A question about the Vitali set.












0












$begingroup$


Let $X=[0,1)$ and we define on $X$ the relation $sim$ in the following way:$$xsim yquadiffquad x-yinmathbb{Q}.$$ The relation $sim$ is an equivalence relation. For all $alphain[0,1)$ the equivalent class is $$E_{alpha}:={yin[0,1);|;y-alphainmathbb{Q}}.$$ The class $E_alpha$ is countable for all $alphain[0,1)$, indeed if $alphainmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$, $E_alpha=mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while if $alphainbig(mathbb{R}setminusmathbb{Q}big)cap [0,1)$, $yin E_alpha$ if and only if $y=(alpha+q)$, where $qinmathbb{Q}cap [0,1).$




Question 1. Is my reasoning correct to show that each class $E_alpha$ is countable?




Therefore $$[0,1)=bigcup_{alphain[0,1)} E_alpha.tag1$$ From $(1)$ it is clear that exists an uncountable infinity of classes $E_alpha.$



For the axiom of choice exists $Vsubseteq [0,1)$ such that $$Vcap E_alpha={x_alpha}quadtext{for all};alphain [0,1).$$ The set $V$ is called the Vitali set. Let ${q_n}_{ninmathbb{N}}$ an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$ and we define for all $ninmathbb{N}$ $$V_n:={x_alpha+q_n;text{mod};1;|;x_alphain V}.$$I must prove that $$[0,1)=bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} V_n.$$ Let $xinbigcup_{n} V_n$ then $xin V_n$ for same $ninmathbb{N}$, therefore $x=x_{alpha}+ q_n;text{mod};1$, where $x_alphain V$, then $xin [0,1).$ Let's proceed with the other inclusion: let $xin [0,1)$ then $xin E_alpha$ for same $alphain [0,1)$, in particular, since the classes $E_alpha$ are disjointed $alpha$ is unique, then $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q},$$ in particular, since $xin [0,1)$ and $x_alphain [0,1)$ we have that $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q}cap (-1,1)tag2$$




Question. From $(2)$ how can I proceed to show inclusion?




Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $X=[0,1)$ and we define on $X$ the relation $sim$ in the following way:$$xsim yquadiffquad x-yinmathbb{Q}.$$ The relation $sim$ is an equivalence relation. For all $alphain[0,1)$ the equivalent class is $$E_{alpha}:={yin[0,1);|;y-alphainmathbb{Q}}.$$ The class $E_alpha$ is countable for all $alphain[0,1)$, indeed if $alphainmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$, $E_alpha=mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while if $alphainbig(mathbb{R}setminusmathbb{Q}big)cap [0,1)$, $yin E_alpha$ if and only if $y=(alpha+q)$, where $qinmathbb{Q}cap [0,1).$




    Question 1. Is my reasoning correct to show that each class $E_alpha$ is countable?




    Therefore $$[0,1)=bigcup_{alphain[0,1)} E_alpha.tag1$$ From $(1)$ it is clear that exists an uncountable infinity of classes $E_alpha.$



    For the axiom of choice exists $Vsubseteq [0,1)$ such that $$Vcap E_alpha={x_alpha}quadtext{for all};alphain [0,1).$$ The set $V$ is called the Vitali set. Let ${q_n}_{ninmathbb{N}}$ an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$ and we define for all $ninmathbb{N}$ $$V_n:={x_alpha+q_n;text{mod};1;|;x_alphain V}.$$I must prove that $$[0,1)=bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} V_n.$$ Let $xinbigcup_{n} V_n$ then $xin V_n$ for same $ninmathbb{N}$, therefore $x=x_{alpha}+ q_n;text{mod};1$, where $x_alphain V$, then $xin [0,1).$ Let's proceed with the other inclusion: let $xin [0,1)$ then $xin E_alpha$ for same $alphain [0,1)$, in particular, since the classes $E_alpha$ are disjointed $alpha$ is unique, then $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q},$$ in particular, since $xin [0,1)$ and $x_alphain [0,1)$ we have that $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q}cap (-1,1)tag2$$




    Question. From $(2)$ how can I proceed to show inclusion?




    Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $X=[0,1)$ and we define on $X$ the relation $sim$ in the following way:$$xsim yquadiffquad x-yinmathbb{Q}.$$ The relation $sim$ is an equivalence relation. For all $alphain[0,1)$ the equivalent class is $$E_{alpha}:={yin[0,1);|;y-alphainmathbb{Q}}.$$ The class $E_alpha$ is countable for all $alphain[0,1)$, indeed if $alphainmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$, $E_alpha=mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while if $alphainbig(mathbb{R}setminusmathbb{Q}big)cap [0,1)$, $yin E_alpha$ if and only if $y=(alpha+q)$, where $qinmathbb{Q}cap [0,1).$




      Question 1. Is my reasoning correct to show that each class $E_alpha$ is countable?




      Therefore $$[0,1)=bigcup_{alphain[0,1)} E_alpha.tag1$$ From $(1)$ it is clear that exists an uncountable infinity of classes $E_alpha.$



      For the axiom of choice exists $Vsubseteq [0,1)$ such that $$Vcap E_alpha={x_alpha}quadtext{for all};alphain [0,1).$$ The set $V$ is called the Vitali set. Let ${q_n}_{ninmathbb{N}}$ an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$ and we define for all $ninmathbb{N}$ $$V_n:={x_alpha+q_n;text{mod};1;|;x_alphain V}.$$I must prove that $$[0,1)=bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} V_n.$$ Let $xinbigcup_{n} V_n$ then $xin V_n$ for same $ninmathbb{N}$, therefore $x=x_{alpha}+ q_n;text{mod};1$, where $x_alphain V$, then $xin [0,1).$ Let's proceed with the other inclusion: let $xin [0,1)$ then $xin E_alpha$ for same $alphain [0,1)$, in particular, since the classes $E_alpha$ are disjointed $alpha$ is unique, then $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q},$$ in particular, since $xin [0,1)$ and $x_alphain [0,1)$ we have that $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q}cap (-1,1)tag2$$




      Question. From $(2)$ how can I proceed to show inclusion?




      Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $X=[0,1)$ and we define on $X$ the relation $sim$ in the following way:$$xsim yquadiffquad x-yinmathbb{Q}.$$ The relation $sim$ is an equivalence relation. For all $alphain[0,1)$ the equivalent class is $$E_{alpha}:={yin[0,1);|;y-alphainmathbb{Q}}.$$ The class $E_alpha$ is countable for all $alphain[0,1)$, indeed if $alphainmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$, $E_alpha=mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while if $alphainbig(mathbb{R}setminusmathbb{Q}big)cap [0,1)$, $yin E_alpha$ if and only if $y=(alpha+q)$, where $qinmathbb{Q}cap [0,1).$




      Question 1. Is my reasoning correct to show that each class $E_alpha$ is countable?




      Therefore $$[0,1)=bigcup_{alphain[0,1)} E_alpha.tag1$$ From $(1)$ it is clear that exists an uncountable infinity of classes $E_alpha.$



      For the axiom of choice exists $Vsubseteq [0,1)$ such that $$Vcap E_alpha={x_alpha}quadtext{for all};alphain [0,1).$$ The set $V$ is called the Vitali set. Let ${q_n}_{ninmathbb{N}}$ an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$ and we define for all $ninmathbb{N}$ $$V_n:={x_alpha+q_n;text{mod};1;|;x_alphain V}.$$I must prove that $$[0,1)=bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} V_n.$$ Let $xinbigcup_{n} V_n$ then $xin V_n$ for same $ninmathbb{N}$, therefore $x=x_{alpha}+ q_n;text{mod};1$, where $x_alphain V$, then $xin [0,1).$ Let's proceed with the other inclusion: let $xin [0,1)$ then $xin E_alpha$ for same $alphain [0,1)$, in particular, since the classes $E_alpha$ are disjointed $alpha$ is unique, then $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q},$$ in particular, since $xin [0,1)$ and $x_alphain [0,1)$ we have that $$x-x_alphainmathbb{Q}cap (-1,1)tag2$$




      Question. From $(2)$ how can I proceed to show inclusion?




      Thanks!







      measure-theory proof-verification elementary-set-theory lebesgue-measure






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 1 at 16:09









      José Carlos Santos

      174k23133242




      174k23133242










      asked Feb 1 at 15:22









      Jack J.Jack J.

      3592419




      3592419






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$


          1. It is not entirely correct. For instance, you claim that$$yin E_alphaiff y=alpha+qtext{, where }qinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1).$$What if $y<alpha$? Besides, there is no nedd to treat the cases $alphainmathbb Q$ and $alphanotinmathbb Q$ separately.

          2. Why induction? If $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q-lfloor qrfloor=q_n$ for some $ninmathbb N$ (since $q-lfloor qrfloorinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$) and therefore $xin V_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. Why if $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q=q_n$? $q_ninmathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while $x-x_alphain (-1,1).$ 1. At this point how can I show that every $E_alpha$ is countable?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 15:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've edited my answer to the second doubt. What do you think now?
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:02










          • $begingroup$
            So are we using the fact that there is a bjection between $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 16:44










          • $begingroup$
            No, I did not use that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:59






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes, it is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 18:50



















          1












          $begingroup$

          One way to see countability of all classes is to note that the class of $xin mathbb{R}$ is just $[x]={x+q: q in mathbb{Q}}cap [0,1)$: every $x+q in [x]$ is equivalent to $x$, as $x+q-x = q in mathbb{Q}$ and if $x sim y$ then $q:=y-x in mathbb{Q}$ and $y = x+q in [x]$.



          So every class is in bijective correspondence with $mathbb{Q}$ (via $q to x+q$ for the class of $x$).



          $[0,1)$ is a partition of classes so (assuming choice) there are $mathfrak{c}=|mathbb{R}|$ many different classes; if there are $kappa ge aleph_0$ classes each of size $aleph_0$, $|[0,1)|$ has size $kappa cdot aleph_0=kappa$ as well. So $kappa=mathfrak{c}$.



          There is not the Vitali set but only a Vitali set (it depends on a lot of choices and every different choice for a representative of a class gives a different Vitali set).



          To see that $[0,1) = bigcup_n (V+{q_n} pmod{1})$, let $x in [0,1)$. Then $x$ is in $[x]$ and we have some unique $v in [x] cap V$ as a representative. So $x-v= q_k pmod{1}$ for some $k$ so $x in V+{q_k} pmod{1}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Let's see if I understand what you said in the first part: we fix $alphain [0,1)$ and we consider the map $fcolon mathbb{Q}to E_alpha$ defined as $qmapsto f(q):=q+alpha$. The map $f$ is well defined and injective. Now, let $yin E_alpha$, then $y-alphainmathbb{Q}$, therefore $q:=y-alpha$, then $y=q+alpha$. Since $q+alphasimalpha$, $y=f(q)in E_alpha$. Correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 18:45












          • $begingroup$
            @JackJ. Yes, that’s about it.
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Feb 1 at 19:20












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096353%2fa-question-about-the-vitali-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$


          1. It is not entirely correct. For instance, you claim that$$yin E_alphaiff y=alpha+qtext{, where }qinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1).$$What if $y<alpha$? Besides, there is no nedd to treat the cases $alphainmathbb Q$ and $alphanotinmathbb Q$ separately.

          2. Why induction? If $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q-lfloor qrfloor=q_n$ for some $ninmathbb N$ (since $q-lfloor qrfloorinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$) and therefore $xin V_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. Why if $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q=q_n$? $q_ninmathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while $x-x_alphain (-1,1).$ 1. At this point how can I show that every $E_alpha$ is countable?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 15:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've edited my answer to the second doubt. What do you think now?
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:02










          • $begingroup$
            So are we using the fact that there is a bjection between $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 16:44










          • $begingroup$
            No, I did not use that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:59






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes, it is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 18:50
















          2












          $begingroup$


          1. It is not entirely correct. For instance, you claim that$$yin E_alphaiff y=alpha+qtext{, where }qinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1).$$What if $y<alpha$? Besides, there is no nedd to treat the cases $alphainmathbb Q$ and $alphanotinmathbb Q$ separately.

          2. Why induction? If $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q-lfloor qrfloor=q_n$ for some $ninmathbb N$ (since $q-lfloor qrfloorinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$) and therefore $xin V_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. Why if $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q=q_n$? $q_ninmathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while $x-x_alphain (-1,1).$ 1. At this point how can I show that every $E_alpha$ is countable?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 15:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've edited my answer to the second doubt. What do you think now?
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:02










          • $begingroup$
            So are we using the fact that there is a bjection between $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 16:44










          • $begingroup$
            No, I did not use that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:59






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes, it is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 18:50














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$


          1. It is not entirely correct. For instance, you claim that$$yin E_alphaiff y=alpha+qtext{, where }qinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1).$$What if $y<alpha$? Besides, there is no nedd to treat the cases $alphainmathbb Q$ and $alphanotinmathbb Q$ separately.

          2. Why induction? If $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q-lfloor qrfloor=q_n$ for some $ninmathbb N$ (since $q-lfloor qrfloorinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$) and therefore $xin V_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          1. It is not entirely correct. For instance, you claim that$$yin E_alphaiff y=alpha+qtext{, where }qinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1).$$What if $y<alpha$? Besides, there is no nedd to treat the cases $alphainmathbb Q$ and $alphanotinmathbb Q$ separately.

          2. Why induction? If $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q-lfloor qrfloor=q_n$ for some $ninmathbb N$ (since $q-lfloor qrfloorinmathbb{Q}cap[0,1)$) and therefore $xin V_n$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Feb 1 at 16:02

























          answered Feb 1 at 15:31









          José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

          174k23133242




          174k23133242












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. Why if $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q=q_n$? $q_ninmathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while $x-x_alphain (-1,1).$ 1. At this point how can I show that every $E_alpha$ is countable?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 15:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've edited my answer to the second doubt. What do you think now?
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:02










          • $begingroup$
            So are we using the fact that there is a bjection between $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 16:44










          • $begingroup$
            No, I did not use that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:59






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes, it is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 18:50


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your answer. Why if $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q=q_n$? $q_ninmathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while $x-x_alphain (-1,1).$ 1. At this point how can I show that every $E_alpha$ is countable?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 15:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've edited my answer to the second doubt. What do you think now?
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:02










          • $begingroup$
            So are we using the fact that there is a bjection between $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 16:44










          • $begingroup$
            No, I did not use that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 16:59






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes, it is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Feb 1 at 18:50
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your answer. Why if $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q=q_n$? $q_ninmathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while $x-x_alphain (-1,1).$ 1. At this point how can I show that every $E_alpha$ is countable?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack J.
          Feb 1 at 15:58




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your answer. Why if $x-x_alpha=qinmathbb{Q}$, then $q=q_n$? $q_ninmathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$, while $x-x_alphain (-1,1).$ 1. At this point how can I show that every $E_alpha$ is countable?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack J.
          Feb 1 at 15:58




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I've edited my answer to the second doubt. What do you think now?
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Feb 1 at 16:02




          $begingroup$
          I've edited my answer to the second doubt. What do you think now?
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Feb 1 at 16:02












          $begingroup$
          So are we using the fact that there is a bjection between $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack J.
          Feb 1 at 16:44




          $begingroup$
          So are we using the fact that there is a bjection between $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{Q}cap [0,1)$?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack J.
          Feb 1 at 16:44












          $begingroup$
          No, I did not use that.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Feb 1 at 16:59




          $begingroup$
          No, I did not use that.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Feb 1 at 16:59




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Yes, it is correct.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Feb 1 at 18:50




          $begingroup$
          Yes, it is correct.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Feb 1 at 18:50











          1












          $begingroup$

          One way to see countability of all classes is to note that the class of $xin mathbb{R}$ is just $[x]={x+q: q in mathbb{Q}}cap [0,1)$: every $x+q in [x]$ is equivalent to $x$, as $x+q-x = q in mathbb{Q}$ and if $x sim y$ then $q:=y-x in mathbb{Q}$ and $y = x+q in [x]$.



          So every class is in bijective correspondence with $mathbb{Q}$ (via $q to x+q$ for the class of $x$).



          $[0,1)$ is a partition of classes so (assuming choice) there are $mathfrak{c}=|mathbb{R}|$ many different classes; if there are $kappa ge aleph_0$ classes each of size $aleph_0$, $|[0,1)|$ has size $kappa cdot aleph_0=kappa$ as well. So $kappa=mathfrak{c}$.



          There is not the Vitali set but only a Vitali set (it depends on a lot of choices and every different choice for a representative of a class gives a different Vitali set).



          To see that $[0,1) = bigcup_n (V+{q_n} pmod{1})$, let $x in [0,1)$. Then $x$ is in $[x]$ and we have some unique $v in [x] cap V$ as a representative. So $x-v= q_k pmod{1}$ for some $k$ so $x in V+{q_k} pmod{1}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Let's see if I understand what you said in the first part: we fix $alphain [0,1)$ and we consider the map $fcolon mathbb{Q}to E_alpha$ defined as $qmapsto f(q):=q+alpha$. The map $f$ is well defined and injective. Now, let $yin E_alpha$, then $y-alphainmathbb{Q}$, therefore $q:=y-alpha$, then $y=q+alpha$. Since $q+alphasimalpha$, $y=f(q)in E_alpha$. Correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 18:45












          • $begingroup$
            @JackJ. Yes, that’s about it.
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Feb 1 at 19:20
















          1












          $begingroup$

          One way to see countability of all classes is to note that the class of $xin mathbb{R}$ is just $[x]={x+q: q in mathbb{Q}}cap [0,1)$: every $x+q in [x]$ is equivalent to $x$, as $x+q-x = q in mathbb{Q}$ and if $x sim y$ then $q:=y-x in mathbb{Q}$ and $y = x+q in [x]$.



          So every class is in bijective correspondence with $mathbb{Q}$ (via $q to x+q$ for the class of $x$).



          $[0,1)$ is a partition of classes so (assuming choice) there are $mathfrak{c}=|mathbb{R}|$ many different classes; if there are $kappa ge aleph_0$ classes each of size $aleph_0$, $|[0,1)|$ has size $kappa cdot aleph_0=kappa$ as well. So $kappa=mathfrak{c}$.



          There is not the Vitali set but only a Vitali set (it depends on a lot of choices and every different choice for a representative of a class gives a different Vitali set).



          To see that $[0,1) = bigcup_n (V+{q_n} pmod{1})$, let $x in [0,1)$. Then $x$ is in $[x]$ and we have some unique $v in [x] cap V$ as a representative. So $x-v= q_k pmod{1}$ for some $k$ so $x in V+{q_k} pmod{1}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Let's see if I understand what you said in the first part: we fix $alphain [0,1)$ and we consider the map $fcolon mathbb{Q}to E_alpha$ defined as $qmapsto f(q):=q+alpha$. The map $f$ is well defined and injective. Now, let $yin E_alpha$, then $y-alphainmathbb{Q}$, therefore $q:=y-alpha$, then $y=q+alpha$. Since $q+alphasimalpha$, $y=f(q)in E_alpha$. Correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 18:45












          • $begingroup$
            @JackJ. Yes, that’s about it.
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Feb 1 at 19:20














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          One way to see countability of all classes is to note that the class of $xin mathbb{R}$ is just $[x]={x+q: q in mathbb{Q}}cap [0,1)$: every $x+q in [x]$ is equivalent to $x$, as $x+q-x = q in mathbb{Q}$ and if $x sim y$ then $q:=y-x in mathbb{Q}$ and $y = x+q in [x]$.



          So every class is in bijective correspondence with $mathbb{Q}$ (via $q to x+q$ for the class of $x$).



          $[0,1)$ is a partition of classes so (assuming choice) there are $mathfrak{c}=|mathbb{R}|$ many different classes; if there are $kappa ge aleph_0$ classes each of size $aleph_0$, $|[0,1)|$ has size $kappa cdot aleph_0=kappa$ as well. So $kappa=mathfrak{c}$.



          There is not the Vitali set but only a Vitali set (it depends on a lot of choices and every different choice for a representative of a class gives a different Vitali set).



          To see that $[0,1) = bigcup_n (V+{q_n} pmod{1})$, let $x in [0,1)$. Then $x$ is in $[x]$ and we have some unique $v in [x] cap V$ as a representative. So $x-v= q_k pmod{1}$ for some $k$ so $x in V+{q_k} pmod{1}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          One way to see countability of all classes is to note that the class of $xin mathbb{R}$ is just $[x]={x+q: q in mathbb{Q}}cap [0,1)$: every $x+q in [x]$ is equivalent to $x$, as $x+q-x = q in mathbb{Q}$ and if $x sim y$ then $q:=y-x in mathbb{Q}$ and $y = x+q in [x]$.



          So every class is in bijective correspondence with $mathbb{Q}$ (via $q to x+q$ for the class of $x$).



          $[0,1)$ is a partition of classes so (assuming choice) there are $mathfrak{c}=|mathbb{R}|$ many different classes; if there are $kappa ge aleph_0$ classes each of size $aleph_0$, $|[0,1)|$ has size $kappa cdot aleph_0=kappa$ as well. So $kappa=mathfrak{c}$.



          There is not the Vitali set but only a Vitali set (it depends on a lot of choices and every different choice for a representative of a class gives a different Vitali set).



          To see that $[0,1) = bigcup_n (V+{q_n} pmod{1})$, let $x in [0,1)$. Then $x$ is in $[x]$ and we have some unique $v in [x] cap V$ as a representative. So $x-v= q_k pmod{1}$ for some $k$ so $x in V+{q_k} pmod{1}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Feb 1 at 17:32









          Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

          116k349127




          116k349127












          • $begingroup$
            Let's see if I understand what you said in the first part: we fix $alphain [0,1)$ and we consider the map $fcolon mathbb{Q}to E_alpha$ defined as $qmapsto f(q):=q+alpha$. The map $f$ is well defined and injective. Now, let $yin E_alpha$, then $y-alphainmathbb{Q}$, therefore $q:=y-alpha$, then $y=q+alpha$. Since $q+alphasimalpha$, $y=f(q)in E_alpha$. Correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 18:45












          • $begingroup$
            @JackJ. Yes, that’s about it.
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Feb 1 at 19:20


















          • $begingroup$
            Let's see if I understand what you said in the first part: we fix $alphain [0,1)$ and we consider the map $fcolon mathbb{Q}to E_alpha$ defined as $qmapsto f(q):=q+alpha$. The map $f$ is well defined and injective. Now, let $yin E_alpha$, then $y-alphainmathbb{Q}$, therefore $q:=y-alpha$, then $y=q+alpha$. Since $q+alphasimalpha$, $y=f(q)in E_alpha$. Correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack J.
            Feb 1 at 18:45












          • $begingroup$
            @JackJ. Yes, that’s about it.
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Feb 1 at 19:20
















          $begingroup$
          Let's see if I understand what you said in the first part: we fix $alphain [0,1)$ and we consider the map $fcolon mathbb{Q}to E_alpha$ defined as $qmapsto f(q):=q+alpha$. The map $f$ is well defined and injective. Now, let $yin E_alpha$, then $y-alphainmathbb{Q}$, therefore $q:=y-alpha$, then $y=q+alpha$. Since $q+alphasimalpha$, $y=f(q)in E_alpha$. Correct?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack J.
          Feb 1 at 18:45






          $begingroup$
          Let's see if I understand what you said in the first part: we fix $alphain [0,1)$ and we consider the map $fcolon mathbb{Q}to E_alpha$ defined as $qmapsto f(q):=q+alpha$. The map $f$ is well defined and injective. Now, let $yin E_alpha$, then $y-alphainmathbb{Q}$, therefore $q:=y-alpha$, then $y=q+alpha$. Since $q+alphasimalpha$, $y=f(q)in E_alpha$. Correct?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack J.
          Feb 1 at 18:45














          $begingroup$
          @JackJ. Yes, that’s about it.
          $endgroup$
          – Henno Brandsma
          Feb 1 at 19:20




          $begingroup$
          @JackJ. Yes, that’s about it.
          $endgroup$
          – Henno Brandsma
          Feb 1 at 19:20


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096353%2fa-question-about-the-vitali-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith