Does having two lines of symmetry $y=0$ and $y=-x$ imply that the shape also has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and...












4












$begingroup$


I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.



My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.



Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).



I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.



    My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.



    Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).



    I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.



      My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.



      Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).



      I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.



      My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.



      Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).



      I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.







      coordinate-systems symmetry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 30 at 11:10









      abc...

      3,237739




      3,237739










      asked Jan 30 at 10:51









      SweeperSweeper

      1526




      1526






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:




          • symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;

          • symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.


          Now we can apply these rules iteratively:




          • reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$

          • reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$


          And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.



          Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, this is true.



            Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$



            Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.



            Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$



            Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093377%2fdoes-having-two-lines-of-symmetry-y-0-and-y-x-imply-that-the-shape-also-has%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:




              • symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;

              • symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.


              Now we can apply these rules iteratively:




              • reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$

              • reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$


              And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.



              Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:




                • symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;

                • symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.


                Now we can apply these rules iteratively:




                • reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$

                • reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$


                And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.



                Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:




                  • symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;

                  • symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.


                  Now we can apply these rules iteratively:




                  • reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$

                  • reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$


                  And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.



                  Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:




                  • symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;

                  • symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.


                  Now we can apply these rules iteratively:




                  • reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$

                  • reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$


                  And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.



                  Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 30 at 11:53

























                  answered Jan 30 at 11:09









                  TonyKTonyK

                  43.8k358137




                  43.8k358137























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Yes, this is true.



                      Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$



                      Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.



                      Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$



                      Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Yes, this is true.



                        Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$



                        Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.



                        Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$



                        Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Yes, this is true.



                          Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$



                          Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.



                          Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$



                          Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Yes, this is true.



                          Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$



                          Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.



                          Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$



                          Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 30 at 11:09









                          abc...abc...

                          3,237739




                          3,237739






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093377%2fdoes-having-two-lines-of-symmetry-y-0-and-y-x-imply-that-the-shape-also-has%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                              Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                              A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$