Proving a gcd equation: $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$












0












$begingroup$


How would I be able to prove that $$gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$$



I'm assuming I can start by saying $gcd(ab,c) cdot n = gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$ for some $n in Z$ but I'm not sure how I can represent the $gcd$ value as an integer combination of $a$ and $b$ to prove that the left side can divide the right side










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easiest, I think, to use unique factorization and the fact that the order of a prime $p$ in $gcd (m,n)$ is the lesser of the orders of $p$ in $m,n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:54










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: if $dmid x$ and $dmid y$, then $gcd(x,y) = dcdot gcd(frac xd,frac yd)$. Apply this fact with $d=gcd(a,c)$ and $x=ab$ and $y=c$.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Apr 19 '17 at 18:11
















0












$begingroup$


How would I be able to prove that $$gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$$



I'm assuming I can start by saying $gcd(ab,c) cdot n = gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$ for some $n in Z$ but I'm not sure how I can represent the $gcd$ value as an integer combination of $a$ and $b$ to prove that the left side can divide the right side










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easiest, I think, to use unique factorization and the fact that the order of a prime $p$ in $gcd (m,n)$ is the lesser of the orders of $p$ in $m,n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:54










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: if $dmid x$ and $dmid y$, then $gcd(x,y) = dcdot gcd(frac xd,frac yd)$. Apply this fact with $d=gcd(a,c)$ and $x=ab$ and $y=c$.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Apr 19 '17 at 18:11














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


How would I be able to prove that $$gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$$



I'm assuming I can start by saying $gcd(ab,c) cdot n = gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$ for some $n in Z$ but I'm not sure how I can represent the $gcd$ value as an integer combination of $a$ and $b$ to prove that the left side can divide the right side










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




How would I be able to prove that $$gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$$



I'm assuming I can start by saying $gcd(ab,c) cdot n = gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$ for some $n in Z$ but I'm not sure how I can represent the $gcd$ value as an integer combination of $a$ and $b$ to prove that the left side can divide the right side







elementary-number-theory discrete-mathematics greatest-common-divisor






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 27 at 11:00









Martin Sleziak

44.9k10122276




44.9k10122276










asked Apr 19 '17 at 17:49









Spencer ChowSpencer Chow

1417




1417








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easiest, I think, to use unique factorization and the fact that the order of a prime $p$ in $gcd (m,n)$ is the lesser of the orders of $p$ in $m,n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:54










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: if $dmid x$ and $dmid y$, then $gcd(x,y) = dcdot gcd(frac xd,frac yd)$. Apply this fact with $d=gcd(a,c)$ and $x=ab$ and $y=c$.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Apr 19 '17 at 18:11














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easiest, I think, to use unique factorization and the fact that the order of a prime $p$ in $gcd (m,n)$ is the lesser of the orders of $p$ in $m,n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 19 '17 at 17:54










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: if $dmid x$ and $dmid y$, then $gcd(x,y) = dcdot gcd(frac xd,frac yd)$. Apply this fact with $d=gcd(a,c)$ and $x=ab$ and $y=c$.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Apr 19 '17 at 18:11








1




1




$begingroup$
Easiest, I think, to use unique factorization and the fact that the order of a prime $p$ in $gcd (m,n)$ is the lesser of the orders of $p$ in $m,n$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 19 '17 at 17:54




$begingroup$
Easiest, I think, to use unique factorization and the fact that the order of a prime $p$ in $gcd (m,n)$ is the lesser of the orders of $p$ in $m,n$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 19 '17 at 17:54












$begingroup$
Hint: if $dmid x$ and $dmid y$, then $gcd(x,y) = dcdot gcd(frac xd,frac yd)$. Apply this fact with $d=gcd(a,c)$ and $x=ab$ and $y=c$.
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Apr 19 '17 at 18:11




$begingroup$
Hint: if $dmid x$ and $dmid y$, then $gcd(x,y) = dcdot gcd(frac xd,frac yd)$. Apply this fact with $d=gcd(a,c)$ and $x=ab$ and $y=c$.
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Apr 19 '17 at 18:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

From $gcd(ab,c)$, we conclude that $gcd(ab,c) mid ab$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$. Now we will have two cases:



Case 1: $gcd(ab,c) mid a$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



In this case, we see that $gcd(ab,c)$ is a common divisor of $a$ and $c$, so by definition of gcd, we have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c)$.



Case 2: $gcd(ab,c) mid b$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



Similarly, in this case we have $gcd(ab,c)$ to be a common divisor of $b$ and $c$, so $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(b,c)$.



In either case, we will have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$, and we are done.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2242222%2fproving-a-gcd-equation-gcdab-c-mid-gcda-c-cdot-gcdb-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    From $gcd(ab,c)$, we conclude that $gcd(ab,c) mid ab$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$. Now we will have two cases:



    Case 1: $gcd(ab,c) mid a$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



    In this case, we see that $gcd(ab,c)$ is a common divisor of $a$ and $c$, so by definition of gcd, we have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c)$.



    Case 2: $gcd(ab,c) mid b$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



    Similarly, in this case we have $gcd(ab,c)$ to be a common divisor of $b$ and $c$, so $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(b,c)$.



    In either case, we will have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$, and we are done.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      From $gcd(ab,c)$, we conclude that $gcd(ab,c) mid ab$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$. Now we will have two cases:



      Case 1: $gcd(ab,c) mid a$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



      In this case, we see that $gcd(ab,c)$ is a common divisor of $a$ and $c$, so by definition of gcd, we have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c)$.



      Case 2: $gcd(ab,c) mid b$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



      Similarly, in this case we have $gcd(ab,c)$ to be a common divisor of $b$ and $c$, so $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(b,c)$.



      In either case, we will have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$, and we are done.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        From $gcd(ab,c)$, we conclude that $gcd(ab,c) mid ab$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$. Now we will have two cases:



        Case 1: $gcd(ab,c) mid a$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



        In this case, we see that $gcd(ab,c)$ is a common divisor of $a$ and $c$, so by definition of gcd, we have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c)$.



        Case 2: $gcd(ab,c) mid b$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



        Similarly, in this case we have $gcd(ab,c)$ to be a common divisor of $b$ and $c$, so $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(b,c)$.



        In either case, we will have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$, and we are done.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        From $gcd(ab,c)$, we conclude that $gcd(ab,c) mid ab$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$. Now we will have two cases:



        Case 1: $gcd(ab,c) mid a$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



        In this case, we see that $gcd(ab,c)$ is a common divisor of $a$ and $c$, so by definition of gcd, we have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c)$.



        Case 2: $gcd(ab,c) mid b$ and $gcd(ab,c) mid c$:



        Similarly, in this case we have $gcd(ab,c)$ to be a common divisor of $b$ and $c$, so $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(b,c)$.



        In either case, we will have $gcd(ab,c) mid gcd(a,c) cdot gcd(b,c)$, and we are done.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 19 '17 at 18:09









        Chenyang YuChenyang Yu

        31728




        31728






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2242222%2fproving-a-gcd-equation-gcdab-c-mid-gcda-c-cdot-gcdb-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith