Product of functions in higher dimensions












0












$begingroup$


Suppose $f,g :mathbb R^ntomathbb R^m$ be two functions.



My question is that whether we can define product of $f$ and $g$ the i.e $f.g$.



My teacher says no. I wonder why not? We can define inner product or pointwise product of terms.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Suppose $f,g :mathbb R^ntomathbb R^m$ be two functions.



    My question is that whether we can define product of $f$ and $g$ the i.e $f.g$.



    My teacher says no. I wonder why not? We can define inner product or pointwise product of terms.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Suppose $f,g :mathbb R^ntomathbb R^m$ be two functions.



      My question is that whether we can define product of $f$ and $g$ the i.e $f.g$.



      My teacher says no. I wonder why not? We can define inner product or pointwise product of terms.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose $f,g :mathbb R^ntomathbb R^m$ be two functions.



      My question is that whether we can define product of $f$ and $g$ the i.e $f.g$.



      My teacher says no. I wonder why not? We can define inner product or pointwise product of terms.







      real-analysis calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 1 at 19:55









      Mundron Schmidt

      7,4942729




      7,4942729










      asked Feb 1 at 19:53









      IbrahimIbrahim

      627




      627






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The question is whether we can define a product of two elements in $mathbb R^m$.



          The answer is: It depends, what you like to get. Naturally, you can define a lot of operations which combines two elements of $mathbb R^m$ like the dot product. You can even define operator from $mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$. Further, you can do it such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ is a ring like $mathbb Z$ by the componentwise multiplication.



          But if you ask for a product $cdot:mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$ such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ forms a field then your teacher is right.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096655%2fproduct-of-functions-in-higher-dimensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The question is whether we can define a product of two elements in $mathbb R^m$.



            The answer is: It depends, what you like to get. Naturally, you can define a lot of operations which combines two elements of $mathbb R^m$ like the dot product. You can even define operator from $mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$. Further, you can do it such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ is a ring like $mathbb Z$ by the componentwise multiplication.



            But if you ask for a product $cdot:mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$ such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ forms a field then your teacher is right.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              The question is whether we can define a product of two elements in $mathbb R^m$.



              The answer is: It depends, what you like to get. Naturally, you can define a lot of operations which combines two elements of $mathbb R^m$ like the dot product. You can even define operator from $mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$. Further, you can do it such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ is a ring like $mathbb Z$ by the componentwise multiplication.



              But if you ask for a product $cdot:mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$ such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ forms a field then your teacher is right.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The question is whether we can define a product of two elements in $mathbb R^m$.



                The answer is: It depends, what you like to get. Naturally, you can define a lot of operations which combines two elements of $mathbb R^m$ like the dot product. You can even define operator from $mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$. Further, you can do it such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ is a ring like $mathbb Z$ by the componentwise multiplication.



                But if you ask for a product $cdot:mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$ such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ forms a field then your teacher is right.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The question is whether we can define a product of two elements in $mathbb R^m$.



                The answer is: It depends, what you like to get. Naturally, you can define a lot of operations which combines two elements of $mathbb R^m$ like the dot product. You can even define operator from $mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$. Further, you can do it such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ is a ring like $mathbb Z$ by the componentwise multiplication.



                But if you ask for a product $cdot:mathbb R^mtimesmathbb R^mtomathbb R^m$ such that $(mathbb R^m, +,cdot)$ forms a field then your teacher is right.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Feb 1 at 20:02









                Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt

                7,4942729




                7,4942729






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096655%2fproduct-of-functions-in-higher-dimensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    SQL update select statement

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]