Different Response to simulator vs skype integration












0















here is the image for better understanding, i merged the inline editor, simulator, and skype



I just created an agent and intent entity with sone parameters and in the fullfilment tab, in the inline editor wrote some code to give response specific to the intent parameter, while all this is working as expected in the simulator. But giving generic response(intent static response) in the Skype integration. Should i do anything extra for skype?



Why is the behaviour different?



Does it have anything to do with webhook?



Ps: I have enabled fullfilment for the intent










share|improve this question

























  • Can you update your question to show the code in question and screenshots of how it looks in the simulator?

    – Prisoner
    Jan 2 at 17:21











  • Please check the question again, i added the link to requested image, thanks

    – bajiShaik
    Jan 3 at 5:51
















0















here is the image for better understanding, i merged the inline editor, simulator, and skype



I just created an agent and intent entity with sone parameters and in the fullfilment tab, in the inline editor wrote some code to give response specific to the intent parameter, while all this is working as expected in the simulator. But giving generic response(intent static response) in the Skype integration. Should i do anything extra for skype?



Why is the behaviour different?



Does it have anything to do with webhook?



Ps: I have enabled fullfilment for the intent










share|improve this question

























  • Can you update your question to show the code in question and screenshots of how it looks in the simulator?

    – Prisoner
    Jan 2 at 17:21











  • Please check the question again, i added the link to requested image, thanks

    – bajiShaik
    Jan 3 at 5:51














0












0








0








here is the image for better understanding, i merged the inline editor, simulator, and skype



I just created an agent and intent entity with sone parameters and in the fullfilment tab, in the inline editor wrote some code to give response specific to the intent parameter, while all this is working as expected in the simulator. But giving generic response(intent static response) in the Skype integration. Should i do anything extra for skype?



Why is the behaviour different?



Does it have anything to do with webhook?



Ps: I have enabled fullfilment for the intent










share|improve this question
















here is the image for better understanding, i merged the inline editor, simulator, and skype



I just created an agent and intent entity with sone parameters and in the fullfilment tab, in the inline editor wrote some code to give response specific to the intent parameter, while all this is working as expected in the simulator. But giving generic response(intent static response) in the Skype integration. Should i do anything extra for skype?



Why is the behaviour different?



Does it have anything to do with webhook?



Ps: I have enabled fullfilment for the intent







dialogflow skype






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 3 at 5:50







bajiShaik

















asked Jan 2 at 11:15









bajiShaikbajiShaik

11




11













  • Can you update your question to show the code in question and screenshots of how it looks in the simulator?

    – Prisoner
    Jan 2 at 17:21











  • Please check the question again, i added the link to requested image, thanks

    – bajiShaik
    Jan 3 at 5:51



















  • Can you update your question to show the code in question and screenshots of how it looks in the simulator?

    – Prisoner
    Jan 2 at 17:21











  • Please check the question again, i added the link to requested image, thanks

    – bajiShaik
    Jan 3 at 5:51

















Can you update your question to show the code in question and screenshots of how it looks in the simulator?

– Prisoner
Jan 2 at 17:21





Can you update your question to show the code in question and screenshots of how it looks in the simulator?

– Prisoner
Jan 2 at 17:21













Please check the question again, i added the link to requested image, thanks

– bajiShaik
Jan 3 at 5:51





Please check the question again, i added the link to requested image, thanks

– bajiShaik
Jan 3 at 5:51












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54005326%2fdifferent-response-to-simulator-vs-skype-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54005326%2fdifferent-response-to-simulator-vs-skype-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith