Decomposition of $SO(10)$ into $SU(4)$












1














I would like to apply branching rule to decompose a representation of $SO(10)$ into that of $SU(4)$. So I did the following, and I'm not sure if it's correct. I use the following chain of decomposition:



$$SO(10)hspace{1mm}rightarrowhspace{1mm}SU(2)times SU(2) times SU(4) hspace{1mm} rightarrow hspace{1mm}SU(4).$$



In particular, I'm interested in the adjoint $mathbf{45}$ of $SO(10)$:
begin{eqnarray}
mathbf{45} &rightarrow &mathbf{(3,1,1) + (1,3,1) + (1,1,15) + (2,2,6)} nonumber\
%
&rightarrow & mathbf{(3times 1) + (3times 1) + 15 + (4times 6)}. nonumber\
%
end{eqnarray}

My concern is in the second line of the above equation. Since I'm only interested in the $SU(4)$ part and not the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ part, can I just simply convert the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ representation into the coefficients counting the number of representation of $SU(4)$?










share|cite|improve this question





























    1














    I would like to apply branching rule to decompose a representation of $SO(10)$ into that of $SU(4)$. So I did the following, and I'm not sure if it's correct. I use the following chain of decomposition:



    $$SO(10)hspace{1mm}rightarrowhspace{1mm}SU(2)times SU(2) times SU(4) hspace{1mm} rightarrow hspace{1mm}SU(4).$$



    In particular, I'm interested in the adjoint $mathbf{45}$ of $SO(10)$:
    begin{eqnarray}
    mathbf{45} &rightarrow &mathbf{(3,1,1) + (1,3,1) + (1,1,15) + (2,2,6)} nonumber\
    %
    &rightarrow & mathbf{(3times 1) + (3times 1) + 15 + (4times 6)}. nonumber\
    %
    end{eqnarray}

    My concern is in the second line of the above equation. Since I'm only interested in the $SU(4)$ part and not the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ part, can I just simply convert the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ representation into the coefficients counting the number of representation of $SU(4)$?










    share|cite|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1


      0





      I would like to apply branching rule to decompose a representation of $SO(10)$ into that of $SU(4)$. So I did the following, and I'm not sure if it's correct. I use the following chain of decomposition:



      $$SO(10)hspace{1mm}rightarrowhspace{1mm}SU(2)times SU(2) times SU(4) hspace{1mm} rightarrow hspace{1mm}SU(4).$$



      In particular, I'm interested in the adjoint $mathbf{45}$ of $SO(10)$:
      begin{eqnarray}
      mathbf{45} &rightarrow &mathbf{(3,1,1) + (1,3,1) + (1,1,15) + (2,2,6)} nonumber\
      %
      &rightarrow & mathbf{(3times 1) + (3times 1) + 15 + (4times 6)}. nonumber\
      %
      end{eqnarray}

      My concern is in the second line of the above equation. Since I'm only interested in the $SU(4)$ part and not the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ part, can I just simply convert the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ representation into the coefficients counting the number of representation of $SU(4)$?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I would like to apply branching rule to decompose a representation of $SO(10)$ into that of $SU(4)$. So I did the following, and I'm not sure if it's correct. I use the following chain of decomposition:



      $$SO(10)hspace{1mm}rightarrowhspace{1mm}SU(2)times SU(2) times SU(4) hspace{1mm} rightarrow hspace{1mm}SU(4).$$



      In particular, I'm interested in the adjoint $mathbf{45}$ of $SO(10)$:
      begin{eqnarray}
      mathbf{45} &rightarrow &mathbf{(3,1,1) + (1,3,1) + (1,1,15) + (2,2,6)} nonumber\
      %
      &rightarrow & mathbf{(3times 1) + (3times 1) + 15 + (4times 6)}. nonumber\
      %
      end{eqnarray}

      My concern is in the second line of the above equation. Since I'm only interested in the $SU(4)$ part and not the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ part, can I just simply convert the $SU(2)times SU(2)$ representation into the coefficients counting the number of representation of $SU(4)$?







      group-theory representation-theory lie-groups lie-algebras branching-rules






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:19









      Qmechanic

      4,87711854




      4,87711854










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 8:08









      user195583

      211




      211






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Note that the branching rule $$so(10)quad supseteq quad so(4) oplus so(6)quad cong quad su(2)oplus su(2) oplus su(4)$$ only holds at the level of Lie algebras, not Lie groups. But apart from that then Yes, the number of $su(4)$-representation in OP's example is given by the product of dimensions of the two $su(2)$-representations.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007414%2fdecomposition-of-so10-into-su4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Note that the branching rule $$so(10)quad supseteq quad so(4) oplus so(6)quad cong quad su(2)oplus su(2) oplus su(4)$$ only holds at the level of Lie algebras, not Lie groups. But apart from that then Yes, the number of $su(4)$-representation in OP's example is given by the product of dimensions of the two $su(2)$-representations.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Note that the branching rule $$so(10)quad supseteq quad so(4) oplus so(6)quad cong quad su(2)oplus su(2) oplus su(4)$$ only holds at the level of Lie algebras, not Lie groups. But apart from that then Yes, the number of $su(4)$-representation in OP's example is given by the product of dimensions of the two $su(2)$-representations.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Note that the branching rule $$so(10)quad supseteq quad so(4) oplus so(6)quad cong quad su(2)oplus su(2) oplus su(4)$$ only holds at the level of Lie algebras, not Lie groups. But apart from that then Yes, the number of $su(4)$-representation in OP's example is given by the product of dimensions of the two $su(2)$-representations.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Note that the branching rule $$so(10)quad supseteq quad so(4) oplus so(6)quad cong quad su(2)oplus su(2) oplus su(4)$$ only holds at the level of Lie algebras, not Lie groups. But apart from that then Yes, the number of $su(4)$-representation in OP's example is given by the product of dimensions of the two $su(2)$-representations.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:18









                Qmechanic

                4,87711854




                4,87711854






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007414%2fdecomposition-of-so10-into-su4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

                    Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory