Prove that $C$ is Banach.












0












$begingroup$


$C={x_n lvert x_n converges } $



Let $x^n in C$ is Cauchy.



$rightarrow$ For $epsilon> 0$ there is N such that $n,m >N $ $$ lVert x^n -x^mrVert< frac {epsilon} {3} $$
we know that for every k $$lvert u^n -u^mrvert le sup_{ige 1} lvert x^n_i -x^m_irvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
So $u^n$ is Cauchy in $mathbb R$ which is Banach so $$u^n rightarrow u in mathbb R or lvert u^n -urvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
by this we can say that $lVert x^n -xrVert = sup lvert x^n_i -x_i rvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $ $ $ ($epsilon>0, nge Nin mathbb N$)



which means $x_n rightarrow x$



Now to show that $xin C$



$$lvert x-urvert le lvert x^n-xrvert+ lvert x^n-u^nrvert +lvert u^n-urvert <frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}=epsilon$$



This gives us $xrightarrow u$



So $xin C$



Is this Correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You will not get a faster answer by reposting, even less if you do not explain, say, your notations.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 5 at 23:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second part seems flawed.. What is $u$ there?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 5 at 23:10










  • $begingroup$
    I have no idea what $C$ is, what your hypotheses on it are, what $u$ is, what $x$ is, what you mean by $x_n to x$, if $x$ is not necessarily in $C$, or what these $x^n_k$ are. So no, it isn't correct.
    $endgroup$
    – user3482749
    Jan 5 at 23:10












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci Please check now.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Mindlack it is not a repost.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30
















0












$begingroup$


$C={x_n lvert x_n converges } $



Let $x^n in C$ is Cauchy.



$rightarrow$ For $epsilon> 0$ there is N such that $n,m >N $ $$ lVert x^n -x^mrVert< frac {epsilon} {3} $$
we know that for every k $$lvert u^n -u^mrvert le sup_{ige 1} lvert x^n_i -x^m_irvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
So $u^n$ is Cauchy in $mathbb R$ which is Banach so $$u^n rightarrow u in mathbb R or lvert u^n -urvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
by this we can say that $lVert x^n -xrVert = sup lvert x^n_i -x_i rvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $ $ $ ($epsilon>0, nge Nin mathbb N$)



which means $x_n rightarrow x$



Now to show that $xin C$



$$lvert x-urvert le lvert x^n-xrvert+ lvert x^n-u^nrvert +lvert u^n-urvert <frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}=epsilon$$



This gives us $xrightarrow u$



So $xin C$



Is this Correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You will not get a faster answer by reposting, even less if you do not explain, say, your notations.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 5 at 23:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second part seems flawed.. What is $u$ there?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 5 at 23:10










  • $begingroup$
    I have no idea what $C$ is, what your hypotheses on it are, what $u$ is, what $x$ is, what you mean by $x_n to x$, if $x$ is not necessarily in $C$, or what these $x^n_k$ are. So no, it isn't correct.
    $endgroup$
    – user3482749
    Jan 5 at 23:10












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci Please check now.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Mindlack it is not a repost.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


$C={x_n lvert x_n converges } $



Let $x^n in C$ is Cauchy.



$rightarrow$ For $epsilon> 0$ there is N such that $n,m >N $ $$ lVert x^n -x^mrVert< frac {epsilon} {3} $$
we know that for every k $$lvert u^n -u^mrvert le sup_{ige 1} lvert x^n_i -x^m_irvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
So $u^n$ is Cauchy in $mathbb R$ which is Banach so $$u^n rightarrow u in mathbb R or lvert u^n -urvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
by this we can say that $lVert x^n -xrVert = sup lvert x^n_i -x_i rvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $ $ $ ($epsilon>0, nge Nin mathbb N$)



which means $x_n rightarrow x$



Now to show that $xin C$



$$lvert x-urvert le lvert x^n-xrvert+ lvert x^n-u^nrvert +lvert u^n-urvert <frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}=epsilon$$



This gives us $xrightarrow u$



So $xin C$



Is this Correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$C={x_n lvert x_n converges } $



Let $x^n in C$ is Cauchy.



$rightarrow$ For $epsilon> 0$ there is N such that $n,m >N $ $$ lVert x^n -x^mrVert< frac {epsilon} {3} $$
we know that for every k $$lvert u^n -u^mrvert le sup_{ige 1} lvert x^n_i -x^m_irvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
So $u^n$ is Cauchy in $mathbb R$ which is Banach so $$u^n rightarrow u in mathbb R or lvert u^n -urvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $$
by this we can say that $lVert x^n -xrVert = sup lvert x^n_i -x_i rvert < frac {epsilon} {3} $ $ $ ($epsilon>0, nge Nin mathbb N$)



which means $x_n rightarrow x$



Now to show that $xin C$



$$lvert x-urvert le lvert x^n-xrvert+ lvert x^n-u^nrvert +lvert u^n-urvert <frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}+frac {epsilon} {3}=epsilon$$



This gives us $xrightarrow u$



So $xin C$



Is this Correct?







functional-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 6 at 0:22







Hitman

















asked Jan 5 at 23:05









HitmanHitman

1749




1749












  • $begingroup$
    You will not get a faster answer by reposting, even less if you do not explain, say, your notations.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 5 at 23:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second part seems flawed.. What is $u$ there?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 5 at 23:10










  • $begingroup$
    I have no idea what $C$ is, what your hypotheses on it are, what $u$ is, what $x$ is, what you mean by $x_n to x$, if $x$ is not necessarily in $C$, or what these $x^n_k$ are. So no, it isn't correct.
    $endgroup$
    – user3482749
    Jan 5 at 23:10












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci Please check now.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Mindlack it is not a repost.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30


















  • $begingroup$
    You will not get a faster answer by reposting, even less if you do not explain, say, your notations.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 5 at 23:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second part seems flawed.. What is $u$ there?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 5 at 23:10










  • $begingroup$
    I have no idea what $C$ is, what your hypotheses on it are, what $u$ is, what $x$ is, what you mean by $x_n to x$, if $x$ is not necessarily in $C$, or what these $x^n_k$ are. So no, it isn't correct.
    $endgroup$
    – user3482749
    Jan 5 at 23:10












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci Please check now.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Mindlack it is not a repost.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:30
















$begingroup$
You will not get a faster answer by reposting, even less if you do not explain, say, your notations.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 23:09




$begingroup$
You will not get a faster answer by reposting, even less if you do not explain, say, your notations.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 23:09




1




1




$begingroup$
The second part seems flawed.. What is $u$ there?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 5 at 23:10




$begingroup$
The second part seems flawed.. What is $u$ there?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 5 at 23:10












$begingroup$
I have no idea what $C$ is, what your hypotheses on it are, what $u$ is, what $x$ is, what you mean by $x_n to x$, if $x$ is not necessarily in $C$, or what these $x^n_k$ are. So no, it isn't correct.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 5 at 23:10






$begingroup$
I have no idea what $C$ is, what your hypotheses on it are, what $u$ is, what $x$ is, what you mean by $x_n to x$, if $x$ is not necessarily in $C$, or what these $x^n_k$ are. So no, it isn't correct.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 5 at 23:10














$begingroup$
@Berci Please check now.
$endgroup$
– Hitman
Jan 5 at 23:30




$begingroup$
@Berci Please check now.
$endgroup$
– Hitman
Jan 5 at 23:30












$begingroup$
@Mindlack it is not a repost.
$endgroup$
– Hitman
Jan 5 at 23:30




$begingroup$
@Mindlack it is not a repost.
$endgroup$
– Hitman
Jan 5 at 23:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The second part is not correct: $x$ should converge to a real number.



A hint for that: show that the real sequence $(x^n_n)$ is Cauchy, and show that $x=(lim x^n)$ converges to its limit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you please check again. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:48











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063299%2fprove-that-c-is-banach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

The second part is not correct: $x$ should converge to a real number.



A hint for that: show that the real sequence $(x^n_n)$ is Cauchy, and show that $x=(lim x^n)$ converges to its limit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you please check again. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:48
















0












$begingroup$

The second part is not correct: $x$ should converge to a real number.



A hint for that: show that the real sequence $(x^n_n)$ is Cauchy, and show that $x=(lim x^n)$ converges to its limit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you please check again. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:48














0












0








0





$begingroup$

The second part is not correct: $x$ should converge to a real number.



A hint for that: show that the real sequence $(x^n_n)$ is Cauchy, and show that $x=(lim x^n)$ converges to its limit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The second part is not correct: $x$ should converge to a real number.



A hint for that: show that the real sequence $(x^n_n)$ is Cauchy, and show that $x=(lim x^n)$ converges to its limit.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 5 at 23:39









BerciBerci

60.2k23672




60.2k23672












  • $begingroup$
    Could you please check again. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:48


















  • $begingroup$
    Could you please check again. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Hitman
    Jan 5 at 23:48
















$begingroup$
Could you please check again. I have edited the question.
$endgroup$
– Hitman
Jan 5 at 23:48




$begingroup$
Could you please check again. I have edited the question.
$endgroup$
– Hitman
Jan 5 at 23:48


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063299%2fprove-that-c-is-banach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$