Chord partition of regular polygon: same fraction of area and perimeter?












4












$begingroup$


This is a variation of a question posed by
James Tanton on Twitter.



Let $P$ be a regular $n$-gon, $n ge 3$. A chord $c$ of $P$ is a segment connecting
two distinct points of the boundary of $P$, on two distinct edges (so not two points on one edge). Such a chord partitions both the perimeter and area of $P$ into two non-zero parts.
For a given chord $c$, let $a(c)$ and $p(c)$ be the smaller area fractions and
smaller perimeter fractions of the parts.
In other words, $a(c)$ is the area to the smaller side of $c$ divided by the area of $P$. And similarly for $p(c)$.




Q. For which $n$-gons do there exist chords $c$
and fractions $a(c) = p(c)$ not equal to $frac{1}{2}$?




Tanton's question asks for $n=4$ (a square), can $frac{1}{3}$ be achieved? "Simultaneously divide off one-third of the area of a square and one-third of the perimeter of the square?" And the answer is No.



         
Tanton_1/3

         

(Image from Tanton.)

The generalization asks for all those non-half fractions achievable
for regular $n$-gons.
Perhaps the answer to Q is: For none?






geometry polygons plane-geometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    This is a variation of a question posed by
    James Tanton on Twitter.



    Let $P$ be a regular $n$-gon, $n ge 3$. A chord $c$ of $P$ is a segment connecting
    two distinct points of the boundary of $P$, on two distinct edges (so not two points on one edge). Such a chord partitions both the perimeter and area of $P$ into two non-zero parts.
    For a given chord $c$, let $a(c)$ and $p(c)$ be the smaller area fractions and
    smaller perimeter fractions of the parts.
    In other words, $a(c)$ is the area to the smaller side of $c$ divided by the area of $P$. And similarly for $p(c)$.




    Q. For which $n$-gons do there exist chords $c$
    and fractions $a(c) = p(c)$ not equal to $frac{1}{2}$?




    Tanton's question asks for $n=4$ (a square), can $frac{1}{3}$ be achieved? "Simultaneously divide off one-third of the area of a square and one-third of the perimeter of the square?" And the answer is No.



             
    Tanton_1/3

             

    (Image from Tanton.)

    The generalization asks for all those non-half fractions achievable
    for regular $n$-gons.
    Perhaps the answer to Q is: For none?






    geometry polygons plane-geometry







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4


      0



      $begingroup$


      This is a variation of a question posed by
      James Tanton on Twitter.



      Let $P$ be a regular $n$-gon, $n ge 3$. A chord $c$ of $P$ is a segment connecting
      two distinct points of the boundary of $P$, on two distinct edges (so not two points on one edge). Such a chord partitions both the perimeter and area of $P$ into two non-zero parts.
      For a given chord $c$, let $a(c)$ and $p(c)$ be the smaller area fractions and
      smaller perimeter fractions of the parts.
      In other words, $a(c)$ is the area to the smaller side of $c$ divided by the area of $P$. And similarly for $p(c)$.




      Q. For which $n$-gons do there exist chords $c$
      and fractions $a(c) = p(c)$ not equal to $frac{1}{2}$?




      Tanton's question asks for $n=4$ (a square), can $frac{1}{3}$ be achieved? "Simultaneously divide off one-third of the area of a square and one-third of the perimeter of the square?" And the answer is No.



               
      Tanton_1/3

               

      (Image from Tanton.)

      The generalization asks for all those non-half fractions achievable
      for regular $n$-gons.
      Perhaps the answer to Q is: For none?






      geometry polygons plane-geometry







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      This is a variation of a question posed by
      James Tanton on Twitter.



      Let $P$ be a regular $n$-gon, $n ge 3$. A chord $c$ of $P$ is a segment connecting
      two distinct points of the boundary of $P$, on two distinct edges (so not two points on one edge). Such a chord partitions both the perimeter and area of $P$ into two non-zero parts.
      For a given chord $c$, let $a(c)$ and $p(c)$ be the smaller area fractions and
      smaller perimeter fractions of the parts.
      In other words, $a(c)$ is the area to the smaller side of $c$ divided by the area of $P$. And similarly for $p(c)$.




      Q. For which $n$-gons do there exist chords $c$
      and fractions $a(c) = p(c)$ not equal to $frac{1}{2}$?




      Tanton's question asks for $n=4$ (a square), can $frac{1}{3}$ be achieved? "Simultaneously divide off one-third of the area of a square and one-third of the perimeter of the square?" And the answer is No.



               
      Tanton_1/3

               

      (Image from Tanton.)

      The generalization asks for all those non-half fractions achievable
      for regular $n$-gons.
      Perhaps the answer to Q is: For none?






      geometry polygons plane-geometry




      geometry polygons plane-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 6 at 1:02







      Joseph O'Rourke

















      asked Jan 6 at 0:03









      Joseph O'RourkeJoseph O'Rourke

      17.9k348107




      17.9k348107






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Partial answer: no good chord for the square (with any ratio different from $frac{1}{2}$).



          Proof:
          Assume that we connect two points on opposite sides. Then we obtain a trapezoid.
          Denote the bases by $x,y$. Then $a(c)= frac{x+y}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y+1}{4}$, which yields $x+y=1$, and thus $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$.



          If the two points are on adjacent sides, then we obtain a right triangle.
          Let $x,y$ denote the legs this time. Then $a(c)=frac{xy}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y}{4}$, which yields $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$.
          As $0leq x,yleq 1$, we have $|x-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$ and $|y-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$, thus $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$ is possible only if $|x-frac{1}{2}|=|y-frac{1}{2}|=frac{1}{2}$.
          Hence, either the triangle is degenerate (a point), or $x=y=1$, in which case $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$ again.



          The fact that we needed very different arguments in the two cases suggests that the general question might be hard to handle.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063347%2fchord-partition-of-regular-polygon-same-fraction-of-area-and-perimeter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Partial answer: no good chord for the square (with any ratio different from $frac{1}{2}$).



            Proof:
            Assume that we connect two points on opposite sides. Then we obtain a trapezoid.
            Denote the bases by $x,y$. Then $a(c)= frac{x+y}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y+1}{4}$, which yields $x+y=1$, and thus $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$.



            If the two points are on adjacent sides, then we obtain a right triangle.
            Let $x,y$ denote the legs this time. Then $a(c)=frac{xy}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y}{4}$, which yields $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$.
            As $0leq x,yleq 1$, we have $|x-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$ and $|y-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$, thus $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$ is possible only if $|x-frac{1}{2}|=|y-frac{1}{2}|=frac{1}{2}$.
            Hence, either the triangle is degenerate (a point), or $x=y=1$, in which case $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$ again.



            The fact that we needed very different arguments in the two cases suggests that the general question might be hard to handle.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Partial answer: no good chord for the square (with any ratio different from $frac{1}{2}$).



              Proof:
              Assume that we connect two points on opposite sides. Then we obtain a trapezoid.
              Denote the bases by $x,y$. Then $a(c)= frac{x+y}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y+1}{4}$, which yields $x+y=1$, and thus $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$.



              If the two points are on adjacent sides, then we obtain a right triangle.
              Let $x,y$ denote the legs this time. Then $a(c)=frac{xy}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y}{4}$, which yields $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$.
              As $0leq x,yleq 1$, we have $|x-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$ and $|y-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$, thus $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$ is possible only if $|x-frac{1}{2}|=|y-frac{1}{2}|=frac{1}{2}$.
              Hence, either the triangle is degenerate (a point), or $x=y=1$, in which case $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$ again.



              The fact that we needed very different arguments in the two cases suggests that the general question might be hard to handle.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Partial answer: no good chord for the square (with any ratio different from $frac{1}{2}$).



                Proof:
                Assume that we connect two points on opposite sides. Then we obtain a trapezoid.
                Denote the bases by $x,y$. Then $a(c)= frac{x+y}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y+1}{4}$, which yields $x+y=1$, and thus $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$.



                If the two points are on adjacent sides, then we obtain a right triangle.
                Let $x,y$ denote the legs this time. Then $a(c)=frac{xy}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y}{4}$, which yields $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$.
                As $0leq x,yleq 1$, we have $|x-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$ and $|y-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$, thus $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$ is possible only if $|x-frac{1}{2}|=|y-frac{1}{2}|=frac{1}{2}$.
                Hence, either the triangle is degenerate (a point), or $x=y=1$, in which case $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$ again.



                The fact that we needed very different arguments in the two cases suggests that the general question might be hard to handle.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Partial answer: no good chord for the square (with any ratio different from $frac{1}{2}$).



                Proof:
                Assume that we connect two points on opposite sides. Then we obtain a trapezoid.
                Denote the bases by $x,y$. Then $a(c)= frac{x+y}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y+1}{4}$, which yields $x+y=1$, and thus $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$.



                If the two points are on adjacent sides, then we obtain a right triangle.
                Let $x,y$ denote the legs this time. Then $a(c)=frac{xy}{2}$ and $p(c)=frac{x+y}{4}$, which yields $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$.
                As $0leq x,yleq 1$, we have $|x-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$ and $|y-frac{1}{2}|leq frac{1}{2}$, thus $(x-frac{1}{2})(y-frac{1}{2})=frac{1}{4}$ is possible only if $|x-frac{1}{2}|=|y-frac{1}{2}|=frac{1}{2}$.
                Hence, either the triangle is degenerate (a point), or $x=y=1$, in which case $a(c)=p(c)=frac{1}{2}$ again.



                The fact that we needed very different arguments in the two cases suggests that the general question might be hard to handle.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 6 at 0:28









                A. PongráczA. Pongrácz

                5,9731929




                5,9731929






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063347%2fchord-partition-of-regular-polygon-same-fraction-of-area-and-perimeter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Image
                    28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
                    Read more

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    Image
                    up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
                    Read more

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

                    Image
                    3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
                    Read more