Show that $(Tu)(x)=int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt$ is Compact linear operator on $C([0,1])$
$begingroup$
Show that
begin{equation}
(Tu)(x)=int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt
end{equation}
is Compact linear operator on $C([0,1],R)$ where $alpha, beta:[0,1]rightarrow [0,1]$ are continuous.
My Attempt
$T$ is obviously linear.
Let $M=max (alpha(x)-beta(x))$. Then
$|Tu(x)|leq ||u||_{infty}M$ and $||T||=M$.
For compactness, let $B={uin (C[0,1],R):||u||_{infty}leq 1}$. We show $T(B)$ is equicontinuous family so that by Arzela Ascoli it is relatively compact.
begin{equation}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)|=bigg|int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt-int_{alpha(y)}^{beta(y)} u(t)dtbigg|
end{equation}
Please how do I subtract this integrals. I'm thinking to make the assumption $alpha(y)<beta(y)<alpha(x)<beta(x)$.
functional-analysis operator-theory compact-operators
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that
begin{equation}
(Tu)(x)=int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt
end{equation}
is Compact linear operator on $C([0,1],R)$ where $alpha, beta:[0,1]rightarrow [0,1]$ are continuous.
My Attempt
$T$ is obviously linear.
Let $M=max (alpha(x)-beta(x))$. Then
$|Tu(x)|leq ||u||_{infty}M$ and $||T||=M$.
For compactness, let $B={uin (C[0,1],R):||u||_{infty}leq 1}$. We show $T(B)$ is equicontinuous family so that by Arzela Ascoli it is relatively compact.
begin{equation}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)|=bigg|int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt-int_{alpha(y)}^{beta(y)} u(t)dtbigg|
end{equation}
Please how do I subtract this integrals. I'm thinking to make the assumption $alpha(y)<beta(y)<alpha(x)<beta(x)$.
functional-analysis operator-theory compact-operators
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there any assumption on the regularity of $alpha$ and $beta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 20:24
$begingroup$
They are continuous. I will edit now.
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 12 at 20:25
$begingroup$
My answer below can be rewritten without using the characteristic function $chi$ by arguing case by case. However, I prefer using $chi$ as it makes some idea clearer.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 22:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its clear now
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 13 at 9:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that
begin{equation}
(Tu)(x)=int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt
end{equation}
is Compact linear operator on $C([0,1],R)$ where $alpha, beta:[0,1]rightarrow [0,1]$ are continuous.
My Attempt
$T$ is obviously linear.
Let $M=max (alpha(x)-beta(x))$. Then
$|Tu(x)|leq ||u||_{infty}M$ and $||T||=M$.
For compactness, let $B={uin (C[0,1],R):||u||_{infty}leq 1}$. We show $T(B)$ is equicontinuous family so that by Arzela Ascoli it is relatively compact.
begin{equation}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)|=bigg|int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt-int_{alpha(y)}^{beta(y)} u(t)dtbigg|
end{equation}
Please how do I subtract this integrals. I'm thinking to make the assumption $alpha(y)<beta(y)<alpha(x)<beta(x)$.
functional-analysis operator-theory compact-operators
$endgroup$
Show that
begin{equation}
(Tu)(x)=int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt
end{equation}
is Compact linear operator on $C([0,1],R)$ where $alpha, beta:[0,1]rightarrow [0,1]$ are continuous.
My Attempt
$T$ is obviously linear.
Let $M=max (alpha(x)-beta(x))$. Then
$|Tu(x)|leq ||u||_{infty}M$ and $||T||=M$.
For compactness, let $B={uin (C[0,1],R):||u||_{infty}leq 1}$. We show $T(B)$ is equicontinuous family so that by Arzela Ascoli it is relatively compact.
begin{equation}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)|=bigg|int_{alpha(x)}^{beta(x)} u(t)dt-int_{alpha(y)}^{beta(y)} u(t)dtbigg|
end{equation}
Please how do I subtract this integrals. I'm thinking to make the assumption $alpha(y)<beta(y)<alpha(x)<beta(x)$.
functional-analysis operator-theory compact-operators
functional-analysis operator-theory compact-operators
edited Jan 12 at 20:52
Muhammad Mubarak
asked Jan 12 at 20:17
Muhammad MubarakMuhammad Mubarak
969
969
$begingroup$
Is there any assumption on the regularity of $alpha$ and $beta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 20:24
$begingroup$
They are continuous. I will edit now.
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 12 at 20:25
$begingroup$
My answer below can be rewritten without using the characteristic function $chi$ by arguing case by case. However, I prefer using $chi$ as it makes some idea clearer.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 22:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its clear now
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 13 at 9:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there any assumption on the regularity of $alpha$ and $beta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 20:24
$begingroup$
They are continuous. I will edit now.
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 12 at 20:25
$begingroup$
My answer below can be rewritten without using the characteristic function $chi$ by arguing case by case. However, I prefer using $chi$ as it makes some idea clearer.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 22:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its clear now
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 13 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Is there any assumption on the regularity of $alpha$ and $beta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Is there any assumption on the regularity of $alpha$ and $beta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 20:24
$begingroup$
They are continuous. I will edit now.
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 12 at 20:25
$begingroup$
They are continuous. I will edit now.
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 12 at 20:25
$begingroup$
My answer below can be rewritten without using the characteristic function $chi$ by arguing case by case. However, I prefer using $chi$ as it makes some idea clearer.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 22:39
$begingroup$
My answer below can be rewritten without using the characteristic function $chi$ by arguing case by case. However, I prefer using $chi$ as it makes some idea clearer.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 22:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its clear now
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 13 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its clear now
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 13 at 9:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The integral from $a$ to $b$ can be viewed as $int_a^bf=int_{0}^1chi_{[a,b]}f$. Recall the relation
$$
|chi_A-chi_B| = chi_{A Delta B}
$$
where $ADelta B$ is the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$. It is also easy to verify that
$$
[a,b] Delta [c,d] subset [a,c] cup[c,a]cup[b,d]cup[d,b]
$$
where $[x,y]=emptyset$ if $y<x$, so half of the terms of the right hand side would disappear, depending on the order of $a,b,c,d$. By symmetry of the right hand side, we may assume $ale c$ and $ble d$.
Using the above, we can compute that
$$begin{align}
left|int_a^bf-int_c^df right| &le int_0^1 |chi_{[a,b]} - chi_{[c,d]}| ,|f|\
&= int_0^1 chi_{[a,b] Delta [c,d]} |f|\
&leint_0^1 chi_{[a,c]} |f| + int_0^1 chi_{[b,d]}|f| \
&le (|c-a|+|d-b|)sup_{xin[0,1]} |f(x)|.
end{align}$$
Back to your question, we can deduce that
$$begin{align}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)| &le big(|alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)| big), ||u||_infty \
&le |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|
end{align}$$
for any $uin B$. By continuity of $alpha$ and $beta$, for any given $varepsilon>0$ we may find $delta$ such that
$$
|x-y|<delta implies |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|<varepsilon,
$$
which proves what you want.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071336%2fshow-that-tux-int-alphax-betax-utdt-is-compact-linear-operato%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The integral from $a$ to $b$ can be viewed as $int_a^bf=int_{0}^1chi_{[a,b]}f$. Recall the relation
$$
|chi_A-chi_B| = chi_{A Delta B}
$$
where $ADelta B$ is the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$. It is also easy to verify that
$$
[a,b] Delta [c,d] subset [a,c] cup[c,a]cup[b,d]cup[d,b]
$$
where $[x,y]=emptyset$ if $y<x$, so half of the terms of the right hand side would disappear, depending on the order of $a,b,c,d$. By symmetry of the right hand side, we may assume $ale c$ and $ble d$.
Using the above, we can compute that
$$begin{align}
left|int_a^bf-int_c^df right| &le int_0^1 |chi_{[a,b]} - chi_{[c,d]}| ,|f|\
&= int_0^1 chi_{[a,b] Delta [c,d]} |f|\
&leint_0^1 chi_{[a,c]} |f| + int_0^1 chi_{[b,d]}|f| \
&le (|c-a|+|d-b|)sup_{xin[0,1]} |f(x)|.
end{align}$$
Back to your question, we can deduce that
$$begin{align}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)| &le big(|alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)| big), ||u||_infty \
&le |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|
end{align}$$
for any $uin B$. By continuity of $alpha$ and $beta$, for any given $varepsilon>0$ we may find $delta$ such that
$$
|x-y|<delta implies |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|<varepsilon,
$$
which proves what you want.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral from $a$ to $b$ can be viewed as $int_a^bf=int_{0}^1chi_{[a,b]}f$. Recall the relation
$$
|chi_A-chi_B| = chi_{A Delta B}
$$
where $ADelta B$ is the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$. It is also easy to verify that
$$
[a,b] Delta [c,d] subset [a,c] cup[c,a]cup[b,d]cup[d,b]
$$
where $[x,y]=emptyset$ if $y<x$, so half of the terms of the right hand side would disappear, depending on the order of $a,b,c,d$. By symmetry of the right hand side, we may assume $ale c$ and $ble d$.
Using the above, we can compute that
$$begin{align}
left|int_a^bf-int_c^df right| &le int_0^1 |chi_{[a,b]} - chi_{[c,d]}| ,|f|\
&= int_0^1 chi_{[a,b] Delta [c,d]} |f|\
&leint_0^1 chi_{[a,c]} |f| + int_0^1 chi_{[b,d]}|f| \
&le (|c-a|+|d-b|)sup_{xin[0,1]} |f(x)|.
end{align}$$
Back to your question, we can deduce that
$$begin{align}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)| &le big(|alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)| big), ||u||_infty \
&le |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|
end{align}$$
for any $uin B$. By continuity of $alpha$ and $beta$, for any given $varepsilon>0$ we may find $delta$ such that
$$
|x-y|<delta implies |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|<varepsilon,
$$
which proves what you want.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral from $a$ to $b$ can be viewed as $int_a^bf=int_{0}^1chi_{[a,b]}f$. Recall the relation
$$
|chi_A-chi_B| = chi_{A Delta B}
$$
where $ADelta B$ is the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$. It is also easy to verify that
$$
[a,b] Delta [c,d] subset [a,c] cup[c,a]cup[b,d]cup[d,b]
$$
where $[x,y]=emptyset$ if $y<x$, so half of the terms of the right hand side would disappear, depending on the order of $a,b,c,d$. By symmetry of the right hand side, we may assume $ale c$ and $ble d$.
Using the above, we can compute that
$$begin{align}
left|int_a^bf-int_c^df right| &le int_0^1 |chi_{[a,b]} - chi_{[c,d]}| ,|f|\
&= int_0^1 chi_{[a,b] Delta [c,d]} |f|\
&leint_0^1 chi_{[a,c]} |f| + int_0^1 chi_{[b,d]}|f| \
&le (|c-a|+|d-b|)sup_{xin[0,1]} |f(x)|.
end{align}$$
Back to your question, we can deduce that
$$begin{align}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)| &le big(|alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)| big), ||u||_infty \
&le |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|
end{align}$$
for any $uin B$. By continuity of $alpha$ and $beta$, for any given $varepsilon>0$ we may find $delta$ such that
$$
|x-y|<delta implies |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|<varepsilon,
$$
which proves what you want.
$endgroup$
The integral from $a$ to $b$ can be viewed as $int_a^bf=int_{0}^1chi_{[a,b]}f$. Recall the relation
$$
|chi_A-chi_B| = chi_{A Delta B}
$$
where $ADelta B$ is the symmetric difference of $A$ and $B$. It is also easy to verify that
$$
[a,b] Delta [c,d] subset [a,c] cup[c,a]cup[b,d]cup[d,b]
$$
where $[x,y]=emptyset$ if $y<x$, so half of the terms of the right hand side would disappear, depending on the order of $a,b,c,d$. By symmetry of the right hand side, we may assume $ale c$ and $ble d$.
Using the above, we can compute that
$$begin{align}
left|int_a^bf-int_c^df right| &le int_0^1 |chi_{[a,b]} - chi_{[c,d]}| ,|f|\
&= int_0^1 chi_{[a,b] Delta [c,d]} |f|\
&leint_0^1 chi_{[a,c]} |f| + int_0^1 chi_{[b,d]}|f| \
&le (|c-a|+|d-b|)sup_{xin[0,1]} |f(x)|.
end{align}$$
Back to your question, we can deduce that
$$begin{align}
|Tu(x)-Tu(y)| &le big(|alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)| big), ||u||_infty \
&le |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|
end{align}$$
for any $uin B$. By continuity of $alpha$ and $beta$, for any given $varepsilon>0$ we may find $delta$ such that
$$
|x-y|<delta implies |alpha(x)-alpha(y)|+ |beta(x)-beta(y)|<varepsilon,
$$
which proves what you want.
edited Jan 12 at 23:39
answered Jan 12 at 21:14


BigbearZzzBigbearZzz
8,69121652
8,69121652
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071336%2fshow-that-tux-int-alphax-betax-utdt-is-compact-linear-operato%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Is there any assumption on the regularity of $alpha$ and $beta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 20:24
$begingroup$
They are continuous. I will edit now.
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 12 at 20:25
$begingroup$
My answer below can be rewritten without using the characteristic function $chi$ by arguing case by case. However, I prefer using $chi$ as it makes some idea clearer.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 12 at 22:39
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its clear now
$endgroup$
– Muhammad Mubarak
Jan 13 at 9:56