Typesafe react decorator not recognizing the ReturnType of the passed function












2















I'm trying to extend the redux connect so it can be used with particular reducer/state as a decorator, it's probably not necessary because redux connect can be used as a decorator, but I am curious why I can't make it work the way I want.



This is the HOC that I am using as a decorator:



interface InjectedProps { userId: string; }
type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => InjectedProps;
export function withUserSetting(
stateToProps?: StateToProps
): <P extends InjectedProps>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
return <P extends InjectedProps>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
render() {
return <Comp {...this.props} />;
}
}
return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
};
}


It works fine and it will alert me if the Props is missing, that's because it expecting return type of 'InjectedProps':



enter image description here



however, I would like to modify hoc so it can alert me based on the return type of the 'stateToProps':



type AnyFunction = (...args: any) => any;
type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => { [key: string]: any };
export function withUserSetting<T extends AnyFunction>(
stateToProps?: StateToProps
): <P extends ReturnType<T>>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
return <P extends ReturnType<T>>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
render() {
return <Comp {...this.props} />;
}
}
return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
};
}


as you can see the 'InjectedProps' is not required anymore so it can have any prop name, and I am assuming because of the 'ReturnType' decorator should recognize props automatically and alert me if it's not declared for the component, but it doesn't have any effect:



enter image description here



decorator works fine, however, I don't have a type safety I am looking for!
any idea why it's not working?










share|improve this question



























    2















    I'm trying to extend the redux connect so it can be used with particular reducer/state as a decorator, it's probably not necessary because redux connect can be used as a decorator, but I am curious why I can't make it work the way I want.



    This is the HOC that I am using as a decorator:



    interface InjectedProps { userId: string; }
    type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
    type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => InjectedProps;
    export function withUserSetting(
    stateToProps?: StateToProps
    ): <P extends InjectedProps>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
    return <P extends InjectedProps>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
    class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
    render() {
    return <Comp {...this.props} />;
    }
    }
    return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
    };
    }


    It works fine and it will alert me if the Props is missing, that's because it expecting return type of 'InjectedProps':



    enter image description here



    however, I would like to modify hoc so it can alert me based on the return type of the 'stateToProps':



    type AnyFunction = (...args: any) => any;
    type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
    type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => { [key: string]: any };
    export function withUserSetting<T extends AnyFunction>(
    stateToProps?: StateToProps
    ): <P extends ReturnType<T>>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
    return <P extends ReturnType<T>>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
    class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
    render() {
    return <Comp {...this.props} />;
    }
    }
    return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
    };
    }


    as you can see the 'InjectedProps' is not required anymore so it can have any prop name, and I am assuming because of the 'ReturnType' decorator should recognize props automatically and alert me if it's not declared for the component, but it doesn't have any effect:



    enter image description here



    decorator works fine, however, I don't have a type safety I am looking for!
    any idea why it's not working?










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2








      I'm trying to extend the redux connect so it can be used with particular reducer/state as a decorator, it's probably not necessary because redux connect can be used as a decorator, but I am curious why I can't make it work the way I want.



      This is the HOC that I am using as a decorator:



      interface InjectedProps { userId: string; }
      type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
      type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => InjectedProps;
      export function withUserSetting(
      stateToProps?: StateToProps
      ): <P extends InjectedProps>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
      return <P extends InjectedProps>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
      class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
      render() {
      return <Comp {...this.props} />;
      }
      }
      return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
      };
      }


      It works fine and it will alert me if the Props is missing, that's because it expecting return type of 'InjectedProps':



      enter image description here



      however, I would like to modify hoc so it can alert me based on the return type of the 'stateToProps':



      type AnyFunction = (...args: any) => any;
      type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
      type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => { [key: string]: any };
      export function withUserSetting<T extends AnyFunction>(
      stateToProps?: StateToProps
      ): <P extends ReturnType<T>>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
      return <P extends ReturnType<T>>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
      class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
      render() {
      return <Comp {...this.props} />;
      }
      }
      return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
      };
      }


      as you can see the 'InjectedProps' is not required anymore so it can have any prop name, and I am assuming because of the 'ReturnType' decorator should recognize props automatically and alert me if it's not declared for the component, but it doesn't have any effect:



      enter image description here



      decorator works fine, however, I don't have a type safety I am looking for!
      any idea why it's not working?










      share|improve this question














      I'm trying to extend the redux connect so it can be used with particular reducer/state as a decorator, it's probably not necessary because redux connect can be used as a decorator, but I am curious why I can't make it work the way I want.



      This is the HOC that I am using as a decorator:



      interface InjectedProps { userId: string; }
      type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
      type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => InjectedProps;
      export function withUserSetting(
      stateToProps?: StateToProps
      ): <P extends InjectedProps>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
      return <P extends InjectedProps>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
      class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
      render() {
      return <Comp {...this.props} />;
      }
      }
      return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
      };
      }


      It works fine and it will alert me if the Props is missing, that's because it expecting return type of 'InjectedProps':



      enter image description here



      however, I would like to modify hoc so it can alert me based on the return type of the 'stateToProps':



      type AnyFunction = (...args: any) => any;
      type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
      type StateToProps = (setting: ApplicationState) => { [key: string]: any };
      export function withUserSetting<T extends AnyFunction>(
      stateToProps?: StateToProps
      ): <P extends ReturnType<T>>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
      return <P extends ReturnType<T>>(Comp: ComponentType<P>) => {
      class NewComponent extends (Component || PureComponent)<P> {
      render() {
      return <Comp {...this.props} />;
      }
      }
      return connect(stateToProps)(NewComponent as any);
      };
      }


      as you can see the 'InjectedProps' is not required anymore so it can have any prop name, and I am assuming because of the 'ReturnType' decorator should recognize props automatically and alert me if it's not declared for the component, but it doesn't have any effect:



      enter image description here



      decorator works fine, however, I don't have a type safety I am looking for!
      any idea why it's not working?







      reactjs typescript decorator






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 2 at 15:43









      cyrus-dcyrus-d

      164418




      164418
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          After simplifying the code, and understand it better, I have managed to make it work, this is the working version:



          type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
          type MapStateToProps<T> = (setting: ApplicationState) => T;
          export function withUserSetting<T>(mapStateToProps?: MapStateToProps<T>):
          <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
          return <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => {
          return connect(mapStateToProps)(WrappedComponent as any);
          };
          }


          Now it can be used like this:



          @withUserSetting((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


          Or like this:



          @withUserSetting<UserProps>((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


          In both ways, it will raise an error if a property is missing in the declaration.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54009189%2ftypesafe-react-decorator-not-recognizing-the-returntype-of-the-passed-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            After simplifying the code, and understand it better, I have managed to make it work, this is the working version:



            type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
            type MapStateToProps<T> = (setting: ApplicationState) => T;
            export function withUserSetting<T>(mapStateToProps?: MapStateToProps<T>):
            <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
            return <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => {
            return connect(mapStateToProps)(WrappedComponent as any);
            };
            }


            Now it can be used like this:



            @withUserSetting((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


            Or like this:



            @withUserSetting<UserProps>((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


            In both ways, it will raise an error if a property is missing in the declaration.






            share|improve this answer






























              0














              After simplifying the code, and understand it better, I have managed to make it work, this is the working version:



              type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
              type MapStateToProps<T> = (setting: ApplicationState) => T;
              export function withUserSetting<T>(mapStateToProps?: MapStateToProps<T>):
              <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
              return <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => {
              return connect(mapStateToProps)(WrappedComponent as any);
              };
              }


              Now it can be used like this:



              @withUserSetting((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


              Or like this:



              @withUserSetting<UserProps>((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


              In both ways, it will raise an error if a property is missing in the declaration.






              share|improve this answer




























                0












                0








                0







                After simplifying the code, and understand it better, I have managed to make it work, this is the working version:



                type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
                type MapStateToProps<T> = (setting: ApplicationState) => T;
                export function withUserSetting<T>(mapStateToProps?: MapStateToProps<T>):
                <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
                return <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => {
                return connect(mapStateToProps)(WrappedComponent as any);
                };
                }


                Now it can be used like this:



                @withUserSetting((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


                Or like this:



                @withUserSetting<UserProps>((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


                In both ways, it will raise an error if a property is missing in the declaration.






                share|improve this answer















                After simplifying the code, and understand it better, I have managed to make it work, this is the working version:



                type ComponentType<P> = React.ComponentClass<P> | React.StatelessComponent<P>;
                type MapStateToProps<T> = (setting: ApplicationState) => T;
                export function withUserSetting<T>(mapStateToProps?: MapStateToProps<T>):
                <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => void {
                return <P extends T>(WrappedComponent: ComponentType<P>) => {
                return connect(mapStateToProps)(WrappedComponent as any);
                };
                }


                Now it can be used like this:



                @withUserSetting((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


                Or like this:



                @withUserSetting<UserProps>((state) => ({ userId: state.userSetting.userId }))


                In both ways, it will raise an error if a property is missing in the declaration.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 3 at 10:27

























                answered Jan 3 at 8:57









                cyrus-dcyrus-d

                164418




                164418
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54009189%2ftypesafe-react-decorator-not-recognizing-the-returntype-of-the-passed-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith