Problem with solving the recurrence relation $a_n=a_{n-1}+6a_{n-2}+30$ for $ngeq2$, $a_0=0$, $a_1=-10$
$begingroup$
My task:
$a_n=a_{n-1}+6a_{n-2}+30$ for $ngeq2$, $a_0=0$, $a_1=-10$
My solution
$x^{2}-x-6$
$Delta=25$
$x1=-2 $
$x2=3$
So I am gonna use following formula:
$a_n=ar^{n}+br^{n}$
$a_n=a*(-2)^{n}+b*3^{n}$
$a_0=0=a+b$
$a_1=-10=-2a+3b$
$b=-2$
$a=2$
$a_n=2*(-2)^{n}-2*3^{n}+30$
I calculate $a_2$
$a_2=-10+0+30=20$
Which is correct with above formula
$a_2=2*(-2)^{2}-2*3^{2}+30=20$
but for $a_3$ and above results are not matching, am I doing something wrong here?
discrete-mathematics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My task:
$a_n=a_{n-1}+6a_{n-2}+30$ for $ngeq2$, $a_0=0$, $a_1=-10$
My solution
$x^{2}-x-6$
$Delta=25$
$x1=-2 $
$x2=3$
So I am gonna use following formula:
$a_n=ar^{n}+br^{n}$
$a_n=a*(-2)^{n}+b*3^{n}$
$a_0=0=a+b$
$a_1=-10=-2a+3b$
$b=-2$
$a=2$
$a_n=2*(-2)^{n}-2*3^{n}+30$
I calculate $a_2$
$a_2=-10+0+30=20$
Which is correct with above formula
$a_2=2*(-2)^{2}-2*3^{2}+30=20$
but for $a_3$ and above results are not matching, am I doing something wrong here?
discrete-mathematics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My task:
$a_n=a_{n-1}+6a_{n-2}+30$ for $ngeq2$, $a_0=0$, $a_1=-10$
My solution
$x^{2}-x-6$
$Delta=25$
$x1=-2 $
$x2=3$
So I am gonna use following formula:
$a_n=ar^{n}+br^{n}$
$a_n=a*(-2)^{n}+b*3^{n}$
$a_0=0=a+b$
$a_1=-10=-2a+3b$
$b=-2$
$a=2$
$a_n=2*(-2)^{n}-2*3^{n}+30$
I calculate $a_2$
$a_2=-10+0+30=20$
Which is correct with above formula
$a_2=2*(-2)^{2}-2*3^{2}+30=20$
but for $a_3$ and above results are not matching, am I doing something wrong here?
discrete-mathematics
$endgroup$
My task:
$a_n=a_{n-1}+6a_{n-2}+30$ for $ngeq2$, $a_0=0$, $a_1=-10$
My solution
$x^{2}-x-6$
$Delta=25$
$x1=-2 $
$x2=3$
So I am gonna use following formula:
$a_n=ar^{n}+br^{n}$
$a_n=a*(-2)^{n}+b*3^{n}$
$a_0=0=a+b$
$a_1=-10=-2a+3b$
$b=-2$
$a=2$
$a_n=2*(-2)^{n}-2*3^{n}+30$
I calculate $a_2$
$a_2=-10+0+30=20$
Which is correct with above formula
$a_2=2*(-2)^{2}-2*3^{2}+30=20$
but for $a_3$ and above results are not matching, am I doing something wrong here?
discrete-mathematics
discrete-mathematics
edited Jan 27 at 16:23
Gorosso
asked Jan 27 at 16:17
GorossoGorosso
315
315
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The $+30$ is the problem. Find $c$ such that $b_n:=a_n+cimplies b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}$, then use your usual techniques.
Edit to add detail:
$$b_n=b_{n-1}-c+6(b_{n-2}-c)+30+c=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}+30-6c$$ Set $c=5$ so $$b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}impliesexists a,,b:,b_n=a(-2)^n+b3^n.$$From $b_0=5,,b_1=-5$, you can find $a,,b$. Then $a_n=b_n-5$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't really get it, could you show me how its supposed to look in my case? That's the best way for me to understand it.
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@Gorosso See my edit.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Where does c=5 come from? Also what I am supposed to do with $a_n=b_n-5$?
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 18:00
$begingroup$
@Gorosso The technique you used originally only works when there isn't a constant in the recursion relation, so I chose $c$ to delete it. Once you have a formula for $b_n$, you have one for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 18:14
$begingroup$
Now results are matching, so I guess I did everything according to your tips. But I am having some issue in similar reccurence using your method, could you check it out? math.stackexchange.com/questions/3090006/…
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 19:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since for all $n$ we have $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=30$$ we have also
$$a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}=30$$
so $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}$$
and thus we get l.r. :
$$a_n-2a_{n-1}-5a_{n-2}+6a_{n-3}=0$$
and so on...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089757%2fproblem-with-solving-the-recurrence-relation-a-n-a-n-16a-n-230-for-n-ge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The $+30$ is the problem. Find $c$ such that $b_n:=a_n+cimplies b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}$, then use your usual techniques.
Edit to add detail:
$$b_n=b_{n-1}-c+6(b_{n-2}-c)+30+c=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}+30-6c$$ Set $c=5$ so $$b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}impliesexists a,,b:,b_n=a(-2)^n+b3^n.$$From $b_0=5,,b_1=-5$, you can find $a,,b$. Then $a_n=b_n-5$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't really get it, could you show me how its supposed to look in my case? That's the best way for me to understand it.
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@Gorosso See my edit.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Where does c=5 come from? Also what I am supposed to do with $a_n=b_n-5$?
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 18:00
$begingroup$
@Gorosso The technique you used originally only works when there isn't a constant in the recursion relation, so I chose $c$ to delete it. Once you have a formula for $b_n$, you have one for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 18:14
$begingroup$
Now results are matching, so I guess I did everything according to your tips. But I am having some issue in similar reccurence using your method, could you check it out? math.stackexchange.com/questions/3090006/…
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 19:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The $+30$ is the problem. Find $c$ such that $b_n:=a_n+cimplies b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}$, then use your usual techniques.
Edit to add detail:
$$b_n=b_{n-1}-c+6(b_{n-2}-c)+30+c=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}+30-6c$$ Set $c=5$ so $$b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}impliesexists a,,b:,b_n=a(-2)^n+b3^n.$$From $b_0=5,,b_1=-5$, you can find $a,,b$. Then $a_n=b_n-5$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't really get it, could you show me how its supposed to look in my case? That's the best way for me to understand it.
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@Gorosso See my edit.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Where does c=5 come from? Also what I am supposed to do with $a_n=b_n-5$?
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 18:00
$begingroup$
@Gorosso The technique you used originally only works when there isn't a constant in the recursion relation, so I chose $c$ to delete it. Once you have a formula for $b_n$, you have one for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 18:14
$begingroup$
Now results are matching, so I guess I did everything according to your tips. But I am having some issue in similar reccurence using your method, could you check it out? math.stackexchange.com/questions/3090006/…
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 19:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The $+30$ is the problem. Find $c$ such that $b_n:=a_n+cimplies b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}$, then use your usual techniques.
Edit to add detail:
$$b_n=b_{n-1}-c+6(b_{n-2}-c)+30+c=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}+30-6c$$ Set $c=5$ so $$b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}impliesexists a,,b:,b_n=a(-2)^n+b3^n.$$From $b_0=5,,b_1=-5$, you can find $a,,b$. Then $a_n=b_n-5$.
$endgroup$
The $+30$ is the problem. Find $c$ such that $b_n:=a_n+cimplies b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}$, then use your usual techniques.
Edit to add detail:
$$b_n=b_{n-1}-c+6(b_{n-2}-c)+30+c=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}+30-6c$$ Set $c=5$ so $$b_n=b_{n-1}+6b_{n-2}impliesexists a,,b:,b_n=a(-2)^n+b3^n.$$From $b_0=5,,b_1=-5$, you can find $a,,b$. Then $a_n=b_n-5$.
edited Jan 27 at 17:15
answered Jan 27 at 16:21
J.G.J.G.
31.9k23250
31.9k23250
$begingroup$
I don't really get it, could you show me how its supposed to look in my case? That's the best way for me to understand it.
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@Gorosso See my edit.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Where does c=5 come from? Also what I am supposed to do with $a_n=b_n-5$?
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 18:00
$begingroup$
@Gorosso The technique you used originally only works when there isn't a constant in the recursion relation, so I chose $c$ to delete it. Once you have a formula for $b_n$, you have one for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 18:14
$begingroup$
Now results are matching, so I guess I did everything according to your tips. But I am having some issue in similar reccurence using your method, could you check it out? math.stackexchange.com/questions/3090006/…
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 19:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't really get it, could you show me how its supposed to look in my case? That's the best way for me to understand it.
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@Gorosso See my edit.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Where does c=5 come from? Also what I am supposed to do with $a_n=b_n-5$?
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 18:00
$begingroup$
@Gorosso The technique you used originally only works when there isn't a constant in the recursion relation, so I chose $c$ to delete it. Once you have a formula for $b_n$, you have one for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 18:14
$begingroup$
Now results are matching, so I guess I did everything according to your tips. But I am having some issue in similar reccurence using your method, could you check it out? math.stackexchange.com/questions/3090006/…
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 19:22
$begingroup$
I don't really get it, could you show me how its supposed to look in my case? That's the best way for me to understand it.
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 16:41
$begingroup$
I don't really get it, could you show me how its supposed to look in my case? That's the best way for me to understand it.
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@Gorosso See my edit.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 17:15
$begingroup$
@Gorosso See my edit.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Where does c=5 come from? Also what I am supposed to do with $a_n=b_n-5$?
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 18:00
$begingroup$
Where does c=5 come from? Also what I am supposed to do with $a_n=b_n-5$?
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 18:00
$begingroup$
@Gorosso The technique you used originally only works when there isn't a constant in the recursion relation, so I chose $c$ to delete it. Once you have a formula for $b_n$, you have one for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 18:14
$begingroup$
@Gorosso The technique you used originally only works when there isn't a constant in the recursion relation, so I chose $c$ to delete it. Once you have a formula for $b_n$, you have one for $a_n$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 27 at 18:14
$begingroup$
Now results are matching, so I guess I did everything according to your tips. But I am having some issue in similar reccurence using your method, could you check it out? math.stackexchange.com/questions/3090006/…
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 19:22
$begingroup$
Now results are matching, so I guess I did everything according to your tips. But I am having some issue in similar reccurence using your method, could you check it out? math.stackexchange.com/questions/3090006/…
$endgroup$
– Gorosso
Jan 27 at 19:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since for all $n$ we have $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=30$$ we have also
$$a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}=30$$
so $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}$$
and thus we get l.r. :
$$a_n-2a_{n-1}-5a_{n-2}+6a_{n-3}=0$$
and so on...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since for all $n$ we have $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=30$$ we have also
$$a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}=30$$
so $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}$$
and thus we get l.r. :
$$a_n-2a_{n-1}-5a_{n-2}+6a_{n-3}=0$$
and so on...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since for all $n$ we have $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=30$$ we have also
$$a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}=30$$
so $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}$$
and thus we get l.r. :
$$a_n-2a_{n-1}-5a_{n-2}+6a_{n-3}=0$$
and so on...
$endgroup$
Since for all $n$ we have $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=30$$ we have also
$$a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}=30$$
so $$a_n-a_{n-1}-6a_{n-2}=a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}-6a_{n-3}$$
and thus we get l.r. :
$$a_n-2a_{n-1}-5a_{n-2}+6a_{n-3}=0$$
and so on...
answered Jan 27 at 17:23
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
48.4k1260121
48.4k1260121
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089757%2fproblem-with-solving-the-recurrence-relation-a-n-a-n-16a-n-230-for-n-ge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown