Fundamental Theorem on Homomorphisms - Application












1












$begingroup$


I want to show



1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I want to show



    1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



    I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



    2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



    I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I want to show



      1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



      I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



      2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



      I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to show



      1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



      I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



      2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



      I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.







      abstract-algebra ring-theory modules ideals






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 3 at 15:39









      Antonios-Alexandros Robotis

      9,75241640




      9,75241640










      asked Jan 3 at 15:25









      KingDingelingKingDingeling

      1366




      1366






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
          $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
          So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060672%2ffundamental-theorem-on-homomorphisms-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
          $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
          So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
          $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
          So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
          $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
          So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
          $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
          So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 3 at 15:40

























          answered Jan 3 at 15:34









          Antonios-Alexandros RobotisAntonios-Alexandros Robotis

          9,75241640




          9,75241640












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
          $endgroup$
          – KingDingeling
          Jan 3 at 16:02




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
          $endgroup$
          – KingDingeling
          Jan 3 at 16:02


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060672%2ffundamental-theorem-on-homomorphisms-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]