Any neat proof that $0$ is the unique solution of the equation $4^x+9^x+25^x=6^x+10^x+15^x$?
$begingroup$
It is obvious that both $f(x)= 4^x+9^x+25^x$ and $g(x)=6^x+10^x+15^x$ are strict monotonic increasing functions. It is also easy to check that 0 is a solution of the equation. Also I chart the functions, and it looks that for any $x$, $f(x)>g(x)$, which can be somehow proof by studying the derivative of the $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)$ and showing that $(0,0)$ it's an absolute minimum point for $h(x)$. However $h(x)$ it is a function with a messy derivative, and is not looking easy(for me) to find the zeroes of this derivative.
Does anyone, know an elegant proof(maybe an elementary one, without derivatives) for this problem?
real-analysis exponential-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is obvious that both $f(x)= 4^x+9^x+25^x$ and $g(x)=6^x+10^x+15^x$ are strict monotonic increasing functions. It is also easy to check that 0 is a solution of the equation. Also I chart the functions, and it looks that for any $x$, $f(x)>g(x)$, which can be somehow proof by studying the derivative of the $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)$ and showing that $(0,0)$ it's an absolute minimum point for $h(x)$. However $h(x)$ it is a function with a messy derivative, and is not looking easy(for me) to find the zeroes of this derivative.
Does anyone, know an elegant proof(maybe an elementary one, without derivatives) for this problem?
real-analysis exponential-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is obvious that both $f(x)= 4^x+9^x+25^x$ and $g(x)=6^x+10^x+15^x$ are strict monotonic increasing functions. It is also easy to check that 0 is a solution of the equation. Also I chart the functions, and it looks that for any $x$, $f(x)>g(x)$, which can be somehow proof by studying the derivative of the $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)$ and showing that $(0,0)$ it's an absolute minimum point for $h(x)$. However $h(x)$ it is a function with a messy derivative, and is not looking easy(for me) to find the zeroes of this derivative.
Does anyone, know an elegant proof(maybe an elementary one, without derivatives) for this problem?
real-analysis exponential-function
$endgroup$
It is obvious that both $f(x)= 4^x+9^x+25^x$ and $g(x)=6^x+10^x+15^x$ are strict monotonic increasing functions. It is also easy to check that 0 is a solution of the equation. Also I chart the functions, and it looks that for any $x$, $f(x)>g(x)$, which can be somehow proof by studying the derivative of the $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)$ and showing that $(0,0)$ it's an absolute minimum point for $h(x)$. However $h(x)$ it is a function with a messy derivative, and is not looking easy(for me) to find the zeroes of this derivative.
Does anyone, know an elegant proof(maybe an elementary one, without derivatives) for this problem?
real-analysis exponential-function
real-analysis exponential-function
asked Aug 18 '17 at 19:18
motorasmotoras
417312
417312
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
HINT: $$a^2+b^2+c^2geq ab+bc+ca$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much, I got it!
$endgroup$
– motoras
Aug 18 '17 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
ok, that is nice!
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
Very nice observation!
$endgroup$
– Cauchy
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
2
$begingroup$
From $(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2ge 0$
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
at the University i gave a talk about "solving equations with inequalities"
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Since the question is already settled for the continuous version, I thought I would just add (for fun!) a short proof for the case in which $x$ is a whole number: for $x geq 1$, the two sides are not equal when reduced modulo ten. So, the only possible whole number solution is at $x=0$, which works. "QED"
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess you want a proof that works for the continuous case. If we would know that $x$ is always an integer, then we could say that $f(x)$ is an even number for any $x$ integer except $0$, and $g(x)$ is odd for any $x$ integer except $0$. So, $x$ must be zero.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2398436%2fany-neat-proof-that-0-is-the-unique-solution-of-the-equation-4x9x25x-6x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
HINT: $$a^2+b^2+c^2geq ab+bc+ca$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much, I got it!
$endgroup$
– motoras
Aug 18 '17 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
ok, that is nice!
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
Very nice observation!
$endgroup$
– Cauchy
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
2
$begingroup$
From $(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2ge 0$
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
at the University i gave a talk about "solving equations with inequalities"
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
HINT: $$a^2+b^2+c^2geq ab+bc+ca$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much, I got it!
$endgroup$
– motoras
Aug 18 '17 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
ok, that is nice!
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
Very nice observation!
$endgroup$
– Cauchy
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
2
$begingroup$
From $(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2ge 0$
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
at the University i gave a talk about "solving equations with inequalities"
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
HINT: $$a^2+b^2+c^2geq ab+bc+ca$$
$endgroup$
HINT: $$a^2+b^2+c^2geq ab+bc+ca$$
answered Aug 18 '17 at 19:19
Dr. Sonnhard GraubnerDr. Sonnhard Graubner
76.8k42866
76.8k42866
$begingroup$
Thank you very much, I got it!
$endgroup$
– motoras
Aug 18 '17 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
ok, that is nice!
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
Very nice observation!
$endgroup$
– Cauchy
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
2
$begingroup$
From $(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2ge 0$
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
at the University i gave a talk about "solving equations with inequalities"
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Thank you very much, I got it!
$endgroup$
– motoras
Aug 18 '17 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
ok, that is nice!
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
Very nice observation!
$endgroup$
– Cauchy
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
2
$begingroup$
From $(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2ge 0$
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
at the University i gave a talk about "solving equations with inequalities"
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
Thank you very much, I got it!
$endgroup$
– motoras
Aug 18 '17 at 19:22
$begingroup$
Thank you very much, I got it!
$endgroup$
– motoras
Aug 18 '17 at 19:22
1
1
$begingroup$
ok, that is nice!
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
ok, that is nice!
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
Very nice observation!
$endgroup$
– Cauchy
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
$begingroup$
Very nice observation!
$endgroup$
– Cauchy
Aug 18 '17 at 19:23
2
2
$begingroup$
From $(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2ge 0$
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
From $(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2ge 0$
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
at the University i gave a talk about "solving equations with inequalities"
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
$begingroup$
at the University i gave a talk about "solving equations with inequalities"
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 18 '17 at 19:25
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Since the question is already settled for the continuous version, I thought I would just add (for fun!) a short proof for the case in which $x$ is a whole number: for $x geq 1$, the two sides are not equal when reduced modulo ten. So, the only possible whole number solution is at $x=0$, which works. "QED"
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the question is already settled for the continuous version, I thought I would just add (for fun!) a short proof for the case in which $x$ is a whole number: for $x geq 1$, the two sides are not equal when reduced modulo ten. So, the only possible whole number solution is at $x=0$, which works. "QED"
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the question is already settled for the continuous version, I thought I would just add (for fun!) a short proof for the case in which $x$ is a whole number: for $x geq 1$, the two sides are not equal when reduced modulo ten. So, the only possible whole number solution is at $x=0$, which works. "QED"
$endgroup$
Since the question is already settled for the continuous version, I thought I would just add (for fun!) a short proof for the case in which $x$ is a whole number: for $x geq 1$, the two sides are not equal when reduced modulo ten. So, the only possible whole number solution is at $x=0$, which works. "QED"
edited Aug 19 '17 at 0:19
answered Aug 18 '17 at 19:55
Benjamin DickmanBenjamin Dickman
10.3k22968
10.3k22968
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess you want a proof that works for the continuous case. If we would know that $x$ is always an integer, then we could say that $f(x)$ is an even number for any $x$ integer except $0$, and $g(x)$ is odd for any $x$ integer except $0$. So, $x$ must be zero.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess you want a proof that works for the continuous case. If we would know that $x$ is always an integer, then we could say that $f(x)$ is an even number for any $x$ integer except $0$, and $g(x)$ is odd for any $x$ integer except $0$. So, $x$ must be zero.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess you want a proof that works for the continuous case. If we would know that $x$ is always an integer, then we could say that $f(x)$ is an even number for any $x$ integer except $0$, and $g(x)$ is odd for any $x$ integer except $0$. So, $x$ must be zero.
$endgroup$
I guess you want a proof that works for the continuous case. If we would know that $x$ is always an integer, then we could say that $f(x)$ is an even number for any $x$ integer except $0$, and $g(x)$ is odd for any $x$ integer except $0$. So, $x$ must be zero.
edited Jan 20 at 13:39
Thomas Shelby
3,7492525
3,7492525
answered Apr 14 '18 at 21:05
FerrisFerris
8815
8815
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2398436%2fany-neat-proof-that-0-is-the-unique-solution-of-the-equation-4x9x25x-6x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown