Is every uniformizable topology induced by a Heine-Borel uniformity?
$begingroup$
This is a follow-up to my question here. A subset $A$ of a uniform space is said to be bounded if for each entourage $V$, $A$ is a subset of $V^n[F]$ for some natural number $n$ and some finite set $F$. Just like for metric spaces, a compact subset of a uniform space is always closed and bounded, but the converse need not be true. A uniformity has the Heine-Borel property if a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded.
Suppose $X$ is a uniformizable topological space, AKA a completely regular topological space. My question is, is it necessarily the case that the topology on $X$ is induced by some Heine-Borel uniformity?
Now this answer shows that a metrizable topology is induced a metric with the Heine-Borel property if and only if it is locally compact and separable. But that doesn’t answer this question, because even if we take a topology which isn’t locally compact or isn’t separable, it’s possible that such a topology is induced by a non-metrizable uniformity with the Heine-Borel property.
general-topology metric-spaces compactness examples-counterexamples uniform-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a follow-up to my question here. A subset $A$ of a uniform space is said to be bounded if for each entourage $V$, $A$ is a subset of $V^n[F]$ for some natural number $n$ and some finite set $F$. Just like for metric spaces, a compact subset of a uniform space is always closed and bounded, but the converse need not be true. A uniformity has the Heine-Borel property if a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded.
Suppose $X$ is a uniformizable topological space, AKA a completely regular topological space. My question is, is it necessarily the case that the topology on $X$ is induced by some Heine-Borel uniformity?
Now this answer shows that a metrizable topology is induced a metric with the Heine-Borel property if and only if it is locally compact and separable. But that doesn’t answer this question, because even if we take a topology which isn’t locally compact or isn’t separable, it’s possible that such a topology is induced by a non-metrizable uniformity with the Heine-Borel property.
general-topology metric-spaces compactness examples-counterexamples uniform-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It's probably false, but one would need some more theory on the classs of uniform spaces with the HB property to disprove it, I think. Is this class closed under products, uniformly continuous images etc. ?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 7:59
$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma It may be even easier; the proofs that topologies induced by Heine-Borel metrics are locally compact and separable may be able to be modified to show that topologies induced by Heine-Borel uniformities are locally compact and separable.
$endgroup$
– Keshav Srinivasan
Dec 22 '18 at 8:19
$begingroup$
I don't think that would hold (separability and local compactness), btu I'm not sure. Just a hunch.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 10:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a follow-up to my question here. A subset $A$ of a uniform space is said to be bounded if for each entourage $V$, $A$ is a subset of $V^n[F]$ for some natural number $n$ and some finite set $F$. Just like for metric spaces, a compact subset of a uniform space is always closed and bounded, but the converse need not be true. A uniformity has the Heine-Borel property if a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded.
Suppose $X$ is a uniformizable topological space, AKA a completely regular topological space. My question is, is it necessarily the case that the topology on $X$ is induced by some Heine-Borel uniformity?
Now this answer shows that a metrizable topology is induced a metric with the Heine-Borel property if and only if it is locally compact and separable. But that doesn’t answer this question, because even if we take a topology which isn’t locally compact or isn’t separable, it’s possible that such a topology is induced by a non-metrizable uniformity with the Heine-Borel property.
general-topology metric-spaces compactness examples-counterexamples uniform-spaces
$endgroup$
This is a follow-up to my question here. A subset $A$ of a uniform space is said to be bounded if for each entourage $V$, $A$ is a subset of $V^n[F]$ for some natural number $n$ and some finite set $F$. Just like for metric spaces, a compact subset of a uniform space is always closed and bounded, but the converse need not be true. A uniformity has the Heine-Borel property if a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded.
Suppose $X$ is a uniformizable topological space, AKA a completely regular topological space. My question is, is it necessarily the case that the topology on $X$ is induced by some Heine-Borel uniformity?
Now this answer shows that a metrizable topology is induced a metric with the Heine-Borel property if and only if it is locally compact and separable. But that doesn’t answer this question, because even if we take a topology which isn’t locally compact or isn’t separable, it’s possible that such a topology is induced by a non-metrizable uniformity with the Heine-Borel property.
general-topology metric-spaces compactness examples-counterexamples uniform-spaces
general-topology metric-spaces compactness examples-counterexamples uniform-spaces
asked Dec 22 '18 at 7:42


Keshav SrinivasanKeshav Srinivasan
2,37221445
2,37221445
$begingroup$
It's probably false, but one would need some more theory on the classs of uniform spaces with the HB property to disprove it, I think. Is this class closed under products, uniformly continuous images etc. ?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 7:59
$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma It may be even easier; the proofs that topologies induced by Heine-Borel metrics are locally compact and separable may be able to be modified to show that topologies induced by Heine-Borel uniformities are locally compact and separable.
$endgroup$
– Keshav Srinivasan
Dec 22 '18 at 8:19
$begingroup$
I don't think that would hold (separability and local compactness), btu I'm not sure. Just a hunch.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 10:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's probably false, but one would need some more theory on the classs of uniform spaces with the HB property to disprove it, I think. Is this class closed under products, uniformly continuous images etc. ?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 7:59
$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma It may be even easier; the proofs that topologies induced by Heine-Borel metrics are locally compact and separable may be able to be modified to show that topologies induced by Heine-Borel uniformities are locally compact and separable.
$endgroup$
– Keshav Srinivasan
Dec 22 '18 at 8:19
$begingroup$
I don't think that would hold (separability and local compactness), btu I'm not sure. Just a hunch.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 10:25
$begingroup$
It's probably false, but one would need some more theory on the classs of uniform spaces with the HB property to disprove it, I think. Is this class closed under products, uniformly continuous images etc. ?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 7:59
$begingroup$
It's probably false, but one would need some more theory on the classs of uniform spaces with the HB property to disprove it, I think. Is this class closed under products, uniformly continuous images etc. ?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 7:59
$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma It may be even easier; the proofs that topologies induced by Heine-Borel metrics are locally compact and separable may be able to be modified to show that topologies induced by Heine-Borel uniformities are locally compact and separable.
$endgroup$
– Keshav Srinivasan
Dec 22 '18 at 8:19
$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma It may be even easier; the proofs that topologies induced by Heine-Borel metrics are locally compact and separable may be able to be modified to show that topologies induced by Heine-Borel uniformities are locally compact and separable.
$endgroup$
– Keshav Srinivasan
Dec 22 '18 at 8:19
$begingroup$
I don't think that would hold (separability and local compactness), btu I'm not sure. Just a hunch.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 10:25
$begingroup$
I don't think that would hold (separability and local compactness), btu I'm not sure. Just a hunch.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 10:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A space $X$ is pseudocompact if any continuous $Xtomathbb R$ is bounded.
There exist completely regular non-compact pseudocompact spaces $X$ such as the long line (there are other examples at π-Base). By pseudocompactness, $X$ is bounded in any continuous pseudometric. By the positive answer to your previous question Is a set bounded in every metric for a uniformity bounded in the uniformity?, noting that the answers also work for pseudometrics in non-metrisable spaces, $X$ is bounded in every uniformity. So $X$ does not admit any Heine-Borel uniformity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049200%2fis-every-uniformizable-topology-induced-by-a-heine-borel-uniformity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A space $X$ is pseudocompact if any continuous $Xtomathbb R$ is bounded.
There exist completely regular non-compact pseudocompact spaces $X$ such as the long line (there are other examples at π-Base). By pseudocompactness, $X$ is bounded in any continuous pseudometric. By the positive answer to your previous question Is a set bounded in every metric for a uniformity bounded in the uniformity?, noting that the answers also work for pseudometrics in non-metrisable spaces, $X$ is bounded in every uniformity. So $X$ does not admit any Heine-Borel uniformity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A space $X$ is pseudocompact if any continuous $Xtomathbb R$ is bounded.
There exist completely regular non-compact pseudocompact spaces $X$ such as the long line (there are other examples at π-Base). By pseudocompactness, $X$ is bounded in any continuous pseudometric. By the positive answer to your previous question Is a set bounded in every metric for a uniformity bounded in the uniformity?, noting that the answers also work for pseudometrics in non-metrisable spaces, $X$ is bounded in every uniformity. So $X$ does not admit any Heine-Borel uniformity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A space $X$ is pseudocompact if any continuous $Xtomathbb R$ is bounded.
There exist completely regular non-compact pseudocompact spaces $X$ such as the long line (there are other examples at π-Base). By pseudocompactness, $X$ is bounded in any continuous pseudometric. By the positive answer to your previous question Is a set bounded in every metric for a uniformity bounded in the uniformity?, noting that the answers also work for pseudometrics in non-metrisable spaces, $X$ is bounded in every uniformity. So $X$ does not admit any Heine-Borel uniformity.
$endgroup$
A space $X$ is pseudocompact if any continuous $Xtomathbb R$ is bounded.
There exist completely regular non-compact pseudocompact spaces $X$ such as the long line (there are other examples at π-Base). By pseudocompactness, $X$ is bounded in any continuous pseudometric. By the positive answer to your previous question Is a set bounded in every metric for a uniformity bounded in the uniformity?, noting that the answers also work for pseudometrics in non-metrisable spaces, $X$ is bounded in every uniformity. So $X$ does not admit any Heine-Borel uniformity.
answered Jan 26 at 20:29
DapDap
19k842
19k842
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049200%2fis-every-uniformizable-topology-induced-by-a-heine-borel-uniformity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
It's probably false, but one would need some more theory on the classs of uniform spaces with the HB property to disprove it, I think. Is this class closed under products, uniformly continuous images etc. ?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 7:59
$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma It may be even easier; the proofs that topologies induced by Heine-Borel metrics are locally compact and separable may be able to be modified to show that topologies induced by Heine-Borel uniformities are locally compact and separable.
$endgroup$
– Keshav Srinivasan
Dec 22 '18 at 8:19
$begingroup$
I don't think that would hold (separability and local compactness), btu I'm not sure. Just a hunch.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 22 '18 at 10:25