The use of the noun “number” in context
Tell me please if the use of the word number is correct and natural in the following context.
Person 1: How many of you are today at work?
Person 2: We are the same number as we were yesterday.
word-choice
add a comment |
Tell me please if the use of the word number is correct and natural in the following context.
Person 1: How many of you are today at work?
Person 2: We are the same number as we were yesterday.
word-choice
add a comment |
Tell me please if the use of the word number is correct and natural in the following context.
Person 1: How many of you are today at work?
Person 2: We are the same number as we were yesterday.
word-choice
Tell me please if the use of the word number is correct and natural in the following context.
Person 1: How many of you are today at work?
Person 2: We are the same number as we were yesterday.
word-choice
word-choice
asked Jan 26 at 11:59
Dmytro O'HopeDmytro O'Hope
3,0621931
3,0621931
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Person 1: How many of you are at work today? (notice word order)
Person 2: We are the same number as yesterday. (This is correct and would be understood although it sounds like something that might have been said in the 19th century.)
Nowadays the following replies would be more likely:
Person 2:
[There's] the same number as yesterday.
[There are] as many [of us] as there were yesterday.
The bracketed parts are optional in informal speech.
+1 for pegging it as something of an archaism.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 26 at 13:42
add a comment |
That's grammatical but we are the same number is unlikely to be heard in a contemporary conversation.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194210%2fthe-use-of-the-noun-number-in-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Person 1: How many of you are at work today? (notice word order)
Person 2: We are the same number as yesterday. (This is correct and would be understood although it sounds like something that might have been said in the 19th century.)
Nowadays the following replies would be more likely:
Person 2:
[There's] the same number as yesterday.
[There are] as many [of us] as there were yesterday.
The bracketed parts are optional in informal speech.
+1 for pegging it as something of an archaism.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 26 at 13:42
add a comment |
Person 1: How many of you are at work today? (notice word order)
Person 2: We are the same number as yesterday. (This is correct and would be understood although it sounds like something that might have been said in the 19th century.)
Nowadays the following replies would be more likely:
Person 2:
[There's] the same number as yesterday.
[There are] as many [of us] as there were yesterday.
The bracketed parts are optional in informal speech.
+1 for pegging it as something of an archaism.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 26 at 13:42
add a comment |
Person 1: How many of you are at work today? (notice word order)
Person 2: We are the same number as yesterday. (This is correct and would be understood although it sounds like something that might have been said in the 19th century.)
Nowadays the following replies would be more likely:
Person 2:
[There's] the same number as yesterday.
[There are] as many [of us] as there were yesterday.
The bracketed parts are optional in informal speech.
Person 1: How many of you are at work today? (notice word order)
Person 2: We are the same number as yesterday. (This is correct and would be understood although it sounds like something that might have been said in the 19th century.)
Nowadays the following replies would be more likely:
Person 2:
[There's] the same number as yesterday.
[There are] as many [of us] as there were yesterday.
The bracketed parts are optional in informal speech.
answered Jan 26 at 12:55


chasly from UKchasly from UK
2,571313
2,571313
+1 for pegging it as something of an archaism.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 26 at 13:42
add a comment |
+1 for pegging it as something of an archaism.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 26 at 13:42
+1 for pegging it as something of an archaism.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 26 at 13:42
+1 for pegging it as something of an archaism.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 26 at 13:42
add a comment |
That's grammatical but we are the same number is unlikely to be heard in a contemporary conversation.
add a comment |
That's grammatical but we are the same number is unlikely to be heard in a contemporary conversation.
add a comment |
That's grammatical but we are the same number is unlikely to be heard in a contemporary conversation.
That's grammatical but we are the same number is unlikely to be heard in a contemporary conversation.
answered Jan 26 at 13:39


TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
114k788182
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194210%2fthe-use-of-the-noun-number-in-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown