Is every map from $mathbb{R}P^2 to S^2$ nullhomotopic?












3












$begingroup$


I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyrone
    Jan 6 at 12:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One way to see the above is to use cellular chains, if you take the CW-structure on $S^2$ with one $0$-cell and one $2$-cell, you will see that your map is cellular, and maps the $2$-cell to the $2$-cell. Then, if you calculate the cellular chain complex with $mathbb Z/2$ coefficients, you clearly get the identity on $H_2$, which is not possible for a nullhomotopic map.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 9 at 18:32
















3












$begingroup$


I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyrone
    Jan 6 at 12:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One way to see the above is to use cellular chains, if you take the CW-structure on $S^2$ with one $0$-cell and one $2$-cell, you will see that your map is cellular, and maps the $2$-cell to the $2$-cell. Then, if you calculate the cellular chain complex with $mathbb Z/2$ coefficients, you clearly get the identity on $H_2$, which is not possible for a nullhomotopic map.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 9 at 18:32














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?







algebraic-topology homotopy-theory projective-space






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 5 at 22:50









Sameer KailasaSameer Kailasa

5,50621843




5,50621843








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyrone
    Jan 6 at 12:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One way to see the above is to use cellular chains, if you take the CW-structure on $S^2$ with one $0$-cell and one $2$-cell, you will see that your map is cellular, and maps the $2$-cell to the $2$-cell. Then, if you calculate the cellular chain complex with $mathbb Z/2$ coefficients, you clearly get the identity on $H_2$, which is not possible for a nullhomotopic map.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 9 at 18:32














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyrone
    Jan 6 at 12:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One way to see the above is to use cellular chains, if you take the CW-structure on $S^2$ with one $0$-cell and one $2$-cell, you will see that your map is cellular, and maps the $2$-cell to the $2$-cell. Then, if you calculate the cellular chain complex with $mathbb Z/2$ coefficients, you clearly get the identity on $H_2$, which is not possible for a nullhomotopic map.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 9 at 18:32








6




6




$begingroup$
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56




$begingroup$
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56




1




1




$begingroup$
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Jan 6 at 12:26




$begingroup$
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
– Tyrone
Jan 6 at 12:26




1




1




$begingroup$
One way to see the above is to use cellular chains, if you take the CW-structure on $S^2$ with one $0$-cell and one $2$-cell, you will see that your map is cellular, and maps the $2$-cell to the $2$-cell. Then, if you calculate the cellular chain complex with $mathbb Z/2$ coefficients, you clearly get the identity on $H_2$, which is not possible for a nullhomotopic map.
$endgroup$
– Justin Young
Jan 9 at 18:32




$begingroup$
One way to see the above is to use cellular chains, if you take the CW-structure on $S^2$ with one $0$-cell and one $2$-cell, you will see that your map is cellular, and maps the $2$-cell to the $2$-cell. Then, if you calculate the cellular chain complex with $mathbb Z/2$ coefficients, you clearly get the identity on $H_2$, which is not possible for a nullhomotopic map.
$endgroup$
– Justin Young
Jan 9 at 18:32










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

There is a cofibration sequence



$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$



where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets



$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$



Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.



Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.



The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.



There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.



The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.



Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by



$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$



Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map



$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$



This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence



$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$



It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    Jan 6 at 13:33













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063286%2fis-every-map-from-mathbbrp2-to-s2-nullhomotopic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

There is a cofibration sequence



$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$



where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets



$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$



Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.



Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.



The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.



There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.



The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.



Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by



$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$



Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map



$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$



This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence



$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$



It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    Jan 6 at 13:33


















3












$begingroup$

There is a cofibration sequence



$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$



where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets



$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$



Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.



Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.



The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.



There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.



The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.



Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by



$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$



Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map



$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$



This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence



$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$



It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    Jan 6 at 13:33
















3












3








3





$begingroup$

There is a cofibration sequence



$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$



where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets



$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$



Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.



Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.



The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.



There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.



The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.



Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by



$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$



Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map



$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$



This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence



$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$



It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



There is a cofibration sequence



$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$



where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets



$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$



Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.



Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.



The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.



There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.



The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.



Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by



$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$



Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map



$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$



This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence



$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$



It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.



Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 6 at 13:13









TyroneTyrone

4,55011225




4,55011225












  • $begingroup$
    Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    Jan 6 at 13:33




















  • $begingroup$
    Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    Jan 6 at 13:33


















$begingroup$
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Jan 6 at 13:33






$begingroup$
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Jan 6 at 13:33




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063286%2fis-every-map-from-mathbbrp2-to-s2-nullhomotopic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$