show $[0,1]$ is uncountable using outer measure
$begingroup$
This is a question from Real Analysis by Royden, 4th edition. (#5, pg. 34)
Using properties of outer measure, prove that $[0,1]$ is uncountable.
I believe that I am going to have to assume otherwise and use countable subadditivity in some way to produce a contradiction. I am not sure how to do so though. What other properties of outer measure might I need?
Thank you for any help!
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a question from Real Analysis by Royden, 4th edition. (#5, pg. 34)
Using properties of outer measure, prove that $[0,1]$ is uncountable.
I believe that I am going to have to assume otherwise and use countable subadditivity in some way to produce a contradiction. I am not sure how to do so though. What other properties of outer measure might I need?
Thank you for any help!
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a question from Real Analysis by Royden, 4th edition. (#5, pg. 34)
Using properties of outer measure, prove that $[0,1]$ is uncountable.
I believe that I am going to have to assume otherwise and use countable subadditivity in some way to produce a contradiction. I am not sure how to do so though. What other properties of outer measure might I need?
Thank you for any help!
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
This is a question from Real Analysis by Royden, 4th edition. (#5, pg. 34)
Using properties of outer measure, prove that $[0,1]$ is uncountable.
I believe that I am going to have to assume otherwise and use countable subadditivity in some way to produce a contradiction. I am not sure how to do so though. What other properties of outer measure might I need?
Thank you for any help!
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
asked Sep 10 '14 at 19:16
RebekahRebekah
443614
443614
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Do you already know points have measure zero?
If so, then enumerate all points in $[0,1]$. The "countable" union of all these points is the entire interval, with measure $1$. The "countable" sum of the measures of all these points, on the other hand, is...
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
In any proof of the fact that [0,1] is uncountable, you are bound to use the completeness axiom of the real numbers (after all, it is this completeness axiom that gives birth to the irrationals from the rationals, which previously formed a countable set!). For example, in Cantor's proof, it was used in the fact that every real number has a decimal representation. Hence, in Baron VT's proof also, the completeness axiom is exploited somewhere! Can you figure out, where? These kind of exercises will help you develop your mathematical feelings more and more!
$endgroup$
– Somabha Mukherjee
Sep 10 '14 at 20:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let [0 1] is countable then outer measure of [0 1] is "zero" because outer measure of countable st is zero . and we also know that outer measure of [a b] is "b-a" so m*[0 1]=1-0=1.
This is contradiction our assumption so [0 1] is uncountable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f926697%2fshow-0-1-is-uncountable-using-outer-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Do you already know points have measure zero?
If so, then enumerate all points in $[0,1]$. The "countable" union of all these points is the entire interval, with measure $1$. The "countable" sum of the measures of all these points, on the other hand, is...
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
In any proof of the fact that [0,1] is uncountable, you are bound to use the completeness axiom of the real numbers (after all, it is this completeness axiom that gives birth to the irrationals from the rationals, which previously formed a countable set!). For example, in Cantor's proof, it was used in the fact that every real number has a decimal representation. Hence, in Baron VT's proof also, the completeness axiom is exploited somewhere! Can you figure out, where? These kind of exercises will help you develop your mathematical feelings more and more!
$endgroup$
– Somabha Mukherjee
Sep 10 '14 at 20:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do you already know points have measure zero?
If so, then enumerate all points in $[0,1]$. The "countable" union of all these points is the entire interval, with measure $1$. The "countable" sum of the measures of all these points, on the other hand, is...
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
In any proof of the fact that [0,1] is uncountable, you are bound to use the completeness axiom of the real numbers (after all, it is this completeness axiom that gives birth to the irrationals from the rationals, which previously formed a countable set!). For example, in Cantor's proof, it was used in the fact that every real number has a decimal representation. Hence, in Baron VT's proof also, the completeness axiom is exploited somewhere! Can you figure out, where? These kind of exercises will help you develop your mathematical feelings more and more!
$endgroup$
– Somabha Mukherjee
Sep 10 '14 at 20:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do you already know points have measure zero?
If so, then enumerate all points in $[0,1]$. The "countable" union of all these points is the entire interval, with measure $1$. The "countable" sum of the measures of all these points, on the other hand, is...
$endgroup$
Do you already know points have measure zero?
If so, then enumerate all points in $[0,1]$. The "countable" union of all these points is the entire interval, with measure $1$. The "countable" sum of the measures of all these points, on the other hand, is...
answered Sep 10 '14 at 19:21


BaronVTBaronVT
11.6k11337
11.6k11337
2
$begingroup$
In any proof of the fact that [0,1] is uncountable, you are bound to use the completeness axiom of the real numbers (after all, it is this completeness axiom that gives birth to the irrationals from the rationals, which previously formed a countable set!). For example, in Cantor's proof, it was used in the fact that every real number has a decimal representation. Hence, in Baron VT's proof also, the completeness axiom is exploited somewhere! Can you figure out, where? These kind of exercises will help you develop your mathematical feelings more and more!
$endgroup$
– Somabha Mukherjee
Sep 10 '14 at 20:24
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
In any proof of the fact that [0,1] is uncountable, you are bound to use the completeness axiom of the real numbers (after all, it is this completeness axiom that gives birth to the irrationals from the rationals, which previously formed a countable set!). For example, in Cantor's proof, it was used in the fact that every real number has a decimal representation. Hence, in Baron VT's proof also, the completeness axiom is exploited somewhere! Can you figure out, where? These kind of exercises will help you develop your mathematical feelings more and more!
$endgroup$
– Somabha Mukherjee
Sep 10 '14 at 20:24
2
2
$begingroup$
In any proof of the fact that [0,1] is uncountable, you are bound to use the completeness axiom of the real numbers (after all, it is this completeness axiom that gives birth to the irrationals from the rationals, which previously formed a countable set!). For example, in Cantor's proof, it was used in the fact that every real number has a decimal representation. Hence, in Baron VT's proof also, the completeness axiom is exploited somewhere! Can you figure out, where? These kind of exercises will help you develop your mathematical feelings more and more!
$endgroup$
– Somabha Mukherjee
Sep 10 '14 at 20:24
$begingroup$
In any proof of the fact that [0,1] is uncountable, you are bound to use the completeness axiom of the real numbers (after all, it is this completeness axiom that gives birth to the irrationals from the rationals, which previously formed a countable set!). For example, in Cantor's proof, it was used in the fact that every real number has a decimal representation. Hence, in Baron VT's proof also, the completeness axiom is exploited somewhere! Can you figure out, where? These kind of exercises will help you develop your mathematical feelings more and more!
$endgroup$
– Somabha Mukherjee
Sep 10 '14 at 20:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let [0 1] is countable then outer measure of [0 1] is "zero" because outer measure of countable st is zero . and we also know that outer measure of [a b] is "b-a" so m*[0 1]=1-0=1.
This is contradiction our assumption so [0 1] is uncountable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let [0 1] is countable then outer measure of [0 1] is "zero" because outer measure of countable st is zero . and we also know that outer measure of [a b] is "b-a" so m*[0 1]=1-0=1.
This is contradiction our assumption so [0 1] is uncountable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let [0 1] is countable then outer measure of [0 1] is "zero" because outer measure of countable st is zero . and we also know that outer measure of [a b] is "b-a" so m*[0 1]=1-0=1.
This is contradiction our assumption so [0 1] is uncountable.
$endgroup$
Let [0 1] is countable then outer measure of [0 1] is "zero" because outer measure of countable st is zero . and we also know that outer measure of [a b] is "b-a" so m*[0 1]=1-0=1.
This is contradiction our assumption so [0 1] is uncountable.
answered Jan 22 '17 at 13:55
user409137user409137
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f926697%2fshow-0-1-is-uncountable-using-outer-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown