Definition of algebraic integer












0












$begingroup$


Can the definition of algebraic Integer




The roots of polynomials, such as $x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0$, with integer (or rational) coefficients.




be accurately paraphrased as




Any real or complex number $A + iB$ where $A$ and $B$ are integers.




If not, what belongs to my definition that does not belong to the usual one?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about $sqrt 2$? It is root of $x^2 - 2$. Your numbers are gaussian integers
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:27








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of algebraic integer isn't even correct. An algebraic integer is a complex number which is the root of a monic polynomial with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – lokodiz
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:34












  • $begingroup$
    You got it the other way around. The numbers you mention are all algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers take that form. For example think about the roots of unity.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    Jul 17 '15 at 12:05
















0












$begingroup$


Can the definition of algebraic Integer




The roots of polynomials, such as $x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0$, with integer (or rational) coefficients.




be accurately paraphrased as




Any real or complex number $A + iB$ where $A$ and $B$ are integers.




If not, what belongs to my definition that does not belong to the usual one?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about $sqrt 2$? It is root of $x^2 - 2$. Your numbers are gaussian integers
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:27








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of algebraic integer isn't even correct. An algebraic integer is a complex number which is the root of a monic polynomial with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – lokodiz
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:34












  • $begingroup$
    You got it the other way around. The numbers you mention are all algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers take that form. For example think about the roots of unity.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    Jul 17 '15 at 12:05














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Can the definition of algebraic Integer




The roots of polynomials, such as $x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0$, with integer (or rational) coefficients.




be accurately paraphrased as




Any real or complex number $A + iB$ where $A$ and $B$ are integers.




If not, what belongs to my definition that does not belong to the usual one?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Can the definition of algebraic Integer




The roots of polynomials, such as $x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0$, with integer (or rational) coefficients.




be accurately paraphrased as




Any real or complex number $A + iB$ where $A$ and $B$ are integers.




If not, what belongs to my definition that does not belong to the usual one?







algebraic-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 20 '15 at 21:14









coldnumber

3,3021820




3,3021820










asked Jul 17 '15 at 10:21









xatabayxatabay

94110




94110












  • $begingroup$
    What about $sqrt 2$? It is root of $x^2 - 2$. Your numbers are gaussian integers
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:27








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of algebraic integer isn't even correct. An algebraic integer is a complex number which is the root of a monic polynomial with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – lokodiz
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:34












  • $begingroup$
    You got it the other way around. The numbers you mention are all algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers take that form. For example think about the roots of unity.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    Jul 17 '15 at 12:05


















  • $begingroup$
    What about $sqrt 2$? It is root of $x^2 - 2$. Your numbers are gaussian integers
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:27








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of algebraic integer isn't even correct. An algebraic integer is a complex number which is the root of a monic polynomial with integer coefficients.
    $endgroup$
    – lokodiz
    Jul 17 '15 at 10:34












  • $begingroup$
    You got it the other way around. The numbers you mention are all algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers take that form. For example think about the roots of unity.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    Jul 17 '15 at 12:05
















$begingroup$
What about $sqrt 2$? It is root of $x^2 - 2$. Your numbers are gaussian integers
$endgroup$
– Michael Galuza
Jul 17 '15 at 10:27






$begingroup$
What about $sqrt 2$? It is root of $x^2 - 2$. Your numbers are gaussian integers
$endgroup$
– Michael Galuza
Jul 17 '15 at 10:27






2




2




$begingroup$
Your definition of algebraic integer isn't even correct. An algebraic integer is a complex number which is the root of a monic polynomial with integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
– lokodiz
Jul 17 '15 at 10:34






$begingroup$
Your definition of algebraic integer isn't even correct. An algebraic integer is a complex number which is the root of a monic polynomial with integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
– lokodiz
Jul 17 '15 at 10:34














$begingroup$
You got it the other way around. The numbers you mention are all algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers take that form. For example think about the roots of unity.
$endgroup$
– A.P.
Jul 17 '15 at 12:05




$begingroup$
You got it the other way around. The numbers you mention are all algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers take that form. For example think about the roots of unity.
$endgroup$
– A.P.
Jul 17 '15 at 12:05










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

If by "i" you mean $i = sqrt{-1}$, then your "paraphrase" is lacking. It would be like saying only beagles are dogs, thus ignoring terriers, colliers, retrievers, etc. Your "such as" seemed to indicate knowledge of algebraic integers of degree $3$, such as $1 + root 3 of 2$, which is a little difficult to represent as $A + iB$.



I recommend that you play around with Wolfram Alpha, asking it questions like:




  • is 1/2 + sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

  • is sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

  • is 3^(1/5) an algebraic integer?

