How do I find the 3 possible 4th points when given 3 unnamed vertices of a parallelogram?












0












$begingroup$


So, I got have this task:




"The points (3, -4, 5), (1, 0, 5) and (3, 1, -2) are three of four vertices of parallelogram ABCD. Explain why there are three possibilities for the location of the fourth vertex, and find the three points."




Now, the points are unnamed, so I am to assign A, B and C to them myself. I know this because if they were named, point D could only be in one place due to alphabetical order. But since I have no idea which point is/can be which, I'm not sure where to start.



I'm not looking for an answer to the whole problem, just a hint as to where I would start in terms of determining the possible combinations of ABC these 3 points could be.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    So, I got have this task:




    "The points (3, -4, 5), (1, 0, 5) and (3, 1, -2) are three of four vertices of parallelogram ABCD. Explain why there are three possibilities for the location of the fourth vertex, and find the three points."




    Now, the points are unnamed, so I am to assign A, B and C to them myself. I know this because if they were named, point D could only be in one place due to alphabetical order. But since I have no idea which point is/can be which, I'm not sure where to start.



    I'm not looking for an answer to the whole problem, just a hint as to where I would start in terms of determining the possible combinations of ABC these 3 points could be.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      So, I got have this task:




      "The points (3, -4, 5), (1, 0, 5) and (3, 1, -2) are three of four vertices of parallelogram ABCD. Explain why there are three possibilities for the location of the fourth vertex, and find the three points."




      Now, the points are unnamed, so I am to assign A, B and C to them myself. I know this because if they were named, point D could only be in one place due to alphabetical order. But since I have no idea which point is/can be which, I'm not sure where to start.



      I'm not looking for an answer to the whole problem, just a hint as to where I would start in terms of determining the possible combinations of ABC these 3 points could be.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      So, I got have this task:




      "The points (3, -4, 5), (1, 0, 5) and (3, 1, -2) are three of four vertices of parallelogram ABCD. Explain why there are three possibilities for the location of the fourth vertex, and find the three points."




      Now, the points are unnamed, so I am to assign A, B and C to them myself. I know this because if they were named, point D could only be in one place due to alphabetical order. But since I have no idea which point is/can be which, I'm not sure where to start.



      I'm not looking for an answer to the whole problem, just a hint as to where I would start in terms of determining the possible combinations of ABC these 3 points could be.







      geometry vectors






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 6 '14 at 20:27









      ThreethumbThreethumb

      43631631




      43631631






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Everything happens in a plane. Perhaps you can figure out the equation of the plane. Anyway, after that, the relationships are simple.



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Oh wow, that illustration really helps. I understand how to explain it and do the calculations now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Threethumb
            Jan 6 '14 at 20:53










          • $begingroup$
            I found the points (5, -3, -2), (1, -5, 12) and (1, 5, -2). Does this look right to you? When I tried plotting them into some software, two of them looked like they formed parallelograms, but (5, -3, -2) almost looked like a rectangle.
            $endgroup$
            – Threethumb
            Jan 6 '14 at 22:30










          • $begingroup$
            @Treethumb: A rectangle is a parallelogram.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:01










          • $begingroup$
            @Threethumb, I see, three thumbs. unusual. If you calculate the lengths of the three edges of the original triangle, that is enough information to find out the angles at the given vertices. Also instructive.
            $endgroup$
            – Will Jagy
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:05










          • $begingroup$
            @TonyK, it turns out to be THreethumb. No idea why.
            $endgroup$
            – Will Jagy
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:06



















          0












          $begingroup$

          Two of the given points form a diagonal of the parallelogram. You must find the fourth point which forms the other diagonal with the third point.



          There are three ways you can choose the first diagonal, so there are three ways to form the other.



          To arrive at the fourth point, start at one end of the diagonal you know. Go to the off diagonal point you know by displacing the point by $vec{A}$. From that point, go the other end of the diagonal you know by a displacement of $vec{B}$. Finally, go the fourth point by displacing that point by $-vec{A}.$ You can compute the components of $vec{A}$ and $vec{B}$ easily for each of your three cases.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I also think so.
            $endgroup$
            – kmitov
            Jan 6 '14 at 20:35



















          0












          $begingroup$

          The reason there are three possible loci for the fourth point is — that there are three existing points. For each point,

          1. Select it $(x_0|y_0|z_0)$ and consider it to be a known vertex of the parallelogram.

          2. Consider the other two points, $(x_1|y_1|z_1)$ and $(x_2|y_2|z_2)$, as endpoints of a diagonal of the parallelogram.

          3. The sought-after opposite vertex is $(x_1+x_2-x_0|y_1+y_2-y_0|z_1+z_2-z_0)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f629430%2fhow-do-i-find-the-3-possible-4th-points-when-given-3-unnamed-vertices-of-a-paral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            Everything happens in a plane. Perhaps you can figure out the equation of the plane. Anyway, after that, the relationships are simple.



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Oh wow, that illustration really helps. I understand how to explain it and do the calculations now. Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:53










            • $begingroup$
              I found the points (5, -3, -2), (1, -5, 12) and (1, 5, -2). Does this look right to you? When I tried plotting them into some software, two of them looked like they formed parallelograms, but (5, -3, -2) almost looked like a rectangle.
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 22:30










            • $begingroup$
              @Treethumb: A rectangle is a parallelogram.
              $endgroup$
              – TonyK
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:01










            • $begingroup$
              @Threethumb, I see, three thumbs. unusual. If you calculate the lengths of the three edges of the original triangle, that is enough information to find out the angles at the given vertices. Also instructive.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:05










            • $begingroup$
              @TonyK, it turns out to be THreethumb. No idea why.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:06
















            4












            $begingroup$

            Everything happens in a plane. Perhaps you can figure out the equation of the plane. Anyway, after that, the relationships are simple.



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Oh wow, that illustration really helps. I understand how to explain it and do the calculations now. Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:53










            • $begingroup$
              I found the points (5, -3, -2), (1, -5, 12) and (1, 5, -2). Does this look right to you? When I tried plotting them into some software, two of them looked like they formed parallelograms, but (5, -3, -2) almost looked like a rectangle.
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 22:30










            • $begingroup$
              @Treethumb: A rectangle is a parallelogram.
              $endgroup$
              – TonyK
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:01










            • $begingroup$
              @Threethumb, I see, three thumbs. unusual. If you calculate the lengths of the three edges of the original triangle, that is enough information to find out the angles at the given vertices. Also instructive.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:05










            • $begingroup$
              @TonyK, it turns out to be THreethumb. No idea why.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:06














            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Everything happens in a plane. Perhaps you can figure out the equation of the plane. Anyway, after that, the relationships are simple.



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Everything happens in a plane. Perhaps you can figure out the equation of the plane. Anyway, after that, the relationships are simple.



            enter image description here







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 6 '14 at 20:44









            Will JagyWill Jagy

            104k5102201




            104k5102201












            • $begingroup$
              Oh wow, that illustration really helps. I understand how to explain it and do the calculations now. Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:53










            • $begingroup$
              I found the points (5, -3, -2), (1, -5, 12) and (1, 5, -2). Does this look right to you? When I tried plotting them into some software, two of them looked like they formed parallelograms, but (5, -3, -2) almost looked like a rectangle.
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 22:30










            • $begingroup$
              @Treethumb: A rectangle is a parallelogram.
              $endgroup$
              – TonyK
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:01










            • $begingroup$
              @Threethumb, I see, three thumbs. unusual. If you calculate the lengths of the three edges of the original triangle, that is enough information to find out the angles at the given vertices. Also instructive.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:05










            • $begingroup$
              @TonyK, it turns out to be THreethumb. No idea why.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:06


















            • $begingroup$
              Oh wow, that illustration really helps. I understand how to explain it and do the calculations now. Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:53










            • $begingroup$
              I found the points (5, -3, -2), (1, -5, 12) and (1, 5, -2). Does this look right to you? When I tried plotting them into some software, two of them looked like they formed parallelograms, but (5, -3, -2) almost looked like a rectangle.
              $endgroup$
              – Threethumb
              Jan 6 '14 at 22:30










            • $begingroup$
              @Treethumb: A rectangle is a parallelogram.
              $endgroup$
              – TonyK
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:01










            • $begingroup$
              @Threethumb, I see, three thumbs. unusual. If you calculate the lengths of the three edges of the original triangle, that is enough information to find out the angles at the given vertices. Also instructive.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:05










            • $begingroup$
              @TonyK, it turns out to be THreethumb. No idea why.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 7 '14 at 0:06
















            $begingroup$
            Oh wow, that illustration really helps. I understand how to explain it and do the calculations now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Threethumb
            Jan 6 '14 at 20:53




            $begingroup$
            Oh wow, that illustration really helps. I understand how to explain it and do the calculations now. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Threethumb
            Jan 6 '14 at 20:53












            $begingroup$
            I found the points (5, -3, -2), (1, -5, 12) and (1, 5, -2). Does this look right to you? When I tried plotting them into some software, two of them looked like they formed parallelograms, but (5, -3, -2) almost looked like a rectangle.
            $endgroup$
            – Threethumb
            Jan 6 '14 at 22:30




            $begingroup$
            I found the points (5, -3, -2), (1, -5, 12) and (1, 5, -2). Does this look right to you? When I tried plotting them into some software, two of them looked like they formed parallelograms, but (5, -3, -2) almost looked like a rectangle.
            $endgroup$
            – Threethumb
            Jan 6 '14 at 22:30












            $begingroup$
            @Treethumb: A rectangle is a parallelogram.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:01




            $begingroup$
            @Treethumb: A rectangle is a parallelogram.
            $endgroup$
            – TonyK
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:01












            $begingroup$
            @Threethumb, I see, three thumbs. unusual. If you calculate the lengths of the three edges of the original triangle, that is enough information to find out the angles at the given vertices. Also instructive.
            $endgroup$
            – Will Jagy
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:05




            $begingroup$
            @Threethumb, I see, three thumbs. unusual. If you calculate the lengths of the three edges of the original triangle, that is enough information to find out the angles at the given vertices. Also instructive.
            $endgroup$
            – Will Jagy
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:05












            $begingroup$
            @TonyK, it turns out to be THreethumb. No idea why.
            $endgroup$
            – Will Jagy
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:06




            $begingroup$
            @TonyK, it turns out to be THreethumb. No idea why.
            $endgroup$
            – Will Jagy
            Jan 7 '14 at 0:06











            0












            $begingroup$

            Two of the given points form a diagonal of the parallelogram. You must find the fourth point which forms the other diagonal with the third point.



            There are three ways you can choose the first diagonal, so there are three ways to form the other.



            To arrive at the fourth point, start at one end of the diagonal you know. Go to the off diagonal point you know by displacing the point by $vec{A}$. From that point, go the other end of the diagonal you know by a displacement of $vec{B}$. Finally, go the fourth point by displacing that point by $-vec{A}.$ You can compute the components of $vec{A}$ and $vec{B}$ easily for each of your three cases.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I also think so.
              $endgroup$
              – kmitov
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:35
















            0












            $begingroup$

            Two of the given points form a diagonal of the parallelogram. You must find the fourth point which forms the other diagonal with the third point.



            There are three ways you can choose the first diagonal, so there are three ways to form the other.



            To arrive at the fourth point, start at one end of the diagonal you know. Go to the off diagonal point you know by displacing the point by $vec{A}$. From that point, go the other end of the diagonal you know by a displacement of $vec{B}$. Finally, go the fourth point by displacing that point by $-vec{A}.$ You can compute the components of $vec{A}$ and $vec{B}$ easily for each of your three cases.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I also think so.
              $endgroup$
              – kmitov
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:35














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Two of the given points form a diagonal of the parallelogram. You must find the fourth point which forms the other diagonal with the third point.



            There are three ways you can choose the first diagonal, so there are three ways to form the other.



            To arrive at the fourth point, start at one end of the diagonal you know. Go to the off diagonal point you know by displacing the point by $vec{A}$. From that point, go the other end of the diagonal you know by a displacement of $vec{B}$. Finally, go the fourth point by displacing that point by $-vec{A}.$ You can compute the components of $vec{A}$ and $vec{B}$ easily for each of your three cases.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Two of the given points form a diagonal of the parallelogram. You must find the fourth point which forms the other diagonal with the third point.



            There are three ways you can choose the first diagonal, so there are three ways to form the other.



            To arrive at the fourth point, start at one end of the diagonal you know. Go to the off diagonal point you know by displacing the point by $vec{A}$. From that point, go the other end of the diagonal you know by a displacement of $vec{B}$. Finally, go the fourth point by displacing that point by $-vec{A}.$ You can compute the components of $vec{A}$ and $vec{B}$ easily for each of your three cases.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 6 '14 at 20:49

























            answered Jan 6 '14 at 20:33









            JohnJohn

            22.8k32550




            22.8k32550












            • $begingroup$
              I also think so.
              $endgroup$
              – kmitov
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:35


















            • $begingroup$
              I also think so.
              $endgroup$
              – kmitov
              Jan 6 '14 at 20:35
















            $begingroup$
            I also think so.
            $endgroup$
            – kmitov
            Jan 6 '14 at 20:35




            $begingroup$
            I also think so.
            $endgroup$
            – kmitov
            Jan 6 '14 at 20:35











            0












            $begingroup$

            The reason there are three possible loci for the fourth point is — that there are three existing points. For each point,

            1. Select it $(x_0|y_0|z_0)$ and consider it to be a known vertex of the parallelogram.

            2. Consider the other two points, $(x_1|y_1|z_1)$ and $(x_2|y_2|z_2)$, as endpoints of a diagonal of the parallelogram.

            3. The sought-after opposite vertex is $(x_1+x_2-x_0|y_1+y_2-y_0|z_1+z_2-z_0)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              The reason there are three possible loci for the fourth point is — that there are three existing points. For each point,

              1. Select it $(x_0|y_0|z_0)$ and consider it to be a known vertex of the parallelogram.

              2. Consider the other two points, $(x_1|y_1|z_1)$ and $(x_2|y_2|z_2)$, as endpoints of a diagonal of the parallelogram.

              3. The sought-after opposite vertex is $(x_1+x_2-x_0|y_1+y_2-y_0|z_1+z_2-z_0)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                The reason there are three possible loci for the fourth point is — that there are three existing points. For each point,

                1. Select it $(x_0|y_0|z_0)$ and consider it to be a known vertex of the parallelogram.

                2. Consider the other two points, $(x_1|y_1|z_1)$ and $(x_2|y_2|z_2)$, as endpoints of a diagonal of the parallelogram.

                3. The sought-after opposite vertex is $(x_1+x_2-x_0|y_1+y_2-y_0|z_1+z_2-z_0)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The reason there are three possible loci for the fourth point is — that there are three existing points. For each point,

                1. Select it $(x_0|y_0|z_0)$ and consider it to be a known vertex of the parallelogram.

                2. Consider the other two points, $(x_1|y_1|z_1)$ and $(x_2|y_2|z_2)$, as endpoints of a diagonal of the parallelogram.

                3. The sought-after opposite vertex is $(x_1+x_2-x_0|y_1+y_2-y_0|z_1+z_2-z_0)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Feb 17 '14 at 17:26

























                answered Jan 6 '14 at 23:28









                Senex Ægypti ParviSenex Ægypti Parvi

                2,2231816




                2,2231816






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f629430%2fhow-do-i-find-the-3-possible-4th-points-when-given-3-unnamed-vertices-of-a-paral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith