Quotient Ring And Cosets
$begingroup$
I know that for a Ring $R$, the Quotient Ring $R/I$ is defined as the set of all cosets of $I$ in $R$.
And the definition of a coset being ${r+I : r in R}$
Now I can't really see why $R/R={0}$ with $R$ being the Real number in this definition. If someone could write out why the only coset of $R$ in $R$ is ${0}$ by the definition of cosets above I would be grateful.
My excuses if things seems unclear or not well defined or just not right, trying to learn some algebra on my own.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that for a Ring $R$, the Quotient Ring $R/I$ is defined as the set of all cosets of $I$ in $R$.
And the definition of a coset being ${r+I : r in R}$
Now I can't really see why $R/R={0}$ with $R$ being the Real number in this definition. If someone could write out why the only coset of $R$ in $R$ is ${0}$ by the definition of cosets above I would be grateful.
My excuses if things seems unclear or not well defined or just not right, trying to learn some algebra on my own.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
There seems to be some confusion: ${r+Imid rin R}$ is not the definition of a coset but rather the set of all cosets: $R/I={r+Imid rin R}$; cosets are sets of the form $r+I$ for $rin R$ and $r+I$ is the set ${r+imid iin I}$. To your question: there is exactly one coset in $R/R$, namely $R=0+R=r+R$ for every $rin R$ and the quotient ring $R/R$ is a ring having only one element, that is, it is isomorphic to the ring ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that for a Ring $R$, the Quotient Ring $R/I$ is defined as the set of all cosets of $I$ in $R$.
And the definition of a coset being ${r+I : r in R}$
Now I can't really see why $R/R={0}$ with $R$ being the Real number in this definition. If someone could write out why the only coset of $R$ in $R$ is ${0}$ by the definition of cosets above I would be grateful.
My excuses if things seems unclear or not well defined or just not right, trying to learn some algebra on my own.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
I know that for a Ring $R$, the Quotient Ring $R/I$ is defined as the set of all cosets of $I$ in $R$.
And the definition of a coset being ${r+I : r in R}$
Now I can't really see why $R/R={0}$ with $R$ being the Real number in this definition. If someone could write out why the only coset of $R$ in $R$ is ${0}$ by the definition of cosets above I would be grateful.
My excuses if things seems unclear or not well defined or just not right, trying to learn some algebra on my own.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory
edited Jan 26 at 11:19


Matt Samuel
38.9k63769
38.9k63769
asked Feb 11 '15 at 16:08
Frederic DuryFrederic Dury
83
83
1
$begingroup$
There seems to be some confusion: ${r+Imid rin R}$ is not the definition of a coset but rather the set of all cosets: $R/I={r+Imid rin R}$; cosets are sets of the form $r+I$ for $rin R$ and $r+I$ is the set ${r+imid iin I}$. To your question: there is exactly one coset in $R/R$, namely $R=0+R=r+R$ for every $rin R$ and the quotient ring $R/R$ is a ring having only one element, that is, it is isomorphic to the ring ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:35
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
There seems to be some confusion: ${r+Imid rin R}$ is not the definition of a coset but rather the set of all cosets: $R/I={r+Imid rin R}$; cosets are sets of the form $r+I$ for $rin R$ and $r+I$ is the set ${r+imid iin I}$. To your question: there is exactly one coset in $R/R$, namely $R=0+R=r+R$ for every $rin R$ and the quotient ring $R/R$ is a ring having only one element, that is, it is isomorphic to the ring ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:35
1
1
$begingroup$
There seems to be some confusion: ${r+Imid rin R}$ is not the definition of a coset but rather the set of all cosets: $R/I={r+Imid rin R}$; cosets are sets of the form $r+I$ for $rin R$ and $r+I$ is the set ${r+imid iin I}$. To your question: there is exactly one coset in $R/R$, namely $R=0+R=r+R$ for every $rin R$ and the quotient ring $R/R$ is a ring having only one element, that is, it is isomorphic to the ring ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:35
$begingroup$
There seems to be some confusion: ${r+Imid rin R}$ is not the definition of a coset but rather the set of all cosets: $R/I={r+Imid rin R}$; cosets are sets of the form $r+I$ for $rin R$ and $r+I$ is the set ${r+imid iin I}$. To your question: there is exactly one coset in $R/R$, namely $R=0+R=r+R$ for every $rin R$ and the quotient ring $R/R$ is a ring having only one element, that is, it is isomorphic to the ring ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:35
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two elements $r,s$ are in the same coset of an ideal $I$ is $r-sin I$. If $I=R$, then $r-0in I$ for all $r$. Thus every element is in the same coset as 0.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$x$ ~ $y$ for all $x, y in R$
Then R is a point. Say {0}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not $R$ is a point but rather $R/R$ is.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:38
$begingroup$
Sure. R/I = R/R = R/~
$endgroup$
– Vinícius Ferraz
Feb 14 '15 at 1:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1143726%2fquotient-ring-and-cosets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two elements $r,s$ are in the same coset of an ideal $I$ is $r-sin I$. If $I=R$, then $r-0in I$ for all $r$. Thus every element is in the same coset as 0.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two elements $r,s$ are in the same coset of an ideal $I$ is $r-sin I$. If $I=R$, then $r-0in I$ for all $r$. Thus every element is in the same coset as 0.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two elements $r,s$ are in the same coset of an ideal $I$ is $r-sin I$. If $I=R$, then $r-0in I$ for all $r$. Thus every element is in the same coset as 0.
$endgroup$
Two elements $r,s$ are in the same coset of an ideal $I$ is $r-sin I$. If $I=R$, then $r-0in I$ for all $r$. Thus every element is in the same coset as 0.
answered Feb 11 '15 at 16:20


Matt SamuelMatt Samuel
38.9k63769
38.9k63769
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$x$ ~ $y$ for all $x, y in R$
Then R is a point. Say {0}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not $R$ is a point but rather $R/R$ is.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:38
$begingroup$
Sure. R/I = R/R = R/~
$endgroup$
– Vinícius Ferraz
Feb 14 '15 at 1:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$x$ ~ $y$ for all $x, y in R$
Then R is a point. Say {0}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not $R$ is a point but rather $R/R$ is.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:38
$begingroup$
Sure. R/I = R/R = R/~
$endgroup$
– Vinícius Ferraz
Feb 14 '15 at 1:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$x$ ~ $y$ for all $x, y in R$
Then R is a point. Say {0}
$endgroup$
$x$ ~ $y$ for all $x, y in R$
Then R is a point. Say {0}
answered Feb 11 '15 at 16:37
Vinícius FerrazVinícius Ferraz
1214
1214
$begingroup$
Not $R$ is a point but rather $R/R$ is.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:38
$begingroup$
Sure. R/I = R/R = R/~
$endgroup$
– Vinícius Ferraz
Feb 14 '15 at 1:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not $R$ is a point but rather $R/R$ is.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:38
$begingroup$
Sure. R/I = R/R = R/~
$endgroup$
– Vinícius Ferraz
Feb 14 '15 at 1:15
$begingroup$
Not $R$ is a point but rather $R/R$ is.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:38
$begingroup$
Not $R$ is a point but rather $R/R$ is.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:38
$begingroup$
Sure. R/I = R/R = R/~
$endgroup$
– Vinícius Ferraz
Feb 14 '15 at 1:15
$begingroup$
Sure. R/I = R/R = R/~
$endgroup$
– Vinícius Ferraz
Feb 14 '15 at 1:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1143726%2fquotient-ring-and-cosets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
There seems to be some confusion: ${r+Imid rin R}$ is not the definition of a coset but rather the set of all cosets: $R/I={r+Imid rin R}$; cosets are sets of the form $r+I$ for $rin R$ and $r+I$ is the set ${r+imid iin I}$. To your question: there is exactly one coset in $R/R$, namely $R=0+R=r+R$ for every $rin R$ and the quotient ring $R/R$ is a ring having only one element, that is, it is isomorphic to the ring ${0}$.
$endgroup$
– user 59363
Feb 11 '15 at 16:35