stab(S) is isomorphic to $ S_k times S_{n-k} $
$begingroup$
Show that the group $S_n$ (right) acts on the set of subsets of ${1,2,ldots n}$ by $rho(S,sigma)=Ssigma$.
Show that there are $n+1$ orbits, one for each possible value of $|S|$. Show that if $|S|=k$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)cong S_ktimes S_{n-k}$.
I have shown that there are n+1 orbits but now I am stuck with the last bit.
my initial thought is that if I let $S ={1,2,3,...,k}$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)$ would involve $(1)(2)(3)...(k)$ i.e. mapping to itself and then $k+1$ to $n$ mapped in any ways ($S_{n-k}$)
I feel like $mathrm{Stab}$ is isomorphic to $S_{n-k}$ what am I misunderstanding here? How would I prove the last part?
Thanks a lot
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that the group $S_n$ (right) acts on the set of subsets of ${1,2,ldots n}$ by $rho(S,sigma)=Ssigma$.
Show that there are $n+1$ orbits, one for each possible value of $|S|$. Show that if $|S|=k$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)cong S_ktimes S_{n-k}$.
I have shown that there are n+1 orbits but now I am stuck with the last bit.
my initial thought is that if I let $S ={1,2,3,...,k}$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)$ would involve $(1)(2)(3)...(k)$ i.e. mapping to itself and then $k+1$ to $n$ mapped in any ways ($S_{n-k}$)
I feel like $mathrm{Stab}$ is isomorphic to $S_{n-k}$ what am I misunderstanding here? How would I prove the last part?
Thanks a lot
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that the group $S_n$ (right) acts on the set of subsets of ${1,2,ldots n}$ by $rho(S,sigma)=Ssigma$.
Show that there are $n+1$ orbits, one for each possible value of $|S|$. Show that if $|S|=k$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)cong S_ktimes S_{n-k}$.
I have shown that there are n+1 orbits but now I am stuck with the last bit.
my initial thought is that if I let $S ={1,2,3,...,k}$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)$ would involve $(1)(2)(3)...(k)$ i.e. mapping to itself and then $k+1$ to $n$ mapped in any ways ($S_{n-k}$)
I feel like $mathrm{Stab}$ is isomorphic to $S_{n-k}$ what am I misunderstanding here? How would I prove the last part?
Thanks a lot
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
Show that the group $S_n$ (right) acts on the set of subsets of ${1,2,ldots n}$ by $rho(S,sigma)=Ssigma$.
Show that there are $n+1$ orbits, one for each possible value of $|S|$. Show that if $|S|=k$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)cong S_ktimes S_{n-k}$.
I have shown that there are n+1 orbits but now I am stuck with the last bit.
my initial thought is that if I let $S ={1,2,3,...,k}$ then $mathrm{Stab}(S)$ would involve $(1)(2)(3)...(k)$ i.e. mapping to itself and then $k+1$ to $n$ mapped in any ways ($S_{n-k}$)
I feel like $mathrm{Stab}$ is isomorphic to $S_{n-k}$ what am I misunderstanding here? How would I prove the last part?
Thanks a lot
abstract-algebra group-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory
edited Dec 18 '14 at 13:12


rschwieb
107k12102251
107k12102251
asked May 13 '14 at 22:29
user120227user120227
510617
510617
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You're missing that $sigma$ need not fix $S$ pointwise, but rather only setwise. That's where you get the initial $S_k$ factor.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Aha! Thanks for your reply
$endgroup$
– user120227
May 13 '14 at 23:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f793789%2fstabs-is-isomorphic-to-s-k-times-s-n-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You're missing that $sigma$ need not fix $S$ pointwise, but rather only setwise. That's where you get the initial $S_k$ factor.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Aha! Thanks for your reply
$endgroup$
– user120227
May 13 '14 at 23:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're missing that $sigma$ need not fix $S$ pointwise, but rather only setwise. That's where you get the initial $S_k$ factor.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Aha! Thanks for your reply
$endgroup$
– user120227
May 13 '14 at 23:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're missing that $sigma$ need not fix $S$ pointwise, but rather only setwise. That's where you get the initial $S_k$ factor.
$endgroup$
You're missing that $sigma$ need not fix $S$ pointwise, but rather only setwise. That's where you get the initial $S_k$ factor.
answered May 13 '14 at 22:53
jdcjdc
2,7861330
2,7861330
$begingroup$
Aha! Thanks for your reply
$endgroup$
– user120227
May 13 '14 at 23:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Aha! Thanks for your reply
$endgroup$
– user120227
May 13 '14 at 23:02
$begingroup$
Aha! Thanks for your reply
$endgroup$
– user120227
May 13 '14 at 23:02
$begingroup$
Aha! Thanks for your reply
$endgroup$
– user120227
May 13 '14 at 23:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f793789%2fstabs-is-isomorphic-to-s-k-times-s-n-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown