Fourier transform of $f(x) = frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$ in $Bbb R^3$












1












$begingroup$


I got a function $f(x) = frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$, where $k gt 0$ is a constant. And I wanted do make the fourier transform in $Bbb R^3$ (it is solved in my textbook). But in the solution it was said that the transform is in the sense of the distributions. But why? Why this function isn't Lebesgue integrable, in $L^1(Bbb R^3)$?



I understand that $frac {1}{x^2}$ isn't in $L^1$, because the function isn't continuous in $x=0$. Even though $frac {1}{x^2}$ goes to zero for $x to infty$. But I don't see any discontinuity in $frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$. So why it is needed to use the radial distribution. Because of the dimension? I am confused.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is $x$ a radial coordinate of a spherically symmetric function, or is $x$ just the normal cartesian $x$ coordinate?
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:10










  • $begingroup$
    For a 3-D Fourier Transform of a function with radial symmetry, you may want to look at this answer to a similar question: math.stackexchange.com/a/3029986/441161
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Fun Fact: the similar question was posted by my classmate.
    $endgroup$
    – Leif
    Jan 27 at 3:07


















1












$begingroup$


I got a function $f(x) = frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$, where $k gt 0$ is a constant. And I wanted do make the fourier transform in $Bbb R^3$ (it is solved in my textbook). But in the solution it was said that the transform is in the sense of the distributions. But why? Why this function isn't Lebesgue integrable, in $L^1(Bbb R^3)$?



I understand that $frac {1}{x^2}$ isn't in $L^1$, because the function isn't continuous in $x=0$. Even though $frac {1}{x^2}$ goes to zero for $x to infty$. But I don't see any discontinuity in $frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$. So why it is needed to use the radial distribution. Because of the dimension? I am confused.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is $x$ a radial coordinate of a spherically symmetric function, or is $x$ just the normal cartesian $x$ coordinate?
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:10










  • $begingroup$
    For a 3-D Fourier Transform of a function with radial symmetry, you may want to look at this answer to a similar question: math.stackexchange.com/a/3029986/441161
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Fun Fact: the similar question was posted by my classmate.
    $endgroup$
    – Leif
    Jan 27 at 3:07
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


I got a function $f(x) = frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$, where $k gt 0$ is a constant. And I wanted do make the fourier transform in $Bbb R^3$ (it is solved in my textbook). But in the solution it was said that the transform is in the sense of the distributions. But why? Why this function isn't Lebesgue integrable, in $L^1(Bbb R^3)$?



I understand that $frac {1}{x^2}$ isn't in $L^1$, because the function isn't continuous in $x=0$. Even though $frac {1}{x^2}$ goes to zero for $x to infty$. But I don't see any discontinuity in $frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$. So why it is needed to use the radial distribution. Because of the dimension? I am confused.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I got a function $f(x) = frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$, where $k gt 0$ is a constant. And I wanted do make the fourier transform in $Bbb R^3$ (it is solved in my textbook). But in the solution it was said that the transform is in the sense of the distributions. But why? Why this function isn't Lebesgue integrable, in $L^1(Bbb R^3)$?



I understand that $frac {1}{x^2}$ isn't in $L^1$, because the function isn't continuous in $x=0$. Even though $frac {1}{x^2}$ goes to zero for $x to infty$. But I don't see any discontinuity in $frac {1}{4pi x^2 + k^2}$. So why it is needed to use the radial distribution. Because of the dimension? I am confused.







calculus lebesgue-integral fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 26 at 14:35









LeifLeif

611314




611314












  • $begingroup$
    Is $x$ a radial coordinate of a spherically symmetric function, or is $x$ just the normal cartesian $x$ coordinate?
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:10










  • $begingroup$
    For a 3-D Fourier Transform of a function with radial symmetry, you may want to look at this answer to a similar question: math.stackexchange.com/a/3029986/441161
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Fun Fact: the similar question was posted by my classmate.
    $endgroup$
    – Leif
    Jan 27 at 3:07




















  • $begingroup$
    Is $x$ a radial coordinate of a spherically symmetric function, or is $x$ just the normal cartesian $x$ coordinate?
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:10










  • $begingroup$
    For a 3-D Fourier Transform of a function with radial symmetry, you may want to look at this answer to a similar question: math.stackexchange.com/a/3029986/441161
    $endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Jan 27 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Fun Fact: the similar question was posted by my classmate.
    $endgroup$
    – Leif
    Jan 27 at 3:07


















$begingroup$
Is $x$ a radial coordinate of a spherically symmetric function, or is $x$ just the normal cartesian $x$ coordinate?
$endgroup$
– Andy Walls
Jan 27 at 0:10




$begingroup$
Is $x$ a radial coordinate of a spherically symmetric function, or is $x$ just the normal cartesian $x$ coordinate?
$endgroup$
– Andy Walls
Jan 27 at 0:10












$begingroup$
For a 3-D Fourier Transform of a function with radial symmetry, you may want to look at this answer to a similar question: math.stackexchange.com/a/3029986/441161
$endgroup$
– Andy Walls
Jan 27 at 0:13




$begingroup$
For a 3-D Fourier Transform of a function with radial symmetry, you may want to look at this answer to a similar question: math.stackexchange.com/a/3029986/441161
$endgroup$
– Andy Walls
Jan 27 at 0:13












$begingroup$
Thank you. Fun Fact: the similar question was posted by my classmate.
$endgroup$
– Leif
Jan 27 at 3:07






$begingroup$
Thank you. Fun Fact: the similar question was posted by my classmate.
$endgroup$
– Leif
Jan 27 at 3:07












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088321%2ffourier-transform-of-fx-frac-14-pi-x2-k2-in-bbb-r3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088321%2ffourier-transform-of-fx-frac-14-pi-x2-k2-in-bbb-r3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith