Is $[1,5]$ an open set?
$begingroup$
Wikipedia page for open set gives two definitions for the open set:
First
A subset $U$ of the Euclidean $n$-space $mathbb R^n$ is called open if, given any point $x$ in $U$, there exists a real number $ε > 0$ such that, given any point $y$ in $mathbb R^n$ whose Euclidean distance from $x$ is smaller than $ε$, $y$ also belongs to $U$.
Second
All elements of $T$ where
The trivial subsets are in T.
Whenever sets $A$ and $B$ are in $T$, then so is $A$ intersection $B$.
Whenever two or more sets are in $T$, then so is their union
Consider the topology of $mathbb R$.
Now, according to the first definition, $[1,5]$ is not open because there exists no ε>0 such that $5+ε$ is in $[1,5]$.
However, we now let $T$ be the family of all subsets of $mathbb R$.
We can see that $T$ satisfies all $3$ conditions outlined in the second definition. Thus, all elements of $T$ are open, which includes $[1,5]$.
Now, obviously one of these must be wrong. It should be the second one, but I don't see why exactly. Any help is appreciated.
general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wikipedia page for open set gives two definitions for the open set:
First
A subset $U$ of the Euclidean $n$-space $mathbb R^n$ is called open if, given any point $x$ in $U$, there exists a real number $ε > 0$ such that, given any point $y$ in $mathbb R^n$ whose Euclidean distance from $x$ is smaller than $ε$, $y$ also belongs to $U$.
Second
All elements of $T$ where
The trivial subsets are in T.
Whenever sets $A$ and $B$ are in $T$, then so is $A$ intersection $B$.
Whenever two or more sets are in $T$, then so is their union
Consider the topology of $mathbb R$.
Now, according to the first definition, $[1,5]$ is not open because there exists no ε>0 such that $5+ε$ is in $[1,5]$.
However, we now let $T$ be the family of all subsets of $mathbb R$.
We can see that $T$ satisfies all $3$ conditions outlined in the second definition. Thus, all elements of $T$ are open, which includes $[1,5]$.
Now, obviously one of these must be wrong. It should be the second one, but I don't see why exactly. Any help is appreciated.
general-topology
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
The notion of open sets varies along with the underground topology.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:21
$begingroup$
So, does that mean that both the results are correct in their respective contexts?
$endgroup$
– Star Platinum ZA WARUDO
Jan 27 at 15:23
$begingroup$
In this case, yes.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wikipedia page for open set gives two definitions for the open set:
First
A subset $U$ of the Euclidean $n$-space $mathbb R^n$ is called open if, given any point $x$ in $U$, there exists a real number $ε > 0$ such that, given any point $y$ in $mathbb R^n$ whose Euclidean distance from $x$ is smaller than $ε$, $y$ also belongs to $U$.
Second
All elements of $T$ where
The trivial subsets are in T.
Whenever sets $A$ and $B$ are in $T$, then so is $A$ intersection $B$.
Whenever two or more sets are in $T$, then so is their union
Consider the topology of $mathbb R$.
Now, according to the first definition, $[1,5]$ is not open because there exists no ε>0 such that $5+ε$ is in $[1,5]$.
However, we now let $T$ be the family of all subsets of $mathbb R$.
We can see that $T$ satisfies all $3$ conditions outlined in the second definition. Thus, all elements of $T$ are open, which includes $[1,5]$.
Now, obviously one of these must be wrong. It should be the second one, but I don't see why exactly. Any help is appreciated.
general-topology
$endgroup$
Wikipedia page for open set gives two definitions for the open set:
First
A subset $U$ of the Euclidean $n$-space $mathbb R^n$ is called open if, given any point $x$ in $U$, there exists a real number $ε > 0$ such that, given any point $y$ in $mathbb R^n$ whose Euclidean distance from $x$ is smaller than $ε$, $y$ also belongs to $U$.
Second
All elements of $T$ where
The trivial subsets are in T.
Whenever sets $A$ and $B$ are in $T$, then so is $A$ intersection $B$.
Whenever two or more sets are in $T$, then so is their union
Consider the topology of $mathbb R$.
Now, according to the first definition, $[1,5]$ is not open because there exists no ε>0 such that $5+ε$ is in $[1,5]$.
However, we now let $T$ be the family of all subsets of $mathbb R$.
We can see that $T$ satisfies all $3$ conditions outlined in the second definition. Thus, all elements of $T$ are open, which includes $[1,5]$.
Now, obviously one of these must be wrong. It should be the second one, but I don't see why exactly. Any help is appreciated.
general-topology
general-topology
edited Jan 27 at 15:24


Exp ikx
4489
4489
asked Jan 27 at 15:20
Star Platinum ZA WARUDOStar Platinum ZA WARUDO
349112
349112
2
$begingroup$
The notion of open sets varies along with the underground topology.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:21
$begingroup$
So, does that mean that both the results are correct in their respective contexts?
$endgroup$
– Star Platinum ZA WARUDO
Jan 27 at 15:23
$begingroup$
In this case, yes.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:24
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
The notion of open sets varies along with the underground topology.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:21
$begingroup$
So, does that mean that both the results are correct in their respective contexts?
$endgroup$
– Star Platinum ZA WARUDO
Jan 27 at 15:23
$begingroup$
In this case, yes.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:24
2
2
$begingroup$
The notion of open sets varies along with the underground topology.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:21
$begingroup$
The notion of open sets varies along with the underground topology.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:21
$begingroup$
So, does that mean that both the results are correct in their respective contexts?
$endgroup$
– Star Platinum ZA WARUDO
Jan 27 at 15:23
$begingroup$
So, does that mean that both the results are correct in their respective contexts?
$endgroup$
– Star Platinum ZA WARUDO
Jan 27 at 15:23
$begingroup$
In this case, yes.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:24
$begingroup$
In this case, yes.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first definition uses the standard topology on $mathbb{R}$, while the second is the more general definition of a topology. In your example, you simply created a different topology (the discrete topology) on $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089691%2fis-1-5-an-open-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first definition uses the standard topology on $mathbb{R}$, while the second is the more general definition of a topology. In your example, you simply created a different topology (the discrete topology) on $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first definition uses the standard topology on $mathbb{R}$, while the second is the more general definition of a topology. In your example, you simply created a different topology (the discrete topology) on $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first definition uses the standard topology on $mathbb{R}$, while the second is the more general definition of a topology. In your example, you simply created a different topology (the discrete topology) on $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
The first definition uses the standard topology on $mathbb{R}$, while the second is the more general definition of a topology. In your example, you simply created a different topology (the discrete topology) on $mathbb{R}$.
answered Jan 27 at 15:25
MetricMetric
1,22659
1,22659
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089691%2fis-1-5-an-open-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
The notion of open sets varies along with the underground topology.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:21
$begingroup$
So, does that mean that both the results are correct in their respective contexts?
$endgroup$
– Star Platinum ZA WARUDO
Jan 27 at 15:23
$begingroup$
In this case, yes.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 27 at 15:24