Existence of conditional expectations onto masas.
$begingroup$
Given an inclusion $Nsubset M$ of von Neumann algebras, a conditional expectation is a map $E:Mto N$ that is a projection ($E^2=E$) and it has $|E|=1$. This automatically implies that $E$ is completely positive, and that
$$tag1
E(axb)=aE(x)b, a,bin N, xin M.
$$
Conversely, a completely positive idempotent satisfies $|E|=1$.
In the particular case where $N=A$ is a masa (maximal abelian subalgebra), is it true that a conditional expectation exists for any masa $Asubset M$? Is it always normal?
functional-analysis operator-algebras von-neumann-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given an inclusion $Nsubset M$ of von Neumann algebras, a conditional expectation is a map $E:Mto N$ that is a projection ($E^2=E$) and it has $|E|=1$. This automatically implies that $E$ is completely positive, and that
$$tag1
E(axb)=aE(x)b, a,bin N, xin M.
$$
Conversely, a completely positive idempotent satisfies $|E|=1$.
In the particular case where $N=A$ is a masa (maximal abelian subalgebra), is it true that a conditional expectation exists for any masa $Asubset M$? Is it always normal?
functional-analysis operator-algebras von-neumann-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given an inclusion $Nsubset M$ of von Neumann algebras, a conditional expectation is a map $E:Mto N$ that is a projection ($E^2=E$) and it has $|E|=1$. This automatically implies that $E$ is completely positive, and that
$$tag1
E(axb)=aE(x)b, a,bin N, xin M.
$$
Conversely, a completely positive idempotent satisfies $|E|=1$.
In the particular case where $N=A$ is a masa (maximal abelian subalgebra), is it true that a conditional expectation exists for any masa $Asubset M$? Is it always normal?
functional-analysis operator-algebras von-neumann-algebras
$endgroup$
Given an inclusion $Nsubset M$ of von Neumann algebras, a conditional expectation is a map $E:Mto N$ that is a projection ($E^2=E$) and it has $|E|=1$. This automatically implies that $E$ is completely positive, and that
$$tag1
E(axb)=aE(x)b, a,bin N, xin M.
$$
Conversely, a completely positive idempotent satisfies $|E|=1$.
In the particular case where $N=A$ is a masa (maximal abelian subalgebra), is it true that a conditional expectation exists for any masa $Asubset M$? Is it always normal?
functional-analysis operator-algebras von-neumann-algebras
functional-analysis operator-algebras von-neumann-algebras
asked Jan 30 at 17:22
Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami
129k1184185
129k1184185
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are cases where a normal conditional expectation does not exist. By Exercise IX.4.1 in Takesaki's Theory of Operator Algebras, volume 2, if $E:Mto A$ is a normal conditional expectation and $M$ is atomic, then $A$ is atomic. So, for instance, if $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, then no normal conditional expectation exists.
Without the requirement of normality, a conditional expectation onto a masa always exists. For this consider the collection $mathcal F$ of finite partitions of 1 in $A$ (that is, projections $p_1,ldots,p_nin A$ with $sum p_j=1$), ordered by inclusion; this makes it a net. Because $A$ is a masa, $mathcal F'cap M=A$.
Given any $P={p_1,ldots,p_n}inmathcal F$, define $phi_P:Mto M$ by
$$
phi_P(x)=sum_{j=1}^n p_jxp_j.
$$
Note that $phi_P(x)p_k=p_kphi_P(x)$ for all $k=1,ldots,n$. The maps $phi_P$ are unital and completely positive. In particular the net ${phi_P}_{Pinmathcal F}$ is bounded, and so it has cluster points in the BW-topology (pointwise wot convergence). Let $phi$ be a cluster point. Given any projection $pin A$, we may consider partitions of unity that refine $p$, so $pphi_P(x)=phi_P(x)p$ for all $xin M$ and all $Pinmathcal F$ that refine $p$. The subnet we used to obtain $phi$ will eventually contain these partitions, and so $pphi(x)=phi(x)p$. As we can do this for any projection $pin A$, we get that $phi(x)in A'cap M=A$. Note also that for $ain A$ and any $Pinmathcal F$, we have $phi_P(a)=a$, so $phi(a)=a$. Finally, each $phi_P$ is unital and completely positive, so the same is true for $phi$, which is then a conditional expectation.
Akemann and Sherman have proven that if $A$ is singly generated (always true when $H$ is separable) and the construction above yields a unique conditional expectation, then said expectation is normal. This shows that when $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, the above construction yields more than one expectation. In this case the construction can be done more or less explicitly, and one can then see that there are actually infinitely many.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I do not understand the convergence part. Could you please explain me what is BW topology and its convergence?
$endgroup$
– rkmath
Jan 31 at 10:00
1
$begingroup$
$phi_jtophi$ means $phi_j(x)tophi(x)$ wot for every $x$. It is known that this topology has an Alaoglu theorem.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 31 at 14:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093824%2fexistence-of-conditional-expectations-onto-masas%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are cases where a normal conditional expectation does not exist. By Exercise IX.4.1 in Takesaki's Theory of Operator Algebras, volume 2, if $E:Mto A$ is a normal conditional expectation and $M$ is atomic, then $A$ is atomic. So, for instance, if $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, then no normal conditional expectation exists.
Without the requirement of normality, a conditional expectation onto a masa always exists. For this consider the collection $mathcal F$ of finite partitions of 1 in $A$ (that is, projections $p_1,ldots,p_nin A$ with $sum p_j=1$), ordered by inclusion; this makes it a net. Because $A$ is a masa, $mathcal F'cap M=A$.
Given any $P={p_1,ldots,p_n}inmathcal F$, define $phi_P:Mto M$ by
$$
phi_P(x)=sum_{j=1}^n p_jxp_j.
$$
Note that $phi_P(x)p_k=p_kphi_P(x)$ for all $k=1,ldots,n$. The maps $phi_P$ are unital and completely positive. In particular the net ${phi_P}_{Pinmathcal F}$ is bounded, and so it has cluster points in the BW-topology (pointwise wot convergence). Let $phi$ be a cluster point. Given any projection $pin A$, we may consider partitions of unity that refine $p$, so $pphi_P(x)=phi_P(x)p$ for all $xin M$ and all $Pinmathcal F$ that refine $p$. The subnet we used to obtain $phi$ will eventually contain these partitions, and so $pphi(x)=phi(x)p$. As we can do this for any projection $pin A$, we get that $phi(x)in A'cap M=A$. Note also that for $ain A$ and any $Pinmathcal F$, we have $phi_P(a)=a$, so $phi(a)=a$. Finally, each $phi_P$ is unital and completely positive, so the same is true for $phi$, which is then a conditional expectation.
Akemann and Sherman have proven that if $A$ is singly generated (always true when $H$ is separable) and the construction above yields a unique conditional expectation, then said expectation is normal. This shows that when $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, the above construction yields more than one expectation. In this case the construction can be done more or less explicitly, and one can then see that there are actually infinitely many.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I do not understand the convergence part. Could you please explain me what is BW topology and its convergence?
$endgroup$
– rkmath
Jan 31 at 10:00
1
$begingroup$
$phi_jtophi$ means $phi_j(x)tophi(x)$ wot for every $x$. It is known that this topology has an Alaoglu theorem.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 31 at 14:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are cases where a normal conditional expectation does not exist. By Exercise IX.4.1 in Takesaki's Theory of Operator Algebras, volume 2, if $E:Mto A$ is a normal conditional expectation and $M$ is atomic, then $A$ is atomic. So, for instance, if $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, then no normal conditional expectation exists.
Without the requirement of normality, a conditional expectation onto a masa always exists. For this consider the collection $mathcal F$ of finite partitions of 1 in $A$ (that is, projections $p_1,ldots,p_nin A$ with $sum p_j=1$), ordered by inclusion; this makes it a net. Because $A$ is a masa, $mathcal F'cap M=A$.
Given any $P={p_1,ldots,p_n}inmathcal F$, define $phi_P:Mto M$ by
$$
phi_P(x)=sum_{j=1}^n p_jxp_j.
$$
Note that $phi_P(x)p_k=p_kphi_P(x)$ for all $k=1,ldots,n$. The maps $phi_P$ are unital and completely positive. In particular the net ${phi_P}_{Pinmathcal F}$ is bounded, and so it has cluster points in the BW-topology (pointwise wot convergence). Let $phi$ be a cluster point. Given any projection $pin A$, we may consider partitions of unity that refine $p$, so $pphi_P(x)=phi_P(x)p$ for all $xin M$ and all $Pinmathcal F$ that refine $p$. The subnet we used to obtain $phi$ will eventually contain these partitions, and so $pphi(x)=phi(x)p$. As we can do this for any projection $pin A$, we get that $phi(x)in A'cap M=A$. Note also that for $ain A$ and any $Pinmathcal F$, we have $phi_P(a)=a$, so $phi(a)=a$. Finally, each $phi_P$ is unital and completely positive, so the same is true for $phi$, which is then a conditional expectation.
Akemann and Sherman have proven that if $A$ is singly generated (always true when $H$ is separable) and the construction above yields a unique conditional expectation, then said expectation is normal. This shows that when $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, the above construction yields more than one expectation. In this case the construction can be done more or less explicitly, and one can then see that there are actually infinitely many.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I do not understand the convergence part. Could you please explain me what is BW topology and its convergence?
$endgroup$
– rkmath
Jan 31 at 10:00
1
$begingroup$
$phi_jtophi$ means $phi_j(x)tophi(x)$ wot for every $x$. It is known that this topology has an Alaoglu theorem.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 31 at 14:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are cases where a normal conditional expectation does not exist. By Exercise IX.4.1 in Takesaki's Theory of Operator Algebras, volume 2, if $E:Mto A$ is a normal conditional expectation and $M$ is atomic, then $A$ is atomic. So, for instance, if $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, then no normal conditional expectation exists.
Without the requirement of normality, a conditional expectation onto a masa always exists. For this consider the collection $mathcal F$ of finite partitions of 1 in $A$ (that is, projections $p_1,ldots,p_nin A$ with $sum p_j=1$), ordered by inclusion; this makes it a net. Because $A$ is a masa, $mathcal F'cap M=A$.
Given any $P={p_1,ldots,p_n}inmathcal F$, define $phi_P:Mto M$ by
$$
phi_P(x)=sum_{j=1}^n p_jxp_j.
$$
Note that $phi_P(x)p_k=p_kphi_P(x)$ for all $k=1,ldots,n$. The maps $phi_P$ are unital and completely positive. In particular the net ${phi_P}_{Pinmathcal F}$ is bounded, and so it has cluster points in the BW-topology (pointwise wot convergence). Let $phi$ be a cluster point. Given any projection $pin A$, we may consider partitions of unity that refine $p$, so $pphi_P(x)=phi_P(x)p$ for all $xin M$ and all $Pinmathcal F$ that refine $p$. The subnet we used to obtain $phi$ will eventually contain these partitions, and so $pphi(x)=phi(x)p$. As we can do this for any projection $pin A$, we get that $phi(x)in A'cap M=A$. Note also that for $ain A$ and any $Pinmathcal F$, we have $phi_P(a)=a$, so $phi(a)=a$. Finally, each $phi_P$ is unital and completely positive, so the same is true for $phi$, which is then a conditional expectation.
Akemann and Sherman have proven that if $A$ is singly generated (always true when $H$ is separable) and the construction above yields a unique conditional expectation, then said expectation is normal. This shows that when $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, the above construction yields more than one expectation. In this case the construction can be done more or less explicitly, and one can then see that there are actually infinitely many.
$endgroup$
There are cases where a normal conditional expectation does not exist. By Exercise IX.4.1 in Takesaki's Theory of Operator Algebras, volume 2, if $E:Mto A$ is a normal conditional expectation and $M$ is atomic, then $A$ is atomic. So, for instance, if $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, then no normal conditional expectation exists.
Without the requirement of normality, a conditional expectation onto a masa always exists. For this consider the collection $mathcal F$ of finite partitions of 1 in $A$ (that is, projections $p_1,ldots,p_nin A$ with $sum p_j=1$), ordered by inclusion; this makes it a net. Because $A$ is a masa, $mathcal F'cap M=A$.
Given any $P={p_1,ldots,p_n}inmathcal F$, define $phi_P:Mto M$ by
$$
phi_P(x)=sum_{j=1}^n p_jxp_j.
$$
Note that $phi_P(x)p_k=p_kphi_P(x)$ for all $k=1,ldots,n$. The maps $phi_P$ are unital and completely positive. In particular the net ${phi_P}_{Pinmathcal F}$ is bounded, and so it has cluster points in the BW-topology (pointwise wot convergence). Let $phi$ be a cluster point. Given any projection $pin A$, we may consider partitions of unity that refine $p$, so $pphi_P(x)=phi_P(x)p$ for all $xin M$ and all $Pinmathcal F$ that refine $p$. The subnet we used to obtain $phi$ will eventually contain these partitions, and so $pphi(x)=phi(x)p$. As we can do this for any projection $pin A$, we get that $phi(x)in A'cap M=A$. Note also that for $ain A$ and any $Pinmathcal F$, we have $phi_P(a)=a$, so $phi(a)=a$. Finally, each $phi_P$ is unital and completely positive, so the same is true for $phi$, which is then a conditional expectation.
Akemann and Sherman have proven that if $A$ is singly generated (always true when $H$ is separable) and the construction above yields a unique conditional expectation, then said expectation is normal. This shows that when $M=B(L^2(X,mu))$ and $A=L^infty(X,mu)$ for a diffuse measure $mu$, the above construction yields more than one expectation. In this case the construction can be done more or less explicitly, and one can then see that there are actually infinitely many.
answered Jan 30 at 17:22
Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami
129k1184185
129k1184185
$begingroup$
I do not understand the convergence part. Could you please explain me what is BW topology and its convergence?
$endgroup$
– rkmath
Jan 31 at 10:00
1
$begingroup$
$phi_jtophi$ means $phi_j(x)tophi(x)$ wot for every $x$. It is known that this topology has an Alaoglu theorem.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 31 at 14:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I do not understand the convergence part. Could you please explain me what is BW topology and its convergence?
$endgroup$
– rkmath
Jan 31 at 10:00
1
$begingroup$
$phi_jtophi$ means $phi_j(x)tophi(x)$ wot for every $x$. It is known that this topology has an Alaoglu theorem.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 31 at 14:50
$begingroup$
I do not understand the convergence part. Could you please explain me what is BW topology and its convergence?
$endgroup$
– rkmath
Jan 31 at 10:00
$begingroup$
I do not understand the convergence part. Could you please explain me what is BW topology and its convergence?
$endgroup$
– rkmath
Jan 31 at 10:00
1
1
$begingroup$
$phi_jtophi$ means $phi_j(x)tophi(x)$ wot for every $x$. It is known that this topology has an Alaoglu theorem.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 31 at 14:50
$begingroup$
$phi_jtophi$ means $phi_j(x)tophi(x)$ wot for every $x$. It is known that this topology has an Alaoglu theorem.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Jan 31 at 14:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093824%2fexistence-of-conditional-expectations-onto-masas%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
