if the base chage of all fibres of a morphism is faithfully flat, do we have flatness of the morphism?












1












$begingroup$


Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$ (with possibly Noetherian conditions all over the place).



For every point $sin S$, the morphism base changed to the fiber $f_s:X_srightarrow Y_s$ is faithfully flat.



Do we have that $f$ is flat? or even faithfully flat?



Edit: what if moreover both $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $Y=S$ and $f:Xto S$ is onto, then for every $sin S, f_s:X_sto s$ is faithfully flat since $s$ is the spectrum of the field. But $f$ is obviously not necessarily flat.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Jan 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Roland what if both of $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$? Then your example doesn't apply.
    $endgroup$
    – Lance Wu
    Jan 26 at 13:11
















1












$begingroup$


Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$ (with possibly Noetherian conditions all over the place).



For every point $sin S$, the morphism base changed to the fiber $f_s:X_srightarrow Y_s$ is faithfully flat.



Do we have that $f$ is flat? or even faithfully flat?



Edit: what if moreover both $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $Y=S$ and $f:Xto S$ is onto, then for every $sin S, f_s:X_sto s$ is faithfully flat since $s$ is the spectrum of the field. But $f$ is obviously not necessarily flat.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Jan 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Roland what if both of $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$? Then your example doesn't apply.
    $endgroup$
    – Lance Wu
    Jan 26 at 13:11














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$ (with possibly Noetherian conditions all over the place).



For every point $sin S$, the morphism base changed to the fiber $f_s:X_srightarrow Y_s$ is faithfully flat.



Do we have that $f$ is flat? or even faithfully flat?



Edit: what if moreover both $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$ (with possibly Noetherian conditions all over the place).



For every point $sin S$, the morphism base changed to the fiber $f_s:X_srightarrow Y_s$ is faithfully flat.



Do we have that $f$ is flat? or even faithfully flat?



Edit: what if moreover both $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$?







algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra flatness






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 17 at 17:29









user26857

39.4k124183




39.4k124183










asked Jan 26 at 11:53









Lance WuLance Wu

1016




1016












  • $begingroup$
    If $Y=S$ and $f:Xto S$ is onto, then for every $sin S, f_s:X_sto s$ is faithfully flat since $s$ is the spectrum of the field. But $f$ is obviously not necessarily flat.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Jan 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Roland what if both of $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$? Then your example doesn't apply.
    $endgroup$
    – Lance Wu
    Jan 26 at 13:11


















  • $begingroup$
    If $Y=S$ and $f:Xto S$ is onto, then for every $sin S, f_s:X_sto s$ is faithfully flat since $s$ is the spectrum of the field. But $f$ is obviously not necessarily flat.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Jan 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Roland what if both of $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$? Then your example doesn't apply.
    $endgroup$
    – Lance Wu
    Jan 26 at 13:11
















$begingroup$
If $Y=S$ and $f:Xto S$ is onto, then for every $sin S, f_s:X_sto s$ is faithfully flat since $s$ is the spectrum of the field. But $f$ is obviously not necessarily flat.
$endgroup$
– Roland
Jan 26 at 12:41




$begingroup$
If $Y=S$ and $f:Xto S$ is onto, then for every $sin S, f_s:X_sto s$ is faithfully flat since $s$ is the spectrum of the field. But $f$ is obviously not necessarily flat.
$endgroup$
– Roland
Jan 26 at 12:41












$begingroup$
@Roland what if both of $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$? Then your example doesn't apply.
$endgroup$
– Lance Wu
Jan 26 at 13:11




$begingroup$
@Roland what if both of $X$ and $Y$ are flat over $S$? Then your example doesn't apply.
$endgroup$
– Lance Wu
Jan 26 at 13:11










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088170%2fif-the-base-chage-of-all-fibres-of-a-morphism-is-faithfully-flat-do-we-have-fla%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088170%2fif-the-base-chage-of-all-fibres-of-a-morphism-is-faithfully-flat-do-we-have-fla%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith