Evaluate $a_1cdot dots cdot a_n$ where $G={a_1,…,a_n}$ is an abelian group with no element $ane e$ such...












1














Let $G={a_1,...,a_n}$ be a finite abelian group such that $nexists ane e$ with $a^2=e$



Evaluate $a_1cdotdotscdot a_n$



I thaught that a finite abelian group with the property of $a^2=eimplies a=e$ is isomorphic to $Bbb Z/pBbb Z$ with $p$ a prime, but that's not true cause $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$ verifies this property and $9$ is not prime....



Anyway, how can one solve this exercise without using an isomorphism with a subgroup of $Bbb Z$?










share|cite|improve this question





























    1














    Let $G={a_1,...,a_n}$ be a finite abelian group such that $nexists ane e$ with $a^2=e$



    Evaluate $a_1cdotdotscdot a_n$



    I thaught that a finite abelian group with the property of $a^2=eimplies a=e$ is isomorphic to $Bbb Z/pBbb Z$ with $p$ a prime, but that's not true cause $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$ verifies this property and $9$ is not prime....



    Anyway, how can one solve this exercise without using an isomorphism with a subgroup of $Bbb Z$?










    share|cite|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      Let $G={a_1,...,a_n}$ be a finite abelian group such that $nexists ane e$ with $a^2=e$



      Evaluate $a_1cdotdotscdot a_n$



      I thaught that a finite abelian group with the property of $a^2=eimplies a=e$ is isomorphic to $Bbb Z/pBbb Z$ with $p$ a prime, but that's not true cause $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$ verifies this property and $9$ is not prime....



      Anyway, how can one solve this exercise without using an isomorphism with a subgroup of $Bbb Z$?










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $G={a_1,...,a_n}$ be a finite abelian group such that $nexists ane e$ with $a^2=e$



      Evaluate $a_1cdotdotscdot a_n$



      I thaught that a finite abelian group with the property of $a^2=eimplies a=e$ is isomorphic to $Bbb Z/pBbb Z$ with $p$ a prime, but that's not true cause $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$ verifies this property and $9$ is not prime....



      Anyway, how can one solve this exercise without using an isomorphism with a subgroup of $Bbb Z$?







      group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 '18 at 17:37

























      asked Nov 20 '18 at 17:34









      John Cataldo

      1,0061216




      1,0061216






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Hint:



          In the product $;a_1cdotldotscdot a_n;$ , pair up each element with its inverse ...(Why can you change the order of the product to do this pairing? What element cannot be paired with other element?)



          Finally, unrelated to the question itself but also interesting: can you characterize the number $;n;$ ?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Yes I did that already, should have included it in the question. But I never use the property $a^2ne e forall ane e$
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:38










          • I cannot characterize $n$ if you mean to infer that $n$ is prime, cause it doesn't hold for $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










          • Oh $n$ should be odd, is that it?
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










          • @JohnCataldo Yes, that is it...and you have to have used $;a^2neq e;$, otherwise you can't pair up each element of the group with other element ...and this is important also for the above characterization of $;n;$ , certainly.
            – DonAntonio
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:51



















          0














          Let $x=a_1...a_n$



          Claim: $n$ is odd (and the number of non identity elements is even)



          If $xne e$ then $x^2ne eimplies (a_1...a_n)(a_1...a_n)ne e$



          But since $G$ is abelian (and associative) we can change the order of the $a_i's$ to get $ene a_1a_1^{-1}cdot...cdot a_{(n-1)/2}a_{(n-1)/2}^{-1}cdot e=e$
          which is absurd. So $x=e$



          Now we need to prove the claim:



          Consider the partition of $G$ by the classes of equivalence $xsim yiff x=y text{ or } x=y^{-1}$. All those classes should be even (except {e}) which would imply $n$ is odd. In fact if there is a class ${a=a^{-1}}$ then $a^2=eimplies a=e$. So $n$ is odd.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006632%2fevaluate-a-1-cdot-dots-cdot-a-n-where-g-a-1-a-n-is-an-abelian-grou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Hint:



            In the product $;a_1cdotldotscdot a_n;$ , pair up each element with its inverse ...(Why can you change the order of the product to do this pairing? What element cannot be paired with other element?)



            Finally, unrelated to the question itself but also interesting: can you characterize the number $;n;$ ?






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Yes I did that already, should have included it in the question. But I never use the property $a^2ne e forall ane e$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:38










            • I cannot characterize $n$ if you mean to infer that $n$ is prime, cause it doesn't hold for $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • Oh $n$ should be odd, is that it?
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • @JohnCataldo Yes, that is it...and you have to have used $;a^2neq e;$, otherwise you can't pair up each element of the group with other element ...and this is important also for the above characterization of $;n;$ , certainly.
              – DonAntonio
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:51
















            1














            Hint:



            In the product $;a_1cdotldotscdot a_n;$ , pair up each element with its inverse ...(Why can you change the order of the product to do this pairing? What element cannot be paired with other element?)



            Finally, unrelated to the question itself but also interesting: can you characterize the number $;n;$ ?






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Yes I did that already, should have included it in the question. But I never use the property $a^2ne e forall ane e$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:38










            • I cannot characterize $n$ if you mean to infer that $n$ is prime, cause it doesn't hold for $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • Oh $n$ should be odd, is that it?
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • @JohnCataldo Yes, that is it...and you have to have used $;a^2neq e;$, otherwise you can't pair up each element of the group with other element ...and this is important also for the above characterization of $;n;$ , certainly.
              – DonAntonio
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:51














            1












            1








            1






            Hint:



            In the product $;a_1cdotldotscdot a_n;$ , pair up each element with its inverse ...(Why can you change the order of the product to do this pairing? What element cannot be paired with other element?)



            Finally, unrelated to the question itself but also interesting: can you characterize the number $;n;$ ?






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Hint:



            In the product $;a_1cdotldotscdot a_n;$ , pair up each element with its inverse ...(Why can you change the order of the product to do this pairing? What element cannot be paired with other element?)



            Finally, unrelated to the question itself but also interesting: can you characterize the number $;n;$ ?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 '18 at 17:37









            DonAntonio

            177k1491225




            177k1491225












            • Yes I did that already, should have included it in the question. But I never use the property $a^2ne e forall ane e$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:38










            • I cannot characterize $n$ if you mean to infer that $n$ is prime, cause it doesn't hold for $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • Oh $n$ should be odd, is that it?
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • @JohnCataldo Yes, that is it...and you have to have used $;a^2neq e;$, otherwise you can't pair up each element of the group with other element ...and this is important also for the above characterization of $;n;$ , certainly.
              – DonAntonio
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:51


















            • Yes I did that already, should have included it in the question. But I never use the property $a^2ne e forall ane e$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:38










            • I cannot characterize $n$ if you mean to infer that $n$ is prime, cause it doesn't hold for $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • Oh $n$ should be odd, is that it?
              – John Cataldo
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:41










            • @JohnCataldo Yes, that is it...and you have to have used $;a^2neq e;$, otherwise you can't pair up each element of the group with other element ...and this is important also for the above characterization of $;n;$ , certainly.
              – DonAntonio
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:51
















            Yes I did that already, should have included it in the question. But I never use the property $a^2ne e forall ane e$
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:38




            Yes I did that already, should have included it in the question. But I never use the property $a^2ne e forall ane e$
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:38












            I cannot characterize $n$ if you mean to infer that $n$ is prime, cause it doesn't hold for $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:41




            I cannot characterize $n$ if you mean to infer that $n$ is prime, cause it doesn't hold for $Bbb Z/9Bbb Z$
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:41












            Oh $n$ should be odd, is that it?
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:41




            Oh $n$ should be odd, is that it?
            – John Cataldo
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:41












            @JohnCataldo Yes, that is it...and you have to have used $;a^2neq e;$, otherwise you can't pair up each element of the group with other element ...and this is important also for the above characterization of $;n;$ , certainly.
            – DonAntonio
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:51




            @JohnCataldo Yes, that is it...and you have to have used $;a^2neq e;$, otherwise you can't pair up each element of the group with other element ...and this is important also for the above characterization of $;n;$ , certainly.
            – DonAntonio
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:51











            0














            Let $x=a_1...a_n$



            Claim: $n$ is odd (and the number of non identity elements is even)



            If $xne e$ then $x^2ne eimplies (a_1...a_n)(a_1...a_n)ne e$



            But since $G$ is abelian (and associative) we can change the order of the $a_i's$ to get $ene a_1a_1^{-1}cdot...cdot a_{(n-1)/2}a_{(n-1)/2}^{-1}cdot e=e$
            which is absurd. So $x=e$



            Now we need to prove the claim:



            Consider the partition of $G$ by the classes of equivalence $xsim yiff x=y text{ or } x=y^{-1}$. All those classes should be even (except {e}) which would imply $n$ is odd. In fact if there is a class ${a=a^{-1}}$ then $a^2=eimplies a=e$. So $n$ is odd.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              0














              Let $x=a_1...a_n$



              Claim: $n$ is odd (and the number of non identity elements is even)



              If $xne e$ then $x^2ne eimplies (a_1...a_n)(a_1...a_n)ne e$



              But since $G$ is abelian (and associative) we can change the order of the $a_i's$ to get $ene a_1a_1^{-1}cdot...cdot a_{(n-1)/2}a_{(n-1)/2}^{-1}cdot e=e$
              which is absurd. So $x=e$



              Now we need to prove the claim:



              Consider the partition of $G$ by the classes of equivalence $xsim yiff x=y text{ or } x=y^{-1}$. All those classes should be even (except {e}) which would imply $n$ is odd. In fact if there is a class ${a=a^{-1}}$ then $a^2=eimplies a=e$. So $n$ is odd.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0






                Let $x=a_1...a_n$



                Claim: $n$ is odd (and the number of non identity elements is even)



                If $xne e$ then $x^2ne eimplies (a_1...a_n)(a_1...a_n)ne e$



                But since $G$ is abelian (and associative) we can change the order of the $a_i's$ to get $ene a_1a_1^{-1}cdot...cdot a_{(n-1)/2}a_{(n-1)/2}^{-1}cdot e=e$
                which is absurd. So $x=e$



                Now we need to prove the claim:



                Consider the partition of $G$ by the classes of equivalence $xsim yiff x=y text{ or } x=y^{-1}$. All those classes should be even (except {e}) which would imply $n$ is odd. In fact if there is a class ${a=a^{-1}}$ then $a^2=eimplies a=e$. So $n$ is odd.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Let $x=a_1...a_n$



                Claim: $n$ is odd (and the number of non identity elements is even)



                If $xne e$ then $x^2ne eimplies (a_1...a_n)(a_1...a_n)ne e$



                But since $G$ is abelian (and associative) we can change the order of the $a_i's$ to get $ene a_1a_1^{-1}cdot...cdot a_{(n-1)/2}a_{(n-1)/2}^{-1}cdot e=e$
                which is absurd. So $x=e$



                Now we need to prove the claim:



                Consider the partition of $G$ by the classes of equivalence $xsim yiff x=y text{ or } x=y^{-1}$. All those classes should be even (except {e}) which would imply $n$ is odd. In fact if there is a class ${a=a^{-1}}$ then $a^2=eimplies a=e$. So $n$ is odd.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 22 '18 at 12:36

























                answered Nov 20 '18 at 18:00









                John Cataldo

                1,0061216




                1,0061216






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006632%2fevaluate-a-1-cdot-dots-cdot-a-n-where-g-a-1-a-n-is-an-abelian-grou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]