Solve the line integral without Green's formula












1














I'm starting on double and line integrals, and I'm stuck at this question.
It asks of me to calculate the following integral without using Green's theorem. Usually with Green's theorem I use polar coordinates easily, but I can't seem to make the same substitution here.



$int_{L}{(2x-y)dx+(x-y)dy}$



$L = {(x,y): x^{2}+y^{2}=2y, xgeq0}cup{(x,y):x^{2}+y^{2}=4, xleq0,ygeq0} $



The curve $L$ is oriented from the point $(0,0)$, that is counter-clockwise.



I am not sure which subsitution to use. I always used Greens theorem so far. How would I go about solving this without it? I thought of using some parameter $t$ but couldn't quite specify its range. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Tell your teacher that this is a sick way to define a $1$-chain.
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:08
















1














I'm starting on double and line integrals, and I'm stuck at this question.
It asks of me to calculate the following integral without using Green's theorem. Usually with Green's theorem I use polar coordinates easily, but I can't seem to make the same substitution here.



$int_{L}{(2x-y)dx+(x-y)dy}$



$L = {(x,y): x^{2}+y^{2}=2y, xgeq0}cup{(x,y):x^{2}+y^{2}=4, xleq0,ygeq0} $



The curve $L$ is oriented from the point $(0,0)$, that is counter-clockwise.



I am not sure which subsitution to use. I always used Greens theorem so far. How would I go about solving this without it? I thought of using some parameter $t$ but couldn't quite specify its range. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Tell your teacher that this is a sick way to define a $1$-chain.
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:08














1












1








1







I'm starting on double and line integrals, and I'm stuck at this question.
It asks of me to calculate the following integral without using Green's theorem. Usually with Green's theorem I use polar coordinates easily, but I can't seem to make the same substitution here.



$int_{L}{(2x-y)dx+(x-y)dy}$



$L = {(x,y): x^{2}+y^{2}=2y, xgeq0}cup{(x,y):x^{2}+y^{2}=4, xleq0,ygeq0} $



The curve $L$ is oriented from the point $(0,0)$, that is counter-clockwise.



I am not sure which subsitution to use. I always used Greens theorem so far. How would I go about solving this without it? I thought of using some parameter $t$ but couldn't quite specify its range. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question













I'm starting on double and line integrals, and I'm stuck at this question.
It asks of me to calculate the following integral without using Green's theorem. Usually with Green's theorem I use polar coordinates easily, but I can't seem to make the same substitution here.



$int_{L}{(2x-y)dx+(x-y)dy}$



$L = {(x,y): x^{2}+y^{2}=2y, xgeq0}cup{(x,y):x^{2}+y^{2}=4, xleq0,ygeq0} $



The curve $L$ is oriented from the point $(0,0)$, that is counter-clockwise.



I am not sure which subsitution to use. I always used Greens theorem so far. How would I go about solving this without it? I thought of using some parameter $t$ but couldn't quite specify its range. Thank you.







integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '18 at 17:32









math101

597




597












  • Tell your teacher that this is a sick way to define a $1$-chain.
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:08


















  • Tell your teacher that this is a sick way to define a $1$-chain.
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:08
















Tell your teacher that this is a sick way to define a $1$-chain.
– Christian Blatter
Nov 20 '18 at 19:08




Tell your teacher that this is a sick way to define a $1$-chain.
– Christian Blatter
Nov 20 '18 at 19:08










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














You have two curves.



first part.



$x = 2sin tcos t = sin 2t\
y = 2sin^2 t = 1-cos 2t$



$int_limits{0}^{frac {pi}{2}} (2sin 2t + 1 - cos 2t )(2cos 2t)+(sin 2t +1-cos 2t)(2sin 2t) dt$



and the second part



$x = 2cos t\
y = 2sin t$



$int_limits{frac {pi}{2}}^{pi} (4cos t - 2sin t)(-2sin t)+(2cos t - sin t)(2cos t) dt$



If you wanted to use greens.



Then the you would add the straight line from $(-2,0)$ to $(0,0)$ to close the contour.



Then



$int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy + int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA\
int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA- int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks, I understand everything except how you got the first parts parametric equations. Since the first part of the curve is the right side of a circle of radius 1 and y offset of 1, shouldn't y be $y=1+sin(t)$. And $x=cos(t)$.
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:32










  • You could use that parameterization, it would be for a different range of t. That is fine. I said, $x = rcos t, y = rsin t$ plugging into $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ gives $r = 2sin t$ And put that back in for $r$ in the equations of $x,y$
    – Doug M
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:42










  • So that's it! I see now , thanks!
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:13











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006630%2fsolve-the-line-integral-without-greens-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














You have two curves.



first part.



$x = 2sin tcos t = sin 2t\
y = 2sin^2 t = 1-cos 2t$



$int_limits{0}^{frac {pi}{2}} (2sin 2t + 1 - cos 2t )(2cos 2t)+(sin 2t +1-cos 2t)(2sin 2t) dt$



and the second part



$x = 2cos t\
y = 2sin t$



$int_limits{frac {pi}{2}}^{pi} (4cos t - 2sin t)(-2sin t)+(2cos t - sin t)(2cos t) dt$



If you wanted to use greens.



Then the you would add the straight line from $(-2,0)$ to $(0,0)$ to close the contour.



Then



$int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy + int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA\
int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA- int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks, I understand everything except how you got the first parts parametric equations. Since the first part of the curve is the right side of a circle of radius 1 and y offset of 1, shouldn't y be $y=1+sin(t)$. And $x=cos(t)$.
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:32










  • You could use that parameterization, it would be for a different range of t. That is fine. I said, $x = rcos t, y = rsin t$ plugging into $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ gives $r = 2sin t$ And put that back in for $r$ in the equations of $x,y$
    – Doug M
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:42










  • So that's it! I see now , thanks!
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:13
















1














You have two curves.



first part.



$x = 2sin tcos t = sin 2t\
y = 2sin^2 t = 1-cos 2t$



$int_limits{0}^{frac {pi}{2}} (2sin 2t + 1 - cos 2t )(2cos 2t)+(sin 2t +1-cos 2t)(2sin 2t) dt$



and the second part



$x = 2cos t\
y = 2sin t$



$int_limits{frac {pi}{2}}^{pi} (4cos t - 2sin t)(-2sin t)+(2cos t - sin t)(2cos t) dt$



If you wanted to use greens.



Then the you would add the straight line from $(-2,0)$ to $(0,0)$ to close the contour.



Then



$int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy + int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA\
int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA- int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks, I understand everything except how you got the first parts parametric equations. Since the first part of the curve is the right side of a circle of radius 1 and y offset of 1, shouldn't y be $y=1+sin(t)$. And $x=cos(t)$.
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:32










  • You could use that parameterization, it would be for a different range of t. That is fine. I said, $x = rcos t, y = rsin t$ plugging into $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ gives $r = 2sin t$ And put that back in for $r$ in the equations of $x,y$
    – Doug M
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:42










  • So that's it! I see now , thanks!
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:13














1












1








1






You have two curves.



first part.



$x = 2sin tcos t = sin 2t\
y = 2sin^2 t = 1-cos 2t$



$int_limits{0}^{frac {pi}{2}} (2sin 2t + 1 - cos 2t )(2cos 2t)+(sin 2t +1-cos 2t)(2sin 2t) dt$



and the second part



$x = 2cos t\
y = 2sin t$



$int_limits{frac {pi}{2}}^{pi} (4cos t - 2sin t)(-2sin t)+(2cos t - sin t)(2cos t) dt$



If you wanted to use greens.



Then the you would add the straight line from $(-2,0)$ to $(0,0)$ to close the contour.



Then



$int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy + int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA\
int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA- int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy$






share|cite|improve this answer














You have two curves.



first part.



$x = 2sin tcos t = sin 2t\
y = 2sin^2 t = 1-cos 2t$



$int_limits{0}^{frac {pi}{2}} (2sin 2t + 1 - cos 2t )(2cos 2t)+(sin 2t +1-cos 2t)(2sin 2t) dt$



and the second part



$x = 2cos t\
y = 2sin t$



$int_limits{frac {pi}{2}}^{pi} (4cos t - 2sin t)(-2sin t)+(2cos t - sin t)(2cos t) dt$



If you wanted to use greens.



Then the you would add the straight line from $(-2,0)$ to $(0,0)$ to close the contour.



Then



$int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy + int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA\
int_{C_1} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy = iint frac {partial P}{partial y} - frac{partial Q}{partial x} dA- int_{C_2} P(x,y) dx + Q(x,y) dy$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 20 '18 at 17:57

























answered Nov 20 '18 at 17:51









Doug M

44k31854




44k31854












  • Thanks, I understand everything except how you got the first parts parametric equations. Since the first part of the curve is the right side of a circle of radius 1 and y offset of 1, shouldn't y be $y=1+sin(t)$. And $x=cos(t)$.
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:32










  • You could use that parameterization, it would be for a different range of t. That is fine. I said, $x = rcos t, y = rsin t$ plugging into $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ gives $r = 2sin t$ And put that back in for $r$ in the equations of $x,y$
    – Doug M
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:42










  • So that's it! I see now , thanks!
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:13


















  • Thanks, I understand everything except how you got the first parts parametric equations. Since the first part of the curve is the right side of a circle of radius 1 and y offset of 1, shouldn't y be $y=1+sin(t)$. And $x=cos(t)$.
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:32










  • You could use that parameterization, it would be for a different range of t. That is fine. I said, $x = rcos t, y = rsin t$ plugging into $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ gives $r = 2sin t$ And put that back in for $r$ in the equations of $x,y$
    – Doug M
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:42










  • So that's it! I see now , thanks!
    – math101
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:13
















Thanks, I understand everything except how you got the first parts parametric equations. Since the first part of the curve is the right side of a circle of radius 1 and y offset of 1, shouldn't y be $y=1+sin(t)$. And $x=cos(t)$.
– math101
Nov 20 '18 at 22:32




Thanks, I understand everything except how you got the first parts parametric equations. Since the first part of the curve is the right side of a circle of radius 1 and y offset of 1, shouldn't y be $y=1+sin(t)$. And $x=cos(t)$.
– math101
Nov 20 '18 at 22:32












You could use that parameterization, it would be for a different range of t. That is fine. I said, $x = rcos t, y = rsin t$ plugging into $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ gives $r = 2sin t$ And put that back in for $r$ in the equations of $x,y$
– Doug M
Nov 20 '18 at 22:42




You could use that parameterization, it would be for a different range of t. That is fine. I said, $x = rcos t, y = rsin t$ plugging into $x^2 + y^2 = 2y$ gives $r = 2sin t$ And put that back in for $r$ in the equations of $x,y$
– Doug M
Nov 20 '18 at 22:42












So that's it! I see now , thanks!
– math101
Nov 20 '18 at 23:13




So that's it! I see now , thanks!
– math101
Nov 20 '18 at 23:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006630%2fsolve-the-line-integral-without-greens-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]