What does: “for all free variables shown” mean in Set Theory.
$begingroup$
I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,
Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.
What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?
For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.
logic set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,
Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.
What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?
For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.
logic set-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,
Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.
What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?
For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.
logic set-theory
$endgroup$
I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,
Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.
What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?
For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.
logic set-theory
logic set-theory
edited Jan 20 at 14:12
Scientifica
6,79641335
6,79641335
asked Jan 20 at 14:05
foshofosho
4,7661033
4,7661033
$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10
$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10
$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080616%2fwhat-does-for-all-free-variables-shown-mean-in-set-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)
$endgroup$
Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)
answered Jan 20 at 14:10
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
126k10151290
126k10151290
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.
$endgroup$
My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.
answered Jan 20 at 14:09
ScientificaScientifica
6,79641335
6,79641335
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080616%2fwhat-does-for-all-free-variables-shown-mean-in-set-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10