Does having two lines of symmetry $y=0$ and $y=-x$ imply that the shape also has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and...
$begingroup$
I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.
My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.
Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).
I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.
coordinate-systems symmetry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.
My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.
Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).
I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.
coordinate-systems symmetry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.
My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.
Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).
I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.
coordinate-systems symmetry
$endgroup$
I have been wondering if a shape/curve that has a line of symmetry along the lines $y=0$ and $y=-x$ is guaranteed to also have lines of symmetry along the lines $x=0$ and $y=x$.
My gut feeling tells me that this is true. All the shapes that I can think of satisfy this. But I can't think of a way to prove this.
Also, is this relationship "if and only if" (with a $Leftrightarrow$ symbol) or just "implies" (with a $Rightarrow$ symbol).
I tried looking up similar questions here but I couldn't find any. Maybe I worded it too verbosely.
coordinate-systems symmetry
coordinate-systems symmetry
edited Jan 30 at 11:10
abc...
3,237739
3,237739
asked Jan 30 at 10:51
SweeperSweeper
1526
1526
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:
- symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;
- symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.
Now we can apply these rules iteratively:
- reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$
- reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$
And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.
Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true.
Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$
Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.
Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$
Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093377%2fdoes-having-two-lines-of-symmetry-y-0-and-y-x-imply-that-the-shape-also-has%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:
- symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;
- symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.
Now we can apply these rules iteratively:
- reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$
- reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$
And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.
Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:
- symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;
- symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.
Now we can apply these rules iteratively:
- reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$
- reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$
And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.
Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:
- symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;
- symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.
Now we can apply these rules iteratively:
- reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$
- reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$
And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.
Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.
$endgroup$
Let $(u,v)$ be a point on the curve. Then:
- symmetry about $y=0$ implies that $(u,-v)$ is on the curve;
- symmetry about $y=-x$ implies that $(-v,-u)$ is on the curve.
Now we can apply these rules iteratively:
- reflect $(u,-v)$ about $y=-x$ to get $(v,-u)$
- reflect $(v,-u)$ about $y=0$ to get $(v,u)$
And $(v,u)$ is $(u,v)$ reflected about $y=x$. So $y=x$ is indeed a line of symmetry.
Similarly, reflecting $(-v,-u)$ about $y=0$ then $y=-x$ gives $(-u,v)$, which is $(u,v)$ reflected about $x=0$. So $x=0$ is also a line of symmetry.
edited Jan 30 at 11:53
answered Jan 30 at 11:09
TonyKTonyK
43.8k358137
43.8k358137
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true.
Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$
Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.
Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$
Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true.
Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$
Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.
Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$
Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true.
Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$
Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.
Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$
Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.
$endgroup$
Yes, this is true.
Consider a point $(x,y)$ in the $1^{text{st}}$ quadrant. By line of symmetry $y=0$, the curve also contains $(-x,y)$. Then by the line of symmetry $y=-x$, the curve contains $(-x,-y)$ (since it contains $(x,y)$). Now, the curve must contain $(-x,y)$ since the line of symmetry $y=0.$
Therefore we have proved the $4$ points $(x,y),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-x,y)$ are simultaneously on the curve or off the curve.
Then you can try prove it has lines of symmetry $x=0$ and $y=x$. $(*)$
Comment if you got stuck on how to prove $(*)$ or if I have made anything unclear.
answered Jan 30 at 11:09
abc...abc...
3,237739
3,237739
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093377%2fdoes-having-two-lines-of-symmetry-y-0-and-y-x-imply-that-the-shape-also-has%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown