Let c be an element of order 2 and d an element of order 5 in a Group G with 10 Elements , show that either...












2












$begingroup$


The first equality holds true if G is commutative, but I’m stuck on the second one if G isn’t. What’s a good way to start?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – verret
    Jan 26 at 19:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no reason $cdc^{-1}$ has to be a power of $d$. If for some reason you know that $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ for some $k$, then conjugating by $c$ twice gives $d = cd^kc^{-1} = (cdc^{-1})^k = (d^k)^k = d^{k^2}$, so $1 equiv k^2 bmod 5$ and thus $k equiv pm 1 bmod 5$. More generally, if $d$ has order $m$ and for some reason you know $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ then $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$. Generally speaking there can be more solutions to $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$ than just $pm 1 bmod m$, although those are the only solutions when $m$ is prime. The main problem is $cdc^{-1}$ need not be a power of $d$.
    $endgroup$
    – KCd
    Jan 26 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    "What's a good way to start?". A good way to start would be to check again the source of the problem and to write an exact formulation of the problem. Reading the title I have the impression that you wrote this down out of your memory, and some things are missing.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 26 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    I’m sorry, I forgot that G needs to be a group of 10 elements
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: What are the possible groups with $10$ elements (up to isomorphism)?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Jan 26 at 19:42


















2












$begingroup$


The first equality holds true if G is commutative, but I’m stuck on the second one if G isn’t. What’s a good way to start?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – verret
    Jan 26 at 19:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no reason $cdc^{-1}$ has to be a power of $d$. If for some reason you know that $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ for some $k$, then conjugating by $c$ twice gives $d = cd^kc^{-1} = (cdc^{-1})^k = (d^k)^k = d^{k^2}$, so $1 equiv k^2 bmod 5$ and thus $k equiv pm 1 bmod 5$. More generally, if $d$ has order $m$ and for some reason you know $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ then $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$. Generally speaking there can be more solutions to $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$ than just $pm 1 bmod m$, although those are the only solutions when $m$ is prime. The main problem is $cdc^{-1}$ need not be a power of $d$.
    $endgroup$
    – KCd
    Jan 26 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    "What's a good way to start?". A good way to start would be to check again the source of the problem and to write an exact formulation of the problem. Reading the title I have the impression that you wrote this down out of your memory, and some things are missing.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 26 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    I’m sorry, I forgot that G needs to be a group of 10 elements
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: What are the possible groups with $10$ elements (up to isomorphism)?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Jan 26 at 19:42
















2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


The first equality holds true if G is commutative, but I’m stuck on the second one if G isn’t. What’s a good way to start?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The first equality holds true if G is commutative, but I’m stuck on the second one if G isn’t. What’s a good way to start?







group-theory cyclic-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 26 at 19:40







jk1998

















asked Jan 26 at 19:12









jk1998jk1998

264




264








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – verret
    Jan 26 at 19:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no reason $cdc^{-1}$ has to be a power of $d$. If for some reason you know that $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ for some $k$, then conjugating by $c$ twice gives $d = cd^kc^{-1} = (cdc^{-1})^k = (d^k)^k = d^{k^2}$, so $1 equiv k^2 bmod 5$ and thus $k equiv pm 1 bmod 5$. More generally, if $d$ has order $m$ and for some reason you know $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ then $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$. Generally speaking there can be more solutions to $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$ than just $pm 1 bmod m$, although those are the only solutions when $m$ is prime. The main problem is $cdc^{-1}$ need not be a power of $d$.
    $endgroup$
    – KCd
    Jan 26 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    "What's a good way to start?". A good way to start would be to check again the source of the problem and to write an exact formulation of the problem. Reading the title I have the impression that you wrote this down out of your memory, and some things are missing.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 26 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    I’m sorry, I forgot that G needs to be a group of 10 elements
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: What are the possible groups with $10$ elements (up to isomorphism)?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Jan 26 at 19:42
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – verret
    Jan 26 at 19:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no reason $cdc^{-1}$ has to be a power of $d$. If for some reason you know that $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ for some $k$, then conjugating by $c$ twice gives $d = cd^kc^{-1} = (cdc^{-1})^k = (d^k)^k = d^{k^2}$, so $1 equiv k^2 bmod 5$ and thus $k equiv pm 1 bmod 5$. More generally, if $d$ has order $m$ and for some reason you know $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ then $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$. Generally speaking there can be more solutions to $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$ than just $pm 1 bmod m$, although those are the only solutions when $m$ is prime. The main problem is $cdc^{-1}$ need not be a power of $d$.
    $endgroup$
    – KCd
    Jan 26 at 19:27










  • $begingroup$
    "What's a good way to start?". A good way to start would be to check again the source of the problem and to write an exact formulation of the problem. Reading the title I have the impression that you wrote this down out of your memory, and some things are missing.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 26 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    I’m sorry, I forgot that G needs to be a group of 10 elements
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: What are the possible groups with $10$ elements (up to isomorphism)?
    $endgroup$
    – Somos
    Jan 26 at 19:42










2




2




$begingroup$
This is not true.
$endgroup$
– verret
Jan 26 at 19:21




$begingroup$
This is not true.
$endgroup$
– verret
Jan 26 at 19:21




1




1




$begingroup$
There is no reason $cdc^{-1}$ has to be a power of $d$. If for some reason you know that $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ for some $k$, then conjugating by $c$ twice gives $d = cd^kc^{-1} = (cdc^{-1})^k = (d^k)^k = d^{k^2}$, so $1 equiv k^2 bmod 5$ and thus $k equiv pm 1 bmod 5$. More generally, if $d$ has order $m$ and for some reason you know $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ then $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$. Generally speaking there can be more solutions to $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$ than just $pm 1 bmod m$, although those are the only solutions when $m$ is prime. The main problem is $cdc^{-1}$ need not be a power of $d$.
$endgroup$
– KCd
Jan 26 at 19:27




$begingroup$
There is no reason $cdc^{-1}$ has to be a power of $d$. If for some reason you know that $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ for some $k$, then conjugating by $c$ twice gives $d = cd^kc^{-1} = (cdc^{-1})^k = (d^k)^k = d^{k^2}$, so $1 equiv k^2 bmod 5$ and thus $k equiv pm 1 bmod 5$. More generally, if $d$ has order $m$ and for some reason you know $cdc^{-1} = d^k$ then $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$. Generally speaking there can be more solutions to $k^2 equiv 1 bmod m$ than just $pm 1 bmod m$, although those are the only solutions when $m$ is prime. The main problem is $cdc^{-1}$ need not be a power of $d$.
$endgroup$
– KCd
Jan 26 at 19:27












$begingroup$
"What's a good way to start?". A good way to start would be to check again the source of the problem and to write an exact formulation of the problem. Reading the title I have the impression that you wrote this down out of your memory, and some things are missing.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 26 at 19:37






$begingroup$
"What's a good way to start?". A good way to start would be to check again the source of the problem and to write an exact formulation of the problem. Reading the title I have the impression that you wrote this down out of your memory, and some things are missing.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 26 at 19:37














$begingroup$
I’m sorry, I forgot that G needs to be a group of 10 elements
$endgroup$
– jk1998
Jan 26 at 19:41




$begingroup$
I’m sorry, I forgot that G needs to be a group of 10 elements
$endgroup$
– jk1998
Jan 26 at 19:41












$begingroup$
Hint: What are the possible groups with $10$ elements (up to isomorphism)?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Jan 26 at 19:42






$begingroup$
Hint: What are the possible groups with $10$ elements (up to isomorphism)?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Jan 26 at 19:42












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Hint: A subgroup of order $5$ in $G$ has index $2$, hence it must be normal. So we have $cdc^{-1}in langle drangle $, i.e., $cdc^{-1}=d^k$ for some $k$. Now conclude that $k=pm 1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Do I still need to use the assumptions above or does it then follow simply through the fact, that the subgroup is normal? I’m kind of stuck
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:22












  • $begingroup$
    Use that if the group isn't abelian it's $D_5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 26 at 20:42










  • $begingroup$
    But I need to proof I’m in $D_5$ :D
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:42










  • $begingroup$
    True. See this: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 26 at 20:46



















0












$begingroup$

I must confess that this answer is actually off-point, since shows the two hypotheses (1) and (3) are mutually exclusive, not that at least one holds.
Nevertheless, for the time being at least, I'm leaving this answer as is, since it seems to have generated an engaging discussion in the comments.



Let $e_G$ denote the identity element of $G$.



The hypothesis $vert G vert = 10$ does not appear to be necessary:



If



$cdc^{-1} = d, tag 1$



then



$cd = dc; tag 2$



now if



$d^{-1} = cdc^{-1}, tag 3$



we may write



$d^{-1} = cdc^{-1} = dcc^{-1} = d Longrightarrow d^2 = e_G; tag 4$



that is, assuming (1) and (3) both hold contradicts the hypothesis



$o(d) = 5. tag 5$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But your assuming that G is commutative
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the first equality
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @jk1998 Two elements $c,d$ of a group commuting does not imply that $G$ is commutative.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 26 at 20:07








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I know but, what I need to proof is that either one of the equalities hold, but not at the same time
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde If c and d commute, would not the the commutivity of G be implied in this case?
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:21





















0












$begingroup$

My solution would be the following,
Since the 5 order subgroup has index 2 it must be normal in G and has the factorgroup $Z/2Z$, therefore the commutatorgroup $[G,G]$ must be a subgroup of $<d>$, if it is trivial the first equation holds and G must be abelian, if it is the whole group the second one holds true.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088635%2flet-c-be-an-element-of-order-2-and-d-an-element-of-order-5-in-a-group-g-with-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Hint: A subgroup of order $5$ in $G$ has index $2$, hence it must be normal. So we have $cdc^{-1}in langle drangle $, i.e., $cdc^{-1}=d^k$ for some $k$. Now conclude that $k=pm 1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Do I still need to use the assumptions above or does it then follow simply through the fact, that the subgroup is normal? I’m kind of stuck
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:22












    • $begingroup$
      Use that if the group isn't abelian it's $D_5$.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      But I need to proof I’m in $D_5$ :D
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      True. See this: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:46
















    5












    $begingroup$

    Hint: A subgroup of order $5$ in $G$ has index $2$, hence it must be normal. So we have $cdc^{-1}in langle drangle $, i.e., $cdc^{-1}=d^k$ for some $k$. Now conclude that $k=pm 1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Do I still need to use the assumptions above or does it then follow simply through the fact, that the subgroup is normal? I’m kind of stuck
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:22












    • $begingroup$
      Use that if the group isn't abelian it's $D_5$.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      But I need to proof I’m in $D_5$ :D
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      True. See this: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:46














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Hint: A subgroup of order $5$ in $G$ has index $2$, hence it must be normal. So we have $cdc^{-1}in langle drangle $, i.e., $cdc^{-1}=d^k$ for some $k$. Now conclude that $k=pm 1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Hint: A subgroup of order $5$ in $G$ has index $2$, hence it must be normal. So we have $cdc^{-1}in langle drangle $, i.e., $cdc^{-1}=d^k$ for some $k$. Now conclude that $k=pm 1$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jan 26 at 19:54

























    answered Jan 26 at 19:48









    Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde

    81.2k648106




    81.2k648106












    • $begingroup$
      Do I still need to use the assumptions above or does it then follow simply through the fact, that the subgroup is normal? I’m kind of stuck
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:22












    • $begingroup$
      Use that if the group isn't abelian it's $D_5$.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      But I need to proof I’m in $D_5$ :D
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      True. See this: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:46


















    • $begingroup$
      Do I still need to use the assumptions above or does it then follow simply through the fact, that the subgroup is normal? I’m kind of stuck
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:22












    • $begingroup$
      Use that if the group isn't abelian it's $D_5$.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      But I need to proof I’m in $D_5$ :D
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:42










    • $begingroup$
      True. See this: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/…
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Custer
      Jan 26 at 20:46
















    $begingroup$
    Do I still need to use the assumptions above or does it then follow simply through the fact, that the subgroup is normal? I’m kind of stuck
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:22






    $begingroup$
    Do I still need to use the assumptions above or does it then follow simply through the fact, that the subgroup is normal? I’m kind of stuck
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:22














    $begingroup$
    Use that if the group isn't abelian it's $D_5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 26 at 20:42




    $begingroup$
    Use that if the group isn't abelian it's $D_5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 26 at 20:42












    $begingroup$
    But I need to proof I’m in $D_5$ :D
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:42




    $begingroup$
    But I need to proof I’m in $D_5$ :D
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:42












    $begingroup$
    True. See this: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 26 at 20:46




    $begingroup$
    True. See this: groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 26 at 20:46











    0












    $begingroup$

    I must confess that this answer is actually off-point, since shows the two hypotheses (1) and (3) are mutually exclusive, not that at least one holds.
    Nevertheless, for the time being at least, I'm leaving this answer as is, since it seems to have generated an engaging discussion in the comments.



    Let $e_G$ denote the identity element of $G$.



    The hypothesis $vert G vert = 10$ does not appear to be necessary:



    If



    $cdc^{-1} = d, tag 1$



    then



    $cd = dc; tag 2$



    now if



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1}, tag 3$



    we may write



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1} = dcc^{-1} = d Longrightarrow d^2 = e_G; tag 4$



    that is, assuming (1) and (3) both hold contradicts the hypothesis



    $o(d) = 5. tag 5$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      But your assuming that G is commutative
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:02






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In the first equality
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @jk1998 Two elements $c,d$ of a group commuting does not imply that $G$ is commutative.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      Jan 26 at 20:07








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I know but, what I need to proof is that either one of the equalities hold, but not at the same time
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:09






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @DietrichBurde If c and d commute, would not the the commutivity of G be implied in this case?
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:21


















    0












    $begingroup$

    I must confess that this answer is actually off-point, since shows the two hypotheses (1) and (3) are mutually exclusive, not that at least one holds.
    Nevertheless, for the time being at least, I'm leaving this answer as is, since it seems to have generated an engaging discussion in the comments.



    Let $e_G$ denote the identity element of $G$.



    The hypothesis $vert G vert = 10$ does not appear to be necessary:



    If



    $cdc^{-1} = d, tag 1$



    then



    $cd = dc; tag 2$



    now if



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1}, tag 3$



    we may write



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1} = dcc^{-1} = d Longrightarrow d^2 = e_G; tag 4$



    that is, assuming (1) and (3) both hold contradicts the hypothesis



    $o(d) = 5. tag 5$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      But your assuming that G is commutative
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:02






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In the first equality
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @jk1998 Two elements $c,d$ of a group commuting does not imply that $G$ is commutative.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      Jan 26 at 20:07








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I know but, what I need to proof is that either one of the equalities hold, but not at the same time
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:09






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @DietrichBurde If c and d commute, would not the the commutivity of G be implied in this case?
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:21
















    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    I must confess that this answer is actually off-point, since shows the two hypotheses (1) and (3) are mutually exclusive, not that at least one holds.
    Nevertheless, for the time being at least, I'm leaving this answer as is, since it seems to have generated an engaging discussion in the comments.



    Let $e_G$ denote the identity element of $G$.



    The hypothesis $vert G vert = 10$ does not appear to be necessary:



    If



    $cdc^{-1} = d, tag 1$



    then



    $cd = dc; tag 2$



    now if



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1}, tag 3$



    we may write



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1} = dcc^{-1} = d Longrightarrow d^2 = e_G; tag 4$



    that is, assuming (1) and (3) both hold contradicts the hypothesis



    $o(d) = 5. tag 5$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I must confess that this answer is actually off-point, since shows the two hypotheses (1) and (3) are mutually exclusive, not that at least one holds.
    Nevertheless, for the time being at least, I'm leaving this answer as is, since it seems to have generated an engaging discussion in the comments.



    Let $e_G$ denote the identity element of $G$.



    The hypothesis $vert G vert = 10$ does not appear to be necessary:



    If



    $cdc^{-1} = d, tag 1$



    then



    $cd = dc; tag 2$



    now if



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1}, tag 3$



    we may write



    $d^{-1} = cdc^{-1} = dcc^{-1} = d Longrightarrow d^2 = e_G; tag 4$



    that is, assuming (1) and (3) both hold contradicts the hypothesis



    $o(d) = 5. tag 5$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jan 26 at 20:29

























    answered Jan 26 at 19:50









    Robert LewisRobert Lewis

    48.3k23167




    48.3k23167








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      But your assuming that G is commutative
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:02






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In the first equality
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @jk1998 Two elements $c,d$ of a group commuting does not imply that $G$ is commutative.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      Jan 26 at 20:07








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I know but, what I need to proof is that either one of the equalities hold, but not at the same time
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:09






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @DietrichBurde If c and d commute, would not the the commutivity of G be implied in this case?
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:21
















    • 1




      $begingroup$
      But your assuming that G is commutative
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:02






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In the first equality
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @jk1998 Two elements $c,d$ of a group commuting does not imply that $G$ is commutative.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      Jan 26 at 20:07








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I know but, what I need to proof is that either one of the equalities hold, but not at the same time
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:09






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @DietrichBurde If c and d commute, would not the the commutivity of G be implied in this case?
      $endgroup$
      – jk1998
      Jan 26 at 20:21










    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    But your assuming that G is commutative
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:02




    $begingroup$
    But your assuming that G is commutative
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:02




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    In the first equality
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:06




    $begingroup$
    In the first equality
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:06




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @jk1998 Two elements $c,d$ of a group commuting does not imply that $G$ is commutative.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 26 at 20:07






    $begingroup$
    @jk1998 Two elements $c,d$ of a group commuting does not imply that $G$ is commutative.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 26 at 20:07






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I know but, what I need to proof is that either one of the equalities hold, but not at the same time
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:09




    $begingroup$
    I know but, what I need to proof is that either one of the equalities hold, but not at the same time
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:09




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde If c and d commute, would not the the commutivity of G be implied in this case?
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:21






    $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde If c and d commute, would not the the commutivity of G be implied in this case?
    $endgroup$
    – jk1998
    Jan 26 at 20:21













    0












    $begingroup$

    My solution would be the following,
    Since the 5 order subgroup has index 2 it must be normal in G and has the factorgroup $Z/2Z$, therefore the commutatorgroup $[G,G]$ must be a subgroup of $<d>$, if it is trivial the first equation holds and G must be abelian, if it is the whole group the second one holds true.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      My solution would be the following,
      Since the 5 order subgroup has index 2 it must be normal in G and has the factorgroup $Z/2Z$, therefore the commutatorgroup $[G,G]$ must be a subgroup of $<d>$, if it is trivial the first equation holds and G must be abelian, if it is the whole group the second one holds true.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        My solution would be the following,
        Since the 5 order subgroup has index 2 it must be normal in G and has the factorgroup $Z/2Z$, therefore the commutatorgroup $[G,G]$ must be a subgroup of $<d>$, if it is trivial the first equation holds and G must be abelian, if it is the whole group the second one holds true.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        My solution would be the following,
        Since the 5 order subgroup has index 2 it must be normal in G and has the factorgroup $Z/2Z$, therefore the commutatorgroup $[G,G]$ must be a subgroup of $<d>$, if it is trivial the first equation holds and G must be abelian, if it is the whole group the second one holds true.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 27 at 11:18









        jk1998jk1998

        264




        264






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088635%2flet-c-be-an-element-of-order-2-and-d-an-element-of-order-5-in-a-group-g-with-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith