How to prove a sequence is bounded above or below
How do i prove a sequence is bounded above or below?
For a sequence like $frac{x}{x^2+1}$ the limit will be 0 as x --> infinity but that doesnt tell me about the bounds?
calculus sequences-and-series limits
|
show 4 more comments
How do i prove a sequence is bounded above or below?
For a sequence like $frac{x}{x^2+1}$ the limit will be 0 as x --> infinity but that doesnt tell me about the bounds?
calculus sequences-and-series limits
Have you tried anything?
– Gerard L.
Nov 4 '17 at 22:42
Every convergent sequence is bounded .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:50
How do i tell if it is bounded above, below or both?
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:53
When sequence is bounded it means that sequence is bounded above and bounded below .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:55
I should've phrased the question better but the question on my sheet says is it bounded or not and if so is it above, below or both and prove it.
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:58
|
show 4 more comments
How do i prove a sequence is bounded above or below?
For a sequence like $frac{x}{x^2+1}$ the limit will be 0 as x --> infinity but that doesnt tell me about the bounds?
calculus sequences-and-series limits
How do i prove a sequence is bounded above or below?
For a sequence like $frac{x}{x^2+1}$ the limit will be 0 as x --> infinity but that doesnt tell me about the bounds?
calculus sequences-and-series limits
calculus sequences-and-series limits
edited Nov 4 '17 at 22:58
asked Nov 4 '17 at 22:37
J.Doe
125
125
Have you tried anything?
– Gerard L.
Nov 4 '17 at 22:42
Every convergent sequence is bounded .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:50
How do i tell if it is bounded above, below or both?
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:53
When sequence is bounded it means that sequence is bounded above and bounded below .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:55
I should've phrased the question better but the question on my sheet says is it bounded or not and if so is it above, below or both and prove it.
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:58
|
show 4 more comments
Have you tried anything?
– Gerard L.
Nov 4 '17 at 22:42
Every convergent sequence is bounded .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:50
How do i tell if it is bounded above, below or both?
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:53
When sequence is bounded it means that sequence is bounded above and bounded below .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:55
I should've phrased the question better but the question on my sheet says is it bounded or not and if so is it above, below or both and prove it.
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:58
Have you tried anything?
– Gerard L.
Nov 4 '17 at 22:42
Have you tried anything?
– Gerard L.
Nov 4 '17 at 22:42
Every convergent sequence is bounded .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:50
Every convergent sequence is bounded .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:50
How do i tell if it is bounded above, below or both?
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:53
How do i tell if it is bounded above, below or both?
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:53
When sequence is bounded it means that sequence is bounded above and bounded below .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:55
When sequence is bounded it means that sequence is bounded above and bounded below .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:55
I should've phrased the question better but the question on my sheet says is it bounded or not and if so is it above, below or both and prove it.
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:58
I should've phrased the question better but the question on my sheet says is it bounded or not and if so is it above, below or both and prove it.
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:58
|
show 4 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
First of all, is it a sequence defined on $mathbb{N}$ or a continuous function defined on $[0,infty)$?
Let $f(n) = frac{n}{n^2+1}$. You can show
$f(n+1) leq f(n)$
hence it is decreasing. Therefore $f(1)$ is the upper bound.
(Lower bound is 0)
If $f(x) = frac{x}{x^2+1}$, then find the solution of $f'(x)=0$, and verify that it is the maximum.
The sequence is defined for all real values of x. Also, i plotted the graph of that sequence and it has a maximum at 0.5 and minimum at -0.5 so how do i show this without plotting a graph because then its not strictly decreasing or increasing
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:15
1
Then it is a function, when you say sequence people tend to think a function defined from $mathbb{N}tomathbb{R}$. You can still find solutions of $f'(x)=0$, which will give you the upper and lower bounds as $1/2$ and $-1/2$.
– Atbey
Nov 4 '17 at 23:25
add a comment |
$dfrac{x}{x^2+1}underset{xto +infty}{to}0iff forall varepsilon>0,exists A>0, s.t.quad x>Aimplies |f(x)|<varepsilon$
That means f is bounded on $(A,+infty)$
As $f$ is continuous on $[0,A]$ according the Extrem Value Theorem $f$ is bounded on $[0,A]$, $|f|<M$
Now we take $M'=max(varepsilon, M)$ then $|f|<M'$ on $[0,+infty)$
ok i think i know what that means according to the link given above :D but how do i show its bounded below too
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:41
$|f|<M$ means $-M<f<M$
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:42
thancs for the explanation
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:45
you are welcome
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:46
hey i got another question i understood the first line but i dont get the second line, we havent done extreme value theorem yet so i dont know whether i should include the second and third line in my answer i dont really know what the third line means either
– J.Doe
Nov 5 '17 at 0:08
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2504917%2fhow-to-prove-a-sequence-is-bounded-above-or-below%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
First of all, is it a sequence defined on $mathbb{N}$ or a continuous function defined on $[0,infty)$?
Let $f(n) = frac{n}{n^2+1}$. You can show
$f(n+1) leq f(n)$
hence it is decreasing. Therefore $f(1)$ is the upper bound.
(Lower bound is 0)
If $f(x) = frac{x}{x^2+1}$, then find the solution of $f'(x)=0$, and verify that it is the maximum.
The sequence is defined for all real values of x. Also, i plotted the graph of that sequence and it has a maximum at 0.5 and minimum at -0.5 so how do i show this without plotting a graph because then its not strictly decreasing or increasing
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:15
1
Then it is a function, when you say sequence people tend to think a function defined from $mathbb{N}tomathbb{R}$. You can still find solutions of $f'(x)=0$, which will give you the upper and lower bounds as $1/2$ and $-1/2$.
– Atbey
Nov 4 '17 at 23:25
add a comment |
First of all, is it a sequence defined on $mathbb{N}$ or a continuous function defined on $[0,infty)$?
Let $f(n) = frac{n}{n^2+1}$. You can show
$f(n+1) leq f(n)$
hence it is decreasing. Therefore $f(1)$ is the upper bound.
(Lower bound is 0)
If $f(x) = frac{x}{x^2+1}$, then find the solution of $f'(x)=0$, and verify that it is the maximum.
The sequence is defined for all real values of x. Also, i plotted the graph of that sequence and it has a maximum at 0.5 and minimum at -0.5 so how do i show this without plotting a graph because then its not strictly decreasing or increasing
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:15
1
Then it is a function, when you say sequence people tend to think a function defined from $mathbb{N}tomathbb{R}$. You can still find solutions of $f'(x)=0$, which will give you the upper and lower bounds as $1/2$ and $-1/2$.
– Atbey
Nov 4 '17 at 23:25
add a comment |
First of all, is it a sequence defined on $mathbb{N}$ or a continuous function defined on $[0,infty)$?
Let $f(n) = frac{n}{n^2+1}$. You can show
$f(n+1) leq f(n)$
hence it is decreasing. Therefore $f(1)$ is the upper bound.
(Lower bound is 0)
If $f(x) = frac{x}{x^2+1}$, then find the solution of $f'(x)=0$, and verify that it is the maximum.
First of all, is it a sequence defined on $mathbb{N}$ or a continuous function defined on $[0,infty)$?
Let $f(n) = frac{n}{n^2+1}$. You can show
$f(n+1) leq f(n)$
hence it is decreasing. Therefore $f(1)$ is the upper bound.
(Lower bound is 0)
If $f(x) = frac{x}{x^2+1}$, then find the solution of $f'(x)=0$, and verify that it is the maximum.
answered Nov 4 '17 at 23:04
Atbey
937411
937411
The sequence is defined for all real values of x. Also, i plotted the graph of that sequence and it has a maximum at 0.5 and minimum at -0.5 so how do i show this without plotting a graph because then its not strictly decreasing or increasing
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:15
1
Then it is a function, when you say sequence people tend to think a function defined from $mathbb{N}tomathbb{R}$. You can still find solutions of $f'(x)=0$, which will give you the upper and lower bounds as $1/2$ and $-1/2$.
– Atbey
Nov 4 '17 at 23:25
add a comment |
The sequence is defined for all real values of x. Also, i plotted the graph of that sequence and it has a maximum at 0.5 and minimum at -0.5 so how do i show this without plotting a graph because then its not strictly decreasing or increasing
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:15
1
Then it is a function, when you say sequence people tend to think a function defined from $mathbb{N}tomathbb{R}$. You can still find solutions of $f'(x)=0$, which will give you the upper and lower bounds as $1/2$ and $-1/2$.
– Atbey
Nov 4 '17 at 23:25
The sequence is defined for all real values of x. Also, i plotted the graph of that sequence and it has a maximum at 0.5 and minimum at -0.5 so how do i show this without plotting a graph because then its not strictly decreasing or increasing
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:15
The sequence is defined for all real values of x. Also, i plotted the graph of that sequence and it has a maximum at 0.5 and minimum at -0.5 so how do i show this without plotting a graph because then its not strictly decreasing or increasing
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:15
1
1
Then it is a function, when you say sequence people tend to think a function defined from $mathbb{N}tomathbb{R}$. You can still find solutions of $f'(x)=0$, which will give you the upper and lower bounds as $1/2$ and $-1/2$.
– Atbey
Nov 4 '17 at 23:25
Then it is a function, when you say sequence people tend to think a function defined from $mathbb{N}tomathbb{R}$. You can still find solutions of $f'(x)=0$, which will give you the upper and lower bounds as $1/2$ and $-1/2$.
– Atbey
Nov 4 '17 at 23:25
add a comment |
$dfrac{x}{x^2+1}underset{xto +infty}{to}0iff forall varepsilon>0,exists A>0, s.t.quad x>Aimplies |f(x)|<varepsilon$
That means f is bounded on $(A,+infty)$
As $f$ is continuous on $[0,A]$ according the Extrem Value Theorem $f$ is bounded on $[0,A]$, $|f|<M$
Now we take $M'=max(varepsilon, M)$ then $|f|<M'$ on $[0,+infty)$
ok i think i know what that means according to the link given above :D but how do i show its bounded below too
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:41
$|f|<M$ means $-M<f<M$
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:42
thancs for the explanation
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:45
you are welcome
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:46
hey i got another question i understood the first line but i dont get the second line, we havent done extreme value theorem yet so i dont know whether i should include the second and third line in my answer i dont really know what the third line means either
– J.Doe
Nov 5 '17 at 0:08
|
show 2 more comments
$dfrac{x}{x^2+1}underset{xto +infty}{to}0iff forall varepsilon>0,exists A>0, s.t.quad x>Aimplies |f(x)|<varepsilon$
That means f is bounded on $(A,+infty)$
As $f$ is continuous on $[0,A]$ according the Extrem Value Theorem $f$ is bounded on $[0,A]$, $|f|<M$
Now we take $M'=max(varepsilon, M)$ then $|f|<M'$ on $[0,+infty)$
ok i think i know what that means according to the link given above :D but how do i show its bounded below too
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:41
$|f|<M$ means $-M<f<M$
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:42
thancs for the explanation
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:45
you are welcome
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:46
hey i got another question i understood the first line but i dont get the second line, we havent done extreme value theorem yet so i dont know whether i should include the second and third line in my answer i dont really know what the third line means either
– J.Doe
Nov 5 '17 at 0:08
|
show 2 more comments
$dfrac{x}{x^2+1}underset{xto +infty}{to}0iff forall varepsilon>0,exists A>0, s.t.quad x>Aimplies |f(x)|<varepsilon$
That means f is bounded on $(A,+infty)$
As $f$ is continuous on $[0,A]$ according the Extrem Value Theorem $f$ is bounded on $[0,A]$, $|f|<M$
Now we take $M'=max(varepsilon, M)$ then $|f|<M'$ on $[0,+infty)$
$dfrac{x}{x^2+1}underset{xto +infty}{to}0iff forall varepsilon>0,exists A>0, s.t.quad x>Aimplies |f(x)|<varepsilon$
That means f is bounded on $(A,+infty)$
As $f$ is continuous on $[0,A]$ according the Extrem Value Theorem $f$ is bounded on $[0,A]$, $|f|<M$
Now we take $M'=max(varepsilon, M)$ then $|f|<M'$ on $[0,+infty)$
edited Nov 4 '17 at 23:36
answered Nov 4 '17 at 23:30


Stu
1,1741413
1,1741413
ok i think i know what that means according to the link given above :D but how do i show its bounded below too
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:41
$|f|<M$ means $-M<f<M$
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:42
thancs for the explanation
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:45
you are welcome
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:46
hey i got another question i understood the first line but i dont get the second line, we havent done extreme value theorem yet so i dont know whether i should include the second and third line in my answer i dont really know what the third line means either
– J.Doe
Nov 5 '17 at 0:08
|
show 2 more comments
ok i think i know what that means according to the link given above :D but how do i show its bounded below too
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:41
$|f|<M$ means $-M<f<M$
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:42
thancs for the explanation
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:45
you are welcome
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:46
hey i got another question i understood the first line but i dont get the second line, we havent done extreme value theorem yet so i dont know whether i should include the second and third line in my answer i dont really know what the third line means either
– J.Doe
Nov 5 '17 at 0:08
ok i think i know what that means according to the link given above :D but how do i show its bounded below too
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:41
ok i think i know what that means according to the link given above :D but how do i show its bounded below too
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:41
$|f|<M$ means $-M<f<M$
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:42
$|f|<M$ means $-M<f<M$
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:42
thancs for the explanation
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:45
thancs for the explanation
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 23:45
you are welcome
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:46
you are welcome
– Stu
Nov 4 '17 at 23:46
hey i got another question i understood the first line but i dont get the second line, we havent done extreme value theorem yet so i dont know whether i should include the second and third line in my answer i dont really know what the third line means either
– J.Doe
Nov 5 '17 at 0:08
hey i got another question i understood the first line but i dont get the second line, we havent done extreme value theorem yet so i dont know whether i should include the second and third line in my answer i dont really know what the third line means either
– J.Doe
Nov 5 '17 at 0:08
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2504917%2fhow-to-prove-a-sequence-is-bounded-above-or-below%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have you tried anything?
– Gerard L.
Nov 4 '17 at 22:42
Every convergent sequence is bounded .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:50
How do i tell if it is bounded above, below or both?
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:53
When sequence is bounded it means that sequence is bounded above and bounded below .
– S.H.W
Nov 4 '17 at 22:55
I should've phrased the question better but the question on my sheet says is it bounded or not and if so is it above, below or both and prove it.
– J.Doe
Nov 4 '17 at 22:58