What does: “for all free variables shown” mean in Set Theory.












0












$begingroup$


I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,




Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.




What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?



For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 20 at 14:10
















0












$begingroup$


I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,




Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.




What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?



For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 20 at 14:10














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,




Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.




What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?



For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am reading the definition of what it means for a class $A$ to model a formula of the Language of Set Theory. It begin,




Let $A$ be a class and $phi(x_1,ldots, x_n)$ be a formula of the Language of Set Theory with all free variables shown.




What does this mean? Does this mean that in the formula $phi$, the free variables are exactly $x_1ldots x_n$. Or are the free variables among $x_1, ldots x_n$, i.e. some may be free and some may not be free?



For example if $phi$ were the formula $forall x(x = x_1)$ would we write $phi(x_1)$ or $phi(x,x_1)$? The first only shows the free variables while the second shows all variables.







logic set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 14:12









Scientifica

6,79641335




6,79641335










asked Jan 20 at 14:05









foshofosho

4,7661033




4,7661033












  • $begingroup$
    "all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 20 at 14:10


















  • $begingroup$
    "all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 20 at 14:10
















$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10




$begingroup$
"all free variables shown" means exactly that $x_1, ldots, x_n$ are all and only the free vars occurring in $phi$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 20 at 14:10










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080616%2fwhat-does-for-all-free-variables-shown-mean-in-set-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Your first interpretation is correct. In general, when we write "$varphi(x_1,...,x_n)$" we are indicating that each of the variables $x_1,...,x_n$ is free in $varphi$. (This is very similar to function notation: the idea is that $varphi$ can take inputs corresponding to the $x_i$s. The weird bit is that sometimes we don't display all the free variables.)







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 20 at 14:10









          Noah SchweberNoah Schweber

          126k10151290




          126k10151290























              1












              $begingroup$

              My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  My guess is that it means that the free variables are precisely $x_1,dots,x_n$, i.e, each of them is a free variable and all of them appear somewhere in the formula. For example, you wouldn't write $forall x (x=x_1)$ as $phi(x_1,x_2)$ but rather $phi(x_1)$ because $x_2$ doesn't appear in it.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 20 at 14:09









                  ScientificaScientifica

                  6,79641335




                  6,79641335






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080616%2fwhat-does-for-all-free-variables-shown-mean-in-set-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                      Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                      A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$