On what condition $trace(A) ge trace(AB)$?












0












$begingroup$


Considering $A$ and $B$ are positive semidefinite real symmetric matrices, on what conditions we can have $trace(A) ge trace(AB)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is a PSD matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 20 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    Positieve semi-definite
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 20 at 17:52










  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if $A,B$ commute? If they don't the problem is much harder, as $AB$ may not be symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Jan 20 at 17:53
















0












$begingroup$


Considering $A$ and $B$ are positive semidefinite real symmetric matrices, on what conditions we can have $trace(A) ge trace(AB)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is a PSD matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 20 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    Positieve semi-definite
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 20 at 17:52










  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if $A,B$ commute? If they don't the problem is much harder, as $AB$ may not be symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Jan 20 at 17:53














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Considering $A$ and $B$ are positive semidefinite real symmetric matrices, on what conditions we can have $trace(A) ge trace(AB)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Considering $A$ and $B$ are positive semidefinite real symmetric matrices, on what conditions we can have $trace(A) ge trace(AB)$?







linear-algebra matrix-calculus positive-semidefinite






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 17:50







Babak

















asked Jan 20 at 17:46









BabakBabak

354111




354111












  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is a PSD matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 20 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    Positieve semi-definite
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 20 at 17:52










  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if $A,B$ commute? If they don't the problem is much harder, as $AB$ may not be symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Jan 20 at 17:53


















  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is a PSD matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 20 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    Positieve semi-definite
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 20 at 17:52










  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if $A,B$ commute? If they don't the problem is much harder, as $AB$ may not be symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Jan 20 at 17:53
















$begingroup$
What exactly is a PSD matrix?
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 20 at 17:49




$begingroup$
What exactly is a PSD matrix?
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 20 at 17:49












$begingroup$
Positieve semi-definite
$endgroup$
– James
Jan 20 at 17:52




$begingroup$
Positieve semi-definite
$endgroup$
– James
Jan 20 at 17:52












$begingroup$
Do you know if $A,B$ commute? If they don't the problem is much harder, as $AB$ may not be symmetric.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 20 at 17:53




$begingroup$
Do you know if $A,B$ commute? If they don't the problem is much harder, as $AB$ may not be symmetric.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 20 at 17:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Under the extra assumption that $A,B$ commute: Then $A,B$ are orthogonally diagonalizable simultaneously.



Let $P$ be an orthogonal matrix, and $D_1,D_2$ be diagonal such that
$$A=PD_1P^T \
B=PD_2P^{T}$$



Then
$$AB=PD_1D_2P^{T}$$



Therefore, if $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$ are the eigenvalues of $B$, in any order, there exists a permutation $sigma$ such that
$$tr(AB)=lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}$$



The question you are asking in this case is basically the following



Question Given some non-negative numbers $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$, (and a permutation $sigma$ which can actually be ignored by reordering $beta$) under which condition do we have
$$lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}leq lambda_1+..+lambda_n ?$$



Note that for any such $lambda, beta$'s you can take $A,B$ to be the diagonal matrix with those numbers on the diagonal for an example/counterexample.



If $A$ is not the zero matrix, then the most obvious answer is : all eigenvalues of $B$ are $leq 1$.



If $A,B$ don't commute, the question seems to be way to complicated.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the nice answer! Unfortunately, A and B don't commute, and I'm going to make more assumptions about their structure, but I think it's better to put it as a new question.
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I changed the problem assumptions as in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3081016/…
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 19:10













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080885%2fon-what-condition-tracea-ge-traceab%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Under the extra assumption that $A,B$ commute: Then $A,B$ are orthogonally diagonalizable simultaneously.



Let $P$ be an orthogonal matrix, and $D_1,D_2$ be diagonal such that
$$A=PD_1P^T \
B=PD_2P^{T}$$



Then
$$AB=PD_1D_2P^{T}$$



Therefore, if $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$ are the eigenvalues of $B$, in any order, there exists a permutation $sigma$ such that
$$tr(AB)=lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}$$



The question you are asking in this case is basically the following



Question Given some non-negative numbers $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$, (and a permutation $sigma$ which can actually be ignored by reordering $beta$) under which condition do we have
$$lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}leq lambda_1+..+lambda_n ?$$



Note that for any such $lambda, beta$'s you can take $A,B$ to be the diagonal matrix with those numbers on the diagonal for an example/counterexample.



If $A$ is not the zero matrix, then the most obvious answer is : all eigenvalues of $B$ are $leq 1$.



If $A,B$ don't commute, the question seems to be way to complicated.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the nice answer! Unfortunately, A and B don't commute, and I'm going to make more assumptions about their structure, but I think it's better to put it as a new question.
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I changed the problem assumptions as in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3081016/…
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 19:10


















1












$begingroup$

Under the extra assumption that $A,B$ commute: Then $A,B$ are orthogonally diagonalizable simultaneously.



Let $P$ be an orthogonal matrix, and $D_1,D_2$ be diagonal such that
$$A=PD_1P^T \
B=PD_2P^{T}$$



Then
$$AB=PD_1D_2P^{T}$$



Therefore, if $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$ are the eigenvalues of $B$, in any order, there exists a permutation $sigma$ such that
$$tr(AB)=lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}$$



The question you are asking in this case is basically the following



Question Given some non-negative numbers $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$, (and a permutation $sigma$ which can actually be ignored by reordering $beta$) under which condition do we have
$$lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}leq lambda_1+..+lambda_n ?$$



Note that for any such $lambda, beta$'s you can take $A,B$ to be the diagonal matrix with those numbers on the diagonal for an example/counterexample.



If $A$ is not the zero matrix, then the most obvious answer is : all eigenvalues of $B$ are $leq 1$.



If $A,B$ don't commute, the question seems to be way to complicated.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the nice answer! Unfortunately, A and B don't commute, and I'm going to make more assumptions about their structure, but I think it's better to put it as a new question.
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I changed the problem assumptions as in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3081016/…
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 19:10
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

Under the extra assumption that $A,B$ commute: Then $A,B$ are orthogonally diagonalizable simultaneously.



Let $P$ be an orthogonal matrix, and $D_1,D_2$ be diagonal such that
$$A=PD_1P^T \
B=PD_2P^{T}$$



Then
$$AB=PD_1D_2P^{T}$$



Therefore, if $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$ are the eigenvalues of $B$, in any order, there exists a permutation $sigma$ such that
$$tr(AB)=lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}$$



The question you are asking in this case is basically the following



Question Given some non-negative numbers $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$, (and a permutation $sigma$ which can actually be ignored by reordering $beta$) under which condition do we have
$$lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}leq lambda_1+..+lambda_n ?$$



Note that for any such $lambda, beta$'s you can take $A,B$ to be the diagonal matrix with those numbers on the diagonal for an example/counterexample.



If $A$ is not the zero matrix, then the most obvious answer is : all eigenvalues of $B$ are $leq 1$.



If $A,B$ don't commute, the question seems to be way to complicated.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Under the extra assumption that $A,B$ commute: Then $A,B$ are orthogonally diagonalizable simultaneously.



Let $P$ be an orthogonal matrix, and $D_1,D_2$ be diagonal such that
$$A=PD_1P^T \
B=PD_2P^{T}$$



Then
$$AB=PD_1D_2P^{T}$$



Therefore, if $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$ are the eigenvalues of $B$, in any order, there exists a permutation $sigma$ such that
$$tr(AB)=lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}$$



The question you are asking in this case is basically the following



Question Given some non-negative numbers $lambda_1,.., lambda_n$ and $beta_1,.., beta_n$, (and a permutation $sigma$ which can actually be ignored by reordering $beta$) under which condition do we have
$$lambda_1 beta_{sigma(1)}+...+lambda_n beta_{sigma(n)}leq lambda_1+..+lambda_n ?$$



Note that for any such $lambda, beta$'s you can take $A,B$ to be the diagonal matrix with those numbers on the diagonal for an example/counterexample.



If $A$ is not the zero matrix, then the most obvious answer is : all eigenvalues of $B$ are $leq 1$.



If $A,B$ don't commute, the question seems to be way to complicated.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 20 at 18:03









N. S.N. S.

104k7114209




104k7114209












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the nice answer! Unfortunately, A and B don't commute, and I'm going to make more assumptions about their structure, but I think it's better to put it as a new question.
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I changed the problem assumptions as in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3081016/…
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 19:10




















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the nice answer! Unfortunately, A and B don't commute, and I'm going to make more assumptions about their structure, but I think it's better to put it as a new question.
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I changed the problem assumptions as in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3081016/…
    $endgroup$
    – Babak
    Jan 20 at 19:10


















$begingroup$
Thank you for the nice answer! Unfortunately, A and B don't commute, and I'm going to make more assumptions about their structure, but I think it's better to put it as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Babak
Jan 20 at 18:58




$begingroup$
Thank you for the nice answer! Unfortunately, A and B don't commute, and I'm going to make more assumptions about their structure, but I think it's better to put it as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Babak
Jan 20 at 18:58












$begingroup$
I changed the problem assumptions as in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3081016/…
$endgroup$
– Babak
Jan 20 at 19:10






$begingroup$
I changed the problem assumptions as in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3081016/…
$endgroup$
– Babak
Jan 20 at 19:10




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080885%2fon-what-condition-tracea-ge-traceab%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith