“Reverse Direction” of the Euler Characteristic for a Triangulated Space












0












$begingroup$


If $X$ is triangulated, the Euler characteristic of the triangulation is the alternating sum $f_0 − f_1 + f_2-...$ where the number $f_n$ counts the n-simplices in the triangulation.



I know that any triangulation of a topological space must satisfy the topological invariant that is the Euler Characteristic.




However is the converse true. For example: five vertices, nine line segments and six triangles would give an Euler Characteristic of 2. Does this imply that a sphere, which has characteristic 2, could have a triangulation of this form?




It would imply having triangulations with almost arbitrarily large vertices, lines and triangles for a sphere, so I think the answer could be no but I am struggling to prove/disprove it.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    If $X$ is triangulated, the Euler characteristic of the triangulation is the alternating sum $f_0 − f_1 + f_2-...$ where the number $f_n$ counts the n-simplices in the triangulation.



    I know that any triangulation of a topological space must satisfy the topological invariant that is the Euler Characteristic.




    However is the converse true. For example: five vertices, nine line segments and six triangles would give an Euler Characteristic of 2. Does this imply that a sphere, which has characteristic 2, could have a triangulation of this form?




    It would imply having triangulations with almost arbitrarily large vertices, lines and triangles for a sphere, so I think the answer could be no but I am struggling to prove/disprove it.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      If $X$ is triangulated, the Euler characteristic of the triangulation is the alternating sum $f_0 − f_1 + f_2-...$ where the number $f_n$ counts the n-simplices in the triangulation.



      I know that any triangulation of a topological space must satisfy the topological invariant that is the Euler Characteristic.




      However is the converse true. For example: five vertices, nine line segments and six triangles would give an Euler Characteristic of 2. Does this imply that a sphere, which has characteristic 2, could have a triangulation of this form?




      It would imply having triangulations with almost arbitrarily large vertices, lines and triangles for a sphere, so I think the answer could be no but I am struggling to prove/disprove it.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      If $X$ is triangulated, the Euler characteristic of the triangulation is the alternating sum $f_0 − f_1 + f_2-...$ where the number $f_n$ counts the n-simplices in the triangulation.



      I know that any triangulation of a topological space must satisfy the topological invariant that is the Euler Characteristic.




      However is the converse true. For example: five vertices, nine line segments and six triangles would give an Euler Characteristic of 2. Does this imply that a sphere, which has characteristic 2, could have a triangulation of this form?




      It would imply having triangulations with almost arbitrarily large vertices, lines and triangles for a sphere, so I think the answer could be no but I am struggling to prove/disprove it.







      algebraic-topology triangulation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 25 at 11:50









      MatthewMatthew

      337112




      337112






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          It is not true, The Euler characteristic of an odd dimensional sphere and an odd dimensional torus is $0$, the triangulation with one zero cell and one $2n+1$-cell is the $2n+1$-dimensional sphere, not the torus.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087008%2freverse-direction-of-the-euler-characteristic-for-a-triangulated-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            It is not true, The Euler characteristic of an odd dimensional sphere and an odd dimensional torus is $0$, the triangulation with one zero cell and one $2n+1$-cell is the $2n+1$-dimensional sphere, not the torus.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              It is not true, The Euler characteristic of an odd dimensional sphere and an odd dimensional torus is $0$, the triangulation with one zero cell and one $2n+1$-cell is the $2n+1$-dimensional sphere, not the torus.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                It is not true, The Euler characteristic of an odd dimensional sphere and an odd dimensional torus is $0$, the triangulation with one zero cell and one $2n+1$-cell is the $2n+1$-dimensional sphere, not the torus.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                It is not true, The Euler characteristic of an odd dimensional sphere and an odd dimensional torus is $0$, the triangulation with one zero cell and one $2n+1$-cell is the $2n+1$-dimensional sphere, not the torus.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 25 at 12:46









                Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

                59.6k11446




                59.6k11446






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087008%2freverse-direction-of-the-euler-characteristic-for-a-triangulated-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith