How to show $|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$?
$begingroup$
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
$endgroup$
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
edited Jan 3 at 15:15
Saeed
asked Jan 3 at 14:25
SaeedSaeed
913310
913310
$begingroup$
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:55
$begingroup$
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:13
$begingroup$
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:23
$begingroup$
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:12
$begingroup$
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:24
$begingroup$
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:28
$begingroup$
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060598%2fhow-to-show-x-y-22-leq-x-222xty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:12
$begingroup$
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:24
$begingroup$
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:28
$begingroup$
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:12
$begingroup$
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:24
$begingroup$
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:28
$begingroup$
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
$endgroup$
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
answered Jan 3 at 15:04


mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.8k21954
25.8k21954
$begingroup$
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:12
$begingroup$
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:24
$begingroup$
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:28
$begingroup$
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:12
$begingroup$
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:24
$begingroup$
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:28
$begingroup$
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:32
$begingroup$
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:12
$begingroup$
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:12
$begingroup$
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:24
$begingroup$
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:24
$begingroup$
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:28
$begingroup$
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:28
$begingroup$
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:32
$begingroup$
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jan 3 at 15:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060598%2fhow-to-show-x-y-22-leq-x-222xty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:13
$begingroup$
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
$endgroup$
– Saeed
Jan 3 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
$endgroup$
– zimbra314
Jan 3 at 15:55