  • is pi an algebraic integer?

  • etc.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    You're getting your Gaussian integers mixed up with your algebraic integers. All Gaussian integers are algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers are Gaussian integers.



    The polynomials are of crucial importance to determining what is or what isn't an algebraic integer. Take a look at this number: $$frac{28 + root 3 of {10} + 19(root 3 of {10})^2}{3}$$ With an approximate decimal value of $39.4482$, this is clearly not your typical integer. But it is a solution to $x^3 - 28x^2 + 198x - 25626 = 0$ (so then $b = 28$, $c = 198$ and $d = -25626$).



    Hey, where's $a$? It's there, it's equal to $a = 1$, so you can just leave it out. Which brings me to my next point: all algebraic integers are algebraic numbers, but not all algebraic numbers are algebraic integers. This is not an algebraic integer, but it is an algebraic number: $$frac{root 3 of {11}}{3}$$ The relevant polynomial is $27x^3 - 11 = 0$. We have $b = 0$, $c = 0$, $d = -11$ but $a = 27$.



    At the risk of sounding monotonous, the root of the polynomial is important, and trying to leave it out of a definition is just not worth it.



    But the nice thing about Gaussian integers is that you can very easily guess the relevant polynomial. If $a + bi$ is a Gaussian integer, then the polynomial is probably is $x^2 - 2a + (a^2 + b^2)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1364368%2fdefinition-of-algebraic-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6












      $begingroup$

      If by "i" you mean $i = sqrt{-1}$, then your "paraphrase" is lacking. It would be like saying only beagles are dogs, thus ignoring terriers, colliers, retrievers, etc. Your "such as" seemed to indicate knowledge of algebraic integers of degree $3$, such as $1 + root 3 of 2$, which is a little difficult to represent as $A + iB$.



      I recommend that you play around with Wolfram Alpha, asking it questions like:




      • is 1/2 + sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

      • is sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

      • is 3^(1/5) an algebraic integer?

      • is pi an algebraic integer?

      • etc.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        6












        $begingroup$

        If by "i" you mean $i = sqrt{-1}$, then your "paraphrase" is lacking. It would be like saying only beagles are dogs, thus ignoring terriers, colliers, retrievers, etc. Your "such as" seemed to indicate knowledge of algebraic integers of degree $3$, such as $1 + root 3 of 2$, which is a little difficult to represent as $A + iB$.



        I recommend that you play around with Wolfram Alpha, asking it questions like:




        • is 1/2 + sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

        • is sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

        • is 3^(1/5) an algebraic integer?

        • is pi an algebraic integer?

        • etc.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          If by "i" you mean $i = sqrt{-1}$, then your "paraphrase" is lacking. It would be like saying only beagles are dogs, thus ignoring terriers, colliers, retrievers, etc. Your "such as" seemed to indicate knowledge of algebraic integers of degree $3$, such as $1 + root 3 of 2$, which is a little difficult to represent as $A + iB$.



          I recommend that you play around with Wolfram Alpha, asking it questions like:




          • is 1/2 + sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

          • is sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

          • is 3^(1/5) an algebraic integer?

          • is pi an algebraic integer?

          • etc.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If by "i" you mean $i = sqrt{-1}$, then your "paraphrase" is lacking. It would be like saying only beagles are dogs, thus ignoring terriers, colliers, retrievers, etc. Your "such as" seemed to indicate knowledge of algebraic integers of degree $3$, such as $1 + root 3 of 2$, which is a little difficult to represent as $A + iB$.



          I recommend that you play around with Wolfram Alpha, asking it questions like:




          • is 1/2 + sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

          • is sqrt(-7)/2 an algebraic integer?

          • is 3^(1/5) an algebraic integer?

          • is pi an algebraic integer?

          • etc.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jul 20 '15 at 13:58







          user153918






























              4












              $begingroup$

              You're getting your Gaussian integers mixed up with your algebraic integers. All Gaussian integers are algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers are Gaussian integers.



              The polynomials are of crucial importance to determining what is or what isn't an algebraic integer. Take a look at this number: $$frac{28 + root 3 of {10} + 19(root 3 of {10})^2}{3}$$ With an approximate decimal value of $39.4482$, this is clearly not your typical integer. But it is a solution to $x^3 - 28x^2 + 198x - 25626 = 0$ (so then $b = 28$, $c = 198$ and $d = -25626$).



              Hey, where's $a$? It's there, it's equal to $a = 1$, so you can just leave it out. Which brings me to my next point: all algebraic integers are algebraic numbers, but not all algebraic numbers are algebraic integers. This is not an algebraic integer, but it is an algebraic number: $$frac{root 3 of {11}}{3}$$ The relevant polynomial is $27x^3 - 11 = 0$. We have $b = 0$, $c = 0$, $d = -11$ but $a = 27$.



              At the risk of sounding monotonous, the root of the polynomial is important, and trying to leave it out of a definition is just not worth it.



              But the nice thing about Gaussian integers is that you can very easily guess the relevant polynomial. If $a + bi$ is a Gaussian integer, then the polynomial is probably is $x^2 - 2a + (a^2 + b^2)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                You're getting your Gaussian integers mixed up with your algebraic integers. All Gaussian integers are algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers are Gaussian integers.



                The polynomials are of crucial importance to determining what is or what isn't an algebraic integer. Take a look at this number: $$frac{28 + root 3 of {10} + 19(root 3 of {10})^2}{3}$$ With an approximate decimal value of $39.4482$, this is clearly not your typical integer. But it is a solution to $x^3 - 28x^2 + 198x - 25626 = 0$ (so then $b = 28$, $c = 198$ and $d = -25626$).



                Hey, where's $a$? It's there, it's equal to $a = 1$, so you can just leave it out. Which brings me to my next point: all algebraic integers are algebraic numbers, but not all algebraic numbers are algebraic integers. This is not an algebraic integer, but it is an algebraic number: $$frac{root 3 of {11}}{3}$$ The relevant polynomial is $27x^3 - 11 = 0$. We have $b = 0$, $c = 0$, $d = -11$ but $a = 27$.



                At the risk of sounding monotonous, the root of the polynomial is important, and trying to leave it out of a definition is just not worth it.



                But the nice thing about Gaussian integers is that you can very easily guess the relevant polynomial. If $a + bi$ is a Gaussian integer, then the polynomial is probably is $x^2 - 2a + (a^2 + b^2)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  You're getting your Gaussian integers mixed up with your algebraic integers. All Gaussian integers are algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers are Gaussian integers.



                  The polynomials are of crucial importance to determining what is or what isn't an algebraic integer. Take a look at this number: $$frac{28 + root 3 of {10} + 19(root 3 of {10})^2}{3}$$ With an approximate decimal value of $39.4482$, this is clearly not your typical integer. But it is a solution to $x^3 - 28x^2 + 198x - 25626 = 0$ (so then $b = 28$, $c = 198$ and $d = -25626$).



                  Hey, where's $a$? It's there, it's equal to $a = 1$, so you can just leave it out. Which brings me to my next point: all algebraic integers are algebraic numbers, but not all algebraic numbers are algebraic integers. This is not an algebraic integer, but it is an algebraic number: $$frac{root 3 of {11}}{3}$$ The relevant polynomial is $27x^3 - 11 = 0$. We have $b = 0$, $c = 0$, $d = -11$ but $a = 27$.



                  At the risk of sounding monotonous, the root of the polynomial is important, and trying to leave it out of a definition is just not worth it.



                  But the nice thing about Gaussian integers is that you can very easily guess the relevant polynomial. If $a + bi$ is a Gaussian integer, then the polynomial is probably is $x^2 - 2a + (a^2 + b^2)$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  You're getting your Gaussian integers mixed up with your algebraic integers. All Gaussian integers are algebraic integers, but not all algebraic integers are Gaussian integers.



                  The polynomials are of crucial importance to determining what is or what isn't an algebraic integer. Take a look at this number: $$frac{28 + root 3 of {10} + 19(root 3 of {10})^2}{3}$$ With an approximate decimal value of $39.4482$, this is clearly not your typical integer. But it is a solution to $x^3 - 28x^2 + 198x - 25626 = 0$ (so then $b = 28$, $c = 198$ and $d = -25626$).



                  Hey, where's $a$? It's there, it's equal to $a = 1$, so you can just leave it out. Which brings me to my next point: all algebraic integers are algebraic numbers, but not all algebraic numbers are algebraic integers. This is not an algebraic integer, but it is an algebraic number: $$frac{root 3 of {11}}{3}$$ The relevant polynomial is $27x^3 - 11 = 0$. We have $b = 0$, $c = 0$, $d = -11$ but $a = 27$.



                  At the risk of sounding monotonous, the root of the polynomial is important, and trying to leave it out of a definition is just not worth it.



                  But the nice thing about Gaussian integers is that you can very easily guess the relevant polynomial. If $a + bi$ is a Gaussian integer, then the polynomial is probably is $x^2 - 2a + (a^2 + b^2)$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 21 '15 at 14:13

























                  answered Jul 20 '15 at 20:58







                  user155234





































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1364368%2fdefinition-of-algebraic-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith