Why the product of two manifolds is paracompact?
$begingroup$
Some authors define a manifold as a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally Euclidean. Also it is said that a product of two manifolds is a manifold.
However, we know that product of a two paracompact spaces is not necessarily paracompact.
So how can we be sure that a product of two manifolds is also paracompact and thus is also a manifold? Is it somehow related to the second-countability property that is usually defined along paracompactness?
general-topology differential-geometry manifolds paracompactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some authors define a manifold as a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally Euclidean. Also it is said that a product of two manifolds is a manifold.
However, we know that product of a two paracompact spaces is not necessarily paracompact.
So how can we be sure that a product of two manifolds is also paracompact and thus is also a manifold? Is it somehow related to the second-countability property that is usually defined along paracompactness?
general-topology differential-geometry manifolds paracompactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some authors define a manifold as a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally Euclidean. Also it is said that a product of two manifolds is a manifold.
However, we know that product of a two paracompact spaces is not necessarily paracompact.
So how can we be sure that a product of two manifolds is also paracompact and thus is also a manifold? Is it somehow related to the second-countability property that is usually defined along paracompactness?
general-topology differential-geometry manifolds paracompactness
$endgroup$
Some authors define a manifold as a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally Euclidean. Also it is said that a product of two manifolds is a manifold.
However, we know that product of a two paracompact spaces is not necessarily paracompact.
So how can we be sure that a product of two manifolds is also paracompact and thus is also a manifold? Is it somehow related to the second-countability property that is usually defined along paracompactness?
general-topology differential-geometry manifolds paracompactness
general-topology differential-geometry manifolds paracompactness
edited Jan 25 at 5:26
Eric Wofsey
190k14216347
190k14216347
asked Apr 8 '17 at 18:29
Sergey DyldaSergey Dylda
1466
1466
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By the Smirnov metrization theorem, a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally metrizable is metrizable. Therefore every manifold is metrizable, and hence so is the product of two manifolds. In particular the product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
IIRC this is called the Smirnov metrication theorem
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Apr 8 '17 at 18:41
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! If I understood it right, it is something like this: Locally Euclidean -> Locally Metrizable -> Metrizable (Hausdorff & paracompact) -> Product of two metrizable spaces is metrizable -> Every metrizable space is paracompact -> Product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
– Sergey Dylda
Apr 8 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
@Sergey Yes that's right.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Apr 8 '17 at 18:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A connected manifold is paracompact iff it is second-countable, so a general paracompact manifold is just a (possibly uncountable) disjoint union of second-countable manifolds. So, if you take a product of two such spaces, you get a disjoint union of products of two second-countable manifolds. A product of two second-countable spaces is second-countable, so each connected component of the product is second-countable and thus paracompact. So, the product is a disjoint union of paracompact spaces and thus itself paracompact.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2225173%2fwhy-the-product-of-two-manifolds-is-paracompact%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By the Smirnov metrization theorem, a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally metrizable is metrizable. Therefore every manifold is metrizable, and hence so is the product of two manifolds. In particular the product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
IIRC this is called the Smirnov metrication theorem
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Apr 8 '17 at 18:41
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! If I understood it right, it is something like this: Locally Euclidean -> Locally Metrizable -> Metrizable (Hausdorff & paracompact) -> Product of two metrizable spaces is metrizable -> Every metrizable space is paracompact -> Product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
– Sergey Dylda
Apr 8 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
@Sergey Yes that's right.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Apr 8 '17 at 18:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By the Smirnov metrization theorem, a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally metrizable is metrizable. Therefore every manifold is metrizable, and hence so is the product of two manifolds. In particular the product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
IIRC this is called the Smirnov metrication theorem
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Apr 8 '17 at 18:41
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! If I understood it right, it is something like this: Locally Euclidean -> Locally Metrizable -> Metrizable (Hausdorff & paracompact) -> Product of two metrizable spaces is metrizable -> Every metrizable space is paracompact -> Product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
– Sergey Dylda
Apr 8 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
@Sergey Yes that's right.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Apr 8 '17 at 18:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By the Smirnov metrization theorem, a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally metrizable is metrizable. Therefore every manifold is metrizable, and hence so is the product of two manifolds. In particular the product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
By the Smirnov metrization theorem, a paracompact Hausdorff space that is locally metrizable is metrizable. Therefore every manifold is metrizable, and hence so is the product of two manifolds. In particular the product is paracompact.
edited Apr 8 '17 at 18:43
answered Apr 8 '17 at 18:35


Matt SamuelMatt Samuel
38.8k63769
38.8k63769
1
$begingroup$
IIRC this is called the Smirnov metrication theorem
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Apr 8 '17 at 18:41
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! If I understood it right, it is something like this: Locally Euclidean -> Locally Metrizable -> Metrizable (Hausdorff & paracompact) -> Product of two metrizable spaces is metrizable -> Every metrizable space is paracompact -> Product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
– Sergey Dylda
Apr 8 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
@Sergey Yes that's right.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Apr 8 '17 at 18:45
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
IIRC this is called the Smirnov metrication theorem
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Apr 8 '17 at 18:41
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! If I understood it right, it is something like this: Locally Euclidean -> Locally Metrizable -> Metrizable (Hausdorff & paracompact) -> Product of two metrizable spaces is metrizable -> Every metrizable space is paracompact -> Product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
– Sergey Dylda
Apr 8 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
@Sergey Yes that's right.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Apr 8 '17 at 18:45
1
1
$begingroup$
IIRC this is called the Smirnov metrication theorem
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Apr 8 '17 at 18:41
$begingroup$
IIRC this is called the Smirnov metrication theorem
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Apr 8 '17 at 18:41
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! If I understood it right, it is something like this: Locally Euclidean -> Locally Metrizable -> Metrizable (Hausdorff & paracompact) -> Product of two metrizable spaces is metrizable -> Every metrizable space is paracompact -> Product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
– Sergey Dylda
Apr 8 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! If I understood it right, it is something like this: Locally Euclidean -> Locally Metrizable -> Metrizable (Hausdorff & paracompact) -> Product of two metrizable spaces is metrizable -> Every metrizable space is paracompact -> Product is paracompact.
$endgroup$
– Sergey Dylda
Apr 8 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
@Sergey Yes that's right.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Apr 8 '17 at 18:45
$begingroup$
@Sergey Yes that's right.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Apr 8 '17 at 18:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A connected manifold is paracompact iff it is second-countable, so a general paracompact manifold is just a (possibly uncountable) disjoint union of second-countable manifolds. So, if you take a product of two such spaces, you get a disjoint union of products of two second-countable manifolds. A product of two second-countable spaces is second-countable, so each connected component of the product is second-countable and thus paracompact. So, the product is a disjoint union of paracompact spaces and thus itself paracompact.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A connected manifold is paracompact iff it is second-countable, so a general paracompact manifold is just a (possibly uncountable) disjoint union of second-countable manifolds. So, if you take a product of two such spaces, you get a disjoint union of products of two second-countable manifolds. A product of two second-countable spaces is second-countable, so each connected component of the product is second-countable and thus paracompact. So, the product is a disjoint union of paracompact spaces and thus itself paracompact.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A connected manifold is paracompact iff it is second-countable, so a general paracompact manifold is just a (possibly uncountable) disjoint union of second-countable manifolds. So, if you take a product of two such spaces, you get a disjoint union of products of two second-countable manifolds. A product of two second-countable spaces is second-countable, so each connected component of the product is second-countable and thus paracompact. So, the product is a disjoint union of paracompact spaces and thus itself paracompact.
$endgroup$
A connected manifold is paracompact iff it is second-countable, so a general paracompact manifold is just a (possibly uncountable) disjoint union of second-countable manifolds. So, if you take a product of two such spaces, you get a disjoint union of products of two second-countable manifolds. A product of two second-countable spaces is second-countable, so each connected component of the product is second-countable and thus paracompact. So, the product is a disjoint union of paracompact spaces and thus itself paracompact.
answered Jan 25 at 5:26
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
190k14216347
190k14216347
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2225173%2fwhy-the-product-of-two-manifolds-is-paracompact%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown