General Mathematical Consensus for Standardized Tests: Log(x) assumed to be base $e$?












0












$begingroup$


Recently, I took a higher level mathematics exam. When I took it, I held the notion that $log(x)$ was assumed to be base ten and natural logarithms were assumed to be $e$.
Come to find out in the directions that $log(x)$ is assumed to have base $e$. I had seen some people use this notation in general mathematics when studying how to raise complex numbers to complex powers but to be honest other than that very rarely, especially with generic integrals.




$textbf{Question}:$ My question is when is the turning point in college/time from logarithms, i.e. $log(x)$, having base ten to all of the sudden base $e$?




$bullet$ I mean are we going to sometime soon start using this notation with AP Calculus where natural logarithms are always used?



$bullet$ Are people seeing this notation in Calculus I/Calculus II at other schools? If so, I would be curious as to what schools commonly use this notation.





I see this switch in notation to be a $textbf{major issue}$ in conflation of symbols which is why I am posting this question.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is probably culture dependent - I personally use $ln x$, $operatorname{lg} x$, $operatorname{ld} x$ for base $e$, base $10$, base $2$ -- and $log$ only when constants don't really matter (i.e., big Oh stuff)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 27 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    That's a good point!
    $endgroup$
    – W. G.
    Jan 27 at 15:01
















0












$begingroup$


Recently, I took a higher level mathematics exam. When I took it, I held the notion that $log(x)$ was assumed to be base ten and natural logarithms were assumed to be $e$.
Come to find out in the directions that $log(x)$ is assumed to have base $e$. I had seen some people use this notation in general mathematics when studying how to raise complex numbers to complex powers but to be honest other than that very rarely, especially with generic integrals.




$textbf{Question}:$ My question is when is the turning point in college/time from logarithms, i.e. $log(x)$, having base ten to all of the sudden base $e$?




$bullet$ I mean are we going to sometime soon start using this notation with AP Calculus where natural logarithms are always used?



$bullet$ Are people seeing this notation in Calculus I/Calculus II at other schools? If so, I would be curious as to what schools commonly use this notation.





I see this switch in notation to be a $textbf{major issue}$ in conflation of symbols which is why I am posting this question.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is probably culture dependent - I personally use $ln x$, $operatorname{lg} x$, $operatorname{ld} x$ for base $e$, base $10$, base $2$ -- and $log$ only when constants don't really matter (i.e., big Oh stuff)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 27 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    That's a good point!
    $endgroup$
    – W. G.
    Jan 27 at 15:01














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Recently, I took a higher level mathematics exam. When I took it, I held the notion that $log(x)$ was assumed to be base ten and natural logarithms were assumed to be $e$.
Come to find out in the directions that $log(x)$ is assumed to have base $e$. I had seen some people use this notation in general mathematics when studying how to raise complex numbers to complex powers but to be honest other than that very rarely, especially with generic integrals.




$textbf{Question}:$ My question is when is the turning point in college/time from logarithms, i.e. $log(x)$, having base ten to all of the sudden base $e$?




$bullet$ I mean are we going to sometime soon start using this notation with AP Calculus where natural logarithms are always used?



$bullet$ Are people seeing this notation in Calculus I/Calculus II at other schools? If so, I would be curious as to what schools commonly use this notation.





I see this switch in notation to be a $textbf{major issue}$ in conflation of symbols which is why I am posting this question.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Recently, I took a higher level mathematics exam. When I took it, I held the notion that $log(x)$ was assumed to be base ten and natural logarithms were assumed to be $e$.
Come to find out in the directions that $log(x)$ is assumed to have base $e$. I had seen some people use this notation in general mathematics when studying how to raise complex numbers to complex powers but to be honest other than that very rarely, especially with generic integrals.




$textbf{Question}:$ My question is when is the turning point in college/time from logarithms, i.e. $log(x)$, having base ten to all of the sudden base $e$?




$bullet$ I mean are we going to sometime soon start using this notation with AP Calculus where natural logarithms are always used?



$bullet$ Are people seeing this notation in Calculus I/Calculus II at other schools? If so, I would be curious as to what schools commonly use this notation.





I see this switch in notation to be a $textbf{major issue}$ in conflation of symbols which is why I am posting this question.







education






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 27 at 14:52









W. G.W. G.

6991718




6991718








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is probably culture dependent - I personally use $ln x$, $operatorname{lg} x$, $operatorname{ld} x$ for base $e$, base $10$, base $2$ -- and $log$ only when constants don't really matter (i.e., big Oh stuff)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 27 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    That's a good point!
    $endgroup$
    – W. G.
    Jan 27 at 15:01














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is probably culture dependent - I personally use $ln x$, $operatorname{lg} x$, $operatorname{ld} x$ for base $e$, base $10$, base $2$ -- and $log$ only when constants don't really matter (i.e., big Oh stuff)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jan 27 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    That's a good point!
    $endgroup$
    – W. G.
    Jan 27 at 15:01








1




1




$begingroup$
This is probably culture dependent - I personally use $ln x$, $operatorname{lg} x$, $operatorname{ld} x$ for base $e$, base $10$, base $2$ -- and $log$ only when constants don't really matter (i.e., big Oh stuff)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 27 at 14:58




$begingroup$
This is probably culture dependent - I personally use $ln x$, $operatorname{lg} x$, $operatorname{ld} x$ for base $e$, base $10$, base $2$ -- and $log$ only when constants don't really matter (i.e., big Oh stuff)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 27 at 14:58












$begingroup$
That's a good point!
$endgroup$
– W. G.
Jan 27 at 15:01




$begingroup$
That's a good point!
$endgroup$
– W. G.
Jan 27 at 15:01










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

There are three especially popular bases for logarithms, $2,,e,,10$. (Occasionally something like the golden ratio is useful instead, but you won't need to consider these unless they're very explicit about it.) As a rule, logarithms are base-$2$ in a information-theoretic context concerned with binary computing, base-$e$ if calculus comes up in the question, or base-$10$ if you need to talk about large or small numbers concisely. Given all of that, the only time you won't know which is needed to handle a question is when you're asked to compute a logarithm, presumably to some specific number of decimal places or significant figures; and even then you may as well just say "here's $ln x$ and here's $log_{10} x$".






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089654%2fgeneral-mathematical-consensus-for-standardized-tests-logx-assumed-to-be-base%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    There are three especially popular bases for logarithms, $2,,e,,10$. (Occasionally something like the golden ratio is useful instead, but you won't need to consider these unless they're very explicit about it.) As a rule, logarithms are base-$2$ in a information-theoretic context concerned with binary computing, base-$e$ if calculus comes up in the question, or base-$10$ if you need to talk about large or small numbers concisely. Given all of that, the only time you won't know which is needed to handle a question is when you're asked to compute a logarithm, presumably to some specific number of decimal places or significant figures; and even then you may as well just say "here's $ln x$ and here's $log_{10} x$".






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      There are three especially popular bases for logarithms, $2,,e,,10$. (Occasionally something like the golden ratio is useful instead, but you won't need to consider these unless they're very explicit about it.) As a rule, logarithms are base-$2$ in a information-theoretic context concerned with binary computing, base-$e$ if calculus comes up in the question, or base-$10$ if you need to talk about large or small numbers concisely. Given all of that, the only time you won't know which is needed to handle a question is when you're asked to compute a logarithm, presumably to some specific number of decimal places or significant figures; and even then you may as well just say "here's $ln x$ and here's $log_{10} x$".






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        There are three especially popular bases for logarithms, $2,,e,,10$. (Occasionally something like the golden ratio is useful instead, but you won't need to consider these unless they're very explicit about it.) As a rule, logarithms are base-$2$ in a information-theoretic context concerned with binary computing, base-$e$ if calculus comes up in the question, or base-$10$ if you need to talk about large or small numbers concisely. Given all of that, the only time you won't know which is needed to handle a question is when you're asked to compute a logarithm, presumably to some specific number of decimal places or significant figures; and even then you may as well just say "here's $ln x$ and here's $log_{10} x$".






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There are three especially popular bases for logarithms, $2,,e,,10$. (Occasionally something like the golden ratio is useful instead, but you won't need to consider these unless they're very explicit about it.) As a rule, logarithms are base-$2$ in a information-theoretic context concerned with binary computing, base-$e$ if calculus comes up in the question, or base-$10$ if you need to talk about large or small numbers concisely. Given all of that, the only time you won't know which is needed to handle a question is when you're asked to compute a logarithm, presumably to some specific number of decimal places or significant figures; and even then you may as well just say "here's $ln x$ and here's $log_{10} x$".







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 27 at 15:02









        J.G.J.G.

        31.9k23250




        31.9k23250






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089654%2fgeneral-mathematical-consensus-for-standardized-tests-logx-assumed-to-be-base%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory