cannot be extended beyond $t=t_0$, then $x(t_0)$ or $y(t_0)$ or $z(t_0)$ is infinite. This is impossible because $x(t_0)=infty$ means that $dot x(t_0) = infty$, so $|dot x|$ must be unbounded. Similarly, $z(t_0)=infty$ means that $ddot z(t_0)=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:04












          • $begingroup$
            However, I agree that my proof is not very strict, it does not rule out other types of singularities, for example $dot x(t)=sin{(1/(t-t_0))}$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:05




















          • $begingroup$
            @user450093: to find $I_1$: multiply equation (i) by $dot x$, (ii) by $dot y$, and add them. To find $I_2$: multiply equation (i) by $y$, (ii) by $x$, and subtract the latter from the former. However, such procedure does not work with equation (iii).
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Jan 30 at 14:36












          • $begingroup$
            This is already really helpful! But to me it is not clear yet how you conclude that all solutions are complete from the fact that $dot{x}$,$dot{y}$ and $ddot{z}$ are bounded (especially I don't see how the boundedness of $ddot{z}$ is used).
            $endgroup$
            – JS.
            Jan 31 at 13:44










          • $begingroup$
            The idea is that if a solution cannot be extended beyond $t=t_0$, then $x(t_0)$ or $y(t_0)$ or $z(t_0)$ is infinite. This is impossible because $x(t_0)=infty$ means that $dot x(t_0) = infty$, so $|dot x|$ must be unbounded. Similarly, $z(t_0)=infty$ means that $ddot z(t_0)=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:04












          • $begingroup$
            However, I agree that my proof is not very strict, it does not rule out other types of singularities, for example $dot x(t)=sin{(1/(t-t_0))}$.
            $endgroup$
            – atarasenko
            Feb 1 at 7:05


















          $begingroup$
          @user450093: to find $I_1$: multiply equation (i) by $dot x$, (ii) by $dot y$, and add them. To find $I_2$: multiply equation (i) by $y$, (ii) by $x$, and subtract the latter from the former. However, such procedure does not work with equation (iii).
          $endgroup$
          – atarasenko
          Jan 30 at 14:36






          $begingroup$
          @user450093: to find $I_1$: multiply equation (i) by $dot x$, (ii) by $dot y$, and add them. To find $I_2$: multiply equation (i) by $y$, (ii) by $x$, and subtract the latter from the former. However, such procedure does not work with equation (iii).
          $endgroup$
          – atarasenko
          Jan 30 at 14:36














          $begingroup$
          This is already really helpful! But to me it is not clear yet how you conclude that all solutions are complete from the fact that $dot{x}$,$dot{y}$ and $ddot{z}$ are bounded (especially I don't see how the boundedness of $ddot{z}$ is used).
          $endgroup$
          – JS.
          Jan 31 at 13:44




          $begingroup$
          This is already really helpful! But to me it is not clear yet how you conclude that all solutions are complete from the fact that $dot{x}$,$dot{y}$ and $ddot{z}$ are bounded (especially I don't see how the boundedness of $ddot{z}$ is used).
          $endgroup$
          – JS.
          Jan 31 at 13:44












          $begingroup$
          The idea is that if a solution cannot be extended beyond $t=t_0$, then $x(t_0)$ or $y(t_0)$ or $z(t_0)$ is infinite. This is impossible because $x(t_0)=infty$ means that $dot x(t_0) = infty$, so $|dot x|$ must be unbounded. Similarly, $z(t_0)=infty$ means that $ddot z(t_0)=infty$.
          $endgroup$
          – atarasenko
          Feb 1 at 7:04






          $begingroup$
          The idea is that if a solution cannot be extended beyond $t=t_0$, then $x(t_0)$ or $y(t_0)$ or $z(t_0)$ is infinite. This is impossible because $x(t_0)=infty$ means that $dot x(t_0) = infty$, so $|dot x|$ must be unbounded. Similarly, $z(t_0)=infty$ means that $ddot z(t_0)=infty$.
          $endgroup$
          – atarasenko
          Feb 1 at 7:04














          $begingroup$
          However, I agree that my proof is not very strict, it does not rule out other types of singularities, for example $dot x(t)=sin{(1/(t-t_0))}$.
          $endgroup$
          – atarasenko
          Feb 1 at 7:05






          $begingroup$
          However, I agree that my proof is not very strict, it does not rule out other types of singularities, for example $dot x(t)=sin{(1/(t-t_0))}$.
          $endgroup$
          – atarasenko
          Feb 1 at 7:05




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088396%2ffinding-incomplete-solutions-of-second-order-ode-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory