Desingularisation of curves (Lorenzini-Invitiation to Arithmetic Geometry, chap 6,ex 7)












0












$begingroup$


Given a nonsingular complete curve over algebraically closed $bar{k}$, which is interpreted as a field $bar{k}(X)$ of transcendence degree 1 and its set of valuations trivial on $bar{k}$, we may choose elements $x,y$ such that $x$ is trancendental, and $bar{k}(X)=bar{k}(x)(y)$. Letting $F$ be the homogenization of the minimal polynomial of $y$ over $bar{k}(x)$, using these coordinates we get a function from the set of valuations to the points of the projective curve $X_F(bar{k})$, given by mapping a valuation $v$ to the unique point $P$ of $X_F(bar{k})$ such that $O_P subset O_v$ and inclusion of maximal ideals.



The first question is to show that if $x,y$ are in $O_v$, then the valuation $v$ is mapped to is $(x(v):y(v):1)$, where $x(v),y(v)$ are the cosets of $x,y$ in $O_v / M_vcong bar{k}$.



For this, my thought was that if $psi =G/H$ with $H(x(v):y(v):1)neq 0$, then we get the coset of $H(x,y,1)$ in $O_v / M_v$ is nonzero, so we can conclude $G/H$ is defined at $v$, in the sense of having nonnegative valuation.



I feel okay with this, and the homogenisation/dehomogenisation is just from our isomorphism of fields $bar{k}(X)cong bar{k}(X_F)$, but the next part I am feeling stuck, which is to show that if $ynotin O_v, x/yin O_v$, then the point is $((x/y)(v):1:0)$.



Any assistance with how to think about this would also be very much appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Given a nonsingular complete curve over algebraically closed $bar{k}$, which is interpreted as a field $bar{k}(X)$ of transcendence degree 1 and its set of valuations trivial on $bar{k}$, we may choose elements $x,y$ such that $x$ is trancendental, and $bar{k}(X)=bar{k}(x)(y)$. Letting $F$ be the homogenization of the minimal polynomial of $y$ over $bar{k}(x)$, using these coordinates we get a function from the set of valuations to the points of the projective curve $X_F(bar{k})$, given by mapping a valuation $v$ to the unique point $P$ of $X_F(bar{k})$ such that $O_P subset O_v$ and inclusion of maximal ideals.



    The first question is to show that if $x,y$ are in $O_v$, then the valuation $v$ is mapped to is $(x(v):y(v):1)$, where $x(v),y(v)$ are the cosets of $x,y$ in $O_v / M_vcong bar{k}$.



    For this, my thought was that if $psi =G/H$ with $H(x(v):y(v):1)neq 0$, then we get the coset of $H(x,y,1)$ in $O_v / M_v$ is nonzero, so we can conclude $G/H$ is defined at $v$, in the sense of having nonnegative valuation.



    I feel okay with this, and the homogenisation/dehomogenisation is just from our isomorphism of fields $bar{k}(X)cong bar{k}(X_F)$, but the next part I am feeling stuck, which is to show that if $ynotin O_v, x/yin O_v$, then the point is $((x/y)(v):1:0)$.



    Any assistance with how to think about this would also be very much appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Given a nonsingular complete curve over algebraically closed $bar{k}$, which is interpreted as a field $bar{k}(X)$ of transcendence degree 1 and its set of valuations trivial on $bar{k}$, we may choose elements $x,y$ such that $x$ is trancendental, and $bar{k}(X)=bar{k}(x)(y)$. Letting $F$ be the homogenization of the minimal polynomial of $y$ over $bar{k}(x)$, using these coordinates we get a function from the set of valuations to the points of the projective curve $X_F(bar{k})$, given by mapping a valuation $v$ to the unique point $P$ of $X_F(bar{k})$ such that $O_P subset O_v$ and inclusion of maximal ideals.



      The first question is to show that if $x,y$ are in $O_v$, then the valuation $v$ is mapped to is $(x(v):y(v):1)$, where $x(v),y(v)$ are the cosets of $x,y$ in $O_v / M_vcong bar{k}$.



      For this, my thought was that if $psi =G/H$ with $H(x(v):y(v):1)neq 0$, then we get the coset of $H(x,y,1)$ in $O_v / M_v$ is nonzero, so we can conclude $G/H$ is defined at $v$, in the sense of having nonnegative valuation.



      I feel okay with this, and the homogenisation/dehomogenisation is just from our isomorphism of fields $bar{k}(X)cong bar{k}(X_F)$, but the next part I am feeling stuck, which is to show that if $ynotin O_v, x/yin O_v$, then the point is $((x/y)(v):1:0)$.



      Any assistance with how to think about this would also be very much appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Given a nonsingular complete curve over algebraically closed $bar{k}$, which is interpreted as a field $bar{k}(X)$ of transcendence degree 1 and its set of valuations trivial on $bar{k}$, we may choose elements $x,y$ such that $x$ is trancendental, and $bar{k}(X)=bar{k}(x)(y)$. Letting $F$ be the homogenization of the minimal polynomial of $y$ over $bar{k}(x)$, using these coordinates we get a function from the set of valuations to the points of the projective curve $X_F(bar{k})$, given by mapping a valuation $v$ to the unique point $P$ of $X_F(bar{k})$ such that $O_P subset O_v$ and inclusion of maximal ideals.



      The first question is to show that if $x,y$ are in $O_v$, then the valuation $v$ is mapped to is $(x(v):y(v):1)$, where $x(v),y(v)$ are the cosets of $x,y$ in $O_v / M_vcong bar{k}$.



      For this, my thought was that if $psi =G/H$ with $H(x(v):y(v):1)neq 0$, then we get the coset of $H(x,y,1)$ in $O_v / M_v$ is nonzero, so we can conclude $G/H$ is defined at $v$, in the sense of having nonnegative valuation.



      I feel okay with this, and the homogenisation/dehomogenisation is just from our isomorphism of fields $bar{k}(X)cong bar{k}(X_F)$, but the next part I am feeling stuck, which is to show that if $ynotin O_v, x/yin O_v$, then the point is $((x/y)(v):1:0)$.



      Any assistance with how to think about this would also be very much appreciated.







      algebraic-geometry algebraic-curves projective-geometry valuation-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 5 at 23:49









      user277182user277182

      431212




      431212






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063333%2fdesingularisation-of-curves-lorenzini-invitiation-to-arithmetic-geometry-chap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063333%2fdesingularisation-of-curves-lorenzini-invitiation-to-arithmetic-geometry-chap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          SQL update select statement

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules