Mixing
The number of non-isomorphic subgraphs of K3 is only 7
$begingroup$
This comes from a book called Introduction to Graph Theory (Dover Books on Mathematics) at the end of the first chapter we are asked to draw all 17 subgraphs of k3 which is pretty easy to do. however the next problem 22 asks The number of non-isomorphic subgraphs of K3 is only 7. Draw them. I do not quite understand what I am comparing the subgraphs to. I could for instance say compare K3 with say another graph proving the 2 graphs are not isomorphic by comparing their subgraphs alternatively I could compare the k3 subgraphs to each other in which case I end up with 7 distinct types of subgraphs:
- 3 vertices 3 edges
- 3 vertices 2 edges
- 3 vertices 0 edges
- 2 vertices 1 edges
- 2 vertices 0 edges
- 1 vertices 0 edges
- 3 vertices 1 edges
is the list above the correct answer?
graph-theory graph-isomorphism
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This comes from a book called Introduction to Graph Theory (Dover Books on Mathematics) at the end of the first chapter we are asked to draw all 17 subgraphs of k3 which is pretty easy to do. however the next problem 22 asks The number of non-isomorphic subgraphs of K3 is only 7. Draw them. I do not quite understand what I am comparing the subgraphs to. I could for instance say compare K3 with say another graph proving the 2 graphs are not isomorphic by comparing their subgraphs alternatively I could compare the k3 subgraphs to each other in which case I end up with 7 distinct types of subgraphs:
- 3 vertices 3 edges
- 3 vertices 2 edges
- 3 vertices 0 edges
- 2 vertices 1 edges
- 2 vertices 0 edges
- 1 vertices 0 edges
- 3 vertices 1 edges
is the list above the correct answer?
graph-theory graph-isomorphism
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This comes from a book called Introduction to Graph Theory (Dover Books on Mathematics) at the end of the first chapter we are asked to draw all 17 subgraphs of k3 which is pretty easy to do. however the next problem 22 asks The number of non-isomorphic subgraphs of K3 is only 7. Draw them. I do not quite understand what I am comparing the subgraphs to. I could for instance say compare K3 with say another graph proving the 2 graphs are not isomorphic by comparing their subgraphs alternatively I could compare the k3 subgraphs to each other in which case I end up with 7 distinct types of subgraphs:
- 3 vertices 3 edges
- 3 vertices 2 edges
- 3 vertices 0 edges
- 2 vertices 1 edges
- 2 vertices 0 edges
- 1 vertices 0 edges
- 3 vertices 1 edges
is the list above the correct answer?
graph-theory graph-isomorphism
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
$endgroup$
This comes from a book called Introduction to Graph Theory (Dover Books on Mathematics) at the end of the first chapter we are asked to draw all 17 subgraphs of k3 which is pretty easy to do. however the next problem 22 asks The number of non-isomorphic subgraphs of K3 is only 7. Draw them. I do not quite understand what I am comparing the subgraphs to. I could for instance say compare K3 with say another graph proving the 2 graphs are not isomorphic by comparing their subgraphs alternatively I could compare the k3 subgraphs to each other in which case I end up with 7 distinct types of subgraphs:
- 3 vertices 3 edges
- 3 vertices 2 edges
- 3 vertices 0 edges
- 2 vertices 1 edges
- 2 vertices 0 edges
- 1 vertices 0 edges
- 3 vertices 1 edges
is the list above the correct answer?
graph-theory graph-isomorphism
graph-theory graph-isomorphism
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
edited Jan 20 at 17:53
liminal18
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
asked Jan 20 at 14:58
liminal18liminal18
1084
1084
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are correct that you are comparing the subgraphs to one another. The goal is to decide which of the 17 labelled (i.e., the vertices have labels) subgraphs of $K_3$ are isomorphic to one another. The isomorphism relation is an equivalence relation, and the really important aspect of that for us is transitivity. That means that if $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_2$ and $G_2$ is isomorphic to $G_3$, then $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_3$. This drastically cuts down on the number of pairs of graphs you have to investigate.
Here are three subgraphs of $K_3$ (the numbers are labeled vertices and the hyphens are edges):
1-2-3
2-3-1
3-1-2
If you remove the vertex labels, however, they all look like:
x-x-x (the path on three vertices, $P_3$)
Since the graphs are identical when labels are removed, they are all isomorphic to one another. You can say they belong to the same isomorphism class.
Another subgraph of $K_3$ is $K_3$ itself. Even when you remove the vertex labels, you will be able to tell that it is a different graph than $P_3$. It is not isomorphic to $P_3$, and therefore belongs in a different isomorphism class.
Continue making these sorts of comparisons until all 17 labelled graphs live in exactly one isomorphism class.
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080682%2fthe-number-of-non-isomorphic-subgraphs-of-k3-is-only-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are correct that you are comparing the subgraphs to one another. The goal is to decide which of the 17 labelled (i.e., the vertices have labels) subgraphs of $K_3$ are isomorphic to one another. The isomorphism relation is an equivalence relation, and the really important aspect of that for us is transitivity. That means that if $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_2$ and $G_2$ is isomorphic to $G_3$, then $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_3$. This drastically cuts down on the number of pairs of graphs you have to investigate.
Here are three subgraphs of $K_3$ (the numbers are labeled vertices and the hyphens are edges):
1-2-3
2-3-1
3-1-2
If you remove the vertex labels, however, they all look like:
x-x-x (the path on three vertices, $P_3$)
Since the graphs are identical when labels are removed, they are all isomorphic to one another. You can say they belong to the same isomorphism class.
Another subgraph of $K_3$ is $K_3$ itself. Even when you remove the vertex labels, you will be able to tell that it is a different graph than $P_3$. It is not isomorphic to $P_3$, and therefore belongs in a different isomorphism class.
Continue making these sorts of comparisons until all 17 labelled graphs live in exactly one isomorphism class.
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct that you are comparing the subgraphs to one another. The goal is to decide which of the 17 labelled (i.e., the vertices have labels) subgraphs of $K_3$ are isomorphic to one another. The isomorphism relation is an equivalence relation, and the really important aspect of that for us is transitivity. That means that if $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_2$ and $G_2$ is isomorphic to $G_3$, then $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_3$. This drastically cuts down on the number of pairs of graphs you have to investigate.
Here are three subgraphs of $K_3$ (the numbers are labeled vertices and the hyphens are edges):
1-2-3
2-3-1
3-1-2
If you remove the vertex labels, however, they all look like:
x-x-x (the path on three vertices, $P_3$)
Since the graphs are identical when labels are removed, they are all isomorphic to one another. You can say they belong to the same isomorphism class.
Another subgraph of $K_3$ is $K_3$ itself. Even when you remove the vertex labels, you will be able to tell that it is a different graph than $P_3$. It is not isomorphic to $P_3$, and therefore belongs in a different isomorphism class.
Continue making these sorts of comparisons until all 17 labelled graphs live in exactly one isomorphism class.
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct that you are comparing the subgraphs to one another. The goal is to decide which of the 17 labelled (i.e., the vertices have labels) subgraphs of $K_3$ are isomorphic to one another. The isomorphism relation is an equivalence relation, and the really important aspect of that for us is transitivity. That means that if $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_2$ and $G_2$ is isomorphic to $G_3$, then $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_3$. This drastically cuts down on the number of pairs of graphs you have to investigate.
Here are three subgraphs of $K_3$ (the numbers are labeled vertices and the hyphens are edges):
1-2-3
2-3-1
3-1-2
If you remove the vertex labels, however, they all look like:
x-x-x (the path on three vertices, $P_3$)
Since the graphs are identical when labels are removed, they are all isomorphic to one another. You can say they belong to the same isomorphism class.
Another subgraph of $K_3$ is $K_3$ itself. Even when you remove the vertex labels, you will be able to tell that it is a different graph than $P_3$. It is not isomorphic to $P_3$, and therefore belongs in a different isomorphism class.
Continue making these sorts of comparisons until all 17 labelled graphs live in exactly one isomorphism class.
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
$endgroup$
You are correct that you are comparing the subgraphs to one another. The goal is to decide which of the 17 labelled (i.e., the vertices have labels) subgraphs of $K_3$ are isomorphic to one another. The isomorphism relation is an equivalence relation, and the really important aspect of that for us is transitivity. That means that if $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_2$ and $G_2$ is isomorphic to $G_3$, then $G_1$ is isomorphic to $G_3$. This drastically cuts down on the number of pairs of graphs you have to investigate.
Here are three subgraphs of $K_3$ (the numbers are labeled vertices and the hyphens are edges):
1-2-3
2-3-1
3-1-2
If you remove the vertex labels, however, they all look like:
x-x-x (the path on three vertices, $P_3$)
Since the graphs are identical when labels are removed, they are all isomorphic to one another. You can say they belong to the same isomorphism class.
Another subgraph of $K_3$ is $K_3$ itself. Even when you remove the vertex labels, you will be able to tell that it is a different graph than $P_3$. It is not isomorphic to $P_3$, and therefore belongs in a different isomorphism class.
Continue making these sorts of comparisons until all 17 labelled graphs live in exactly one isomorphism class.
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
answered Jan 20 at 18:40
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.4k35098
20.4k35098
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080682%2fthe-number-of-non-isomorphic-subgraphs-of-k3-is-only-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
