Moment-generating function of $Z:=X_1X_2+X_3X_4$












0












$begingroup$


Let $X_1,X_2,X_3,X_4$ be four indipendent random variable with normal distribution of mean 0 and variance 1. The exercise asks me to calculate the moment-generating function of $X_1X_2$. I was able to do it and I found that $$M_{X_1X_2}(z) = displaystylefrac{1}{sqrt{1-z^2}}$$
I believe that this result is correct since I found a similar question here. The exercise goes on and ask to prove that the moment-generating function of $Z:=X_1X_2+X_3X_4$ is $$M_Z(t)= displaystylefrac{1}{1+t^2}$$
What I write was:
$$M_Z(t)=Bbb E[e^{tZ}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2+tX_3X_4}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}e^{tX_3X_4}] overset{indip.}{=} Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}]Bbb E[e^{tX_3X_4}]=displaystyle left(frac{1}{sqrt{1-t^2}}right)^2=frac{1}{1-t^2}$$
Am I missing something or there is an error in the exercise's text?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Result is certainly true : stats.stackexchange.com/q/71126/119261.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @StubbornAtom. I wasn't able to find a reference of this
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 12:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom I have look that answer but it seems that they are calculating the characteristic function instead of the moment-generating function. In fact $M_Z(t)=phi(-it)$ (where $phi$ is the characteristic function) seems to confirm that my calculation where good(I have manually found $M_Z(t)$).
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, sorry. Yes the stated answer is wrong (if it was characteristic function it would have been true). It should be $M_Z(t)=1/(1-t^2)$, as confirmed here.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom Thank you for your time. If you want to make your comments into an answer I will gladly accept it!
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:59
















0












$begingroup$


Let $X_1,X_2,X_3,X_4$ be four indipendent random variable with normal distribution of mean 0 and variance 1. The exercise asks me to calculate the moment-generating function of $X_1X_2$. I was able to do it and I found that $$M_{X_1X_2}(z) = displaystylefrac{1}{sqrt{1-z^2}}$$
I believe that this result is correct since I found a similar question here. The exercise goes on and ask to prove that the moment-generating function of $Z:=X_1X_2+X_3X_4$ is $$M_Z(t)= displaystylefrac{1}{1+t^2}$$
What I write was:
$$M_Z(t)=Bbb E[e^{tZ}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2+tX_3X_4}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}e^{tX_3X_4}] overset{indip.}{=} Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}]Bbb E[e^{tX_3X_4}]=displaystyle left(frac{1}{sqrt{1-t^2}}right)^2=frac{1}{1-t^2}$$
Am I missing something or there is an error in the exercise's text?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Result is certainly true : stats.stackexchange.com/q/71126/119261.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @StubbornAtom. I wasn't able to find a reference of this
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 12:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom I have look that answer but it seems that they are calculating the characteristic function instead of the moment-generating function. In fact $M_Z(t)=phi(-it)$ (where $phi$ is the characteristic function) seems to confirm that my calculation where good(I have manually found $M_Z(t)$).
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, sorry. Yes the stated answer is wrong (if it was characteristic function it would have been true). It should be $M_Z(t)=1/(1-t^2)$, as confirmed here.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom Thank you for your time. If you want to make your comments into an answer I will gladly accept it!
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:59














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $X_1,X_2,X_3,X_4$ be four indipendent random variable with normal distribution of mean 0 and variance 1. The exercise asks me to calculate the moment-generating function of $X_1X_2$. I was able to do it and I found that $$M_{X_1X_2}(z) = displaystylefrac{1}{sqrt{1-z^2}}$$
I believe that this result is correct since I found a similar question here. The exercise goes on and ask to prove that the moment-generating function of $Z:=X_1X_2+X_3X_4$ is $$M_Z(t)= displaystylefrac{1}{1+t^2}$$
What I write was:
$$M_Z(t)=Bbb E[e^{tZ}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2+tX_3X_4}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}e^{tX_3X_4}] overset{indip.}{=} Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}]Bbb E[e^{tX_3X_4}]=displaystyle left(frac{1}{sqrt{1-t^2}}right)^2=frac{1}{1-t^2}$$
Am I missing something or there is an error in the exercise's text?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $X_1,X_2,X_3,X_4$ be four indipendent random variable with normal distribution of mean 0 and variance 1. The exercise asks me to calculate the moment-generating function of $X_1X_2$. I was able to do it and I found that $$M_{X_1X_2}(z) = displaystylefrac{1}{sqrt{1-z^2}}$$
I believe that this result is correct since I found a similar question here. The exercise goes on and ask to prove that the moment-generating function of $Z:=X_1X_2+X_3X_4$ is $$M_Z(t)= displaystylefrac{1}{1+t^2}$$
What I write was:
$$M_Z(t)=Bbb E[e^{tZ}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2+tX_3X_4}]=Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}e^{tX_3X_4}] overset{indip.}{=} Bbb E[e^{tX_1X_2}]Bbb E[e^{tX_3X_4}]=displaystyle left(frac{1}{sqrt{1-t^2}}right)^2=frac{1}{1-t^2}$$
Am I missing something or there is an error in the exercise's text?







proof-verification random-variables moment-generating-functions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 27 at 10:54









edo1998edo1998

419113




419113








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Result is certainly true : stats.stackexchange.com/q/71126/119261.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @StubbornAtom. I wasn't able to find a reference of this
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 12:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom I have look that answer but it seems that they are calculating the characteristic function instead of the moment-generating function. In fact $M_Z(t)=phi(-it)$ (where $phi$ is the characteristic function) seems to confirm that my calculation where good(I have manually found $M_Z(t)$).
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, sorry. Yes the stated answer is wrong (if it was characteristic function it would have been true). It should be $M_Z(t)=1/(1-t^2)$, as confirmed here.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom Thank you for your time. If you want to make your comments into an answer I will gladly accept it!
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:59














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Result is certainly true : stats.stackexchange.com/q/71126/119261.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @StubbornAtom. I wasn't able to find a reference of this
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 12:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom I have look that answer but it seems that they are calculating the characteristic function instead of the moment-generating function. In fact $M_Z(t)=phi(-it)$ (where $phi$ is the characteristic function) seems to confirm that my calculation where good(I have manually found $M_Z(t)$).
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, sorry. Yes the stated answer is wrong (if it was characteristic function it would have been true). It should be $M_Z(t)=1/(1-t^2)$, as confirmed here.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 27 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @StubbornAtom Thank you for your time. If you want to make your comments into an answer I will gladly accept it!
    $endgroup$
    – edo1998
    Jan 27 at 13:59








1




1




$begingroup$
Result is certainly true : stats.stackexchange.com/q/71126/119261.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 27 at 11:45




$begingroup$
Result is certainly true : stats.stackexchange.com/q/71126/119261.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 27 at 11:45












$begingroup$
Thank you @StubbornAtom. I wasn't able to find a reference of this
$endgroup$
– edo1998
Jan 27 at 12:54




$begingroup$
Thank you @StubbornAtom. I wasn't able to find a reference of this
$endgroup$
– edo1998
Jan 27 at 12:54




1




1




$begingroup$
@StubbornAtom I have look that answer but it seems that they are calculating the characteristic function instead of the moment-generating function. In fact $M_Z(t)=phi(-it)$ (where $phi$ is the characteristic function) seems to confirm that my calculation where good(I have manually found $M_Z(t)$).
$endgroup$
– edo1998
Jan 27 at 13:44




$begingroup$
@StubbornAtom I have look that answer but it seems that they are calculating the characteristic function instead of the moment-generating function. In fact $M_Z(t)=phi(-it)$ (where $phi$ is the characteristic function) seems to confirm that my calculation where good(I have manually found $M_Z(t)$).
$endgroup$
– edo1998
Jan 27 at 13:44












$begingroup$
You are right, sorry. Yes the stated answer is wrong (if it was characteristic function it would have been true). It should be $M_Z(t)=1/(1-t^2)$, as confirmed here.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 27 at 13:57




$begingroup$
You are right, sorry. Yes the stated answer is wrong (if it was characteristic function it would have been true). It should be $M_Z(t)=1/(1-t^2)$, as confirmed here.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 27 at 13:57












$begingroup$
@StubbornAtom Thank you for your time. If you want to make your comments into an answer I will gladly accept it!
$endgroup$
– edo1998
Jan 27 at 13:59




$begingroup$
@StubbornAtom Thank you for your time. If you want to make your comments into an answer I will gladly accept it!
$endgroup$
– edo1998
Jan 27 at 13:59










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089403%2fmoment-generating-function-of-z-x-1x-2x-3x-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089403%2fmoment-generating-function-of-z-x-1x-2x-3x-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith