Mixing
Getting fb comments plugin content using graph api
I need to fetch fb comments plugin content from server side. There was a few related questions before, but I still cannot find a workable solution.
Official fb doc is here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/faqs#faq_1603507626630008 But api version 2.6 is outdated and there is no og_object.comments field anymore.
Facebook Comments on your website via Graph API instead of Comments plugin? - this way also does not work for me. I get an error message Tried accessing nonexisting field (comments) on node type (URL). Looks like this method is outdated as well.
I found a modern way here Getting comments for a url via facebook graph api and here How to fetch comments with Facebook Graph API from comments plugin .
For example I need to fetch comments for this article: http://diply.com/1301/24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped#2
I can fetch og object id via ?fields=og_object&id=http%3A%2F%2Fsocial.diply.com%2F1301%2F24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped%233, but I always get empty result for /2037050239696956/comments.
I inspected widget content and I found that proper object id is 1767557016664245 and I actually can fetch comments via /1767557016664245/comments.
Why there are different ids? And how can I get a proper id by url?
facebook-graph-api facebook-social-plugins asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
add a comment |
I need to fetch fb comments plugin content from server side. There was a few related questions before, but I still cannot find a workable solution.
Official fb doc is here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/faqs#faq_1603507626630008 But api version 2.6 is outdated and there is no og_object.comments field anymore.
Facebook Comments on your website via Graph API instead of Comments plugin? - this way also does not work for me. I get an error message Tried accessing nonexisting field (comments) on node type (URL). Looks like this method is outdated as well.
I found a modern way here Getting comments for a url via facebook graph api and here How to fetch comments with Facebook Graph API from comments plugin .
For example I need to fetch comments for this article: http://diply.com/1301/24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped#2
I can fetch og object id via ?fields=og_object&id=http%3A%2F%2Fsocial.diply.com%2F1301%2F24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped%233, but I always get empty result for /2037050239696956/comments.
I inspected widget content and I found that proper object id is 1767557016664245 and I actually can fetch comments via /1767557016664245/comments.
Why there are different ids? And how can I get a proper id by url?
facebook-graph-api facebook-social-plugins asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
Facebook’s Open Graph does not treat URLs that only differ in the hash part as different URLs. (The comments plugin however seems to associate the comments with whatever URL you point it to.) This should have been set up using proper distinctive URLs in the first place; not sure if this is still salvageable now without loosing the existing comments.
– misorude
Jan 7 at 9:54
add a comment |
I need to fetch fb comments plugin content from server side. There was a few related questions before, but I still cannot find a workable solution.
Official fb doc is here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/faqs#faq_1603507626630008 But api version 2.6 is outdated and there is no og_object.comments field anymore.
Facebook Comments on your website via Graph API instead of Comments plugin? - this way also does not work for me. I get an error message Tried accessing nonexisting field (comments) on node type (URL). Looks like this method is outdated as well.
I found a modern way here Getting comments for a url via facebook graph api and here How to fetch comments with Facebook Graph API from comments plugin .
For example I need to fetch comments for this article: http://diply.com/1301/24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped#2
I can fetch og object id via ?fields=og_object&id=http%3A%2F%2Fsocial.diply.com%2F1301%2F24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped%233, but I always get empty result for /2037050239696956/comments.
I inspected widget content and I found that proper object id is 1767557016664245 and I actually can fetch comments via /1767557016664245/comments.
Why there are different ids? And how can I get a proper id by url?
facebook-graph-api facebook-social-plugins asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
I need to fetch fb comments plugin content from server side. There was a few related questions before, but I still cannot find a workable solution.
Official fb doc is here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/faqs#faq_1603507626630008 But api version 2.6 is outdated and there is no og_object.comments field anymore.
Facebook Comments on your website via Graph API instead of Comments plugin? - this way also does not work for me. I get an error message Tried accessing nonexisting field (comments) on node type (URL). Looks like this method is outdated as well.
I found a modern way here Getting comments for a url via facebook graph api and here How to fetch comments with Facebook Graph API from comments plugin .
For example I need to fetch comments for this article: http://diply.com/1301/24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped#2
I can fetch og object id via ?fields=og_object&id=http%3A%2F%2Fsocial.diply.com%2F1301%2F24-pics-that-haters-will-say-are-photoshopped%233, but I always get empty result for /2037050239696956/comments.
I inspected widget content and I found that proper object id is 1767557016664245 and I actually can fetch comments via /1767557016664245/comments.
Why there are different ids? And how can I get a proper id by url?
facebook-graph-api facebook-social-plugins facebook-graph-api facebook-social-plugins asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
asked Jan 2 at 13:54
GrigoryGrigory
82
82
Facebook’s Open Graph does not treat URLs that only differ in the hash part as different URLs. (The comments plugin however seems to associate the comments with whatever URL you point it to.) This should have been set up using proper distinctive URLs in the first place; not sure if this is still salvageable now without loosing the existing comments.
– misorude
Jan 7 at 9:54
add a comment |
Facebook’s Open Graph does not treat URLs that only differ in the hash part as different URLs. (The comments plugin however seems to associate the comments with whatever URL you point it to.) This should have been set up using proper distinctive URLs in the first place; not sure if this is still salvageable now without loosing the existing comments.
– misorude
Jan 7 at 9:54
Facebook’s Open Graph does not treat URLs that only differ in the hash part as different URLs. (The comments plugin however seems to associate the comments with whatever URL you point it to.) This should have been set up using proper distinctive URLs in the first place; not sure if this is still salvageable now without loosing the existing comments.
– misorude
Jan 7 at 9:54
Facebook’s Open Graph does not treat URLs that only differ in the hash part as different URLs. (The comments plugin however seems to associate the comments with whatever URL you point it to.) This should have been set up using proper distinctive URLs in the first place; not sure if this is still salvageable now without loosing the existing comments.
– misorude
Jan 7 at 9:54
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54007587%2fgetting-fb-comments-plugin-content-using-graph-api%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54007587%2fgetting-fb-comments-plugin-content-using-graph-api%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Facebook’s Open Graph does not treat URLs that only differ in the hash part as different URLs. (The comments plugin however seems to associate the comments with whatever URL you point it to.) This should have been set up using proper distinctive URLs in the first place; not sure if this is still salvageable now without loosing the existing comments.
– misorude
Jan 7 at 9:54