Mixing
Reduce the size of vdots inside a table
1
Consider the following table
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
I am trying to reduce the size of vdots so there should be additional distance between the table rows due to the size of vdots
tables formatting threeparttable
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
add a comment |
1
Consider the following table
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
I am trying to reduce the size of vdots so there should be additional distance between the table rows due to the size of vdots
tables formatting threeparttable
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
1
Is this what you want to achieve? i.stack.imgur.com/5zlAL.png Apart from that, could you plase add a sketch of the desired output. At first glance 'reduce the size' and 'there should be an additional distance' seem to contradict each other.
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 9:53
That is exactly what I want. Do you want to add a comment,so that I can accept your answer
– Leo96
Jan 26 at 9:55
1
@4Leo96: You can define your ownvdotslike command as shown here: tex.stackexchange.com/a/112212/134144 However, I would prefer CarLaTeX's variant using `multirow
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 10:05
add a comment |
1
1
1
Consider the following table
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
I am trying to reduce the size of vdots so there should be additional distance between the table rows due to the size of vdots
tables formatting threeparttable
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
Consider the following table
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
I am trying to reduce the size of vdots so there should be additional distance between the table rows due to the size of vdots
tables formatting threeparttable
tables formatting threeparttable
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
asked Jan 26 at 9:47
Leo96Leo96
675
675
1
Is this what you want to achieve? i.stack.imgur.com/5zlAL.png Apart from that, could you plase add a sketch of the desired output. At first glance 'reduce the size' and 'there should be an additional distance' seem to contradict each other.
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 9:53
That is exactly what I want. Do you want to add a comment,so that I can accept your answer
– Leo96
Jan 26 at 9:55
1
@4Leo96: You can define your ownvdotslike command as shown here: tex.stackexchange.com/a/112212/134144 However, I would prefer CarLaTeX's variant using `multirow
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 10:05
add a comment |
1
Is this what you want to achieve? i.stack.imgur.com/5zlAL.png Apart from that, could you plase add a sketch of the desired output. At first glance 'reduce the size' and 'there should be an additional distance' seem to contradict each other.
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 9:53
That is exactly what I want. Do you want to add a comment,so that I can accept your answer
– Leo96
Jan 26 at 9:55
1
@4Leo96: You can define your ownvdotslike command as shown here: tex.stackexchange.com/a/112212/134144 However, I would prefer CarLaTeX's variant using `multirow
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 10:05
1
1
Is this what you want to achieve? i.stack.imgur.com/5zlAL.png Apart from that, could you plase add a sketch of the desired output. At first glance 'reduce the size' and 'there should be an additional distance' seem to contradict each other.
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 9:53
Is this what you want to achieve? i.stack.imgur.com/5zlAL.png Apart from that, could you plase add a sketch of the desired output. At first glance 'reduce the size' and 'there should be an additional distance' seem to contradict each other.
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 9:53
That is exactly what I want. Do you want to add a comment,so that I can accept your answer
– Leo96
Jan 26 at 9:55
That is exactly what I want. Do you want to add a comment,so that I can accept your answer
– Leo96
Jan 26 at 9:55
1
1
@4Leo96: You can define your own
vdots like command as shown here: tex.stackexchange.com/a/112212/134144 However, I would prefer CarLaTeX's variant using `multirow– leandriis
Jan 26 at 10:05
@4Leo96: You can define your own
vdots like command as shown here: tex.stackexchange.com/a/112212/134144 However, I would prefer CarLaTeX's variant using `multirow– leandriis
Jan 26 at 10:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
3
I don't know if I correctly understand you needs, but why don't use multirow?
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471928%2freduce-the-size-of-vdots-inside-a-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
3
I don't know if I correctly understand you needs, but why don't use multirow?
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
add a comment |
3
I don't know if I correctly understand you needs, but why don't use multirow?
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
add a comment |
3
3
3
I don't know if I correctly understand you needs, but why don't use multirow?
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
I don't know if I correctly understand you needs, but why don't use multirow?
documentclass[12pt, bibliography=totocnumbered, listof=totoc]{scrartcl}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttable}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
begin{document}
begin{table}[h]
centering
begin{threeparttable}
renewcommand*TPTnoteLabel[1]{parbox[b]{19pt}{hfill#1}}
caption{DiD-Matching Schätzer}
label{tab:DiD}
begin{tabular}{ccccc}
toprule
& Wertschöpfung & Beschäftigung & Gewinnspanne & Exporte \
toprule
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Jahresvergleiche: Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
$t$ \
2013 & $hat{tau}_{1,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,13}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,13}$\
2014 & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} & multirow{3}{*}{vdots} \
2015 & & \
2016 & & \
2017 & $hat{tau}_{1,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,17}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,17}$\
noalign{vskip 2mm}
multicolumn{5}{l}{textit{Vergleich: Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode}} \
midrule
Phase III & $hat{tau}_{1,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{2,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{3,III}$ & $hat{tau}_{4,III}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
begin{tablenotes}
footnotesize
item Aggregierte Vorbehandlungsperiode: $2003-2004$, Phase III: $2013-2017$.
end{tablenotes}
end{threeparttable}
end{table}
end{document}
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
answered Jan 26 at 9:58
CarLaTeXCarLaTeX
33.8k551139
33.8k551139
add a comment |
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471928%2freduce-the-size-of-vdots-inside-a-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Is this what you want to achieve? i.stack.imgur.com/5zlAL.png Apart from that, could you plase add a sketch of the desired output. At first glance 'reduce the size' and 'there should be an additional distance' seem to contradict each other.
– leandriis
Jan 26 at 9:53
That is exactly what I want. Do you want to add a comment,so that I can accept your answer
– Leo96
Jan 26 at 9:55
1
@4Leo96: You can define your own
vdotslike command as shown here: tex.stackexchange.com/a/112212/134144 However, I would prefer CarLaTeX's variant using `multirow– leandriis
Jan 26 at 10:05