If $x_1, x_2$ are roots of $P(x)=x^2-6x+1$, prove that $5 nmid x_1^n+x_2^n$












1












$begingroup$



Given $x_1$ and $x_2$ are roots of $P(x)=x^2-6x+1$ prove using Binomial expansion that $x_1^n+x_2^n$ is not divisible by 5 if $nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}$.




Source: list of problems for the preparation for math contests.



Notice: this problem is different from other SE question, as it requires a specific proof that was suggested by @DeepSea in a comment in that post, but not developed.



My attempt: By solving the roots of $P(x)$ it is easy to see that
$$x_1=3+2sqrt{2} text{and} x_2=3-2sqrt{2}$$
and, using the Binomial expansion,
$$x_1^n+x_2^n=(x_1+x_2)^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}} x_1^{n-k}x_2^k=6^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1} {{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k$$



It is easy to see that $6^nequiv 1pmod{5}$ for all possible $n$. Therefore the problem is showing that for $$A(n)=sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k, A(n)notequiv 1pmod{5}, forall nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}.$$



My problem is on how to proceed with the proof of this last statement. Hints and answers are welcomed.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You forgot the binomial coefficients
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Andrades
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:00










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, will correct.
    $endgroup$
    – bluemaster
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:03
















1












$begingroup$



Given $x_1$ and $x_2$ are roots of $P(x)=x^2-6x+1$ prove using Binomial expansion that $x_1^n+x_2^n$ is not divisible by 5 if $nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}$.




Source: list of problems for the preparation for math contests.



Notice: this problem is different from other SE question, as it requires a specific proof that was suggested by @DeepSea in a comment in that post, but not developed.



My attempt: By solving the roots of $P(x)$ it is easy to see that
$$x_1=3+2sqrt{2} text{and} x_2=3-2sqrt{2}$$
and, using the Binomial expansion,
$$x_1^n+x_2^n=(x_1+x_2)^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}} x_1^{n-k}x_2^k=6^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1} {{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k$$



It is easy to see that $6^nequiv 1pmod{5}$ for all possible $n$. Therefore the problem is showing that for $$A(n)=sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k, A(n)notequiv 1pmod{5}, forall nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}.$$



My problem is on how to proceed with the proof of this last statement. Hints and answers are welcomed.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You forgot the binomial coefficients
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Andrades
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:00










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, will correct.
    $endgroup$
    – bluemaster
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:03














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$



Given $x_1$ and $x_2$ are roots of $P(x)=x^2-6x+1$ prove using Binomial expansion that $x_1^n+x_2^n$ is not divisible by 5 if $nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}$.




Source: list of problems for the preparation for math contests.



Notice: this problem is different from other SE question, as it requires a specific proof that was suggested by @DeepSea in a comment in that post, but not developed.



My attempt: By solving the roots of $P(x)$ it is easy to see that
$$x_1=3+2sqrt{2} text{and} x_2=3-2sqrt{2}$$
and, using the Binomial expansion,
$$x_1^n+x_2^n=(x_1+x_2)^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}} x_1^{n-k}x_2^k=6^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1} {{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k$$



It is easy to see that $6^nequiv 1pmod{5}$ for all possible $n$. Therefore the problem is showing that for $$A(n)=sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k, A(n)notequiv 1pmod{5}, forall nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}.$$



My problem is on how to proceed with the proof of this last statement. Hints and answers are welcomed.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Given $x_1$ and $x_2$ are roots of $P(x)=x^2-6x+1$ prove using Binomial expansion that $x_1^n+x_2^n$ is not divisible by 5 if $nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}$.




Source: list of problems for the preparation for math contests.



Notice: this problem is different from other SE question, as it requires a specific proof that was suggested by @DeepSea in a comment in that post, but not developed.



My attempt: By solving the roots of $P(x)$ it is easy to see that
$$x_1=3+2sqrt{2} text{and} x_2=3-2sqrt{2}$$
and, using the Binomial expansion,
$$x_1^n+x_2^n=(x_1+x_2)^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}} x_1^{n-k}x_2^k=6^n-sum_{k=1}^{n-1} {{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k$$



It is easy to see that $6^nequiv 1pmod{5}$ for all possible $n$. Therefore the problem is showing that for $$A(n)=sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{{n-1}choose {k}}x_1^{n-k}x_2^k, A(n)notequiv 1pmod{5}, forall nin Bbb Nsetminus{0}.$$



My problem is on how to proceed with the proof of this last statement. Hints and answers are welcomed.







algebra-precalculus contest-math






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 11:02









rtybase

11.2k21533




11.2k21533










asked Nov 6 '18 at 13:56









bluemasterbluemaster

1,653519




1,653519












  • $begingroup$
    You forgot the binomial coefficients
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Andrades
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:00










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, will correct.
    $endgroup$
    – bluemaster
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:03


















  • $begingroup$
    You forgot the binomial coefficients
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Andrades
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:00










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, will correct.
    $endgroup$
    – bluemaster
    Nov 6 '18 at 14:03
















$begingroup$
You forgot the binomial coefficients
$endgroup$
– Bruno Andrades
Nov 6 '18 at 14:00




$begingroup$
You forgot the binomial coefficients
$endgroup$
– Bruno Andrades
Nov 6 '18 at 14:00












$begingroup$
Sure, will correct.
$endgroup$
– bluemaster
Nov 6 '18 at 14:03




$begingroup$
Sure, will correct.
$endgroup$
– bluemaster
Nov 6 '18 at 14:03










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

I think you misinterpreted the suggestion by @DeepSea. He probably meant expanding $(3pm2sqrt{2})^n$ instead of $(x_1+x_2)^n$.



So if we follow this and binomial expand $(3pm 2sqrt{2})^n$, we have
$$
x_1^n+x_2^n=sum_{k=0}^nbinom{n}{k}3^{n-k} (2sqrt{2})^k underbrace{[1+(-1)^k]}_{=begin{cases}2&ktext{ even}\0&ktext{ odd}end{cases}}
$$

So we cancel the odd $k$ terms and are left with
$$
x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k}
equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{-k}pmod{5}.
$$

Hence we want to prove
$$
sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}(-3)^knotequiv 0pmod{5}
$$

which I don't see a way without



Cheating



So we look at an equivalent problem with roots $1pmsqrt{-3}pmod{5}$, which if we take out a common factor of $2$ (doesn't change mod 5 nonzero) becomes a problem with roots $y_pm=frac12(1pmsqrt{-3})$ (which are of course the roots of $y^2-y+1$, what you get from reducing coefficients of $P$ mod $5$). Now these roots are sixth roots of unity, so $y_+^n+y_-^n$ only take values $pm 1,pm 2$.



This leaves the question: why not reduce $P$ mod 5 right at the start and be done with it?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    There is a little flaw in your argument. Specifically $$ x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k} equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^kpmod{5}. $$ if $n$ is even, the last term doesn't contain a multiplier of $3$. Try with $(3+2sqrt{2})^2 + (3-2sqrt{2})^2$ for example.
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Nov 10 '18 at 12:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. Now fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Nov 10 '18 at 13:15



















1












$begingroup$

Here is a solution inspired by Pell's equations, which tangentially is related to Binomial expansion. $(3,2)$ is a solution for
$$x^2-2y^2=1 tag{1}$$
but then any $(x,y)$ of the form
$$x=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n+left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2} spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
y=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n-left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2sqrt{2}}$$

where
$$x+ysqrt{2}=left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
x-ysqrt{2}=left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n$$

is also a solution. Using binomial expansion it is easy to check $x,y in mathbb{Z}$ and
$$2x=x_1^n+x_2^n tag{2}$$
Now, proof by contradiction. If $5 mid x_1^n+x_2^n overset{color{red}{(2)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid x$, this is from Euclid's lemma. But then
$$5mid x^2 overset{color{red}{(1)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid 2y^2+1$$
However $2y^2+1$ is never divisible by $5$. This is easy to see from $y^4 equiv 1 pmod{5}$ (LFT) or $5 mid left(y^2-1right)left(y^2+1right)$ (applying the same Euclid's lemma)




  • if $5 mid y^2+1 Rightarrow 5 nmid 2y^2+1$

  • if $5 mid y^2-1 Rightarrow 5 nmid y^2-1+2=2y^2+1$


Alternatively, it's easy to check that $2y^2+1$ never has $0$ or $5$ as the last digit.
$$2cdot color{blue}{0}^2+1=1 text{, }spacespace
2cdot color{blue}{1}^2+1=3 text{, }spacespace
2cdot color{blue}{2}^2+1=9 text{, }spacespace
2cdot color{blue}{3}^2+1=19 text{,}\
2cdot color{blue}{4}^2+1=33 text{, }spacespace
2cdot color{blue}{5}^2+1=51 text{, }spacespace
2cdot color{blue}{6}^2+1=73 text{, }spacespace
2cdot color{blue}{7}^2+1=99 text{,}\
2cdot color{blue}{8}^2+1=129 text{, }spacespace
2cdot color{blue}{9}^2+1=163$$

So we have a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Let $a_n = x_1^n+x_2^n$. Then modulo $5$, $a_1 =1, a_2= 2, a_n = a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}$



    We can see that the terms of the sequence are periodic. They go 1,2,1,-1,-2,-1,1 and the cycle continues so that no term is $0$ modulo 5






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This is what the OP specifically said he was NOT after
      $endgroup$
      – user10354138
      Nov 10 '18 at 13:16










    • $begingroup$
      Realized that long after I posted :)
      $endgroup$
      – Hari Shankar
      Nov 10 '18 at 17:28











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2987204%2fif-x-1-x-2-are-roots-of-px-x2-6x1-prove-that-5-nmid-x-1nx-2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    I think you misinterpreted the suggestion by @DeepSea. He probably meant expanding $(3pm2sqrt{2})^n$ instead of $(x_1+x_2)^n$.



    So if we follow this and binomial expand $(3pm 2sqrt{2})^n$, we have
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=sum_{k=0}^nbinom{n}{k}3^{n-k} (2sqrt{2})^k underbrace{[1+(-1)^k]}_{=begin{cases}2&ktext{ even}\0&ktext{ odd}end{cases}}
    $$

    So we cancel the odd $k$ terms and are left with
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k}
    equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{-k}pmod{5}.
    $$

    Hence we want to prove
    $$
    sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}(-3)^knotequiv 0pmod{5}
    $$

    which I don't see a way without



    Cheating



    So we look at an equivalent problem with roots $1pmsqrt{-3}pmod{5}$, which if we take out a common factor of $2$ (doesn't change mod 5 nonzero) becomes a problem with roots $y_pm=frac12(1pmsqrt{-3})$ (which are of course the roots of $y^2-y+1$, what you get from reducing coefficients of $P$ mod $5$). Now these roots are sixth roots of unity, so $y_+^n+y_-^n$ only take values $pm 1,pm 2$.



    This leaves the question: why not reduce $P$ mod 5 right at the start and be done with it?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      There is a little flaw in your argument. Specifically $$ x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k} equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^kpmod{5}. $$ if $n$ is even, the last term doesn't contain a multiplier of $3$. Try with $(3+2sqrt{2})^2 + (3-2sqrt{2})^2$ for example.
      $endgroup$
      – rtybase
      Nov 10 '18 at 12:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks. Now fixed.
      $endgroup$
      – user10354138
      Nov 10 '18 at 13:15
















    1












    $begingroup$

    I think you misinterpreted the suggestion by @DeepSea. He probably meant expanding $(3pm2sqrt{2})^n$ instead of $(x_1+x_2)^n$.



    So if we follow this and binomial expand $(3pm 2sqrt{2})^n$, we have
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=sum_{k=0}^nbinom{n}{k}3^{n-k} (2sqrt{2})^k underbrace{[1+(-1)^k]}_{=begin{cases}2&ktext{ even}\0&ktext{ odd}end{cases}}
    $$

    So we cancel the odd $k$ terms and are left with
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k}
    equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{-k}pmod{5}.
    $$

    Hence we want to prove
    $$
    sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}(-3)^knotequiv 0pmod{5}
    $$

    which I don't see a way without



    Cheating



    So we look at an equivalent problem with roots $1pmsqrt{-3}pmod{5}$, which if we take out a common factor of $2$ (doesn't change mod 5 nonzero) becomes a problem with roots $y_pm=frac12(1pmsqrt{-3})$ (which are of course the roots of $y^2-y+1$, what you get from reducing coefficients of $P$ mod $5$). Now these roots are sixth roots of unity, so $y_+^n+y_-^n$ only take values $pm 1,pm 2$.



    This leaves the question: why not reduce $P$ mod 5 right at the start and be done with it?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      There is a little flaw in your argument. Specifically $$ x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k} equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^kpmod{5}. $$ if $n$ is even, the last term doesn't contain a multiplier of $3$. Try with $(3+2sqrt{2})^2 + (3-2sqrt{2})^2$ for example.
      $endgroup$
      – rtybase
      Nov 10 '18 at 12:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks. Now fixed.
      $endgroup$
      – user10354138
      Nov 10 '18 at 13:15














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    I think you misinterpreted the suggestion by @DeepSea. He probably meant expanding $(3pm2sqrt{2})^n$ instead of $(x_1+x_2)^n$.



    So if we follow this and binomial expand $(3pm 2sqrt{2})^n$, we have
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=sum_{k=0}^nbinom{n}{k}3^{n-k} (2sqrt{2})^k underbrace{[1+(-1)^k]}_{=begin{cases}2&ktext{ even}\0&ktext{ odd}end{cases}}
    $$

    So we cancel the odd $k$ terms and are left with
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k}
    equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{-k}pmod{5}.
    $$

    Hence we want to prove
    $$
    sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}(-3)^knotequiv 0pmod{5}
    $$

    which I don't see a way without



    Cheating



    So we look at an equivalent problem with roots $1pmsqrt{-3}pmod{5}$, which if we take out a common factor of $2$ (doesn't change mod 5 nonzero) becomes a problem with roots $y_pm=frac12(1pmsqrt{-3})$ (which are of course the roots of $y^2-y+1$, what you get from reducing coefficients of $P$ mod $5$). Now these roots are sixth roots of unity, so $y_+^n+y_-^n$ only take values $pm 1,pm 2$.



    This leaves the question: why not reduce $P$ mod 5 right at the start and be done with it?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I think you misinterpreted the suggestion by @DeepSea. He probably meant expanding $(3pm2sqrt{2})^n$ instead of $(x_1+x_2)^n$.



    So if we follow this and binomial expand $(3pm 2sqrt{2})^n$, we have
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=sum_{k=0}^nbinom{n}{k}3^{n-k} (2sqrt{2})^k underbrace{[1+(-1)^k]}_{=begin{cases}2&ktext{ even}\0&ktext{ odd}end{cases}}
    $$

    So we cancel the odd $k$ terms and are left with
    $$
    x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k}
    equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{-k}pmod{5}.
    $$

    Hence we want to prove
    $$
    sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}(-3)^knotequiv 0pmod{5}
    $$

    which I don't see a way without



    Cheating



    So we look at an equivalent problem with roots $1pmsqrt{-3}pmod{5}$, which if we take out a common factor of $2$ (doesn't change mod 5 nonzero) becomes a problem with roots $y_pm=frac12(1pmsqrt{-3})$ (which are of course the roots of $y^2-y+1$, what you get from reducing coefficients of $P$ mod $5$). Now these roots are sixth roots of unity, so $y_+^n+y_-^n$ only take values $pm 1,pm 2$.



    This leaves the question: why not reduce $P$ mod 5 right at the start and be done with it?







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 10 '18 at 13:14

























    answered Nov 10 '18 at 2:35









    user10354138user10354138

    7,4322925




    7,4322925












    • $begingroup$
      There is a little flaw in your argument. Specifically $$ x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k} equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^kpmod{5}. $$ if $n$ is even, the last term doesn't contain a multiplier of $3$. Try with $(3+2sqrt{2})^2 + (3-2sqrt{2})^2$ for example.
      $endgroup$
      – rtybase
      Nov 10 '18 at 12:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks. Now fixed.
      $endgroup$
      – user10354138
      Nov 10 '18 at 13:15


















    • $begingroup$
      There is a little flaw in your argument. Specifically $$ x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k} equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^kpmod{5}. $$ if $n$ is even, the last term doesn't contain a multiplier of $3$. Try with $(3+2sqrt{2})^2 + (3-2sqrt{2})^2$ for example.
      $endgroup$
      – rtybase
      Nov 10 '18 at 12:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks. Now fixed.
      $endgroup$
      – user10354138
      Nov 10 '18 at 13:15
















    $begingroup$
    There is a little flaw in your argument. Specifically $$ x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k} equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^kpmod{5}. $$ if $n$ is even, the last term doesn't contain a multiplier of $3$. Try with $(3+2sqrt{2})^2 + (3-2sqrt{2})^2$ for example.
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Nov 10 '18 at 12:53




    $begingroup$
    There is a little flaw in your argument. Specifically $$ x_1^n+x_2^n=2sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^{n-2k} (2sqrt{2})^{2k} equiv 2cdot3^nsum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}3^kpmod{5}. $$ if $n$ is even, the last term doesn't contain a multiplier of $3$. Try with $(3+2sqrt{2})^2 + (3-2sqrt{2})^2$ for example.
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Nov 10 '18 at 12:53




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. Now fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Nov 10 '18 at 13:15




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. Now fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Nov 10 '18 at 13:15











    1












    $begingroup$

    Here is a solution inspired by Pell's equations, which tangentially is related to Binomial expansion. $(3,2)$ is a solution for
    $$x^2-2y^2=1 tag{1}$$
    but then any $(x,y)$ of the form
    $$x=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n+left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2} spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
    y=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n-left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2sqrt{2}}$$

    where
    $$x+ysqrt{2}=left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
    x-ysqrt{2}=left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n$$

    is also a solution. Using binomial expansion it is easy to check $x,y in mathbb{Z}$ and
    $$2x=x_1^n+x_2^n tag{2}$$
    Now, proof by contradiction. If $5 mid x_1^n+x_2^n overset{color{red}{(2)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid x$, this is from Euclid's lemma. But then
    $$5mid x^2 overset{color{red}{(1)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid 2y^2+1$$
    However $2y^2+1$ is never divisible by $5$. This is easy to see from $y^4 equiv 1 pmod{5}$ (LFT) or $5 mid left(y^2-1right)left(y^2+1right)$ (applying the same Euclid's lemma)




    • if $5 mid y^2+1 Rightarrow 5 nmid 2y^2+1$

    • if $5 mid y^2-1 Rightarrow 5 nmid y^2-1+2=2y^2+1$


    Alternatively, it's easy to check that $2y^2+1$ never has $0$ or $5$ as the last digit.
    $$2cdot color{blue}{0}^2+1=1 text{, }spacespace
    2cdot color{blue}{1}^2+1=3 text{, }spacespace
    2cdot color{blue}{2}^2+1=9 text{, }spacespace
    2cdot color{blue}{3}^2+1=19 text{,}\
    2cdot color{blue}{4}^2+1=33 text{, }spacespace
    2cdot color{blue}{5}^2+1=51 text{, }spacespace
    2cdot color{blue}{6}^2+1=73 text{, }spacespace
    2cdot color{blue}{7}^2+1=99 text{,}\
    2cdot color{blue}{8}^2+1=129 text{, }spacespace
    2cdot color{blue}{9}^2+1=163$$

    So we have a contradiction.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Here is a solution inspired by Pell's equations, which tangentially is related to Binomial expansion. $(3,2)$ is a solution for
      $$x^2-2y^2=1 tag{1}$$
      but then any $(x,y)$ of the form
      $$x=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n+left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2} spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
      y=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n-left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2sqrt{2}}$$

      where
      $$x+ysqrt{2}=left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
      x-ysqrt{2}=left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n$$

      is also a solution. Using binomial expansion it is easy to check $x,y in mathbb{Z}$ and
      $$2x=x_1^n+x_2^n tag{2}$$
      Now, proof by contradiction. If $5 mid x_1^n+x_2^n overset{color{red}{(2)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid x$, this is from Euclid's lemma. But then
      $$5mid x^2 overset{color{red}{(1)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid 2y^2+1$$
      However $2y^2+1$ is never divisible by $5$. This is easy to see from $y^4 equiv 1 pmod{5}$ (LFT) or $5 mid left(y^2-1right)left(y^2+1right)$ (applying the same Euclid's lemma)




      • if $5 mid y^2+1 Rightarrow 5 nmid 2y^2+1$

      • if $5 mid y^2-1 Rightarrow 5 nmid y^2-1+2=2y^2+1$


      Alternatively, it's easy to check that $2y^2+1$ never has $0$ or $5$ as the last digit.
      $$2cdot color{blue}{0}^2+1=1 text{, }spacespace
      2cdot color{blue}{1}^2+1=3 text{, }spacespace
      2cdot color{blue}{2}^2+1=9 text{, }spacespace
      2cdot color{blue}{3}^2+1=19 text{,}\
      2cdot color{blue}{4}^2+1=33 text{, }spacespace
      2cdot color{blue}{5}^2+1=51 text{, }spacespace
      2cdot color{blue}{6}^2+1=73 text{, }spacespace
      2cdot color{blue}{7}^2+1=99 text{,}\
      2cdot color{blue}{8}^2+1=129 text{, }spacespace
      2cdot color{blue}{9}^2+1=163$$

      So we have a contradiction.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Here is a solution inspired by Pell's equations, which tangentially is related to Binomial expansion. $(3,2)$ is a solution for
        $$x^2-2y^2=1 tag{1}$$
        but then any $(x,y)$ of the form
        $$x=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n+left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2} spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
        y=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n-left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2sqrt{2}}$$

        where
        $$x+ysqrt{2}=left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
        x-ysqrt{2}=left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n$$

        is also a solution. Using binomial expansion it is easy to check $x,y in mathbb{Z}$ and
        $$2x=x_1^n+x_2^n tag{2}$$
        Now, proof by contradiction. If $5 mid x_1^n+x_2^n overset{color{red}{(2)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid x$, this is from Euclid's lemma. But then
        $$5mid x^2 overset{color{red}{(1)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid 2y^2+1$$
        However $2y^2+1$ is never divisible by $5$. This is easy to see from $y^4 equiv 1 pmod{5}$ (LFT) or $5 mid left(y^2-1right)left(y^2+1right)$ (applying the same Euclid's lemma)




        • if $5 mid y^2+1 Rightarrow 5 nmid 2y^2+1$

        • if $5 mid y^2-1 Rightarrow 5 nmid y^2-1+2=2y^2+1$


        Alternatively, it's easy to check that $2y^2+1$ never has $0$ or $5$ as the last digit.
        $$2cdot color{blue}{0}^2+1=1 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{1}^2+1=3 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{2}^2+1=9 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{3}^2+1=19 text{,}\
        2cdot color{blue}{4}^2+1=33 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{5}^2+1=51 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{6}^2+1=73 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{7}^2+1=99 text{,}\
        2cdot color{blue}{8}^2+1=129 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{9}^2+1=163$$

        So we have a contradiction.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Here is a solution inspired by Pell's equations, which tangentially is related to Binomial expansion. $(3,2)$ is a solution for
        $$x^2-2y^2=1 tag{1}$$
        but then any $(x,y)$ of the form
        $$x=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n+left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2} spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
        y=frac{left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n-left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n}{2sqrt{2}}$$

        where
        $$x+ysqrt{2}=left(3+2sqrt{2}right)^n spacespacespacetext{ and }spacespacespace
        x-ysqrt{2}=left(3-2sqrt{2}right)^n$$

        is also a solution. Using binomial expansion it is easy to check $x,y in mathbb{Z}$ and
        $$2x=x_1^n+x_2^n tag{2}$$
        Now, proof by contradiction. If $5 mid x_1^n+x_2^n overset{color{red}{(2)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid x$, this is from Euclid's lemma. But then
        $$5mid x^2 overset{color{red}{(1)}}{Rightarrow} 5 mid 2y^2+1$$
        However $2y^2+1$ is never divisible by $5$. This is easy to see from $y^4 equiv 1 pmod{5}$ (LFT) or $5 mid left(y^2-1right)left(y^2+1right)$ (applying the same Euclid's lemma)




        • if $5 mid y^2+1 Rightarrow 5 nmid 2y^2+1$

        • if $5 mid y^2-1 Rightarrow 5 nmid y^2-1+2=2y^2+1$


        Alternatively, it's easy to check that $2y^2+1$ never has $0$ or $5$ as the last digit.
        $$2cdot color{blue}{0}^2+1=1 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{1}^2+1=3 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{2}^2+1=9 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{3}^2+1=19 text{,}\
        2cdot color{blue}{4}^2+1=33 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{5}^2+1=51 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{6}^2+1=73 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{7}^2+1=99 text{,}\
        2cdot color{blue}{8}^2+1=129 text{, }spacespace
        2cdot color{blue}{9}^2+1=163$$

        So we have a contradiction.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 20 at 11:39

























        answered Jan 19 at 18:27









        rtybasertybase

        11.2k21533




        11.2k21533























            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $a_n = x_1^n+x_2^n$. Then modulo $5$, $a_1 =1, a_2= 2, a_n = a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}$



            We can see that the terms of the sequence are periodic. They go 1,2,1,-1,-2,-1,1 and the cycle continues so that no term is $0$ modulo 5






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              This is what the OP specifically said he was NOT after
              $endgroup$
              – user10354138
              Nov 10 '18 at 13:16










            • $begingroup$
              Realized that long after I posted :)
              $endgroup$
              – Hari Shankar
              Nov 10 '18 at 17:28
















            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $a_n = x_1^n+x_2^n$. Then modulo $5$, $a_1 =1, a_2= 2, a_n = a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}$



            We can see that the terms of the sequence are periodic. They go 1,2,1,-1,-2,-1,1 and the cycle continues so that no term is $0$ modulo 5






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              This is what the OP specifically said he was NOT after
              $endgroup$
              – user10354138
              Nov 10 '18 at 13:16










            • $begingroup$
              Realized that long after I posted :)
              $endgroup$
              – Hari Shankar
              Nov 10 '18 at 17:28














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Let $a_n = x_1^n+x_2^n$. Then modulo $5$, $a_1 =1, a_2= 2, a_n = a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}$



            We can see that the terms of the sequence are periodic. They go 1,2,1,-1,-2,-1,1 and the cycle continues so that no term is $0$ modulo 5






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Let $a_n = x_1^n+x_2^n$. Then modulo $5$, $a_1 =1, a_2= 2, a_n = a_{n-1}-a_{n-2}$



            We can see that the terms of the sequence are periodic. They go 1,2,1,-1,-2,-1,1 and the cycle continues so that no term is $0$ modulo 5







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 10 '18 at 3:02









            Hari ShankarHari Shankar

            2,294139




            2,294139












            • $begingroup$
              This is what the OP specifically said he was NOT after
              $endgroup$
              – user10354138
              Nov 10 '18 at 13:16










            • $begingroup$
              Realized that long after I posted :)
              $endgroup$
              – Hari Shankar
              Nov 10 '18 at 17:28


















            • $begingroup$
              This is what the OP specifically said he was NOT after
              $endgroup$
              – user10354138
              Nov 10 '18 at 13:16










            • $begingroup$
              Realized that long after I posted :)
              $endgroup$
              – Hari Shankar
              Nov 10 '18 at 17:28
















            $begingroup$
            This is what the OP specifically said he was NOT after
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Nov 10 '18 at 13:16




            $begingroup$
            This is what the OP specifically said he was NOT after
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Nov 10 '18 at 13:16












            $begingroup$
            Realized that long after I posted :)
            $endgroup$
            – Hari Shankar
            Nov 10 '18 at 17:28




            $begingroup$
            Realized that long after I posted :)
            $endgroup$
            – Hari Shankar
            Nov 10 '18 at 17:28


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2987204%2fif-x-1-x-2-are-roots-of-px-x2-6x1-prove-that-5-nmid-x-1nx-2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$