Partial Differential Equations Question: Find an explicit expression for the solution of the IVP [closed]












-2












$begingroup$


Find an explicit expression for the solution of the IVP



$$
begin{cases}
u_{t}(x,t)+u_{x}(x,t)+u(x,t)=e^{t+2x}\
\
u(0,x)=0,
end{cases}
$$



by using the method of characteristics










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos Jan 21 at 12:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to the Math.SE. Questions sounding like "do this for me, please" are poorly received from other members. I you need help, help other users help you for example by explaining what you tried and where did you get stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 20 at 17:08
















-2












$begingroup$


Find an explicit expression for the solution of the IVP



$$
begin{cases}
u_{t}(x,t)+u_{x}(x,t)+u(x,t)=e^{t+2x}\
\
u(0,x)=0,
end{cases}
$$



by using the method of characteristics










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos Jan 21 at 12:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to the Math.SE. Questions sounding like "do this for me, please" are poorly received from other members. I you need help, help other users help you for example by explaining what you tried and where did you get stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 20 at 17:08














-2












-2








-2





$begingroup$


Find an explicit expression for the solution of the IVP



$$
begin{cases}
u_{t}(x,t)+u_{x}(x,t)+u(x,t)=e^{t+2x}\
\
u(0,x)=0,
end{cases}
$$



by using the method of characteristics










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Find an explicit expression for the solution of the IVP



$$
begin{cases}
u_{t}(x,t)+u_{x}(x,t)+u(x,t)=e^{t+2x}\
\
u(0,x)=0,
end{cases}
$$



by using the method of characteristics







pde characteristics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 17:06









Daniele Tampieri

2,3372922




2,3372922










asked Jan 20 at 16:34









JennyJenny

624




624




closed as off-topic by max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos Jan 21 at 12:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos Jan 21 at 12:12


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – max_zorn, Riccardo.Alestra, mrtaurho, metamorphy, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to the Math.SE. Questions sounding like "do this for me, please" are poorly received from other members. I you need help, help other users help you for example by explaining what you tried and where did you get stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 20 at 17:08


















  • $begingroup$
    Hi and welcome to the Math.SE. Questions sounding like "do this for me, please" are poorly received from other members. I you need help, help other users help you for example by explaining what you tried and where did you get stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 20 at 17:08
















$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to the Math.SE. Questions sounding like "do this for me, please" are poorly received from other members. I you need help, help other users help you for example by explaining what you tried and where did you get stuck.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
Jan 20 at 17:08




$begingroup$
Hi and welcome to the Math.SE. Questions sounding like "do this for me, please" are poorly received from other members. I you need help, help other users help you for example by explaining what you tried and where did you get stuck.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
Jan 20 at 17:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

This is a linear PDE so



$$
u = u^h + u^p
$$



with



$$
u_t^h+u_x^h=-u^h\
u_t^p+u_x^p+u^p=e^{t+2x}
$$



Using the Characteristics method with $u^h$ we have



$$
begin{cases}
frac{dt}{dtau} = 1 & t(0) = 0 & t(tau) = tau\
frac{dx}{dtau} = 1 & x(0) = s & x(tau) = s+tau\
frac{du^h}{dtau} = -u^h & u^h(0) = phi(s) & -ln u^h(tau) = phi(s)+tau
end{cases}
$$



or



$$
u^h(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)
$$



regarding the particular we have that $u^p(t,x) = frac 14e^{t+2x}$ verifies the particular equation then



$$
u(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)+frac 14e^{t+2x}
$$



and for $t=0$ we have



$$
psi(x) + frac 14e^{2x}=0
$$



then $psi(x) = -frac 14 e^{2x}$ and finally



$$
u(t,x) = frac 14left(-e^{-t}e^{2(x-t)}+e^{t+2x}right)
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Yes, by using the method of characteristics, one can find the explicit expression for the solution :
    $$u(t,x)=frac14left(e^{t+2x}-e^{-3t+2x} right)$$
    The question is concise. The answer as well.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      This is a linear PDE so



      $$
      u = u^h + u^p
      $$



      with



      $$
      u_t^h+u_x^h=-u^h\
      u_t^p+u_x^p+u^p=e^{t+2x}
      $$



      Using the Characteristics method with $u^h$ we have



      $$
      begin{cases}
      frac{dt}{dtau} = 1 & t(0) = 0 & t(tau) = tau\
      frac{dx}{dtau} = 1 & x(0) = s & x(tau) = s+tau\
      frac{du^h}{dtau} = -u^h & u^h(0) = phi(s) & -ln u^h(tau) = phi(s)+tau
      end{cases}
      $$



      or



      $$
      u^h(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)
      $$



      regarding the particular we have that $u^p(t,x) = frac 14e^{t+2x}$ verifies the particular equation then



      $$
      u(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)+frac 14e^{t+2x}
      $$



      and for $t=0$ we have



      $$
      psi(x) + frac 14e^{2x}=0
      $$



      then $psi(x) = -frac 14 e^{2x}$ and finally



      $$
      u(t,x) = frac 14left(-e^{-t}e^{2(x-t)}+e^{t+2x}right)
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        This is a linear PDE so



        $$
        u = u^h + u^p
        $$



        with



        $$
        u_t^h+u_x^h=-u^h\
        u_t^p+u_x^p+u^p=e^{t+2x}
        $$



        Using the Characteristics method with $u^h$ we have



        $$
        begin{cases}
        frac{dt}{dtau} = 1 & t(0) = 0 & t(tau) = tau\
        frac{dx}{dtau} = 1 & x(0) = s & x(tau) = s+tau\
        frac{du^h}{dtau} = -u^h & u^h(0) = phi(s) & -ln u^h(tau) = phi(s)+tau
        end{cases}
        $$



        or



        $$
        u^h(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)
        $$



        regarding the particular we have that $u^p(t,x) = frac 14e^{t+2x}$ verifies the particular equation then



        $$
        u(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)+frac 14e^{t+2x}
        $$



        and for $t=0$ we have



        $$
        psi(x) + frac 14e^{2x}=0
        $$



        then $psi(x) = -frac 14 e^{2x}$ and finally



        $$
        u(t,x) = frac 14left(-e^{-t}e^{2(x-t)}+e^{t+2x}right)
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          This is a linear PDE so



          $$
          u = u^h + u^p
          $$



          with



          $$
          u_t^h+u_x^h=-u^h\
          u_t^p+u_x^p+u^p=e^{t+2x}
          $$



          Using the Characteristics method with $u^h$ we have



          $$
          begin{cases}
          frac{dt}{dtau} = 1 & t(0) = 0 & t(tau) = tau\
          frac{dx}{dtau} = 1 & x(0) = s & x(tau) = s+tau\
          frac{du^h}{dtau} = -u^h & u^h(0) = phi(s) & -ln u^h(tau) = phi(s)+tau
          end{cases}
          $$



          or



          $$
          u^h(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)
          $$



          regarding the particular we have that $u^p(t,x) = frac 14e^{t+2x}$ verifies the particular equation then



          $$
          u(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)+frac 14e^{t+2x}
          $$



          and for $t=0$ we have



          $$
          psi(x) + frac 14e^{2x}=0
          $$



          then $psi(x) = -frac 14 e^{2x}$ and finally



          $$
          u(t,x) = frac 14left(-e^{-t}e^{2(x-t)}+e^{t+2x}right)
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          This is a linear PDE so



          $$
          u = u^h + u^p
          $$



          with



          $$
          u_t^h+u_x^h=-u^h\
          u_t^p+u_x^p+u^p=e^{t+2x}
          $$



          Using the Characteristics method with $u^h$ we have



          $$
          begin{cases}
          frac{dt}{dtau} = 1 & t(0) = 0 & t(tau) = tau\
          frac{dx}{dtau} = 1 & x(0) = s & x(tau) = s+tau\
          frac{du^h}{dtau} = -u^h & u^h(0) = phi(s) & -ln u^h(tau) = phi(s)+tau
          end{cases}
          $$



          or



          $$
          u^h(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)
          $$



          regarding the particular we have that $u^p(t,x) = frac 14e^{t+2x}$ verifies the particular equation then



          $$
          u(t,x) = e^{-t}psi(x-t)+frac 14e^{t+2x}
          $$



          and for $t=0$ we have



          $$
          psi(x) + frac 14e^{2x}=0
          $$



          then $psi(x) = -frac 14 e^{2x}$ and finally



          $$
          u(t,x) = frac 14left(-e^{-t}e^{2(x-t)}+e^{t+2x}right)
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 20 at 18:41

























          answered Jan 20 at 17:19









          CesareoCesareo

          9,2013517




          9,2013517























              2












              $begingroup$

              Yes, by using the method of characteristics, one can find the explicit expression for the solution :
              $$u(t,x)=frac14left(e^{t+2x}-e^{-3t+2x} right)$$
              The question is concise. The answer as well.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Yes, by using the method of characteristics, one can find the explicit expression for the solution :
                $$u(t,x)=frac14left(e^{t+2x}-e^{-3t+2x} right)$$
                The question is concise. The answer as well.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Yes, by using the method of characteristics, one can find the explicit expression for the solution :
                  $$u(t,x)=frac14left(e^{t+2x}-e^{-3t+2x} right)$$
                  The question is concise. The answer as well.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Yes, by using the method of characteristics, one can find the explicit expression for the solution :
                  $$u(t,x)=frac14left(e^{t+2x}-e^{-3t+2x} right)$$
                  The question is concise. The answer as well.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 20 at 18:16









                  JJacquelinJJacquelin

                  44.3k21854




                  44.3k21854















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith